GardenBanter.co.uk

GardenBanter.co.uk (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/)
-   Gardening (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/gardening/)
-   -   North America After the Collapse (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/gardening/50457-north-america-after-collapse.html)

Peter H 19-01-2004 10:12 PM

North America After the Collapse
 
wrote:

"Heynony" wrote in message
...






Certainly he was exaggerating, but 20 acre plots aren't all that large.
......

You could throw a rock "almost" a hundred yards - as a kid? Correct me if
I'm wrong but I don't think the best quarterbacks in the NFL can throw the
entire length of a football field.



Assuming a perfect square, 20 acres would be 312 yards on a side. The
very best NFL quarterbacks can, under duress, throw 50-55 yards with a
modicum of accuracy. An outfielder in baseball is expected to only reach
1st, 2nd, or 3rd base with a deep throw (40-50 yards) & then the
accuracy will be questionable at best (it's usually not even close).

Pete H

--
We are all of one nation, all of one creed
We are all out of nature, all of one seed
I. Bairnson



Peter H 19-01-2004 10:18 PM

North America After the Collapse
 
Nick Danger wrote:

I've
seen the future, and it glows.

Please stay on the yellow rubber line.......

Welcome to the future; it's just starting now.

Thank you.

Pete H aka The Bad Bozo

--
We are all of one nation, all of one creed
We are all out of nature, all of one seed
I. Bairnson



[email protected] 19-01-2004 10:26 PM

North America After the Collapse
 
Heynony wrote:

Certainly he was exaggerating, but 20 acre plots aren't all that large.


Plenty large for self-sufficiency if used properly. It mostly depends on
climate and soil conditions, though.

Unless I can't do math in my head anymore (quite possible): if your
house was offset 80% off center towards the neighbor's lot and his
front porch offset similarly toward yours (not totally unreasonable),
the throw would be possible, I think (I could throw a rock close to 100
yards as a kid and I was far from the best).


Well, lessee...
An acre is 43,560 sq ft, so a 20 acre square would be 871,200 sq ft, or
about 933 feet on a side. Now, why in the hell would I put my house close
to the neighbors when I can easily put it in the middle, 400+ feet away
from them?

--
Joe Bramblett, KD5NRH

Peter H 19-01-2004 10:32 PM

North America After the Collapse
 
Nick Danger wrote:

I've
seen the future, and it glows.

Please stay on the yellow rubber line.......

Welcome to the future; it's just starting now.

Thank you.

Pete H aka The Bad Bozo

--
We are all of one nation, all of one creed
We are all out of nature, all of one seed
I. Bairnson



[email protected] 19-01-2004 10:41 PM

North America After the Collapse
 
Heynony wrote:

Certainly he was exaggerating, but 20 acre plots aren't all that large.


Plenty large for self-sufficiency if used properly. It mostly depends on
climate and soil conditions, though.

Unless I can't do math in my head anymore (quite possible): if your
house was offset 80% off center towards the neighbor's lot and his
front porch offset similarly toward yours (not totally unreasonable),
the throw would be possible, I think (I could throw a rock close to 100
yards as a kid and I was far from the best).


Well, lessee...
An acre is 43,560 sq ft, so a 20 acre square would be 871,200 sq ft, or
about 933 feet on a side. Now, why in the hell would I put my house close
to the neighbors when I can easily put it in the middle, 400+ feet away
from them?

--
Joe Bramblett, KD5NRH

Condor Chef 19-01-2004 11:19 PM

North America After the Collapse
 
"Peter H" wrote in message
...
wrote:

"Heynony" wrote in message
...

Certainly he was exaggerating, but 20 acre plots aren't all that large.

You could throw a rock "almost" a hundred yards - as a kid? Correct me if
I'm wrong but I don't think the best quarterbacks in the NFL can throw

the
entire length of a football field.

Assuming a perfect square, 20 acres would be 312 yards on a side. The
very best NFL quarterbacks can, under duress, throw 50-55 yards with a
modicum of accuracy. An outfielder in baseball is expected to only reach
1st, 2nd, or 3rd base with a deep throw (40-50 yards) & then the
accuracy will be questionable at best (it's usually not even close).


What people forget is that a rock is not a football, or a baseball, or a
grenade. A baseball can be thrown much further than a whiffle ball,
a rock further than a baseball, and, unless the rock is smooth and
symmetrical and of the same size and weight, a grenade further than
a rock.


CC



Condor Chef 19-01-2004 11:19 PM

North America After the Collapse
 
"Peter H" wrote in message
...
wrote:

"Heynony" wrote in message
...

Certainly he was exaggerating, but 20 acre plots aren't all that large.

You could throw a rock "almost" a hundred yards - as a kid? Correct me if
I'm wrong but I don't think the best quarterbacks in the NFL can throw

the
entire length of a football field.

Assuming a perfect square, 20 acres would be 312 yards on a side. The
very best NFL quarterbacks can, under duress, throw 50-55 yards with a
modicum of accuracy. An outfielder in baseball is expected to only reach
1st, 2nd, or 3rd base with a deep throw (40-50 yards) & then the
accuracy will be questionable at best (it's usually not even close).


What people forget is that a rock is not a football, or a baseball, or a
grenade. A baseball can be thrown much further than a whiffle ball,
a rock further than a baseball, and, unless the rock is smooth and
symmetrical and of the same size and weight, a grenade further than
a rock.


