"Chelsea Christenson" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:
....to plant this spring in a spot where disgusting dog owners like to
stop
their filthy beasts on my property. Shrub must be capable of inflicting
enough damage to send the dog to the vet.

The dogs aren't deciding where to stop. Mutilate the owners.


Great idea, but unfortunately, I'm not always around to greet the assholes.
I'm home today, though, and saw something unbelievable. A slimeball was
walking her dog. She began with the usual routine - letting her dog
investigate the edge of my neighbor's lawn where it meets the street. Then,
she wandered RIGHT INTO THE MIDDLE of a 50' deep lawn, let the dog crap, and
cleaned it up. Where the hell do some dog owners get the idea that this sort
of thing is acceptable???

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Chelsea Christenson" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:
....to plant this spring in a spot where disgusting dog owners like to
stop
their filthy beasts on my property. Shrub must be capable of inflicting
enough damage to send the dog to the vet.

The dogs aren't deciding where to stop. Mutilate the owners.


Great idea, but unfortunately, I'm not always around to greet the
assholes.
I'm home today, though, and saw something unbelievable. A slimeball was
walking her dog. She began with the usual routine - letting her dog
investigate the edge of my neighbor's lawn where it meets the street.
Then,
she wandered RIGHT INTO THE MIDDLE of a 50' deep lawn, let the dog crap,
and
cleaned it up. Where the hell do some dog owners get the idea that this
sort
of thing is acceptable???

At least she cleaned up after her dog. Most would not have.

Home owners, if caught, should receive heavy fines for allowing their dogs
to use the neighborhood as a toilet.

Apartment buildings that permit tenants to have dogs should be required by
law to have a fenced in area where dogs must be walked.

"Hound Dog" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Chelsea Christenson" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:
....to plant this spring in a spot where disgusting dog owners like
to
stop
their filthy beasts on my property. Shrub must be capable of
inflicting
enough damage to send the dog to the vet.

The dogs aren't deciding where to stop. Mutilate the owners.


Great idea, but unfortunately, I'm not always around to greet the
assholes.
I'm home today, though, and saw something unbelievable. A slimeball was
walking her dog. She began with the usual routine - letting her dog
investigate the edge of my neighbor's lawn where it meets the street.
Then,
she wandered RIGHT INTO THE MIDDLE of a 50' deep lawn, let the dog crap,
and
cleaned it up. Where the hell do some dog owners get the idea that this
sort
of thing is acceptable???

At least she cleaned up after her dog. Most would not have.

Yeah...but the middle of the damned lawn? Hey....why not just come right
into the house?





Home owners, if caught, should receive heavy fines for allowing their dogs
to use the neighborhood as a toilet.

Apartment buildings that permit tenants to have dogs should be required by
law to have a fenced in area where dogs must be walked.

On 12/1/04 4:50 PM, in article , "Hound
Dog" wrote:


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Chelsea Christenson" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:
....to plant this spring in a spot where disgusting dog owners like to
stop
their filthy beasts on my property. Shrub must be capable of inflicting
enough damage to send the dog to the vet.

The dogs aren't deciding where to stop. Mutilate the owners.


Great idea, but unfortunately, I'm not always around to greet the
assholes.
I'm home today, though, and saw something unbelievable. A slimeball was
walking her dog. She began with the usual routine - letting her dog
investigate the edge of my neighbor's lawn where it meets the street.
Then,
she wandered RIGHT INTO THE MIDDLE of a 50' deep lawn, let the dog crap,
and
cleaned it up. Where the hell do some dog owners get the idea that this
sort
of thing is acceptable???

At least she cleaned up after her dog. Most would not have.

Home owners, if caught, should receive heavy fines for allowing their dogs
to use the neighborhood as a toilet.

Apartment buildings that permit tenants to have dogs should be required by
law to have a fenced in area where dogs must be walked.





There is a real winner that walk a pair of little white things (we can them
the street rats). They've been fined multiple times for not cleaning up
after the dogs and have had animal control called on them countless more.
Hasn't changed a thing....

Cheryl

"Cheryl Isaak" wrote in message
...
On 12/1/04 4:50 PM, in article , "Hound
Dog" wrote:


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Chelsea Christenson" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:
....to plant this spring in a spot where disgusting dog owners like
to
stop
their filthy beasts on my property. Shrub must be capable of
inflicting
enough damage to send the dog to the vet.

The dogs aren't deciding where to stop. Mutilate the owners.


Great idea, but unfortunately, I'm not always around to greet the
assholes.
I'm home today, though, and saw something unbelievable. A slimeball was
walking her dog. She began with the usual routine - letting her dog
investigate the edge of my neighbor's lawn where it meets the street.
Then,
she wandered RIGHT INTO THE MIDDLE of a 50' deep lawn, let the dog
crap,
and
cleaned it up. Where the hell do some dog owners get the idea that this
sort
of thing is acceptable???

At least she cleaned up after her dog. Most would not have.

Home owners, if caught, should receive heavy fines for allowing their
dogs
to use the neighborhood as a toilet.

Apartment buildings that permit tenants to have dogs should be required
by
law to have a fenced in area where dogs must be walked.





There is a real winner that walk a pair of little white things (we can
them
the street rats). They've been fined multiple times for not cleaning up
after the dogs and have had animal control called on them countless more.
Hasn't changed a thing....

