The Bush's
The Bushs claim they truly believe in a free nation with freedom of
religion. Everyone welcome and treated equal. But wait, unless of course you are gay. Then they say you are not welcome in this country to share benefits of other religions. |
The Bush's
That is a lie. Post some proof if you are going to start that crap in here.
So are you Al Qaeda? -- "John A. Keslick, Jr." wrote in message ... The Bushs claim they truly believe in a free nation with freedom of religion. Everyone welcome and treated equal. But wait, unless of course you are gay. Then they say you are not welcome in this country to share benefits of other religions. |
The Bush's
"Wil" wrote in message ... That is a lie. Post some proof if you are going to start that crap in here. So are you Al Qaeda? -- Probably just gay ;( Frank |
The Bush's religion
Which religion is that supposed to be? Satanism?
The Bush clan obviously sold their souls to Satan long ago. "John A. Keslick, Jr." wrote in message ... The Bushs claim they truly believe in a free nation with freedom of religion. Everyone welcome and treated equal. But wait, unless of course you are gay. Then they say you are not welcome in this country to share benefits of other religions. |
The Bush's
Just because their last name is Bush, doesn't mean it has anything to do
w/gardening. Sheesh. "John A. Keslick, Jr." wrote in message ... The Bushs claim they truly believe in a free nation with freedom of religion. Everyone welcome and treated equal. But wait, unless of course you are gay. Then they say you are not welcome in this country to share benefits of other religions. |
The Bush's
It was on tv last night. Gays will not have rights as other religions
married couples do. Him and Mrs Bush both commented on tv about this. CNN "Wil" wrote in message ... That is a lie. Post some proof if you are going to start that crap in here. So are you Al Qaeda? -- "John A. Keslick, Jr." wrote in message ... The Bushs claim they truly believe in a free nation with freedom of religion. Everyone welcome and treated equal. But wait, unless of course you are gay. Then they say you are not welcome in this country to share benefits of other religions. |
The Bush's
No but if he is religious he should be involved in creation care. God even
cares about the sparrows. "LeeAnne" wrote in message ... Just because their last name is Bush, doesn't mean it has anything to do w/gardening. Sheesh. "John A. Keslick, Jr." wrote in message ... The Bushs claim they truly believe in a free nation with freedom of religion. Everyone welcome and treated equal. But wait, unless of course you are gay. Then they say you are not welcome in this country to share benefits of other religions. |
The Bush's
Being gay is a religion??? Are you really that stupid?
"John A. Keslick, Jr." wrote in message ... The Bushs claim they truly believe in a free nation with freedom of religion. Everyone welcome and treated equal. But wait, unless of course you are gay. Then they say you are not welcome in this country to share benefits of other religions. |
The Bush's
Homosexuals are not married. They are partners of a different kind, like
room mates, or other kind of sex partner but can not legally enter into the marriage contract. They have rights as individual but not as a couple who is in a marriage contract between a man and a woman. It has to do with a legal contract. The contract says between a man and a woman. wil -- "John A. Keslick, Jr." wrote in message ... It was on tv last night. Gays will not have rights as other religions married couples do. Him and Mrs Bush both commented on tv about this. CNN "Wil" wrote in message ... That is a lie. Post some proof if you are going to start that crap in here. So are you Al Qaeda? -- "John A. Keslick, Jr." wrote in message ... The Bushs claim they truly believe in a free nation with freedom of religion. Everyone welcome and treated equal. But wait, unless of course you are gay. Then they say you are not welcome in this country to share benefits of other religions. |
The Bush's
Creature care not worship of the creature. Big difference. Big difference
between the care of a human from embrio to old age, and putting a animal first. Your ilk doesn't even give a preborn human the status of a mouse. Wil -- "John A. Keslick, Jr." wrote in message ... No but if he is religious he should be involved in creation care. God even cares about the sparrows. "LeeAnne" wrote in message ... Just because their last name is Bush, doesn't mean it has anything to do w/gardening. Sheesh. "John A. Keslick, Jr." wrote in message ... The Bushs claim they truly believe in a free nation with freedom of religion. Everyone welcome and treated equal. But wait, unless of course you are gay. Then they say you are not welcome in this country to share benefits of other religions. |
The Bush's
