LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #22   Report Post  
Old 24-09-2012, 02:56 AM posted to rec.gardens.edible
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Apr 2012
Posts: 243
Default Scary Study - Roundup

In article ,
Roy wrote:

On Sunday, September 23, 2012 9:08:36 AM UTC-6, Billy wrote:
In article ,

Roy wrote:



Tiny doses of a lot of products increase your risk of cancer. Big deal


...sunlight will do the same thing and I'm not staying inside my cave


and not venture forth.


Roundup IS relatively safe from ALL that I have read.


If small amounts increase the chance of cancer in rats then DON'T


FEED IT TO RATS...problem solved.




You obviously have done little reading, which only burnishes your

anti-rationalism and ignorance, which you seem to think is a badge of

honor.



No lifetime feeding studies were done on glypho$ate. None.

We don't know what it can do.

We are the Guinea pigs.



http://www.i-sis.org.uk/glyphosatePoisonsCrops.php



http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/tx800218n



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arpad_Pusztai



--

Welcome to the New America.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hA736oK9FPg

or

E Pluribus Unum

Green Party Nominee Jill Stein & Running Mate, Cheri Honkala

http://www.democracynow.org/2012/7/1...l_stein_runnin
g


You shouldn't through words like "ignorance" around so carelessly.


When you say things like, "If small amounts increase the chance of
cancer in rats then DON'T FEED IT TO RATS...problem solved.", you can
expect to be consigned to a playpen.

Ignorance can be cured, stupidity, can't.

As a farmer, I know what RoundUp does. I have sprayed quack grass with it and
it works well at the recommended rate. Not bad on Canadian
thistle when applied when they are in the rosette stage in August or
early September. When used for its intended purposes it is a great
product. Other activities of Monsanto with breeding of RR resistant
varieties, I question.


The occasional application to an isolated problem, may have merit, but
in wholesale use for weeding crops, you are damaging the topsoil, which
in the long run we will need top grow post industrial crops. Presently,
it takes more than a calorie of fossil fuel energy to produce a calorie
of food; before the advent of chemical fertilizer a farm produced more
than two calories of food energy for every calorie of energy invested.
Interplanting will grow more food than monocultures. For this more labor
intensive agriculture, you need the ecology of topsoil.

--
Welcome to the New America.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hA736oK9FPg
or
E Pluribus Unum
Green Party Nominee Jill Stein & Running Mate, Cheri Honkala
http://www.democracynow.org/2012/7/13/green_party_nominee_jill_stein_running

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Scary chicken foot looking. [email protected] Gardening 0 10-05-2006 08:22 PM
Scary chicken foot looking. [email protected] Gardening 1 10-05-2006 06:06 PM
The scary insects - possibly large marsh horseflies? Lynda Thornton United Kingdom 3 23-08-2004 09:15 AM
Scary crown rot's keeping me up at night Susan Murray Orchids 3 03-09-2003 09:32 PM
Biodemocracy - long and scary Polar Edible Gardening 2 14-02-2003 10:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 GardenBanter.co.uk.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Gardening"

 

Copyright © 2017