Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
giant morning glory? giant morning glory 2012-09-19 10.06.36.jpg (9 of 9) (1/1)
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
giant morning glory? giant morning glory 2012-09-19 10.06.36.jpg (9 of 9) (1/1)
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 03:08:22 -0500,
lid (Anne's little brother Bob) wrote: Not a morning glory, more likely a moonflower. http://www.bhg.com/gardening/plant-d...al/moonflower/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
giant morning glory? giant morning glory 2012-09-19 10.06.36.jpg (9 of 9) (1/1)
joevan writes:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 03:08:22 -0500, lid (Anne's little brother Bob) wrote: Not a morning glory, more likely a moonflower. http://www.bhg.com/gardening/plant-d...al/moonflower/ Looks more like Jimson Weed (Datura stramonium): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datura_stramonium -- Dan Espen |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
giant morning glory? giant morning glory 2012-09-19 10.06.36.jpg (9 of 9) (1/1)
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:43:52 -0400, Dan Espen
wrote: joevan writes: On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 03:08:22 -0500, lid (Anne's little brother Bob) wrote: Not a morning glory, more likely a moonflower. http://www.bhg.com/gardening/plant-d...al/moonflower/ Looks more like Jimson Weed (Datura stramonium): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datura_stramonium The leaves don't look the same. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
giant morning glory? giant morning glory 2012-09-19 10.06.36.jpg (9 of 9) (1/1)
joevan writes:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:43:52 -0400, Dan Espen wrote: joevan writes: On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 03:08:22 -0500, lid (Anne's little brother Bob) wrote: Not a morning glory, more likely a moonflower. http://www.bhg.com/gardening/plant-d...al/moonflower/ Looks more like Jimson Weed (Datura stramonium): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datura_stramonium The leaves don't look the same. You're right. I was looking at the leaves, but taking a second look, I agree, Moonflower. -- Dan Espen |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
giant morning glory? giant morning glory 2012-09-19 10.06.36.jpg (9 of 9) (1/1)
"Dan Espen" wrote
joevan writes: Dan Espen wrote: joevan writes: On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 03:08:22 -0500, lid (Anne's little brother Bob) wrote: Not a morning glory, more likely a moonflower. http://www.bhg.com/gardening/plant-d...al/moonflower/ Looks more like Jimson Weed (Datura stramonium): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datura_stramonium The leaves don't look the same. You're right. I was looking at the leaves, but taking a second look, I agree, Moonflower. I'm glad you could get it all to re-combine into one photo, I couldn't. -- Regards. Bob Hobden. Posted to this Newsgroup from the W of London, UK |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
giant morning glory? giant morning glory 2012-09-19 10.06.36.jpg (9 of 9) (1/1)
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 17:59:28 +0100, "Bob Hobden"
wrote: I'm glad you could get it all to re-combine into one photo, I couldn't. X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308 The files were posted with PoerPost, for which I believe yEnc is the default setting. For WLM you want to consider a yEnc decoder. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yproxy -- Ann's Little Brother Bob |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
giant morning glory? giant morning glory 2012-09-19 10.06.36.jpg (9 of 9) (1/1)
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:31:41 -0400, Dan Espen
wrote: I was looking at the leaves, but taking a second look, I agree, Moonflower. It seems to be Datura inoxia. I checked this evening and the flowers do bloom after sundown: I just happened to notice them in the early morning. They also have a delightful fragrance which I'd not noticed at all. Too bad they're so poisonous. Thanks to everyone who replied. -- Ann's Little Brother Bob |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
giant morning glory? giant morning glory 2012-09-19 10.06.36.jpg (9 of 9) (1/1)
"Bob O'Dyne" wrote
"Bob Hobden"wrote: I'm glad you could get it all to re-combine into one photo, I couldn't. X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308 The files were posted with PoerPost, for which I believe yEnc is the default setting. For WLM you want to consider a yEnc decoder. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yproxy Been down that route before and it isn't worth the bother. I've managed to re-combine and see other yEnc split photos but this lot just would not. Why not post a jpeg image reduced in size like most other people here? -- Regards. Bob Hobden. Posted to this Newsgroup from the W of London, UK |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
giant morning glory? giant morning glory 2012-09-19 10.06.36.jpg (9 of 9) (1/1)
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:14:59 +0300, Bob O'Dyne
wrote: On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 17:59:28 +0100, "Bob Hobden" wrote: I'm glad you could get it all to re-combine into one photo, I couldn't. X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308 The files were posted with PoerPost, for which I believe yEnc is the default setting. For WLM you want to consider a yEnc decoder. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yproxy If you mean power post then it has the option I believe to post uuencoded. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