"Wil" wrote in message ... Homosexuals are not married. They are partners of a different kind, like room mates, or other kind of sex partner but can not legally enter into the marriage contract. They have rights as individual but not as a couple who is in a marriage contract between a man and a woman. It has to do with a legal contract. The contract says between a man and a woman. I don't think that is being questioned. The issue is that same-sex couples SHOULD have the right to enter into the same contract. It's simply a legal matter. If churches don't want to "marry" same-sex couples, that's their business. Remember, at one time marriage was only open to two white people of opposite genders. People in mixed race marriages were criminals in many states. People saw that as a partnership of a different kind. Things change. |
The Bush's
"Vox Humana" wrote in message ... "Wil" wrote in message ... Homosexuals are not married. They are partners of a different kind, like room mates, or other kind of sex partner but can not legally enter into the marriage contract. They have rights as individual but not as a couple who is in a marriage contract between a man and a woman. It has to do with a legal contract. The contract says between a man and a woman. I don't think that is being questioned. The issue is that same-sex couples SHOULD have the right to enter into the same contract. It's simply a legal matter. If churches don't want to "marry" same-sex couples, that's their business. Remember, at one time marriage was only open to two white people of opposite genders. People in mixed race marriages were criminals in many states. People saw that as a partnership of a different kind. Things change. It's appalling that on the spectrum of things which truly threaten this country, some people think someone else's sexuality is more important than the fact that most shipping containers entering our ports could be filled with nuclear weapons and we'd be none the wiser. But, I guess they're right. I had a gay neighbor. He forgot to mow his lawn once before he left on vacation. Years later, the children in the neighborhood are still in therapy, some unable to speak or function in school. |
The Bush's
"Wil" wrote in message ... Creature care not worship of the creature. Big difference. Big difference between the care of a human from embrio to old age, and putting a animal first. Your ilk doesn't even give a preborn human the status of a mouse. Wil Wil, I realize that you are a religious halfwit but try to pay attention. Your bible God only exists in your mind, there are no Gods, Goblins, Monsters, Devils, Hell, Heaven, Purgatory, and other nonsense. That is, unless you can provide some verifible evidence for their existence. Until that time, keep your fantasies to yourself, but if you still chose to worship your imaginary friends, do it as Jesus recommended, by yourself! The whole history of these books [the Gospels] is so defective and doubtful that it seems vain to attempt minute enquiry into it: and such tricks have been played with their text, and with the texts of other books relating to them, that we have a right, from that cause, to entertain much doubt what parts of them are genuine. In the New Testament there is internal evidence that parts of it have proceeded from an extraordinary man; and that other parts are of the fabric of very inferior minds. It is as easy to separate those parts, as to pick out diamonds from dunghills. -Thomas Jefferson, letter to John Adams, January 24, 1814 Cindy, Christian Crack Whore and Turning Tricks for Jesus! -- "John A. Keslick, Jr." wrote in message ... No but if he is religious he should be involved in creation care. God even cares about the sparrows. "LeeAnne" wrote in message ... Just because their last name is Bush, doesn't mean it has anything to do w/gardening. Sheesh. "John A. Keslick, Jr." wrote in message ... The Bushs claim they truly believe in a free nation with freedom of religion. Everyone welcome and treated equal. But wait, unless of course you are gay. Then they say you are not welcome in this country to share benefits of other religions. |
The Bush's
"Cindy" wrote in message
news:u78Tc.282209$JR4.147849@attbi_s54... Your bible God only exists in your mind, there are no Gods, Goblins, Monsters, Devils, Hell, Heaven, Purgatory, and other nonsense. That is, unless you can provide some verifible evidence for their existence. I beg to differ. There was (and still may be) *something* living behind the furnace when I was a child. It only made noise when my parents weren't down there with me, which proves that it was evil, and up to something nasty. |
The Bush's
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Vox Humana" wrote in message ... "Wil" wrote in message ... Homosexuals are not married. They are partners of a different kind, like room mates, or other kind of sex partner but can not legally enter into the marriage contract. They have rights as individual but not as a couple who is in a marriage contract between a man and a woman. It has to do with a legal contract. The contract says between a man and a woman. I don't think that is being questioned. The issue is that same-sex couples SHOULD have the right to enter into the same contract. It's simply a legal matter. If churches don't want to "marry" same-sex couples, that's their business. Remember, at one time marriage was only open to two white people of opposite genders. People in mixed race marriages were criminals in many states. People saw that