CC



19-01-2004 11:20 PM

North America After the Collapse
 

"Robert Sturgeon" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 08:18:27 -0500, ""
wrote:


"Heynony" wrote in message
...
KB9WFK wrote:

responding to "your neighbor will be able to hit your house with a
thrown rock from their front porch"

you are saying that after the collapse, my neighbors biceps are
going to mutate into such freakishly large proportions that they will
be able to throw rocks 20 acres?

Certainly he was exaggerating, but 20 acre plots aren't all that large.
Unless I can't do math in my head anymore (quite possible): if your
house was offset 80% off center towards the neighbor's lot and his
front porch offset similarly toward yours (not totally unreasonable),
the throw would be possible, I think (I could throw a rock close to 100
yards as a kid and I was far from the best). The concept is not hugely
off. From center to center, probably more on point, it would take a
great tee shot rather than a thrown rock.


You could throw a rock "almost" a hundred yards - as a kid? Correct me if
I'm wrong but I don't think the best quarterbacks in the NFL can throw

the
entire length of a football field.


A rock is more like a baseball than a football. A major
league outfielder can throw a baseball 100 yards. In my
younger days, so could I.


Okay, a rock then. 325 feet from home plate is the shortest distance
permissible by major-league standards to the fence. I doubt there are many
that can throw anything from that distance and reach homeplate. Jose
Guillen, had one of strongest arms in baseball and one night he managed a
375' (125 yard) throw, from warning track to homeplate. This is from an
extraordinary guy. And you could almost match him when you were a kid?



19-01-2004 11:20 PM

North America After the Collapse
 

"Robert Sturgeon" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 08:18:27 -0500, ""
wrote:


"Heynony" wrote in message
...
KB9WFK wrote:

responding to "your neighbor will be able to hit your house with a
thrown rock from their front porch"

you are saying that after the collapse, my neighbors biceps are
going to mutate into such freakishly large proportions that they will
be able to throw rocks 20 acres?

Certainly he was exaggerating, but 20 acre plots aren't all that large.
Unless I can't do math in my head anymore (quite possible): if your
house was offset 80% off center towards the neighbor's lot and his
front porch offset similarly toward yours (not totally unreasonable),
the throw would be possible, I think (I could throw a rock close to 100
yards as a kid and I was far from the best). The concept is not hugely
off. From center to center, probably more on point, it would take a
great tee shot rather than a thrown rock.


You could throw a rock "almost" a hundred yards - as a kid? Correct me if
I'm wrong but I don't think the best quarterbacks in the NFL can throw

the
entire length of a football field.


A rock is more like a baseball than a football. A major
league outfielder can throw a baseball 100 yards. In my
younger days, so could I.


Okay, a rock then. 325 feet from home plate is the shortest distance
permissible by major-league standards to the fence. I doubt there are many
that can throw anything from that distance and reach homeplate. Jose
Guillen, had one of strongest arms in baseball and one night he managed a
375' (125 yard) throw, from warning track to homeplate. This is from an
extraordinary guy. And you could almost match him when you were a kid?



Bob G 19-01-2004 11:33 PM

North America After the Collapse
 
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 20:28:34 GMT, Alan Connor wrote:

That's funny. I remember the Internet in the Pacific Northwest being down
for a half a day a while back because some farmer got careless with a backhoe.

It is still dependent on microwave links and fiber-optic cables are more
vulnerable than copper ones.

A few teams of saboteurs could bring down the Internet right now, and never
be caught.

They'd just have to sever T1 lines over and over again, and it isn't possible
to patrol the hundreds of thousands of miles of them...


AC


Geez, Alan

Chuckle, you are funny. Thanks, I needed the laugh.

Bob



shazzbat 19-01-2004 11:33 PM

North America After the Collapse
 

"Frank White" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

I've been lurking in this thread for a while and it has given me much
interest and not a little amusement, but I have a question.

At risk of sticking my nose in from UK, What is the scenario regarding

the
apparently/allegedly overdue supervolcano brewing up under Yellowstone,

and
its
aftermath?

If what I've heard is correct, it might equally involve this side of the
pond.

Or is that a whole different thread? .

Steve


The assessment is that all of Yellowstone is the caldera of a
massive, still active volcano, and *IF* - which is a mighty big
'if' - it goes off at full power it will devastate most of the
western U.S. and have global consequences of horrific proportions.

However, although there are some changes taking place there -
a huge bulge developing at the bottom of Yellowstone Lake, the
ground in some areas of the park becoming so hot it can't be
walked on - there is nothing to suggest immediate danger.

FW


A TV programme I saw over here about 2 yrs ago suggested that this had gone
off at average intervals of 100,000 years(IIRC), and was now 8 - 10
thousand years "overdue" I am not an expert, but it seems to me this is a
matter of when rather than if.

Steve



shazzbat 19-01-2004 11:42 PM

North America After the Collapse
 

wrote in message
...
Heynony wrote:

Certainly he was exaggerating, but 20 acre plots aren't all that large.


Plenty large for self-sufficiency if used properly. It mostly depends on
climate and soil conditions, though.

Unless I can't do math in my head anymore (quite possible): if your
house was offset 80% off center towards the neighbor's lot and his
front porch offset similarly toward yours (not totally unreasonable),
the throw would be possible, I think (I could throw a rock close to 100
yards as a kid and I was far from the best).


