Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Building a retaining wall close to trees
Hello -
I'm planning to have a retaining wall built to hold back a 1 metre height difference between two gardens, It will be built from blocks mortared togther. I guess the concrete footings will extend about 1 metre below the surface of the "low" garden. There are some trees within 30 cm of the planned location of the wall, their trunk diameters range between about 5cm and 20cm. I don't want to kill or substantially harm the trees. The builder I'm getting a quote from says he will put lintels into the wall and footings so that roots larger than about 1cm in diameter don't have to be cut. Is this a sensible approach, for the trees and/or the wall? Thanks |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Building a retaining wall close to trees
"rtreter" wrote in message
... Hello - I'm planning to have a retaining wall built to hold back a 1 metre height difference between two gardens, It will be built from blocks mortared togther. I guess the concrete footings will extend about 1 metre below the surface of the "low" garden. There are some trees within 30 cm of the planned location of the wall, their trunk diameters range between about 5cm and 20cm. I don't want to kill or substantially harm the trees. The builder I'm getting a quote from says he will put lintels into the wall and footings so that roots larger than about 1cm in diameter don't have to be cut. Is this a sensible approach, for the trees and/or the wall? Thanks Just to clarify, the trees are in the lower garden. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Building a retaining wall close to trees
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:29:54 +0100, "rtreter"
wrote: Hello - I'm planning to have a retaining wall built to hold back a 1 metre height difference between two gardens, It will be built from blocks mortared togther. I guess the concrete footings will extend about 1 metre below the surface of the "low" garden. There are some trees within 30 cm of the planned location of the wall, their trunk diameters range between about 5cm and 20cm. I don't want to kill or substantially harm the trees. The builder I'm getting a quote from says he will put lintels into the wall and footings so that roots larger than about 1cm in diameter don't have to be cut. Is this a sensible approach, for the trees and/or the wall? Sorry, I can make no sense of this at all. I doubt that 1 metre of footings will be put in below the surface of the bottom level. And are you seriously saying that the wall footings will be within 12 inches of an unspecified number of trees and that the builder is going to accommodate all of the tree roots larger than 1/3 of an inch, not cut them and allow room for their future growth? I am boggled. Are you using a builder or a conjuror? He is suggesting building a wall within 12 inches of trees, some of which have trunk diameters of 8 inches, without cutting or disturbing their roots. Why bother with such an impractical project. I would stick in a graded slope and live with it. -- (¯`·. ®óñ© © ²°¹° .·´¯) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Building a retaining wall close to trees
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:40:59 +0100, ®óñ© © ²°¹°
wibbled: On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:29:54 +0100, "rtreter" wrote: Hello - I'm planning to have a retaining wall built to hold back a 1 metre height difference between two gardens, It will be built from blocks mortared togther. I guess the concrete footings will extend about 1 metre below the surface of the "low" garden. There are some trees within 30 cm of the planned location of the wall, their trunk diameters range between about 5cm and 20cm. I don't want to kill or substantially harm the trees. The builder I'm getting a quote from says he will put lintels into the wall and footings so that roots larger than about 1cm in diameter don't have to be cut. Is this a sensible approach, for the trees and/or the wall? Sorry, I can make no sense of this at all. I doubt that 1 metre of footings will be put in below the surface of the bottom level. And are you seriously saying that the wall footings will be within 12 inches of an unspecified number of trees and that the builder is going to accommodate all of the tree roots larger than 1/3 of an inch, not cut them and allow room for their future growth? I am boggled. Are you using a builder or a conjuror? He is suggesting building a wall within 12 inches of trees, some of which have trunk diameters of 8 inches, without cutting or disturbing their roots. Why bother with such an impractical project. I would stick in a graded slope and live with it. If a wall is required, I would consider a curved wall - that's one that leans over and into the earth mound - see a few ancient ones round here, all of one brick thick and they've survived. However, won't work with modern building methods (ie hard cement). If doing such a wall, I'd lay the first course onto earth about 1 brick under the surface direct to dirt and use clay or lime mortar for joining them. They work by the physics of a graded slope but you can get away with a someone sharper slope as the bricks reduce the tendency of the earth to wash down with rain and the weight of the bricks works to balance the pressure of the earth. Think dry stone wall on a sideways lean. These sort of walls typically hold back 2-2.5 ft of earth bank quite happily for decades - dunno