Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Paph, what now ?
My new Paph just dropped its last bloom leaving a bare spike. Do I now
leave it to its own devices, or snip the spike back to a node, or right back to the base ? jc -- http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/jc_atm/ --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date: 22/07/2004 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Paph, what now ?
I suppose it depends on what species are in the background.
Some paphs only have a solitary blossom, so when it's gone, it's time to cut the spike off as close to the plant as possible. Others are multi-floral and usually sequential bloomers. If there are still buds beyond where the flower was, do nothing. If not, cut away. -- Ray Barkalow - First Rays Orchids - www.firstrays.com Plants, Supplies, Books, Artwork, and Lots of Free Info! .. "John Carruthers" wrote in message ... My new Paph just dropped its last bloom leaving a bare spike. Do I now leave it to its own devices, or snip the spike back to a node, or right back to the base ? jc -- http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/jc_atm/ --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date: 22/07/2004 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Paph, what now ?
I suppose it depends on what species are in the background.
Some paphs only have a solitary blossom, so when it's gone, it's time to cut the spike off as close to the plant as possible. Others are multi-floral and usually sequential bloomers. If there are still buds beyond where the flower was, do nothing. If not, cut away. -- Ray Barkalow - First Rays Orchids - www.firstrays.com Plants, Supplies, Books, Artwork, and Lots of Free Info! .. "John Carruthers" wrote in message ... My new Paph just dropped its last bloom leaving a bare spike. Do I now leave it to its own devices, or snip the spike back to a node, or right back to the base ? jc -- http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/jc_atm/ --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date: 22/07/2004 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Paph, what now ?
Ray, did you notice he used the word node? Now, I suppose you could
say a multi-floral Paph has nodes but I just have a feeling he has a Phal. I'll bet you $1.37 that he typed Paph. by mistake. Steve .... waiting for John to return and tell me I'm full of prunes. Ray wrote: I suppose it depends on what species are in the background. Some paphs only have a solitary blossom, so when it's gone, it's time to cut the spike off as close to the plant as possible. Others are multi-floral and usually sequential bloomers. If there are still buds beyond where the flower was, do nothing. If not, cut away. "John Carruthers" wrote in message ... My new Paph just dropped its last bloom leaving a bare spike. Do I now leave it to its own devices, or snip the spike back to a node, or right back to the base ? jc -- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Paph, what now ?
Good point, Steve! Reading down the page, I see that I missed the comment about the plant losing
its "last" bloom. Jon, if you're still interested... Phals CAN sometimes rebloom from the same spike if you cut it off just below the point where the lowest blossom formed (or above the 3rd node up from the base, which is often the same). Whether to do that or not is, to some extent, a matter of choice. If the plant is good and strong, it might not hurt it a bit. If it's a smaller plant or one that's not as sturdy as it might be, it would be better to cut it off altogether, so the plant doesn't waste more energy on flowers instead of building itself back up. Personally, I tend to leave them alone, letting the plant decide for itself. -- Ray Barkalow - First Rays Orchids - www.firstrays.com Plants, Supplies, Books, Artwork, and Lots of Free Info! .. "Steve" wrote in message ... Ray, did you notice he used the word node? Now, I suppose you could say a multi-floral Paph has nodes but I just have a feeling he has a Phal. I'll bet you $1.37 that he typed Paph. by mistake. Steve ... waiting for John to return and tell me I'm full of prunes. Ray wrote: I suppose it depends on what species are in the background. Some paphs only have a solitary blossom, so when it's gone, it's time to cut the spike off as close to the plant as possible. Others are multi-floral and usually sequential bloomers. If there are still buds beyond where the flower was, do nothing. If not, cut away. "John Carruthers" wrote in message ... My new Paph just dropped its last bloom leaving a bare spike. Do I now leave it to its own devices, or snip the spike back to a node, or right back to the base ? jc -- |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Paph, what now ?
Ray, did you notice he used the word node? Now, I suppose you could
say a multi-floral Paph has nodes but I just have a feeling he has a Phal. I'll bet you $1.37 that he typed Paph. by mistake. Steve .... waiting for John to return and tell me I'm full of prunes. Ray wrote: I suppose it depends on what species are in the background. Some paphs only have a solitary blossom, so when it's gone, it's time to cut the spike off as close to the plant as possible. Others are multi-floral and usually sequential bloomers. If there are still buds beyond where the flower was, do nothing. If not, cut away. "John Carruthers" wrote in message ... My new Paph just dropped its last bloom leaving a bare spike. Do I now leave it to its own devices, or snip the spike back to a node, or right back to the base ? jc -- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Paph, what now ?
Good point, Steve! Reading down the page, I see that I missed the comment about the plant losing
its "last" bloom. Jon, if you're still interested... Phals CAN sometimes rebloom from the same spike if you cut it off just below the point where the lowest blossom formed (or above the 3rd node up from the base, which is often the same). Whether to do that or not is, to some extent, a matter of choice. If the plant is good and strong, it might not hurt it a bit. If it's a smaller plant or one that's not as sturdy as it might be, it would be better to cut it off altogether, so the plant doesn't waste more energy on flowers instead of building itself back up. Personally, I tend to leave them alone, letting the plant decide for itself. -- Ray Barkalow - First Rays Orchids - www.firstrays.com Plants, Supplies, Books, Artwork, and Lots of Free Info! .. "Steve" wrote in message ... Ray, did you notice he used the word node? Now, I suppose you could say a multi-floral Paph has nodes but I just have a feeling he has a Phal. I'll bet you $1.37 that he typed Paph. by mistake. Steve ... waiting for John to return and tell me I'm full of prunes. Ray wrote: I suppose it depends on what species are in the background. Some paphs only have a solitary blossom, so when it's gone, it's time to cut the spike off as close to the plant as possible. Others are multi-floral and usually sequential bloomers. If there are still buds beyond where the flower was, do nothing. If not, cut away. "John Carruthers" wrote in message ... My new Paph just dropped its last bloom leaving a bare spike. Do I now leave it to its own devices, or snip the spike back to a node, or right back to the base ? jc -- |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Paph, what now ?
