Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
In article k, Larry
Stoter wrote: (snip) The owner went through the process of getting a Certificate of Lawful Use. No real problem, since the neighbours didn't want anybody keeping pigs or hens on the land! However, this process took over 6 months! Once the certificate was finally issued, the lender was prepared to proceed. Something that did come out in all this was that our solicitor was not only acting for us but was also acting for the lender, creating a clear conflict of interest. Apparently, this is standard practise. I would, however, strongly advise anybody buying a house to insist that their solicitor/conveyancer act solely for them - if we had done this, the whole problem might not have arisen. Indeed it is standard practice and I think it's a good thing. It's certainly a good thing, if inconvenient, to get all permissions cleared before buying a house, if only to ensure a) that you're not buying something that will have to be pulled down and b) that when you come to sell, the process will be swift and smooth. Nor would anything have been different had separate legal advisors been operating for your mortgage lender: they would still have to see all the documentation and should still flag up any irregularities. (snip) Simon |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Agricultural land change of use to Garden | United Kingdom | |||
Agricultural land used as garden ? Was Rotovation | United Kingdom | |||
Agricultural grist?? | United Kingdom | |||
FEATURE-INDIA: IT -- can it play a role in the agricultural fields? | sci.agriculture | |||
FMD Agricultural Bioterrorism attack simulation | sci.agriculture |