if that is sufficient for the OP. Then accept that as the trees grow, the wall moves and bits of it may need adjusting and re-bedding. The modern version of the same line of thought are these: http://www.dme.co.za/sites/site1/ima...ation/RWBD.jpg Got them at the local kiddy nursery - simple, effective and laid "dry". Made of concrete and can be planted with ground cover plants like heather and creepy things to make them look good. In the local case, I think (without a tape measure to hand) they are holding back a bank about 3-4' high at an angle of about 15 degrees off vertical. Work by interlocking and dead weight (once filled with earth). Again, the trees may move them and it won't matter too much. When/if it matters, disassemble and re bed the damaged section to accommodate the tree. Building next to trees requires the "earthquake" mentality - either stupidly strong (hoover dam strong) otherwise the tree will prevail eventually - or make it flexible and accept Nature. Cheers Tim -- Tim Watts Managers, politicians and environmentalists: Nature's carbon buffer. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Building a retaining wall close to trees
On Apr 16, 8:29*pm, "rtreter" wrote:
Hello - I'm planning to have a retaining wall built to hold back a 1 metre height difference between two gardens, It will be built from blocks mortared togther. I guess the concrete footings will extend about 1 metre below the surface of the "low" garden. There are some trees within 30 cm of the planned location of the wall, their trunk diameters range between about 5cm and 20cm. I don't want to kill or substantially harm the trees. The builder I'm getting a quote from says he will put lintels into the wall and footings so that roots larger than about 1cm in diameter don't have to be cut. Is this a sensible approach, for the trees and/or the wall? Thanks If you have roots which vary in diametre from 5cm to 20cm, and the builder 'accomodates' say, a 8cm root, will the 'accommodation' suffice when it gets to, oooh, say, 27cm? So, I'll presume what the builder is hoping to be able to do is to create pillars of concrete on to which to rest the lintels; After all, I would think that there would be no point in putting concrete under a root. So, essentially, the wall would be built on a bridge of lintels? Sure would benefit drainage and therefore lessen the pressure on the wall to some extent. And I'll assume that the idea will be to have, say 4 lintels abreast and in staggered formation: (like as in laying grass turfs) in order to limit the potential of the cracks which would most likely occur if they weren't laid thus. A lot of trouble, and expense for a 1m high retaining wall. Why not go for a drystone wall? And whilst I think of it, I've seen this done (albeit only around 70cm high) with stkaes driven into the ground, leaning towards the bank of earth and wooden slates nailed inbetween. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Building a retaining wall close to trees
"aquachimp" wrote in message
... On Apr 16, 8:29 pm, "rtreter" wrote: Hello - I'm planning to have a retaining wall built to hold back a 1 metre height difference between two gardens, It will be built from blocks mortared togther. I guess the concrete footings will extend about 1 metre below the surface of the "low" garden. There are some trees within 30 cm of the planned location of the wall, their trunk diameters range between about 5cm and 20cm. I don't want to kill or substantially harm the trees. The builder I'm getting a quote from says he will put lintels into the wall and footings so that roots larger than about 1cm in diameter don't have to be cut. Is this a sensible approach, for the trees and/or the wall? Thanks If you have roots which vary in diametre from 5cm to 20cm, and the builder 'accomodates' say, a 8cm root, will the 'accommodation' suffice when it gets to, oooh, say, 27cm? So, I'll presume what the builder is hoping to be able to do is to create pillars of concrete on to which to rest the lintels; After all, I would think that there would be no point in putting concrete under a root. So, essentially, the wall would be built on a bridge of lintels? Sure would benefit drainage and therefore lessen the pressure on the wall to some extent. And I'll assume that the idea will be to have, say 4 lintels abreast and in staggered formation: (like as in laying grass turfs) in order to limit the potential of the cracks which would most likely occur if they weren't laid thus. A lot of trouble, and expense for a 1m high retaining wall. Why not go for a drystone wall? And whilst I think of it, I've seen this done (albeit only around 70cm high) with stkaes driven into the ground, leaning towards the bank of earth and wooden slates nailed inbetween. Thanks for the comments. I think the wall needs to be a fairly substantial one, because there are buildings about 4 metres away on the high side. The height difference is currently retained by a wooden fence with 4" posts, but it is starting to lean over. Does anyone have any comments on replacing the existing wooden fence with a fence using 5" concrete posts set in concrete, with concrete gravel boards to retain the soil. I think this is known as a "Berlin Wall" in the building trade. Hopefully it would be possible to position the posts so that they don't interfere with too many roots (there are only 4 trees along the 9 metre fence). I think I'm going to get an engineer in to advise, but the idea of using concrete fence posts and gravel boards appeals to me initially. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Building a retaining wall close to trees
