Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you once again for your kind words, your not a related to that grape
grower are you? Just to make a few points double'y clear!!:- * I need to respond when information about our web site is incorrect, obvious really! * Agreed the Bexrose web site is a young site having been started at the beginning of this year (rather that immature, grapes again!). * We are working on developing the site as can be clearly seen from my postings here that are frequently reporting new stuff being added to the site. * If you care to read the articles on our web site you will find that they not only provide good information (as given by some others of course, but should we leave this out? of course not!) but also information and advice not given elsewhere to my knowledge. We are definitely not into plagiarism we have no need with our experience! * Lumping your two last points:- I am not worried in the first instance I think that I have caught on sufficiently to know that even Anti-Postings make good advertisements. This is proven to me by the hit count and by direct emails for the newsgroup readers. * I have not seen your own site yet but I am looking forward to taking a browse. I'll let you know what I think. Thanks once again for your own bluster, it all helps! Regards Martin Double Bexrose - Webmaster Email: Web Site: http://home.btconnect.com/cadoss/bexrose "dave weil" wrote in message ... On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 08:40:44 +0000 (UTC), "Martin" wrote: So for the best of the best look again at:- http://home.btconnect.com/cadoss/bexrose and don't forget to read it all, and between the lines! It's not a bad site for a UK specific website. It's an immature site that I'm sure will grow with time. But it's hardly "the best of the best". It's barely adequate. It doesn't address very many rose issues and is pretty much barebones. For instance, *our* local website has FAR more valuable information regarding roses. http://www.nashvillerosesociety.com/ I don't care much for the look and feel of the NRS site, but it still offers practical information about the challenges that our area offers (issues that are FAR different than the issues that the UK growers face). So, drop the smugness and get on with building your site. PS, we have quite a few National winning members as well, including a well-known breeder or two *and* Ted Mills, who makes one of the most famous rose formulations sold in the States. I haven't been a member for a couple of years, but I still consult the website on occasion. Your site frankly doesn't need your bluster. That must be good advice then if you have five books in agreement with our own article on pruning! Perhaps that say's something in itself? Yes, it says that, while it's OK to offer that *widely* available information on *your* web site (only one of dozens of websites that give the same information I might add), next time, please read the post before you promote your site instead of relying on a simple keyword to trigger some sort of quasiautoresponsebot sort of response. It will do your cause well, instead of causing people to ignore possible HELPFUL posts from you, as well as possibly avoiding the very website that you are trying to promote. Don' worry though, once you've been in the newsgroups awhile, you're likely to catch on. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Answer to the straight cut pruning method - for the second time! | Gardening | |||
Answer to the straight cut pruning method - for the second time! | United Kingdom | |||
That odd straight across pruning method recently mentioned | Roses | |||
That odd straight across pruning method recently mentioned | Gardening | |||
Answer to the straight cut pruning method - for the second time! | Roses |