Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Query for the judges
And if you want to see a very good example of the most basic reason for
clonal or cultivar names, go to abpo and take a look at Dave Gillingham's pics under the topic !@*&%%$#@@!!! genetics Kenni |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Query for the judges
Looks right to me. Kenni
"wendy7" wrote in message news:CkEhf.9797$dv.7437@fed1read02... Thanks ever so much Kenni for your most explicit explanations, you have managed to clear some items up especially the "varietals" *g* Genus/species or grex/clonal or varietal/Awards......Do I have this correct? I will save this & will look out for your website url. Thanks again, -- Cheers Wendy Remove PETERPAN for email reply |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Query for the judges
Joanna: I think/hope that the usages you mention are just joking
pleasantries, and that "Mrs. Professor" wouldn't include her husband's degree if she were to prepare something like a resume or job application for herself, to publish or to submit to a potential employer. Also, in the example, Betty was Albert's sister, not child or spouse. Although I'm not sure that would make a difference in the conversations you describe. Kenni "J Fortuna" wrote in message news:3Wlhf.3510$Qs2.1889@trnddc03... "Kenni Judd" wrote in message ... snip Much like the Smith family mentioned above. Just because Albert Smith gets a Ph.D, that doesn't mean his sister Betty Smith gets to call herself "Doctor". G. Kenni, Unless the Smith family lives in Austria, and they encounter someone like the Austrian swimming instructor of friends of my family, who would always call their 3-year old son Dr. SoAndSo because his father had a P.h.D. :-) While that is a silly extreme, some titles that technically should not apply to spouses get applied nonetheless, a lot of wives of college professors get called Mrs. Professor, at least in many European countries they do. I guess orchid nomenclature is a bit more consistent on that point, an award given to a seed parent of a hybrid is not applied by association to the pollen parent. :-) Joanna |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Query for the judges
Steve: This is indeed one pitfall, but as you say, I think the benefits
outweigh the hazards. The likelihood of 2 purchasers of the same seed-grown hybrid choosing the _same_ cultivar name seems far less, to me, than the likelihood of say, 5 different purchasers of divisions of the same plant choosing 5 _different_ cultivar names for what are actually pieces of the same plant, if there's not already a cultivar name on it. Kenni "Steve" wrote in message news I don't have a question; I understand all of this. Suppose I buy a seedling Catt, for example. Lots of other people buy a seedling from that cross too. It's a vigorous grower and I soon have a few divisions to sell or give away. I decide to give it a clonal name before divisions go to other people. I name it 'Spee'. Meanwhile, someone in California (who shall remain nameless) has purchased a seedling of that same cross. By some great coincidence, she decides to name hers 'Spee' also. So I give away some plants, time passes and I loose track of where the plants went. Now our California grower takes her Catt Whatever 'Spee' in for judging and it earns an award. Catt Whatever 'Spee' AM/AOS. Now a couple of people who ended up with one of my inferior, not award worthy, plants sees that 'Spee' got the AM/AOS. Oh boy! They add AM/AOS to their tag because they read that the 'Spee' clone got an award. As I said, I have no question. It's just that it's almost ... ALMOST ... a reason to refrain from giving an ordinary plant a clonal name. Maybe it illustrates a reason to give truly unique clonal names (Spee should have done it). The benefits outweigh the hazards I think. Give those plants a clonal name anyway, because it does help keep a group of clones all to be named the same. Steve |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Query for the judges
Kenni,
Oh, I really don't think that these are "joking pleasantries" at least the people I have met in European countries (especially Austria) who would thus misapply the title to the spouse were quite serious people and not joking at the time -- I think in some European countries, among some people or some classes, the importance attached to titles in an informal way as a social status symbol is quite astounding to those who have not encountered it before, and this is something that is very different than in the U.S.. However you are right that "Mrs. Professor" would definitely not include this on her resume, indeed a woman thus addressed would be unlikely to talk about herself in a similar fashion (unless _she_ was joking). And I think such titles are not applied to sisters, just to spouses most of the time -- but as the ridiculous but true example of the 3-year old addressed as Professor shows, there are times when the titles are misapplied further beyond the spouse, but I think that is fairly rare, whereas the misapplication of titles to spouse is fairly common. Joanna "Kenni Judd" wrote in message ... Joanna: I think/hope that the usages you mention are just joking pleasantries, and that "Mrs. Professor" wouldn't include her husband's degree if she were to prepare something like a resume or job application for herself, to publish or to submit to a potential employer. Also, in the example, Betty was Albert's sister, not child or spouse. Although I'm not sure that would make a difference in the conversations you describe. Kenni "J Fortuna" wrote in message news:3Wlhf.3510$Qs2.1889@trnddc03... "Kenni Judd" wrote in message ... snip Much like the Smith family mentioned above. Just because Albert Smith gets a Ph.D, that doesn't mean his sister Betty Smith gets to call herself "Doctor". G. Kenni, Unless the Smith family lives in Austria, and they encounter someone like the Austrian swimming instructor of friends of my family, who would always call their 3-year old son Dr. SoAndSo because his father had a P.h.D. :-) While that is a silly extreme, some titles that technically should not apply to spouses get applied nonetheless, a lot of wives of college professors get called Mrs. Professor, at least in many European countries they do. I guess orchid nomenclature is a bit more consistent on that point, an award given to a seed parent of a hybrid is not applied by association to the pollen parent. :-) Joanna |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
he'll be looking around glad Albert until his puddle judges wickedly | United Kingdom | |||
how Wednesday's bitter shirt judges, Betty seeks without elder, fresh shores | United Kingdom | |||
he'll be teasing in front of sticky Angelo until his bandage judges steadily | United Kingdom | |||
nydia recollects, then Usha finitely judges a solid can towards Roxanne's window | United Kingdom | |||
Pathetic RAS acts like GOD and judges others | Ponds |