as a partnership of a different kind. Things change. It's appalling that on the spectrum of things which truly threaten this country, some people think someone else's sexuality is more important than the fact that most shipping containers entering our ports could be filled with nuclear weapons and we'd be none the wiser. But, I guess they're right. I had a gay neighbor. He forgot to mow his lawn once before he left on vacation. Years later, the children in the neighborhood are still in therapy, some unable to speak or function in school. Some of our neighbors are going to be in therapy soon. The fundamentalist Christian family four doors up just sold their house to a lesbian couple. I heard about it from a neighbor who heard about it from someone on another street! The women haven't even moved in yet. God only knows what they say about me. I sort of hope that it pushes some of them over-the-edge and they move. I wonder what they say about the unmarried heterosexual couples of the serially divorced people who live on our street. If they only focused that energy on their kids. Most of them don't have a clue where their pre-school kids are much of the day. You can't leave your garage open while you do yard work or they are in there exploring. |
The Bush's
"Cindy" wrote in message
news:u78Tc.282209$JR4.147849@attbi_s54... Wil, I realize that you are a religious halfwit but try to pay attention. Your bible God only exists in your mind, there are no Gods, Goblins, Monsters, Devils, Hell, Heaven, Purgatory, and other nonsense. That is, unless you can provide some verifible evidence for their existence. Until that time, keep your fantasies to yourself, but if you still chose to worship your imaginary friends, do it as Jesus recommended, by yourself! The whole history of these books [the Gospels] is so defective and doubtful that it seems vain to attempt minute enquiry into it: and such tricks have been played with their text, and with the texts of other books relating to them, that we have a right, from that cause, to entertain much doubt what parts of them are genuine. In the New Testament there is internal evidence that parts of it have proceeded from an extraordinary man; and that other parts are of the fabric of very inferior minds. It is as easy to separate those parts, as to pick out diamonds from dunghills. -Thomas Jefferson, letter to John Adams, January 24, 1814 Cindy, Cindy You are the reason Jesus once said, "Father forgive them, for they know not what they do." Wil |
The Bush's
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Cindy" wrote in message news:u78Tc.282209$JR4.147849@attbi_s54... Your bible God only exists in your mind, there are no Gods, Goblins, Monsters, Devils, Hell, Heaven, Purgatory, and other nonsense. That is, unless you can provide some verifible evidence for their existence. LOL Cindy I beg to differ. There was (and still may be) *something* living behind the furnace when I was a child. It only made noise when my parents weren't down there with me, which proves that it was evil, and up to something nasty. |
The Bush's
Get serious Wil, God has his son killed because God created evil and we are
all responsible for it? Fundamentalist abhorrence of evil is really a lack of faith, because God created Evil: [Isa 45:7 KJV] I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things. If you want to believe in a God of sorts, believe in your garden, at least it's real. Among the sayings and discourses imputed to him [Jesus] by his biographers, I find many passages of fine imagination, correct morality, and of the most lovely benevolence; and others again of so much ignorance, so much absurdity, so much untruth, charlatanism, and imposture, as to pronounce it impossible that such contradictions should have proceeded from the same being. -Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Short, April 13, 1820 Cindy "Wil" wrote in message ... "Cindy" wrote in message news:u78Tc.282209$JR4.147849@attbi_s54... Wil, I realize that you are a religious halfwit but try to pay attention. Your bible God only exists in your mind, there are no Gods, Goblins, Monsters, Devils, Hell, Heaven, Purgatory, and other nonsense. That is, unless you can provide some verifible evidence for their existence. Until that time, keep your fantasies to yourself, but if you still chose to worship your imaginary friends, do it as Jesus recommended, by yourself! The whole history of these books [the Gospels] is so defective and doubtful that it seems vain to attempt minute enquiry into it: and such tricks have been played with their text, and with the texts of other books relating to them, that we have a right, from that cause, to entertain much doubt what parts of them are genuine. In the New Testament there is internal evidence that parts of it have proceeded from an extraordinary man; and that other parts are of the fabric of very inferior minds. It is as easy to separate those parts, as to pick out diamonds from dunghills. -Thomas Jefferson, letter to John Adams, January 24, 1814 Cindy, Cindy You are the reason Jesus once said, "Father forgive them, for they know not what they do." Wil |
The Bush's
Blessed be!!!