On 16/04/2010 23:27, Tim Watts wrote:
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:40:59 +0100, ®óñ© © wibbled: On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:29:54 +0100, wrote: Hello - I'm planning to have a retaining wall built to hold back a 1 metre height difference between two gardens, It will be built from blocks mortared togther. I guess the concrete footings will extend about 1 metre below the surface of the "low" garden. There are some trees within 30 cm of the planned location of the wall, their trunk diameters range between about 5cm and 20cm. I don't want to kill or substantially harm the trees. The builder I'm getting a quote from says he will put lintels into the wall and footings so that roots larger than about 1cm in diameter don't have to be cut. Is this a sensible approach, for the trees and/or the wall? Sorry, I can make no sense of this at all. I doubt that 1 metre of footings will be put in below the surface of the bottom level. And are you seriously saying that the wall footings will be within 12 inches of an unspecified number of trees and that the builder is going to accommodate all of the tree roots larger than 1/3 of an inch, not cut them and allow room for their future growth? I am boggled. Are you using a builder or a conjuror? He is suggesting building a wall within 12 inches of trees, some of which have trunk diameters of 8 inches, without cutting or disturbing their roots. Why bother with such an impractical project. I would stick in a graded slope and live with it. If a wall is required, I would consider a curved wall - that's one that leans over and into the earth mound - see a few ancient ones round here, all of one brick thick and they've survived. However, won't work with modern building methods (ie hard cement). If doing such a wall, I'd lay the first course onto earth about 1 brick under the surface direct to dirt and use clay or lime mortar for joining them. They work by the physics of a graded slope but you can get away with a someone sharper slope as the bricks reduce the tendency of the earth to wash down with rain and the weight of the bricks works to balance the pressure of the earth. Think dry stone wall on a sideways lean. These sort of walls typically hold back 2-2.5 ft of earth bank quite happily for decades - dunno if that is sufficient for the OP. Then accept that as the trees grow, the wall moves and bits of it may need adjusting and re-bedding. The modern version of the same line of thought are these: http://www.dme.co.za/sites/site1/ima...ation/RWBD.jpg Got them at the local kiddy nursery - simple, effective and laid "dry". Made of concrete and can be planted with ground cover plants like heather and creepy things to make them look good. In the local case, I think (without a tape measure to hand) they are holding back a bank about 3-4' high at an angle of about 15 degrees off vertical. Work by interlocking and dead weight (once filled with earth). Again, the trees may move them and it won't matter too much. When/if it matters, disassemble and re bed the damaged section to accommodate the tree. Building next to trees requires the "earthquake" mentality - either stupidly strong (hoover dam strong) otherwise the tree will prevail eventually - or make it flexible and accept Nature. Cheers Tim Excellent advice Tim, I was going to suggest a dry stone wall until I saw your contribution. Cheers Don |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Building a retaining wall close to trees
On Apr 17, 10:27*am, "rtreter" wrote:
"aquachimp" wrote in message ... On Apr 16, 8:29 pm, "rtreter" wrote: Hello - I'm planning to have a retaining wall built to hold back a 1 metre height difference between two gardens, It will be built from blocks mortared togther. I guess the concrete footings will extend about 1 metre below the surface of the "low" garden. There are some trees within 30 cm of the planned location of the wall, their trunk diameters range between about 5cm and 20cm. I don't want to kill or substantially harm the trees. The builder I'm getting a quote from says he will put lintels into the wall and footings so that roots larger than about 1cm in diameter don't have to be cut. Is this a sensible approach, for the trees and/or the wall? Thanks If you have roots which vary in diameter from 5cm to 20cm, and the builder *'accommodates' *say, a 8cm root, will the 'accommodation' suffice when it gets to, oooh, say, 27cm? So, I'll presume what the builder is hoping to be able to do is to create pillars of concrete on to which to rest the lintels; After all, I would think that there would be no point in putting concrete under a root. So, essentially, the wall would be built on a bridge of lintels? Sure would benefit drainage and therefore lessen the pressure on the wall to some extent. And I'll assume that the idea will be to have, say 4 lintels abreast and in staggered formation: (like *as in laying grass turfs) in order to limit the potential of the *cracks which would most likely occur if they weren't laid thus. A lot of trouble, and expense for a 1m high retaining wall. Why not go for a drystone wall? And whilst I think of it, I've seen this done (albeit only around 70cm high) with stakes driven into the ground, leaning towards the bank of earth and wooden slates nailed in-between. Thanks for the comments. I think the wall needs to be a fairly