NYT provide a interesting view of fire and plant life.

http://judson.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/07/on-fire/


Sort of reminded me of some national parks letting fires burn here in
USA.

Bill

--
Garden in shade zone 5 S Jersey USA

On 7/8/09 9:52 AM, in article
, "Bill who putters"
wrote:

NYT provide a interesting view of fire and plant life.

http://judson.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/07/on-fire/


Sort of reminded me of some national parks letting fires burn here in
USA.

Bill


When we were in Yosemite 20+ years ago, the rangers said the only way for
the sequoia cones to release their seed was to be burned.

C

"Bill who putters" wrote in message
...
NYT provide a interesting view of fire and plant life.

http://judson.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/07/on-fire/


Sort of reminded me of some national parks letting fires burn here in
USA.

Bill

--
Garden in shade zone 5 S Jersey USA

I'm of the opinion that where people build homes, they need to allow for
natural burning and consequential wind when maintaining a fire break as
well. A small footprint of land for this is not feasible, the owner has to
have a large enough plot to do this. Hillside acreage, its even more
important. And, I'm of the opinion its the homeowner's responsibility to
maintain such a firebreak, not the local or state government in the case of
a fire approaching said property.
--
Dave

Hi,
Three chapters on special interest topics - wetland and water plants, a rainforest garden, and fire and vegetation.