There is another born again agnostic among us!!! I too would love to see some actual proof of any of that wacky stuff those crazed bible thumpers try to impose upon us. If it were true, all the trouble in the Middle East would come do a swift end with god's wrath. Terrorists would simply burst into flames and explode. Dubya has proven without a doubt that he certainly isn't the second coming. "Cindy" wrote in message news:u78Tc.282209$JR4.147849@attbi_s54... "Wil" wrote in message ... Creature care not worship of the creature. Big difference. Big difference between the care of a human from embrio to old age, and putting a animal first. Your ilk doesn't even give a preborn human the status of a mouse. Wil Wil, I realize that you are a religious halfwit but try to pay attention. Your bible God only exists in your mind, there are no Gods, Goblins, Monsters, Devils, Hell, Heaven, Purgatory, and other nonsense. That is, unless you can provide some verifible evidence for their existence. Until that time, keep your fantasies to yourself, but if you still chose to worship your imaginary friends, do it as Jesus recommended, by yourself! The whole history of these books [the Gospels] is so defective and doubtful that it seems vain to attempt minute enquiry into it: and such tricks have been played with their text, and with the texts of other books relating to them, that we have a right, from that cause, to entertain much doubt what parts of them are genuine. In the New Testament there is internal evidence that parts of it have proceeded from an extraordinary man; and that other parts are of the fabric of very inferior minds. It is as easy to separate those parts, as to pick out diamonds from dunghills. -Thomas Jefferson, letter to John Adams, January 24, 1814 Cindy, Christian Crack Whore and Turning Tricks for Jesus! -- "John A. Keslick, Jr." wrote in message ... No but if he is religious he should be involved in creation care. God even cares about the sparrows. "LeeAnne" wrote in message ... Just because their last name is Bush, doesn't mean it has anything to do w/gardening. Sheesh. "John A. Keslick, Jr." wrote in message ... The Bushs claim they truly believe in a free nation with freedom of religion. Everyone welcome and treated equal. But wait, unless of course you are gay. Then they say you are not welcome in this country to share benefits of other religions. |
The Bush's
how about Eden garden then....? IS this about gardens?