Well, lessee...
An acre is 43,560 sq ft, so a 20 acre square would be 871,200 sq ft, or
about 933 feet on a side. Now, why in the hell would I put my house close
to the neighbors when I can easily put it in the middle, 400+ feet away
from them?

Cos then you wouldn't need to lay 400' of drive just to get to your boundary
:-))



North 19-01-2004 11:42 PM

North America After the Collapse
 
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 23:58:31 GMT, Alan Connor said:

Like a lot of the folks on this group, he just can't really believe that
the only way of life he's ever known can cease to be.

Almost everyone here is preparing for a temporary breakdown and will be
purely stray, and armed and desperate, when they learn otherwise.

And they aren't taking into account groups like mine, which intend to make
double-damned-sure this civilization stays dead.


Actually Alan, there are groups like mine and several others who will
make damn sure your
group does not survival. And we will use every type of modern weapon
there is execpt nukes. Your
little band of hippys will all be slaughtered in just a matter of
minutes.You
can't hide from a thermal imaging scope and a bunch of highly trained
personal (hence not a bunch of bubba rednecks sucking down beer)

You may have had some fun ****ing with somedumb ass retarded drunk
hunter who wandered onto your
place, but don't steriotype the rest of the hunters/gun
collectors/survivalists, etc... with those drunkened idiots that you
have gotten away with ****ing with

If itsa war you want alan post TEOTWAWKI, then its a war you shall
have. Expect to be invaded be superior forces
and enslaved.
Remember this war will not start untill after TEOTWAWKI.

You had better prepare now alanc of wildwood, because after the crash,
those of you who resist enslavment will be killed. Those that resist
the invasion of wildwood will be killed, no prisoners will be taken,
all of wildwoods wounded will be shot.

Just remember, The axis of hippies will be defeated by the United
Survivalists of America (the USA) And lets not forget our Brit
survivalists friends (The UK or United Killers)

And I simply can't wait for an attack from the wildwood blimp corps, I
have A few wrist rockets that should take out a blimp just fine, and
if they won't do the job, then my 460 magnum should do wonders, and
remember any survivors will be executed on the spot. (we just don't
see a hemp woven wrap around as a military uniform and you will be
shot as a spy under the rules of warfare)

Not that there is anything wrong with technology per se, but the main thrust
behind technology is the need to sell more and more stuff, not any real
benefit to the world, and often quite the contrary.

The other mis-guided (and mis-guiding) faction here are the ones that think
they are going to live like the pioneers.

Wrong. There are far more people and way fewer unspoiled lands than there were
then.

I call these factions the Campers, and the Davey Crocketts.


The people who survive will be gardeners/gatherers and handcrafters. They will
know their plants and how to turn them into clothing and heat and light and food
and paper and medicine and shelter and chemicals.


They will survive only if they leave me and mine alone, if not then
you will have your war.



GENERAL AC {Of the Wildwood defence force}



Peter H 20-01-2004 01:41 AM

North America After the Collapse
 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 23
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.5.184.132
X-Trace: sv3-fJhsA9IN9Z+c7t3o+SmhZ8XjqxhGUadqh8b2FR4+EJK9LLcUg2 5DWB4PMxaD7UU3MyTdFmFZRG52m7t!R3lON/BvcGe22dwoXu68bBxp8Yw3CgPYo17PNrZPgiIluSj0Tn9Gw5Um
X-Complaints-To:
X-DMCA-Complaints-To:

X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.1
Path: kermit!newsfeed-east.nntpserver.com!nntpserver.com!newshosting.com !nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!216.196.98.140.MISMATC H!border1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border2.nntp.sjc.g iganews.com!border1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.gig anews.com!local1.nntp.sjc.giganews
.com!nntp.gwi.net!news.gwi.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
Xref: kermit rec.gardens.edible:67008 rec.gardens:262478 misc.survivalism:515339 misc.rural:122458 rec.backcountry:177935

Condor Chef wrote:

What people forget is that a rock is not a football, or a baseball, or a
grenade.



Footballs & baseballs have already been covered by this thread & even by
professional throwers found quite wanting. And, should you be able to
throw a hand grenade 100 yards or better, it would explode before
landing, pretty well obviating the reason for throwing one in the first
place. It's simply not a feasible feat. Any rock you might throw (by
hand, but I most seriously doubt it) 100 yards would not be an effective
weapon.

Pete H

--
We are all of one nation, all of one creed
We are all out of nature, all of one seed
I. Bairnson



Noah Simoneaux 20-01-2004 01:42 AM

North America After the Collapse
 
On 19 Jan 2004 18:45:25 GMT, (Frank White) wrote:

(snip)
However, although there are some changes taking place there -
a huge bulge developing at the bottom of Yellowstone Lake, the
ground in some areas of the park becoming so hot it can't be
walked on - there is nothing to suggest immediate danger.


Of course, that's "immediate" in the geological sense, right? ;)

Peter H 20-01-2004 01:42 AM

North America After the Collapse
 
Alan Connor wrote:

Now there's an idea. Whether or not man is causing "global
warming", man could correct it. Man could also probably fix
the "nuclear winter" by vaporizing an appropriate volume
of ocean with nukes.




That's just brilliant.


AC


Actually, the same basic idea, using mirrors in orbit to melt ice
sheets, was proposed nearly 60 years ago. A very few years later,
mirrors on the moon were used in a sci-fi story as weapons of mass
destruction. In terms of physics, there's not a single reason why eather
plan wouldn't work.