Got a town judge you can talk to? Do it. Technically, those dog walkers are
guilty of civil trespass, although a judge won't enforce it unless she/he is
informed that the situation is about to get ugly. A judge with a brain will
provide an injunction which permits the cops to arrest the people for simply
setting foot on your lawn. Also works for people who think it's OK to douse
your side of the property line with hideous chemicals.

On 12/1/04 5:26 PM, in article , "Doug
Kanter" wrote:

"Cheryl Isaak" wrote in message
...

(SNIP)


There is a real winner that walk a pair of little white things (we can
them
the street rats). They've been fined multiple times for not cleaning up
after the dogs and have had animal control called on them countless more.
Hasn't changed a thing....

Got a town judge you can talk to? Do it. Technically, those dog walkers are
guilty of civil trespass, although a judge won't enforce it unless she/he is
informed that the situation is about to get ugly. A judge with a brain will
provide an injunction which permits the cops to arrest the people for simply
setting foot on your lawn. Also works for people who think it's OK to douse
your side of the property line with hideous chemicals.



It would have to go to the county IIRC and while I might think it worth it,
my lawn hasn't been anointed for quite some time. Right now they are
targeting other areas of the general neighborhood.

BTW - go with the rugosas - hardy, pretty, makes the birds happy and the
deer don't eat them.

Cheryl

"Cheryl Isaak" wrote in message
...
On 12/1/04 5:26 PM, in article , "Doug
Kanter" wrote:

"Cheryl Isaak" wrote in message
...

(SNIP)


There is a real winner that walk a pair of little white things (we can
them
the street rats). They've been fined multiple times for not cleaning
up
after the dogs and have had animal control called on them countless
more.
Hasn't changed a thing....

Got a town judge you can talk to? Do it. Technically, those dog walkers
are
guilty of civil trespass, although a judge won't enforce it unless
she/he is
informed that the situation is about to get ugly. A judge with a brain
will
provide an injunction which permits the cops to arrest the people for
simply
setting foot on your lawn. Also works for people who think it's OK to
douse
your side of the property line with hideous chemicals.



It would have to go to the county IIRC and while I might think it worth
it,
my lawn hasn't been anointed for quite some time. Right now they are
targeting other areas of the general neighborhood.

BTW - go with the rugosas - hardy, pretty, makes the birds happy and the
deer don't eat them.

Cheryl


I guess it depends on the neighborhood. Here, the town judges are the first
stop, county courts the second.

Rugosa sounds like a good choice. 2-3 nights a week when I step outside,
there are deer 20 feet from the door, and they stand there and stare at me
light I have a lot of nerve for invading their driveway. :-)

In article ,
"Doug Kanter" wrote:

- "Chelsea Christenson" wrote in message
- ...
- Doug Kanter wrote:
- ....to plant this spring in a spot where disgusting dog owners like to
- stop
- their filthy beasts on my property. Shrub must be capable of inflicting
- enough damage to send the dog to the vet.
-
- The dogs aren't deciding where to stop. Mutilate the owners.
-
-
- Great idea, but unfortunately, I'm not always around to greet the assholes.
- I'm home today, though, and saw something unbelievable. A slimeball was
- walking her dog. She began with the usual routine - letting her dog
- investigate the edge of my neighbor's lawn where it meets the street. Then,
- she wandered RIGHT INTO THE MIDDLE of a 50' deep lawn, let the dog crap, and
- cleaned it up. Where the hell do some dog owners get the idea that this sort
- of thing is acceptable???


If she cleaned up after the dog, what's the problem?
--
8^\~~~ Sue (remove the x to e-mail)
~~~~~~
"I reserve the absolute right to be smarter
today than I was yesterday." -Adlai Stevenson

http://www.suzanne-eckhardt.com/
***Revelation 22:12*** ICQ: 349878998
http://www.intergnat.com/malebashing/

"Suzie-Q" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Doug Kanter" wrote:

- "Chelsea Christenson" wrote in message
- ...
- Doug Kanter wrote:
- ....to plant this spring in a spot where disgusting dog owners like
to
- stop
- their filthy beasts on my property. Shrub must be capable of
inflicting
- enough damage to send the dog to the vet.
-
- The dogs aren't deciding where to stop. Mutilate the owners.
-
-
- Great idea, but unfortunately, I'm not always around to greet the
assholes.
- I'm home today, though, and saw something unbelievable. A slimeball was
- walking her dog. She began with the usual routine - letting her dog
- investigate the edge of my neighbor's lawn where it meets the street.
Then,
- she wandered RIGHT INTO THE MIDDLE of a 50' deep lawn, let the dog
crap, and
- cleaned it up. Where the hell do some dog owners get the idea that this
sort
- of thing is acceptable???


If she cleaned up after the dog, what's the problem?

1) You apparently don't observe dogs very effectively. Even if the crap is
cleaned up, the scent interests OTHER dogs, including the unleashed ones.
Then, the spot becomes popular and the property owner has to deal with the
results.

2) If you dragged your trash can to a neighbor's property, dumped it on the
middle of their lawn, and cleaned it up, you'd be arrested and taken
somewhere for psychological evaluation. Afterward, you'd get a little
talking-to from a judge. There is no difference between this and the dog
owner I described.

3) Private property comes with certain rights and privileges. If the owner
asks you to remove your shoes when walking on their lawn, you do it. If the
owner asks dog owners not to stop their animals on the property, regardless
of whether they clean up after them, the request will be honored. Period. No
questions, no debates, no excuses.