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 18:42:25 -0400, "Ray"
wrote: Good point, Steve! Reading down the page, I see that I missed the comment about the plant losing its "last" bloom. Jon, if you're still interested... Phals CAN sometimes rebloom from the same spike if you cut it off just below the point where the lowest blossom formed (or above the 3rd node up from the base, which is often the same). Whether to do that or not is, to some extent, a matter of choice. If the plant is good and strong, it might not hurt it a bit. If it's a smaller plant or one that's not as sturdy as it might be, it would be better to cut it off altogether, so the plant doesn't waste more energy on flowers instead of building itself back up. Personally, I tend to leave them alone, letting the plant decide for itself. If you leave it alone... It may not be slightly for a time. But it will shortly tell you if it wants to be cut off or only trimmed. SuE http://orchids.legolas.org/gallery/albums.php |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Paph, what now ?
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 18:42:25 -0400, "Ray"
wrote: Good point, Steve! Reading down the page, I see that I missed the comment about the plant losing its "last" bloom. Jon, if you're still interested... Phals CAN sometimes rebloom from the same spike if you cut it off just below the point where the lowest blossom formed (or above the 3rd node up from the base, which is often the same). Whether to do that or not is, to some extent, a matter of choice. If the plant is good and strong, it might not hurt it a bit. If it's a smaller plant or one that's not as sturdy as it might be, it would be better to cut it off altogether, so the plant doesn't waste more energy on flowers instead of building itself back up. Personally, I tend to leave them alone, letting the plant decide for itself. If you leave it alone... It may not be slightly for a time. But it will shortly tell you if it wants to be cut off or only trimmed. SuE http://orchids.legolas.org/gallery/albums.php |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Paph, what now ?
Ray, did you notice he used the word node? Now, I suppose you could
say a multi-floral Paph has nodes but I just have a feeling he has a Phal. I'll bet you $1.37 that he typed Paph. by mistake. Thanks Ray. Pay up and look big Steve :-) When I bought it, it had 1 bloom at the top of the spike and a blind seed case at the next node (?) down. I'll put a pic on my astro site (pics page). The knife is sterile, I'm going in. jc -- http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/jc_atm/ --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date: 22/07/2004 |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Paph, what now ?
Ray, did you notice he used the word node? Now, I suppose you could
say a multi-floral Paph has nodes but I just have a feeling he has a Phal. I'll bet you $1.37 that he typed Paph. by mistake. Thanks Ray. Pay up and look big Steve :-) When I bought it, it had 1 bloom at the top of the spike and a blind seed case at the next node (?) down. I'll put a pic on my astro site (pics page). The knife is sterile, I'm going in. jc -- http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/jc_atm/ --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date: 22/07/2004 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Paph, what now ?
It IS a paph! Steve, you can paypal me the $1.37.
John, if the blossoms are gone, go ahead with the knife - as low as you can without damaging the plant. -- Ray Barkalow - First Rays Orchids - www.firstrays.com Plants, Supplies, Books, Artwork, and Lots of Free Info! .. "John Carruthers" wrote in message ... Ray, did you notice he used the word node? Now, I suppose you could say a multi-floral Paph has nodes but I just have a feeling he has a Phal. I'll bet you $1.37 that he typed Paph. by mistake. Thanks Ray. Pay up and look big Steve :-) When I bought it, it had 1 bloom at the top of the spike and a blind seed case at the next node (?) down. I'll put a pic on my astro site (pics page). The knife is sterile, I'm going in. jc -- http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/jc_atm/ --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date: 22/07/2004 |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Paph, what now ?
It IS a paph! Steve, you can paypal me the $1.37.
John, if the blossoms are gone, go ahead with the knife - as low as you can without damaging the plant. -- Ray Barkalow - First Rays Orchids - www.firstrays.com Plants, Supplies, Books, Artwork, and Lots of Free Info! .. "John Carruthers" wrote in message ... Ray, did you notice he used the word node? Now, I suppose you could say a multi-floral Paph has nodes but I just have a feeling he has a Phal. I'll bet you $1.37 that he typed Paph. by mistake. Thanks Ray. Pay up and look big Steve :-) When I bought it, it had 1 bloom at the top of the spike and a blind seed case at the next node (?) down. I'll put a pic on my astro site (pics page). The knife is sterile, I'm going in. jc -- http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/jc_atm/ --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date: 22/07/2004 |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Paph, what now ?
Oh, I didn't even see you accept the bet, but of course I'll pay up.
Steve Ray wrote: It IS a paph! Steve, you can paypal me the $1.37. John, if the blossoms are gone, go ahead with the knife - as low as you can without damaging the plant. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Paph, what now ?
Oh, I didn't even see you accept the bet, but of course I'll pay up.
Steve Ray wrote: It IS a paph! Steve, you can paypal me the $1.37. John, if the blossoms are gone, go ahead with the knife - as low as you can without damaging the plant. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Paph. Psyche x Paph Macabre | Orchid Photos | |||
Paph Margaret Crandall(Paph Vanguard 'Knob Creek' X moquetteanum) | Orchid Photos | |||
Paph kolopakingii x Paph praestans | Orchids | |||
Paph, what now ? | Orchids | |||
snails - now you see them, now you don't | Freshwater Aquaria Plants |