Pete H

--
We are all of one nation, all of one creed
We are all out of nature, all of one seed
I. Bairnson



Peter H 20-01-2004 01:43 AM

North America After the Collapse
 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 23
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.5.184.132
X-Trace: sv3-fJhsA9IN9Z+c7t3o+SmhZ8XjqxhGUadqh8b2FR4+EJK9LLcUg2 5DWB4PMxaD7UU3MyTdFmFZRG52m7t!R3lON/BvcGe22dwoXu68bBxp8Yw3CgPYo17PNrZPgiIluSj0Tn9Gw5Um
X-Complaints-To:
X-DMCA-Complaints-To:

X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.1
Path: kermit!newsfeed-east.nntpserver.com!nntpserver.com!newshosting.com !nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!216.196.98.140.MISMATC H!border1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border2.nntp.sjc.g iganews.com!border1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.gig anews.com!local1.nntp.sjc.giganews
.com!nntp.gwi.net!news.gwi.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
Xref: kermit rec.gardens.edible:67008 rec.gardens:262478 misc.survivalism:515339 misc.rural:122458 rec.backcountry:177935

Condor Chef wrote:

What people forget is that a rock is not a football, or a baseball, or a
grenade.



Footballs & baseballs have already been covered by this thread & even by
professional throwers found quite wanting. And, should you be able to
throw a hand grenade 100 yards or better, it would explode before
landing, pretty well obviating the reason for throwing one in the first
place. It's simply not a feasible feat. Any rock you might throw (by
hand, but I most seriously doubt it) 100 yards would not be an effective
weapon.

Pete H

--
We are all of one nation, all of one creed
We are all out of nature, all of one seed
I. Bairnson



Noah Simoneaux 20-01-2004 01:43 AM

North America After the Collapse
 
On 19 Jan 2004 18:45:25 GMT, (Frank White) wrote:

(snip)
However, although there are some changes taking place there -
a huge bulge developing at the bottom of Yellowstone Lake, the
ground in some areas of the park becoming so hot it can't be
walked on - there is nothing to suggest immediate danger.


Of course, that's "immediate" in the geological sense, right? ;)

Peter H 20-01-2004 01:43 AM

North America After the Collapse
 
Alan Connor wrote:

Now there's an idea. Whether or not man is causing "global
warming", man could correct it. Man could also probably fix
the "nuclear winter" by vaporizing an appropriate volume
of ocean with nukes.




That's just brilliant.


AC


Actually, the same basic idea, using mirrors in orbit to melt ice
sheets, was proposed nearly 60 years ago. A very few years later,
mirrors on the moon were used in a sci-fi story as weapons of mass
destruction. In terms of physics, there's not a single reason why eather
plan wouldn't work.

Pete H

--
We are all of one nation, all of one creed
We are all out of nature, all of one seed
I. Bairnson



Peter H 20-01-2004 01:43 AM

North America After the Collapse
 
Alan Connor wrote:

The abuse and over-indulgence

an emotion-based judement which you do not support with data

in technology is a big part of what's CAUSING

This theme has been around for centuries.

Recycling is a perfect example of the folly of most technological 'solutions'.

Relatively few "technological solutions" involve recycling in any form.

It actually does more

immediate

harm to the environment than throwing things in a

landfill and making new stuff.

Over a lengthy term, the two are roughly equivalent. Your statement
assumes a steady supply of raw materials and a steady state of available
energy which in many cases is not the case. It also assumes a stable
supply of "away" to throw things into. One of the first lessons of the
first Earth Day in 1970 - were you with us then? - was that we could not
longer throw things "away," since in reality there is no such place.

Pete H

--
We are all of one nation, all of one creed
We are all out of nature, all of one seed
I. Bairnson



Peter H 20-01-2004 02:02 AM

North America After the Collapse
 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 16
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.5.184.132
X-Trace: sv3-XVpt+cl4hftALU3COQrFNGGN8BcJyAkTjspZoqrlFPuEGE3PIa W/3DfXKucrjjkcZS2lvsTIO6PYORU!G2/xGOsFn5L5G3dzI2ydry8c4u3fqxyLenw0xdaWwLkLZp+F0mX3r y7o
X-Complaints-To:
X-DMCA-Complaints-To:

X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.1
Path: kermit!newsfeed-east.nntpserver.com!nntpserver.com!newshosting.com !nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!216.196.98.140.MISMATC H!border1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border2.nntp.sjc.g iganews.com!border1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.gig anews.com!local1.nntp.sjc.giganews
.com!nntp.gwi.net!news.gwi.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
Xref: kermit rec.gardens.edible:67012 rec.gardens:262485 misc.survivalism:515348 misc.rural:122463 rec.backcountry:177948

shazzbat wrote:

I am not an expert, but it seems to me this is a
matter of when rather than if.

Earthquakes & volcanoes, being basically abrupt in geologic terms, are
always "when" rather than "if."

Pete H

--
We are all of one nation, all of one creed
We are all out of nature, all of one seed
I. Bairnson



Noah Simoneaux 20-01-2004 02:04 AM

North America After the Collapse
 
On 19 Jan 2004 20:41:11 GMT, wrote:

(snip)
Well, lessee...
An acre is 43,560 sq ft, so a 20 acre square would be 871,200 sq ft, or
about 933 feet on a side. Now, why in the hell would I put my house close
to the neighbors when I can easily put it in the middle, 400+ feet away
from them?


