Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
excerpt from NNFP news
FOREST COMMUNITY NEWS
Published by the National Network of Forest Practitioners Subscribe at Join the NNFP at www.nnfp.org/content/member.html No. 67 August 21, 2003 SAVE THE DATE! NNFP Annual Meeting October 28-November 1, 2003 St. Helena Island, South Carolina Visit www.nnfp.org for information IN THIS ISSUE NEWS 2003 Supplemental Spending Bill Passed Without Fire Money Senate Ag Committee Approves Forest Health Legislation Other Hazardous Fuels Reduction Legislation In Congress Federal Tax Incentives For Conservation Donations? Energy Bill Passes Senate New Categorical Exclusions Become Policy NATIONAL COMMUNITY FORESTRY CENTER: RESOURCES & TOOLS FUNDING POSITIONS, FELLOWSHIPS, AWARDS MEETINGS & WORKSHOPS WHERE DO I SIGN UP? NEWS 2003 SUPPLIMENTAL SPENDING BILL PASSED WITHOUT FIRE MONEY Before the summer recess, Congress passed the FY2003 emergency spending bill that authorizes $983.6 million for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The bill did not contain the $289 million in emergency wildfire suppression funding for the Forest Service and the Department of Interior, requested by the Administration. The House passed the bill 352-60 on July 25 before it left town, presenting the Senate with a take-it-or-leave-it choice. The Senate cleared it by unanimous consent. The bill also eliminated other funding requests previously approved by the Senate and the House Appropriations Committee, including $100 million for the Americorps program. With wildfires growing in number and severity across the country, the Forest Service and DOI are expected to need over $700 million in supplemental funds this year to fight wildfire. Without supplemental funds, the Agencies will be forced to borrow from other programs to cover wildfire suppression costs. SENATE AG COMMITTEE APPROVES FOREST HEALTH LEGISLATION Before leaving for recess, the Senate Agriculture Committee approved a version of HR 1904 (Healthy Forests Restoration Act) that included a few changes to the version passed by the House. The bill expands the areas that are exempt from NEPA review. The bill includes language requested by Energy Committee Chairman Pete Domenici (R-N.M.) to establish a public land corps -- built on the existing federal youth conservation corps, plus tribal, state and locally organized groups -- to work on hazardous fuel reduction and forest beautification projects. The bill also includes Domenici language to establish a program to provide emergency grants to fight invasive plants that might worsen fire risks, or serve as fire fuels. Additionally, the bill includes two provisions from S. 1449, a bill by Senators Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) and Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark), that would direct the Forest Service to establish an upland hardwood research center to study sustainable management needs for the forests of the Ozark Mountains, and include a new rural community forestry enterprise program to aid "resource-dependent communities" in rural forest areas. OTHER HAZARDOUS FUELS REDUCTION LEGISLATION IN CONGRESS The following is a summary of other hazardous fuels reduction bills, parts or all of which may be offered as amendments to HR 1904 when the full Senate takes up the debate once they return from recess. · S 1352 was introduced June 26 by Democratic Sens. Ron Wyden (Ore.) and Dianne Feinstein (Calif.), to authorize a similar environmental review exemption program in a slightly more restricted area, granting those projects in the wildland-urban interface "categorical exclusions" from review under NEPA. Agencies would not have to examine the projects individually or cumulatively for the significance of their environmental effects. The projects would be exempt from administrative appeal. But the bill would direct the agencies to avoid clearcuts and to protect old growth and large trees. · S 1314, introduced by ranking Energy Democrat Jeff Bingaman (N.M.), Minority Leader Tom Daschle (D-S.D.) and Washington Sens. Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell (both D), which would provide categorical exclusions for fire-fuel reduction projects, earmark 70 percent of the money made available for projects within a half-mile of communities or municipal watersheds, and bar new road construction and require the agencies to maintain old and large trees. In addition, S 1314 would make available $100 million annually for grants to states, tribes and private landowners for work to reduce wildfire risk on those lands. · S 1453, introduced by Democratic Sens. Patrick Leahy (Vt.) and Barbara Boxer (Calif), would restrict projects to within half a mile of a community's structures and municipal drinking water infrastructure, provide funding to accomplish the work and allow funds to be spent on federal, state, tribal, local and non-industrial private land. The bill would not place any restrictions on judicial review, but allows for limited use of categorical exclusions. Logging in roadless areas and building new or temporary roads for fuels reduction projects would be prohibited. cut here |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Good news/bad news | Ponds | |||
Good News-Bad News | Ponds | |||
Unabomber Manifesto -- an excerpt | Plant Science | |||
Sad news, good news and questions all in one message | Orchids | |||
There is good news and bad news | United Kingdom |