-- Paulo "Cereus-validus" wrote in message . .. Blessed be!!! There is another born again agnostic among us!!! I too would love to see some actual proof of any of that wacky stuff those crazed bible thumpers try to impose upon us. If it were true, all the trouble in the Middle East would come do a swift end with god's wrath. Terrorists would simply burst into flames and explode. Dubya has proven without a doubt that he certainly isn't the second coming. "Cindy" wrote in message news:u78Tc.282209$JR4.147849@attbi_s54... "Wil" wrote in message ... Creature care not worship of the creature. Big difference. Big difference between the care of a human from embrio to old age, and putting a animal first. Your ilk doesn't even give a preborn human the status of a mouse. Wil Wil, I realize that you are a religious halfwit but try to pay attention. Your bible God only exists in your mind, there are no Gods, Goblins, Monsters, Devils, Hell, Heaven, Purgatory, and other nonsense. That is, unless you can provide some verifible evidence for their existence. Until that time, keep your fantasies to yourself, but if you still chose to worship your imaginary friends, do it as Jesus recommended, by yourself! The whole history of these books [the Gospels] is so defective and doubtful that it seems vain to attempt minute enquiry into it: and such tricks have been played with their text, and with the texts of other books relating to them, that we have a right, from that cause, to entertain much doubt what parts of them are genuine. In the New Testament there is internal evidence that parts of it have proceeded from an extraordinary man; and that other parts are of the fabric of very inferior minds. It is as easy to separate those parts, as to pick out diamonds from dunghills. -Thomas Jefferson, letter to John Adams, January 24, 1814 Cindy, Christian Crack Whore and Turning Tricks for Jesus! -- "John A. Keslick, Jr." wrote in message ... No but if he is religious he should be involved in creation care. God even cares about the sparrows. "LeeAnne" wrote in message ... Just because their last name is Bush, doesn't mean it has anything to do w/gardening. Sheesh. "John A. Keslick, Jr." wrote in message ... The Bushs claim they truly believe in a free nation with freedom of religion. Everyone welcome and treated equal. But wait, unless of course you are gay. Then they say you are not welcome in this country to share benefits of other religions. |
The Bush's
|
The Bush's
Exactly were is this garden of Eden to which you allude, Paulo? Maybe that's
where they have been hiding the WMDs all along? "Paulo" wrote in message ... how about Eden garden then....? IS this about gardens? -- Paulo "Cereus-validus" wrote in message . .. Blessed be!!! There is another born again agnostic among us!!! I too would love to see some actual proof of any of that wacky stuff those crazed bible thumpers try to impose upon us. If it were true, all the trouble in the Middle East would come do a swift end with god's wrath. Terrorists would simply burst into flames and explode. Dubya has proven without a doubt that he certainly isn't the second coming. "Cindy" wrote in message news:u78Tc.282209$JR4.147849@attbi_s54... "Wil" wrote in message ... Creature care not worship of the creature. Big difference. Big difference between the care of a human from embrio to old age, and putting a animal first. Your ilk doesn't even give a preborn human the status of a mouse. Wil Wil, I realize that you are a religious halfwit but try to pay attention. Your bible God only exists in your mind, there are no Gods, Goblins, Monsters, Devils, Hell, Heaven, Purgatory, and other nonsense. That is, unless you can provide some verifible evidence for their existence. Until that time, keep your fantasies to yourself, but if you still chose to worship your imaginary friends, do it as Jesus recommended, by yourself! The whole history of these books [the Gospels] is so defective and doubtful that it seems vain to attempt minute enquiry into it: and such tricks have been played with their text, and with the texts of other books relating to them, that we have a right, from that cause, to entertain much doubt what parts of them are genuine. In the New Testament there is internal evidence that parts of it have proceeded from an extraordinary man; and that other parts are of the fabric of very inferior minds. It is as easy to separate those parts, as to pick out diamonds from dunghills. -Thomas Jefferson, letter to John Adams, January 24, 1814 Cindy, Christian Crack Whore and Turning Tricks for Jesus! -- "John A. Keslick, Jr." wrote in message ... No but if he is religious he should be involved in creation care. God even cares about the sparrows. "LeeAnne" wrote in message ... Just because their last name is Bush, doesn't mean it has anything to do w/gardening. Sheesh. "John A. Keslick, Jr." wrote in message ... The Bushs claim they truly believe in a free nation with freedom of religion. Everyone welcome and treated equal. But wait, unless of course you are gay. Then they say you are not welcome in this country to share benefits of other religions. |