I was wondering the same thing. My neighbor(on the other piece of property I
own) built his house about 100 feet from my fence on his 10 acres. My 10 acres
is mostly sloping, with the only fairly level piece being next to that same
fence, so we're about like neighbors in the suburbs there. The neighbor's 10
acres is mostly level, so they could have built their house anywhere on it.

Noah Simoneaux 20-01-2004 02:06 AM

North America After the Collapse
 
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 20:28:33 GMT, Alan Connor wrote:

(snip)
Recycling is a perfect example of the folly of most technological 'solutions'.

It actually does more harm to the environment than throwing things in a

landfill and making new stuff.


Prove it. Don't just claim it as the truth.

That's why recycled paper costs more than regular paper, even with subsidies.


Ah, pretending it's ALREADY been proven. Good logic there.

Noah Simoneaux 20-01-2004 02:12 AM

North America After the Collapse
 
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 06:28:34 GMT, Alan Connor wrote:

(snip)
CO in an open area is NEVER lethal. Do your homework and quit telling
falsehoods.


CO in an open area is also hard to control. How do you control the concentration
enough to make sure it's effective? Must be magic.

To kill someone with CO they pretty much have to breathe a 100% mixture
for an extended period of time.


And you've verified this how?

Noah Simoneaux 20-01-2004 02:32 AM

North America After the Collapse
 
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 18:41:16 -0500, North wrote:

(piggybacking)
GENERAL AC {Of the Wildwood defence force}


Why do idiots like this with delusions of grandeur ALWAYS appoint themselves as
either Colonels or Generals? :/


KB9WFK 20-01-2004 02:33 AM

North America After the Collapse
 
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 02:04:26 GMT, (Noah Simoneaux)
wrote:

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 06:28:34 GMT, Alan Connor wrote:

(snip)
CO in an open area is NEVER lethal. Do your homework and quit telling
falsehoods.


CO in an open area is also hard to control. How do you control the concentration
enough to make sure it's effective? Must be magic.

To kill someone with CO they pretty much have to breathe a 100% mixture
for an extended period of time.


And you've verified this how?


Not only unverified, but very untrue.

kb9wfk

Robert Sturgeon 20-01-2004 03:02 AM

North America After the Collapse
 
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:16:51 -0500, ""
wrote:


"Robert Sturgeon" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 08:18:27 -0500, ""
wrote:


"Heynony" wrote in message
...
KB9WFK wrote:

responding to "your neighbor will be able to hit your house with a
thrown rock from their front porch"

you are saying that after the collapse, my neighbors biceps are
going to mutate into such freakishly large proportions that they will
be able to throw rocks 20 acres?

Certainly he was exaggerating, but 20 acre plots aren't all that large.
Unless I can't do math in my head anymore (quite possible): if your
house was offset 80% off center towards the neighbor's lot and his
front porch offset similarly toward yours (not totally unreasonable),
the throw would be possible, I think (I could throw a rock close to 100
yards as a kid and I was far from the best). The concept is not hugely
off. From center to center, probably more on point, it would take a
great tee shot rather than a thrown rock.

You could throw a rock "almost" a hundred yards - as a kid? Correct me if
I'm wrong but I don't think the best quarterbacks in the NFL can throw

the
entire length of a football field.


A rock is more like a baseball than a football. A major
league outfielder can throw a baseball 100 yards. In my
younger days, so could I.


Okay, a rock then. 325 feet from home plate is the shortest distance
permissible by major-league standards to the fence. I doubt there are many
that can throw anything from that distance and reach homeplate. Jose
Guillen, had one of strongest arms in baseball and one night he managed a
375' (125 yard) throw, from warning track to homeplate. This is from an
extraordinary guy. And you could almost match him when you were a kid?


As a young man, I could throw a baseball 100 yards. It
isn't a superhuman feat. Have you ever thrown a baseball?
Are you 6'3 and WELL muscled? I was.

--
Robert Sturgeon,
proud member of the vast right wing conspiracy
and the evil gun culture.

Robert Sturgeon 20-01-2004 03:18 AM

North America After the Collapse
 
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:16:51 -0500, ""
wrote:


"Robert Sturgeon" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 08:18:27 -0500, ""
wrote:


"Heynony" wrote in message
...
KB9WFK wrote:

responding to "your neighbor will be able to hit your house with a
thrown rock from their front porch"

you are saying that after the collapse, my neighbors biceps are
going to mutate into such freakishly large proportions that they will
be able to throw rocks 20 acres?

Certainly he was exaggerating, but 20 acre plots aren't all that large.
Unless I can't do math in my head anymore (quite possible): if your
house was offset 80% off center towards the neighbor's lot and his
front porch offset similarly toward yours (not totally unreasonable),
the throw would be possible, I think (I could throw a rock close to 100
yards as a kid and I was far from the best). The concept is not hugely
off. From center to center, probably more on point, it would take a
great tee shot rather than a thrown rock.

You could throw a rock "almost" a hundred yards - as a kid? Correct me if
I'm wrong but I don't think the best quarterbacks in the NFL can throw

the
entire length of a football field.


A rock is more like a baseball than a football. A major
league outfielder can throw a baseball 100 yards. In my
younger days, so could I.


Okay, a rock then. 325 feet from home plate is the shortest distance
permissible by major-league standards to the fence. I doubt there are many
that can throw anything from that distance and reach homeplate. Jose
Guillen, had one of strongest arms in baseball and one night he managed a
375' (125 yard) throw, from warning track to homeplate. This is from an
extraordinary guy. And you could almost match him when you were a kid?


As a young man, I could throw a baseball 100 yards. It
isn't a superhuman feat. Have you ever thrown a baseball?
Are you 6'3 and WELL muscled? I was.

--
Robert Sturgeon,
proud member of the vast right wing conspiracy
and the evil gun culture.

Alan Connor 20-01-2004 03:36 AM

North America After the Collapse
 
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 20:25:02 -0500, Peter H wrote:


Condor Chef wrote:

What people forget is that a rock is not a football, or a baseball, or a
grenade.



Footballs & baseballs have already been covered by this thread & even by
professional throwers found quite wanting. And, should you be able to
throw a hand grenade 100 yards or better, it would explode before
landing, pretty well obviating the reason for throwing one in the first
place. It's simply not a feasible feat. Any rock you might throw (by
hand, but I most seriously doubt it) 100 yards would not be an effective
weapon.


Someone around here needs to look up "figure of speech".


*I* certainly didn't even imply that anyone would try to throw a rock for
an 1/8 of a mile as a weapon.

AC

Alan Connor 20-01-2004 04:02 AM

North America After the Collapse
 
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 20:25:02 -0500, Peter H wrote:


Condor Chef wrote:

What people forget is that a rock is not a football, or a baseball, or a
grenade.



Footballs & baseballs have already been covered by this thread & even by
professional throwers found quite wanting. And, should you be able to
throw a hand grenade 100 yards or better, it would explode before
landing, pretty well obviating the reason for throwing one in the first
place. It's simply not a feasible feat. Any rock you might throw (by
hand, but I most seriously doubt it) 100 yards would not be an effective
weapon.


Someone around here needs to look up "figure of speech".


*I* certainly didn't even imply that anyone would try to throw a rock for
an 1/8 of a mile as a weapon.

AC

[email protected] 20-01-2004 05:32 AM

North America After the Collapse
 
On 2004-01-20, Noah Simoneaux wrote:
On 19 Jan 2004 20:41:11 GMT, wrote:
Well, lessee...
An acre is 43,560 sq ft, so a 20 acre square would be 871,200 sq ft, or
about 933 feet on a side. Now, why in the hell would I put my house close
to the neighbors when I can easily put it in the middle, 400+ feet away
from them?


I was wondering the same thing. My neighbor(on the other piece of
property I own) built his house about 100 feet from my fence on his
10 acres. My 10 acres is mostly sloping, with the only fairly level
piece being next to that same fence, so we're about like neighbors
in the suburbs there. The neighbor's 10 acres is mostly level, so
they could have built their house anywhere on it.


I bet that he was quoted an enormous fee to extend the water and
electric lines any further than near your fence. In my case, when I
hooked up to the rural water system I saved close to $1,000 by
avoiding the need to make another road cut to get to the water main on
the other side of the road (they instead tee'ed off from behind my
grandmother's water meter on my side of the road, and put my water
meter right beside hers). Then I had the fun of running the actual
water line from the water meter to my home (oh joy, slogging manual
labor with shovel).

--
Eric Green
http://news.badtux.net/

Noah Simoneaux 20-01-2004 06:32 AM

North America After the Collapse
 
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 05:27:48 GMT, wrote:

On 2004-01-20, Noah Simoneaux wrote:
On 19 Jan 2004 20:41:11 GMT,
wrote:
Well, lessee...
An acre is 43,560 sq ft, so a 20 acre square would be 871,200 sq ft, or
about 933 feet on a side. Now, why in the hell would I put my house close
to the neighbors when I can easily put it in the middle, 400+ feet away
from them?


I was wondering the same thing. My neighbor(on the other piece of
property I own) built his house about 100 feet from my fence on his
10 acres. My 10 acres is mostly sloping, with the only fairly level
piece being next to that same fence, so we're about like neighbors
in the suburbs there. The neighbor's 10 acres is mostly level, so
they could have built their house anywhere on it.


I bet that he was quoted an enormous fee to extend the water and
electric lines any further than near your fence.


Nah, can't be that. His first residence on his property was a mobile home, which
he had set up on the far side of his property. To build the house he had to
extend the driveway, power lines, and water lines almost the entire distance
across his property. :/

In my case, when I hooked up to the rural water system I saved close to $1,000 by
avoiding the need to make another road cut to get to the water main on
the other side of the road (they instead tee'ed off from behind my
grandmother's water meter on my side of the road, and put my water
meter right beside hers). Then I had the fun of running the actual
water line from the water meter to my home (oh joy, slogging manual
labor with shovel).


Living here in the Ozarks I didn't even think about trying to dig my 900+ feet
of water line by hand. I bet the rocks here even wear out backhoes and trenchers
faster.



Bill Dearth 20-01-2004 11:02 AM

North America After the Collapse
 
Alan/Mabu/GunKid will load up their Main Battle Wheelbarrows with
laser sighted Lorcin .380s, DingDongs and Twinkies, a couple dogeared
and stained copies of Hustlers Beaver Hunt Specials and shortly be run
over by a middle aged long haired Vietnam vet in a Dodge Ram pickup
Bugging Out, who will only look in the rear view mirror to see what
caused that gyser of shit and the muffled thump.

Gunner, that last line made me spray my Mt Dew on my monitor, you owe me.
Well, I'll let it go, best laugh I've had today.