substantial one, because there are buildings about 4 metres away on the high side. Shouldn't they be able to stand on their own feet, as it were, or do they not have foundations? The height difference is currently retained by a wooden fence with 4" posts, but it is starting to lean over. Does anyone have any comments on replacing the existing wooden fence with a fence using 5" concrete posts set in concrete, with concrete gravel boards to retain the soil. I think this is known as a "Berlin Wall" in the building trade. http://www.eco-foundations.co.uk/king_post_walls.html As for concrete gravel boards;;; You'd be better trying it with kerb stones; concrete gravel boards tend to first bulge (and they break easily) and eventually sort of have that ruptured look, with their rusting internal mesh for all to see. Hopefully it would be possible to position the posts so that they don't interfere with too many roots (there are only 4 trees along the 9 metre fence). I think I'm going to get an engineer in to advise, but the idea of using concrete fence posts and gravel boards appeals to me initially. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Building a retaining wall close to trees
"rtreter" wrote in message ... Hello - I'm planning to have a retaining wall built to hold back a 1 metre height difference between two gardens, It will be built from blocks mortared togther. I guess the concrete footings will extend about 1 metre below the surface of the "low" garden. There are some trees within 30 cm of the planned location of the wall, their trunk diameters range between about 5cm and 20cm. I don't want to kill or substantially harm the trees. The builder I'm getting a quote from says he will put lintels into the wall and footings so that roots larger than about 1cm in diameter don't have to be cut. Is this a sensible approach, for the trees and/or the wall? Thanks Plan B: Just build a wall to do the job. Prune roots that are in the way. Plant a couple of trees elsewhere as a form of 'guilt offset'. mark, |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Building a retaining wall close to trees
On 17 Apr, 17:00, "mark" wrote:
"rtreter" wrote in message ... Hello - I'm planning to have a retaining wall built to hold back a 1 metre height difference between two gardens, It will be built from blocks mortared togther. I guess the concrete footings will extend about 1 metre below the surface of the "low" garden. There are some trees within 30 cm of the planned location of the wall, their trunk diameters range between about 5cm and 20cm. I don't want to kill or substantially harm the trees. The builder I'm getting a quote from says he will put lintels into the wall and footings so that roots larger than about 1cm in diameter don't have to be cut. Is this a sensible approach, for the trees and/or the wall? Thanks Plan B: Just build a wall to do the job. Prune roots that are in the way. Plant a couple of trees elsewhere as a form of 'guilt offset'. mark,- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sorry but if you have buildings that require a wall that substantial then I would get rid of the trees, to have them within 4 m of the buildings is much to close for comfort, The .rule of thumb that I was taught was never have a tree closer to a building than the eventual height of the tree. David Hill |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Building a retaining wall close to trees
aquachimp wrote:
As for concrete gravel boards;;; You'd be better trying it with kerb stones; concrete gravel boards tend to first bulge (and they break easily) and eventually sort of have that ruptured look, with their rusting internal mesh for all to see. This shot doesn't quite show the full nature of the upheaval, but here is one panel that is giving up the fight. The pavement has recently been resurfaced, but is already beginning to bulge again. http://tinyurl.com/y6tlcbf Chris -- Chris J Dixon Nottingham UK Have dancing shoes, will ceilidh. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Building a retaining wall close to trees
On Apr 18, 8:16*am, Chris J Dixon wrote:
aquachimp wrote: As for concrete gravel boards;;; You'd be better trying it with kerb stones; concrete gravel boards tend to first bulge (and they break easily) and eventually sort of have that ruptured look, with their rusting internal mesh for all to see. This shot doesn't quite show the full nature of the upheaval, but here is one panel that is giving up the fight. The pavement has recently been resurfaced, but is already beginning to bulge again. Even a kerb stone would be undone in that situation I think. What I thought the OP referred to was gravel boards all the way up. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Building a retaining wall close to trees
"aquachimp" wrote in message ... Even a kerb stone would be undone in that situation I think. What I thought the OP referred to was gravel boards all the way up. I have seen a retaining wall made from concrete fence panels three high. It broke in several places within a couple of months. The last time I saw it they had inserted extra concrete posts in the centre of each panel, AFAIK they are still holding it back after a few years. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Retaining wall for RV | Gardening | |||
Concord Wall Blocks (Retaining Wall) | Gardening | |||
garden stone retaining wall | Gardening | |||
Concrete retaining wall | Lawns | |||
Retaining Wall Ideas - a006_6.jpg (0/1) | Gardening |