The Bush's
"Cereus-validus" wrote in message . .. Blessed be!!! There is another born again agnostic among us!!! I too would love to see some actual proof of any of that wacky stuff those crazed bible thumpers try to impose upon us. If it were true, all the trouble in the Middle East would come do a swift end with god's wrath. Terrorists would simply burst into flames and explode. Dubya has proven without a doubt that he certainly isn't the second coming. Why do the "born again agnostics" have to be so rude, crude, blasphemous and down right ignorant of which they speak? That seems to tell me there is a "spirit" inside them making them awful angry at the "Spirit" in those who follow the teachings of Jesus Christ. Wil |
The Bush's
"Wil" wrote in message ... "Cereus-validus" wrote in message . .. Blessed be!!! There is another born again agnostic among us!!! I too would love to see some actual proof of any of that wacky stuff those crazed bible thumpers try to impose upon us. If it were true, all the trouble in the Middle East would come do a swift end with god's wrath. Terrorists would simply burst into flames and explode. Dubya has proven without a doubt that he certainly isn't the second coming. Why do the "born again agnostics" have to be so rude, crude, blasphemous and down right ignorant of which they speak? That seems to tell me there is a "spirit" inside them making them awful angry at the "Spirit" in those who follow the teachings of Jesus Christ. People tend to be less perky when there is a pack of religious nuts stalking them. Perhaps if they did follow the teachings of Jesus and mind their own business things would be better. |
The Bush's
"Vox Humana" wrote in message ... "Wil" wrote in message ... "Cereus-validus" wrote in message . .. Blessed be!!! There is another born again agnostic among us!!! I too would love to see some actual proof of any of that wacky stuff those crazed bible thumpers try to impose upon us. If it were true, all the trouble in the Middle East would come do a swift end with god's wrath. Terrorists would simply burst into flames and explode. Dubya has proven without a doubt that he certainly isn't the second coming. Why do the "born again agnostics" have to be so rude, crude, blasphemous and down right ignorant of which they speak? You don't have any room to talk Wil, you use your religion to condemn Homosexuals, single mothers, mothers seeking abortions and others of different religions. You are the hater and you dare to accuse other people of just the traits that you are displaying. I can not be "blasphemous" towards the bible God, because fictional characters don't care what you say about them. I am not "ignorant of" what I speak, the bible is so full of holes it can rightfully ignored by right thinking people. That seems to tell me there is a "spirit" inside them making them awful angry at the "Spirit" in those who follow the teachings of Jesus Christ. You seem to attribute everything to the supernatural, can you provide any verifible evidence that the supernatural exist? People that disagree with you don't have evil spirits within them, just anger at haters using the bible as an excuse to hate someone that is different or don't believe the same nonsense that they do. People tend to be less perky when there is a pack of religious nuts stalking them. Perhaps if they did follow the teachings of Jesus and mind their own business things would be better. Very True! Cindy |
The Bush's
Yadda, yadda, yadda.
When you finally grow a brain, little Willy, then get back to us. Its quite obvious you haven't a clue what you are babbling on about. "Wil" wrote in message ... "Cereus-validus" wrote in message . .. Blessed be!!! There is another born again agnostic among us!!! I too would love to see some actual proof of any of that wacky stuff those crazed bible thumpers try to impose upon us. If it were true, all the trouble in the Middle East would come do a swift end with god's wrath. Terrorists would simply burst into flames and explode. Dubya has proven without a doubt that he certainly isn't the second coming. Why do the "born again agnostics" have to be so rude, crude, blasphemous and down right ignorant of which they speak? That seems to tell me there is a "spirit" inside them making them awful angry at the "Spirit" in those who follow the teachings of Jesus Christ. Wil |
The Bush's
Maybe little Willy's problem is that he is a Jehovah's witless wannabe?