20-01-2004 12:12 PM

North America After the Collapse
 

"Robert Sturgeon" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:16:51 -0500, ""
wrote:


"Robert Sturgeon" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 08:18:27 -0500, ""
wrote:


"Heynony" wrote in message
...
KB9WFK wrote:

responding to "your neighbor will be able to hit your house with a
thrown rock from their front porch"

you are saying that after the collapse, my neighbors biceps are
going to mutate into such freakishly large proportions that they

will
be able to throw rocks 20 acres?

Certainly he was exaggerating, but 20 acre plots aren't all that

large.
Unless I can't do math in my head anymore (quite possible): if your
house was offset 80% off center towards the neighbor's lot and his
front porch offset similarly toward yours (not totally

unreasonable),
the throw would be possible, I think (I could throw a rock close to

100
yards as a kid and I was far from the best). The concept is not

hugely
off. From center to center, probably more on point, it would take a
great tee shot rather than a thrown rock.

You could throw a rock "almost" a hundred yards - as a kid? Correct me

if
I'm wrong but I don't think the best quarterbacks in the NFL can throw

the
entire length of a football field.

A rock is more like a baseball than a football. A major
league outfielder can throw a baseball 100 yards. In my
younger days, so could I.


Okay, a rock then. 325 feet from home plate is the shortest distance
permissible by major-league standards to the fence. I doubt there are

many
that can throw anything from that distance and reach homeplate. Jose
Guillen, had one of strongest arms in baseball and one night he managed a
375' (125 yard) throw, from warning track to homeplate. This is from an
extraordinary guy. And you could almost match him when you were a kid?


As a young man, I could throw a baseball 100 yards. It
isn't a superhuman feat. Have you ever thrown a baseball?
Are you 6'3 and WELL muscled? I was.


I am 6'2" and was considered well defined in my day and still am. I still
think you are having exaggerated memories though. Oh well, enjoy them.



20-01-2004 12:13 PM

North America After the Collapse
 

"Alan Connor" wrote in message
ink.net...
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 20:25:02 -0500, Peter H wrote:


Condor Chef wrote:

What people forget is that a rock is not a football, or a baseball, or a
grenade.



Footballs & baseballs have already been covered by this thread & even by
professional throwers found quite wanting. And, should you be able to
throw a hand grenade 100 yards or better, it would explode before
landing, pretty well obviating the reason for throwing one in the first
place. It's simply not a feasible feat. Any rock you might throw (by
hand, but I most seriously doubt it) 100 yards would not be an effective
weapon.


Someone around here needs to look up "figure of speech".


*I* certainly didn't even imply that anyone would try to throw a rock for
an 1/8 of a mile as a weapon.


No, but now you've implied that there are 800 yards to a mile.



Starlord 20-01-2004 04:02 PM

North America After the Collapse
 
"Vietnam vet in a Dodge Ram pickup
Bugging Out, who will only look in the rear view mirror to see what
caused that gyser of shit and the muffled thump."

Na, we'll be driving 71 FORD 250's paited caution yellow powered by 390 engines
and have our scopes in the back.

But realy, living out here in the Mojave Desert I could just run everyone else
out of the trailer park and set up Ft.Mojave in it.

--
"In this universe the night was falling,the shadows were lengthening
towards an east that would not know another dawn.
But elsewhere the stars were still young and the light of morning
lingered: and along the path he once had followed, man would one day go
again."

Arthur C. Clarke, The City & The Stars

SIAR
www.starlords.org
Freelance Writers Shop
http://www.freelancewrittersshop.netfirms.com
Telescope Buyers FAQ
http://home.inreach.com/starlord
Ad World
http://adworld.netfirms.com

"Bill Dearth" wrote in message
news:_D7Pb.107058$na.67317@attbi_s04...
Alan/Mabu/GunKid will load up their Main Battle Wheelbarrows with
laser sighted Lorcin .380s, DingDongs and Twinkies, a couple dogeared
and stained copies of Hustlers Beaver Hunt Specials and shortly be run
over by a middle aged long haired Vietnam vet in a Dodge Ram pickup
Bugging Out, who will only look in the rear view mirror to see what
caused that gyser of shit and the muffled thump.




---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.563 / Virus Database: 355 - Release Date: 1/17/04



Jonathan Ball 20-01-2004 05:02 PM

North America After the Collapse
 
Robert Sturgeon wrote:

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:16:51 -0500, ""
wrote:


"Robert Sturgeon" wrote in message
. ..

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 08:18:27 -0500, ""
wrote:


"Heynony" wrote in message
...

KB9WFK wrote:

responding to "your neighbor will be able to hit your house with a
thrown rock from their front porch"


you are saying that after the collapse, my neighbors biceps are
going to mutate into such freakishly large proportions that they will
be able to throw rocks 20 acres?

Certainly he was exaggerating, but 20 acre plots aren't all that large.
Unless I can't do math in my head anymore (quite possible): if your
house was offset 80% off center towards the neighbor's lot and his
front porch offset similarly toward yours (not totally unreasonable),
the throw would be possible, I think (I could throw a rock close to 100
yards as a kid and I was far from the best). The concept is not hugely
off. From center to center, probably more on point, it would take a
great tee shot rather than a thrown rock.

You could throw a rock "almost" a hundred yards - as a kid? Correct me if
I'm wrong but I don't think the best quarterbacks in the NFL can throw


the

entire length of a football field.