giant morning glory? giant morning glory 2012-09-19 10.06.36.jpg (9 of 9) (1/1)
Been down that route before and it isn't worth the bother. I've managed to re-combine and see other yEnc split photos but this lot just would not. if you insist on using a broken newsreader please stop complaining when it doesn't work Why not post a jpeg image reduced in size like most other people here?/ they are jpeg images ..-- -- I Know That I Know What I Know |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
giant morning glory? giant morning glory 2012-09-19 10.06.36.jpg (9 of 9) (1/1)
"Wolf K" wrote
Gertrude wrote: Been down that route before and it isn't worth the bother. I've managed to re-combine and see other yEnc split photos but this lot just would not. if you insist on using a broken newsreader please stop complaining when it doesn't work Why not post a jpeg image reduced in size like most other people here?/ they are jpeg images yEnc is a method of encoding images (== converting to strings of text) so they can be transmitted as posts or emails. It does not conform to international (open) standards, and exists in several versions. Its originator refused to deal with the ISO, because he wanted to make loadsadough licensing it. I don't know whether the e-mail/news readers that can decode it have licensed the code. It was a useful idea in its time because it produces smaller files for transmission than the standard methods do. That had advantages in the days of slow connections and limited bandwidth. IMO it's obsolete. It's a jpeg image that has been encoded using yEnc and split into many parts. My thoughts too Wolf, it was OK in the days of dialup but is totally unnecessary these days with broadband speeds. It's the first one for some while that I haven't been able to recombine which is strange, perhaps it's a different version of yEnc. -- Regards. Bob Hobden. Posted to this Newsgroup from the W of London, UK |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
giant morning glory? giant morning glory 2012-09-19 10.06.36.jpg (9 of 9) (1/1)
"joevan" wrote
Bob O'Dyne wrote: Bob Hobden" wrote: I'm glad you could get it all to re-combine into one photo, I couldn't. X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308 The files were posted with PoerPost, for which I believe yEnc is the default setting. For WLM you want to consider a yEnc decoder. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yproxy If you mean power post then it has the option I believe to post uuencoded. I have a yEnc decoder and have always found it worked well previously, this time it would not. -- Regards. Bob Hobden. Posted to this Newsgroup from the W of London, UK |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
giant morning glory? giant morning glory 2012-09-19 10.06.36.jpg (9 of 9) (1/1)
Bob Hobden wrote:
"Wolf K" wrote Gertrude wrote: Been down that route before and it isn't worth the bother. I've managed to re-combine and see other yEnc split photos but this lot just would not. if you insist on using a broken newsreader please stop complaining when it doesn't work Why not post a jpeg image reduced in size like most other people here?/ they are jpeg images yEnc is a method of encoding images (== converting to strings of text) so they can be transmitted as posts or emails. It does not conform to international (open) standards, and exists in several versions. Its originator refused to deal with the ISO, because he wanted to make loadsadough licensing it. I don't know whether the e-mail/news readers that can decode it have licensed the code. It was a useful idea in its time because it produces smaller files for transmission than the standard methods do. That had advantages in the days of slow connections and limited bandwidth. IMO it's obsolete. It's a jpeg image that has been encoded using yEnc and split into many parts. My thoughts too Wolf, it was OK in the days of dialup but is totally unnecessary these days with broadband speeds. It's the first one for some while that I haven't been able to recombine which is strange, perhaps it's a different version of yEnc. Totally agree. If someone wants people to see their photos, why not just post them in a normal, everyday format that everyone is guaranteed to be able to read? -- bill n |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
giant morning glory? giant morning glory 2012-09-19 10.06.36.jpg (9 of 9) (1/1)
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 23:09:56 +0100, "Bob Hobden"
wrote: I have a yEnc decoder and have always found it worked well previously, this time it would not. Now that IS strange. They were posted with Camelsystem Powerpost (http://powerpost.camelsystem.nl/e-index.php) which is a recently (Jan 2012) updated version of the original. One of the "improvements" that I just noticed appears to the removal of the uuencode option... I need to look into this. -- Ann's Little Brother Bob |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
giant morning glory? giant morning glory 2012-09-19 08.02.16.jpg (7 of 9) (1/1) | Garden Photos | |||
giant morning glory? giant morning glory 2012-09-19 08.01.47 pod.jpg (5 of 9) (1/1) | Garden Photos | |||
giant morning glory? giant morning glory 2012-09-19 08.01.16.jpg (4 of 9) (1/1) | Garden Photos | |||
giant morning glory? giant morning glory 2012-09-19 08.00.52.jpg (3 of 9) (1/1) | Garden Photos | |||
giant morning glory? giant morning glory 2012-09-19 08.00.26.jpg (2 of 9) (1/1) | Garden Photos |