"Zootal" wrote in message
. 97.131...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in
:

"BB" m wrote in
message ...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in
:

What are your 5 favorite news sources?

If I were to provide you with that information, what would you do
with it?

How would you respond if I said my favorite news sources were Regis
Philbin, Glenn Beck, Ronn Owens, Sarah Palin, and Bob Woodward?
Would it make a difference if I said I liked Fox News? MSNBC?
CBS? Mother Jones? Associated Press? BBC? Al Jazeera? Or the
local Alternative Press' weekly publication?

~~BB


It's fun to ask the question because some people can't even name ONE
news source which they consult regularly.




Some people don't consult any "news sources" at all regularly.


Right. I just said that. Thanks for agreeing.


And along
with the question you ignored, why are you asking? So you can ridicule
those that don't use the same news sources that you use?

I explained why I asked. You're pretending I didn't. That tactic ALWAYS
fails.

It's fun to ask the question because some people can't even name ONE
news source which they consult regularly.




Some people don't consult any "news sources" at all regularly.


Right. I just said that. Thanks for agreeing.


And along
with the question you ignored, why are you asking? So you can ridicule
those that don't use the same news sources that you use?

I explained why I asked. You're pretending I didn't. That tactic ALWAYS
fails.

Again you fail to answer the question(s) you were asked. That tactic, too,
ALWAYS fails.

"Zootal" wrote in message
. 97.131...


It's fun to ask the question because some people can't even name ONE
news source which they consult regularly.




Some people don't consult any "news sources" at all regularly.


Right. I just said that. Thanks for agreeing.


And along
with the question you ignored, why are you asking? So you can ridicule
those that don't use the same news sources that you use?

I explained why I asked. You're pretending I didn't. That tactic ALWAYS
fails.

Again you fail to answer the question(s) you were asked. That tactic, too,
ALWAYS fails.


The questions were absurd.

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in
:

"Zootal" wrote in message
. 97.131...


It's fun to ask the question because some people can't even name
ONE news source which they consult regularly.




Some people don't consult any "news sources" at all regularly.


Right. I just said that. Thanks for agreeing.


And along
with the question you ignored, why are you asking? So you can
ridicule those that don't use the same news sources that you use?

I explained why I asked. You're pretending I didn't. That tactic
ALWAYS fails.

Again you fail to answer the question(s) you were asked. That tactic,
too, ALWAYS fails.


The questions were absurd.


Dismissing valid questions by calling them absurd is yet another tactic
that ALWAYS fails.

"Zootal" wrote in message
. 97.131...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in
:

"Zootal" wrote in message
. 97.131...


It's fun to ask the question because some people can't even name
ONE news source which they consult regularly.




Some people don't consult any "news sources" at all regularly.


Right. I just said that. Thanks for agreeing.


And along
with the question you ignored, why are you asking? So you can
ridicule those that don't use the same news sources that you use?

I explained why I asked. You're pretending I didn't. That tactic
ALWAYS fails.

Again you fail to answer the question(s) you were asked. That tactic,
too, ALWAYS fails.


The questions were absurd.


Dismissing valid questions by calling them absurd is yet another tactic
that ALWAYS fails.


When the questions are worth answering, I'll let you know. Have a nice day.

"BB" m wrote in message
...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in
:

It's fun to ask the question because some people can't even name
ONE news source which they consult regularly.

You may be right on that point. But that means the point of the
question was to determine if I was worthy of your ridicule based on
whether or not I could name some news sources.

~~BB


I wasn't sure if this is the first you'd heard of Monsanto's tricks. The
subject has been mentioned by many news sources which are aimed at grownups.
I believe Fox even made mention of Monsanto's tricks a few years back.

So, is this the first you've heard about it?

In article ,
BB m wrote:

(EVP MAN) wrote in
:

Only time will tell but this bill and Monsanto will sure hurt
the little guy!

http://www.nwofighters.org/senate-bi...t-illegal-to-g
row-share-trade-or-sell-homegrown-food/


Monsanto isn't necessarily evil (though, some of what they do
causes me a little concern...)

And I can't take any person who believes in the poorly-defined "New
World Order" seriously. There's just no clear evidence for it; as
far as I can tell it's all just conspiracy theories...

~~BB

http://www.fedcoseeds.com/seeds/monsanto.htm

http://www.mcgilltribune.com/home/in...rticle&ustory_
id=f3d7c112-9bbf-4fdc-9017-902d93f09513

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/business/6768757.html

http://civileats.com/2009/04/30/you-say-tomato-i-say-monsanto/

http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/05/monsanto200805
--
- Billy
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/7/2/maude
http://english.aljazeera.net/video/m...515308172.html