A rock is more like a baseball than a football. A major
league outfielder can throw a baseball 100 yards. In my
younger days, so could I.


Okay, a rock then. 325 feet from home plate is the shortest distance
permissible by major-league standards to the fence. I doubt there are many
that can throw anything from that distance and reach homeplate. Jose
Guillen, had one of strongest arms in baseball and one night he managed a
375' (125 yard) throw, from warning track to homeplate. This is from an
extraordinary guy. And you could almost match him when you were a kid?



As a young man, I could throw a baseball 100 yards. It
isn't a superhuman feat. Have you ever thrown a baseball?
Are you 6'3 and WELL muscled? I was.


I am not 6'3" - more like 5'6" - but I was fairly
well-muscled - about 150 lb; max bench press of 255 lb;
one-handed clean-and-jerk of 95 lb; 45' puts with a 12
lb shot - and the best thrown I could manage was about
93-94 yards. I lived across the street during this
time from Granada Hills High School in the San Fernando
Valley, John Elway's high school (saw him play baseball
there one afternoon), and I went over to the football
field specifically to see how far I could throw a
baseball. I had always imagined I had a good arm, and
I wanted to know just how good. I'd stand in one end
zone, run towards the goal line, and heave it as hard
as I could toward the other end zone. The best I could
get was a couple or three yards inside the far 10 yard
line, and other than "toward the far end zone", I had
no idea where the thing was going.

Damn, I knew this theme was something I had seen before
in misc.rural (where I'm following the thread), and it
didn't take me long to find it. It was that FAT ****
Boob Adkins, bragging that he once could throw a
football over 70 yards, and a softball - not a baseball
- 100 yards or more. He also claimed he could throw a
14+ ounce grenade 75 yards or more, "on a straight
line", when he was in the army. What a ****ing
shit-4-braincell liar. You can't read Boob's post
directly, because the GUTLESS COWARD always posts using
x-no-archive, but you can read it in my reply to it:
http://tinyurl.com/2thfp


Robert Sturgeon 20-01-2004 05:42 PM

North America After the Collapse
 
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:57:47 GMT, Jonathan Ball
wrote:

(snips)

Damn, I knew this theme was something I had seen before
in misc.rural (where I'm following the thread), and it
didn't take me long to find it. It was that FAT ****
Boob Adkins, bragging that he once could throw a
football over 70 yards, and a softball - not a baseball
- 100 yards or more.


I could throw a softball 60 yards or so. A baseball is a
MUCH better missile than a softball. Unfortunately, I don't
have a WayBack machine. I really don't understand why
throwing a baseball 100 yards is such a big deal. Any good
major league outfielder can throw the ball from the foul
line fence to home plate on the fly. They don't do it
because the accuracy tends to fall way off, so they throw to
the cutoff man who can then throw accurately in to home
plate, or to another base if that makes more sense.
Throwing the ball all the way in from the foul line fence is
seldom a Good Idea, but it isn't an impossible feat, either.
Heck, the catcher throws the ball 40 yards with 1 step from
a crouch.

The difference between a major leaguer and an amateur isn't
strength, it's skill.

(rest snipped)

--
Robert Sturgeon,
proud member of the vast right wing conspiracy
and the evil gun culture.

Jonathan Ball 20-01-2004 06:02 PM

North America After the Collapse
 
Robert Sturgeon wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:57:47 GMT, Jonathan Ball
wrote:

(snips)


Damn, I knew this theme was something I had seen before
in misc.rural (where I'm following the thread), and it
didn't take me long to find it. It was that FAT ****
Boob Adkins, bragging that he once could throw a
football over 70 yards, and a softball - not a baseball
- 100 yards or more.



I could throw a softball 60 yards or so. A baseball is a
MUCH better missile than a softball. Unfortunately, I don't
have a WayBack machine. I really don't understand why
throwing a baseball 100 yards is such a big deal.


It wasn't a big deal, in the original post; somehow, as
things have a way of doing in usenet, it evolved into a
big deal. Also, because usenet attracts boastful liars
like Boob Adkins, whose absurd claims can't be
verified, these things take on a life of their own.

Any good
major league outfielder can throw the ball from the foul
line fence to home plate on the fly. They don't do it
because the accuracy tends to fall way off, so they throw to
the cutoff man who can then throw accurately in to home
plate, or to another base if that makes more sense.
Throwing the ball all the way in from the foul line fence is
seldom a Good Idea, but it isn't an impossible feat, either.
Heck, the catcher throws the ball 40 yards with 1 step from
a crouch.

The difference between a major leaguer and an amateur isn't
strength, it's skill.

(rest snipped)

--
Robert Sturgeon,
proud member of the vast right wing conspiracy
and the evil gun culture.



Noah Simoneaux 20-01-2004 08:05 PM

North America After the Collapse
 
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 00:28:29 GMT, Alan Connor wrote:
(snip)
(your neighbor will be able to hit your house with a thrown rock from their
front porch)


Irrelevant. My neighbors won't be throwing rocks my way. They'll be watching for
Amazon warriors(and their little runt sidekicks) trying to put birth-control
drugs into our wells. ;)

(snip)
If you HAVE to run, then you had better know your wild edible plants, of
which there are more than 1800 species in North America, because trapping
and hunting will SERIOUSLY slow you down...


Sounds amazingly like GUNkid. Imagine that. Two different internet putzes with
delusions of adequacy. :/


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter