Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Maurandya
I have grown some from seed (only to find it in Lanthorne's plantery!) and it doesn't seem to be a self-clinger. Is that so, or is it like Gloriosa rothschildiana and some others that only develop their attachments when they get medium sized? Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Maurandya
it doesn't seem to be a self-clinger. Is that so
Nick: Maurandya antirrhiniflora is a twining vine and doesn't get the clingy bits. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Maurandya
In article ,
IntarsiaCo wrote: it doesn't seem to be a self-clinger. Is that so Nick: Maurandya antirrhiniflora is a twining vine and doesn't get the clingy bits. Thanks. Mine isn't twining either! Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Maurandya
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Maurandya
In article ,
Dave Poole wrote: On 3 Jul 2004 13:38:49 GMT, (Nick Maclaren) wrote: Maurandya antirrhiniflora is a twining vine and doesn't get the clingy bits. Thanks. Mine isn't twining either! Nick, it doesn't twine or produce tendrils - the leaf stalks (petioles) twist around clematis fashion. Some species don't even do this, merely pushing their stems upwards through any convenient shrub. Thanks. Mine seems to be doing the latter! For years the delightful rich purple flowered species M. barclaiana self seeded itself about here with abandon. It was always welcome since it never smothered anything and merely draped itself delicately where it could. I don't know which species this is, as Chilterns described it as "red flowered form". It has started to flower, and is definitely snapdragon-like, and quite attractive. Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Maurandya
"Nick Maclaren" wrote in message ... I have grown some from seed (only to find it in Lanthorne's plantery!) and it doesn't seem to be a self-clinger. Is that so, or is it like Gloriosa rothschildiana and some others that only develop their attachments when they get medium sized? Regards, Nick Maclaren. ________________ I envy you. Haven't seen Maurandia since it was known as Asarina~~ and then we only had it under glass.Yours seems to be the most acceptable colour though we had both pink and white [quite rare] M. barcliana and grew to about 12' with wires and assistance. Very long flowering and attractive. The flowers were as you described but many thought them to be similar to Jasmine until looking closer. Regards Brian 'flayb' to respond. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Maurandya
In article ,
Brian wrote: I envy you. Haven't seen Maurandia since it was known as Asarina~~ and then we only had it under glass.Yours seems to be the most acceptable colour though we had both pink and white [quite rare] M. barcliana and grew to about 12' with wires and assistance. Very long flowering and attractive. The flowers were as you described but many thought them to be similar to Jasmine until looking closer. This is under glass! I have two in pots outside, but they are much less advanced. It was very easy to grow, but I shall have to see whether I can keep it going. Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|