LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old 03-09-2003, 01:02 AM
Mike Simpson
 
Posts: n/a
Default Roundup Unready


"Bill Oliver" wrote in message ...
In article ,
Henry Kuska wrote:
Scientists undertake a research project for a reason (i.e. they are trained
to know what type of experiments will produce meaningful data). They then
submit their results to a refereed journal which is edited by someone well
respected in the field. If the referees (reviewers) and editor agree that
the choice of research is meaningful, and that their procedure is sound, it
gets published. If anyone feels that it is not, he/she can publish their
own paper and the review process will judge the validity of their "points".

For those who are not familar with scientific methods and therefore wonder
if "billo" has a point about dosage (that the scientists themselves and the
editor and the reviewers missed), the following is a very simplified
explanation: To see if a chemical causes long term problems one can often
study exposure to a small amount for many years, or one can study a shorter
term exposure to a larger amount.



Which is why you are working so hard to ban the use of water, no doubt.
After all, if one gives a short term exposure to enough water, it is
deadly. I also suppose you are actively working to remove oxygen
from the atmosphere, since oxygen is an tremendously deadly poison
at high doses.

In fact, the authors of your papers do not make the claim you pretend.
Were you to actually read the articles, you will note that *they* do
not claim that their article shows that Roundup is dangerous when used
as directed.

For those not familiar with scientific methods, and wonder if "Henry"
has a point, it turns out that *everything* is toxic when given in
high enough doses. The fact that something is toxic when given in
high enough doses, such as water or oxygen, does not imply that
it is deadly with chronic exposure. In fact, there are protocols
for making the inference that "Henry" claims; under *those* protocols,
Roundup was shown to be not dangerous when used as directed.


billo


Overdose on water.........

http://www.ananova.com/entertainment...814.html?menu=

ms


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
roundup-application carl roberts Lawns 22 09-06-2003 12:20 PM
The dangers of weed killers - Glyphostae aka Roundup, the hidden killer. Malcolm United Kingdom 517 02-06-2003 04:20 PM
Horsetails and Roundup Rufus United Kingdom 17 19-05-2003 02:49 PM
How Soon To Plant After Using Roundup? Frogleg Gardening 25 14-05-2003 07:44 AM
weedkiller, roundup, knockdown Frank Logullo Gardening 5 05-05-2003 02:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 GardenBanter.co.uk.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Gardening"

 

Copyright © 2017