"Vox Humana" wrote in message ... "Wil" wrote in message ... "Cereus-validus" wrote in message . .. Blessed be!!! There is another born again agnostic among us!!! I too would love to see some actual proof of any of that wacky stuff those crazed bible thumpers try to impose upon us. If it were true, all the trouble in the Middle East would come do a swift end with god's wrath. Terrorists would simply burst into flames and explode. Dubya has proven without a doubt that he certainly isn't the second coming. Why do the "born again agnostics" have to be so rude, crude, blasphemous and down right ignorant of which they speak? That seems to tell me there is a "spirit" inside them making them awful angry at the "Spirit" in those who follow the teachings of Jesus Christ. People tend to be less perky when there is a pack of religious nuts stalking them. Perhaps if they did follow the teachings of Jesus and mind their own business things would be better. |
The Bush's
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 18:14:02 -0400, "Wil" wrote:
(snip) Why do the "born again agnostics" have to be so rude, crude, blasphemous and down right ignorant of which they speak? Maybe they're tired of hearing the same old garbage again and again and again...... That seems to tell me there is a "spirit" inside them making them awful angry at the "Spirit" in those who follow the teachings of Jesus Christ. Well isn't that special. It "tells" you just what you already believe and want to hear. :/ |
The Bush's
John A. Keslick, Jr. wrote:
The Bushs claim they truly believe in a free nation with freedom of religion. Everyone welcome and treated equal. But wait, unless of course you are gay. Then they say you are not welcome in this country to share benefits of other religions. To fully answer your question, could you post a picture of the Bush? |
The Bush's
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 04:43:47 -0500, Dan Hartung
wrote: John A. Keslick, Jr. wrote: The Bushs claim they truly believe in a free nation with freedom of religion. Everyone welcome and treated equal. But wait, unless of course you are gay. Then they say you are not welcome in this country to share benefits of other religions. To fully answer your question, could you post a picture of the Bush? Here's one (and you can change it if you don't like it!)... http://homepage.mac.com/krousen/Bush%20site/index.html |
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 11:29:07 GMT, Phisherman wrote:
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 04:43:47 -0500, Dan Hartung wrote: John A. Keslick, Jr. wrote: The Bushs claim they truly believe in a free nation with freedom of religion. Everyone welcome and treated equal. But wait, unless of course you are gay. Then they say you are not welcome in this country to share benefits of other religions. To fully answer your question, could you post a picture of the Bush? Here's one (and you can change it if you don't like it!)... A change might be good, but the alternatives available might not be much of a change(and if it is a change it might be a change for the worse). ;) |
"Cindy" expounded:
mothers seeking abortions Now there's an oxymoron for you. Women seeking abortions are not mothers. -- Ann, Gardening in zone 6a Just south of Boston, MA ******************************** |
"Ann" wrote in message ... "Cindy" expounded: mothers seeking abortions Now there's an oxymoron for you. Women seeking abortions are not mothers. I guess you could make an argument either way depending on your view. I bet that the people I see picketing Planned Parenthood would disagree. |
Are you saying one can't be a mother, and then later in life seek an abortion?
|
"Dan Kaiser" wrote in message ... Are you saying one can't be a mother, and then later in life seek an abortion? With some of the kids in our neighborhood, I think it would be tempting! |
LOL I was, of course, referring to a subsequent pregnancy.
|
"Dan Kaiser" wrote in message ... LOL I was, of course, referring to a subsequent pregnancy. Yes, but if abortion could be retroactive .... |
"Vox Humana" expounded:
Yes, but if abortion could be retroactive .... I actually knew a guy who described himself as a poster child for abortion ;- -- Ann, Gardening in zone 6a Just south of Boston, MA ******************************** |
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 06:18:42 -0400, Ann wrote:
"Cindy" expounded: mothers seeking abortions Now there's an oxymoron for you. Women seeking abortions are not mothers. Not even if they already have a dozen kids? How would you characterize their relationship to those 12 kids then? |
You do mean pro-choice. Cause nobody except a few lunatics are pro-abortion. The
term "pro-abortion" was coined by the anti-choice people (mostly white men) who wanted to twist the political language to fit their purpose of taking reproductive choices away from women. I dont like abortion either, my choice and thankfully never had to come up to that choice face to face. Pro-choice people have to often be over the top and strident cause many of the anti-choice people are crazy as hell, including gunning down doctors and threatening women exercising their choice. I live in Milwaukee.... a hot bed of the anti-choice nut cases. Ingrid Ann wrote: A woman losing a wanted pregnancy is nowhere near the same thing as a woman to aborts. And just to clarify (not that it'll stop all you howling pro-abortionists out there) I am totally against laws regulating abortion. I just don't like it and would never do it myself. Personal choice. I realize that's a threat to pro-abortionists, we're all supposed to love it. And to stop your next blast, I'm no christian. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ List Manager: Puregold Goldfish List http://puregold.aquaria.net/ www.drsolo.com Solve the problem, dont waste energy finding who's to blame ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Unfortunately, I receive no money, gifts, discounts or other compensation for all the damn work I do, nor for any of the endorsements or recommendations I make. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter