Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
OT Linux
"john rutz" wrote in message ... BenignVanilla wrote: "D Kat" wrote in message ... I love Unix and have since 1970. Linux isn't there yet (NeXT was! and was 10 years ahead of its time). DK snip Linux is not ready for prime time as a desktop OS. Clearly. BV. i beg to differ I have been using suse linux on my desktop for three years and love it I'm on someone elses puter now ewith winderz and hate it I plan to switch OS's when someone delivers a way for me to harnes my entire network. I have 6 or 7 machines always running, and if I could harness all 7 to compile video, or compile code, I'd switch tomorrow. BV. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
OT Linux
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 17:40:53 -0500
"BenignVanilla" wrote: I plan to switch OS's when someone delivers a way for me to harnes my entire network. I have 6 or 7 machines always running, and if I could harness all 7 to compile video, or compile code, I'd switch tomorrow. BV. Google for "Beowulf clusters." Linux will do that. Cybe R. Wizard -- Unofficial "Wizard of Odds," A.H.P. Original PORG "Water Wizard," R.P. "Wize(ned) Wizard," A.P.F-P-Y. Barely Tolerated Wizard, A.J.L & A.A.L |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
OT Linux
that is exactly what i mean. a stupid marketing trick.
mad From: "BenignVanilla" Newsgroups: rec.ponds Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 17:39:21 -0500 Subject: OT Linux They never let anyone build clones. -- "We are all born mad. Some remain so." Irish playwright Samuel Beckett -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
OT Linux
"Cybe R. Wizard" Cybe_R_Wizard@WizardsTower wrote in message news:20031109190031.69299e5e.Cybe_R_Wizard@Wizards Tower... On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 17:40:53 -0500 "BenignVanilla" wrote: I plan to switch OS's when someone delivers a way for me to harnes my entire network. I have 6 or 7 machines always running, and if I could harness all 7 to compile video, or compile code, I'd switch tomorrow. BV. Google for "Beowulf clusters." Linux will do that. This thread needs to end, there are plenty of linux groups that are better suited to this discussion, for example comp.os.linux.advocacy, rec.ponds is better suited for ponding. Anyways to answer the question, a beowulf cluster probably isn't the best solution. The bottleneck with code compilation is typically disk-io, not cpu time. The original poster might have better luck just copying the code to a ram disk, and compiling in ram, then copying the results back to disk. Of course this assumes the original poster is writing code that can be compiled anywhere, and not writing Win32/MFC/.NET specific products. If disk-io is the bottleneck, distributed compilation of code on a network filesystem, such as NFS, or CIFS via either rsh/ssh or a beowulf cluster, is just goign to make things worse. As for for the rendering of video, to my knowledge, beowulf is again not the best solution for that either, several products, such as Muster by Virtual Vertex, distribute the rendering for Maya, Lighwave and XSI. Of course none of these products are cheap. Sameer |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
OT Linux
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 07:24:46 GMT
"Snooze" wrote: This thread needs to end, there are plenty of linux groups that are better suited to this discussion, for example comp.os.linux.advocacy, rec.ponds is better suited for ponding. Reply To: header re-changed back to rec.ponds instead of cola You are right about there being more informed forums for these kinds of discussions and it's a good thing to point us to them. Thank you. That said, for a lot of us ponders, colder weather has arrived and our thoughts turn to other things. It's only natural that we discuss these things with our ponding friends. Heck, it happens every time cold weather comes around. I wish it were warmer as I have a big pond in my Mom's backyard that really needs some more work before fish are re-introduced, but it looks as if that will have to wait for spring. Should I, perhaps, un-subscribe to rec.ponds for the duration? Heck, no, I have friends here! We have a wide range of interests in here and don't usually bother too much if things go Off-Topic (that little OT there in the subject line is included just so folks can fail to read these messages if they so desire), especially since some on here are a bit sluggish in learning how to do new things with their computers and are just lucky to find and keep on finding rec.ponds. Just pass on by if you see that 'OT' in the subject line and you, along with the rest of us and rec.ponds, will be just fine. Cybe R. Wizard -- Unofficial "Wizard of Odds," A.H.P. Original PORG "Water Wizard," R.P. "Wize(ned) Wizard," A.P.F-P-Y. Barely Tolerated Wizard, A.J.L & A.A.L |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
OT Linux
Cybe is clearly smarter than I am, to pick up on Sameer's sleazy trick of
changing the "reply to" headers. Will someone please remind me how one killfiles posts from someone like this? Clearly, this is an example of the need for doing this. Anne Lurie Raleigh, NC "Cybe R. Wizard" Cybe_R_Wizard@WizardsTower wrote Reply To: header re-changed back to rec.ponds instead of cola |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
OT Linux
"Anne Lurie" wrote in message .com... Cybe is clearly smarter than I am, to pick up on Sameer's sleazy trick of changing the "reply to" headers. Will someone please remind me how one killfiles posts from someone like this? Clearly, this is an example of the need for doing this. Anne Lurie Raleigh, NC It's not a sleazy trick, especially when I say I'm redirecting the follow-ups for a particular post to a different newsgroup. In the future, all you have to do, is look at the headers, for: Followup-to: In the previous message you saw this: From: "Snooze" Newsgroups: rec.ponds Followup-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy The "From:" line is who posted it, which contains my modified email address. The "Newsgroups:" line tells what newsgroup it was posted to, and Follow-ups means, whoever follows up to that particular post will post in the new newsgroup. Most newsreader software will warn you that you're posting into a different newsgroup, incase you didn't notice the follow-up line. A killfile general blocks entire threads, or posters. If you want to add me to your kill file, here are the directions for the newsreader you appear to be using: Microsoft Outlook Newsreader Click once on the message, go to the message menu, go down to 'block sender', then you will see no further posts from me. Sameer |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
OT Linux
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 01:27:30 GMT
"Snooze" wrote: It's not a sleazy trick, especially when I say I'm redirecting the follow-ups for a particular post to a different newsgroup. I, for one, don't think it was a sleazy trick nor probably intentional that you /did not/ mention that you were changing the reply to: header. But, still, you didn't mention it at all, merely said the discussion belonged there. Here is a quote from your original message: "This thread needs to end, there are plenty of linux groups that are better suited to this discussion, for example comp.os.linux.advocacy, rec.ponds is better suited for ponding." Cybe R. Wizard -- Unofficial "Wizard of Odds," A.H.P. Original PORG "Water Wizard," R.P. "Wize(ned) Wizard," A.P.F-P-Y. Barely Tolerated Wizard, A.J.L & A.A.L |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
OT Linux
mad wrote in message ...
to quote maynard g. krebs: WORK? G Dumb kids these days just give me a funny look when I quote Maynard. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
OT Linux
"Snooze" wrote in message .com...
This thread needs to end, there are plenty of linux groups that are better suited to this discussion, for example comp.os.linux.advocacy, rec.ponds is better suited for ponding. Ever consider the demographics of who can afford ponds and who would find ponds to be most relaxing? G (I had not, until I saw the quality of responses to the original post.) |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
OT Linux
ah well, age kicks a** sometimes. i am in awe of those who have lived more
and know more than i do. someday those same dumb kids will realize... :-D mad -- "We are all born mad. Some remain so." Irish playwright Samuel Beckett From: (Offbreed) mad wrote in message ... to quote maynard g. krebs: WORK? G Dumb kids these days just give me a funny look when I quote Maynard. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
OT Linux
"Snooze" wrote in message news:
This thread needs to end, there are plenty of linux groups that are better suited to this discussion, for example comp.os.linux.advocacy, rec.ponds is better suited for ponding. On 10 Nov 2003 19:46:25 -0800, (Offbreed) wrote: Ever consider the demographics of who can afford ponds and who would find ponds to be most relaxing? G (I had not, until I saw the quality of responses to the original post.) I agree. Where would rec.ponds be without our computers, we couldn't cyberpond? Seems to me the conversation is On Topic. Rec.ponds & Computers go hand in hand, if you asked me. ;o) ~ jan (the pond geek living in a household with 3 computer *Linux their specialty* geeks.) See my ponds thru the seasons and/or my filter design: http://users.owt.com/jjspond/ ~Keep 'em Defrosted~ Tri-Cities, WA Zone 7a To e-mail see website |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
OT Linux
"Snooze" wrote
[snippage hopefully at least close to correct] In the previous message you saw this: From: "Snooze" Newsgroups: rec.ponds Followup-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy Nope. Since I'm using [the obviously-lacking] Outlook Express for email and newsgroups, what I saw on your post was "Snooze" to "rec.ponds" "OT Linux". period. And, when I hit "Reply Group", it showed (and still does show) "rec.ponds" as the recipient of [any email I cared to send] with : yada-yada-yada OT Linux as the subject. The "From:" line is who posted it, which contains my modified email address. Nope. Lame-o Outlook Express just ID's you as Snooze. The "Newsgroups:" line tells what newsgroup it was posted to, I wish!!! Good ole OE just says "To: rec.ponds" and Follow-ups means, whoever follows up to that particular post will post in the new newsgroup. Well, if that showed up in not-so-good lame-o Outlook Express, I might have been able to figure that one out for myself. I was wrong to talk about killfiling your posts; I apologize. Although there may come a time when I do need to kill-file newsgroup posts because they are egregiously offensive -- this thread has not reached that limit. Again, I apologize for not having my priorities straight. Also, from now on, I will double-check the "recipients" of any replies, because it seems that ever-increasing vigilance is in order. Anne Lurie Raleigh, NC |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
OT Linux
"~ jan JJsPond.us" wrote in message
... I agree. Where would rec.ponds be without our computers, we couldn't cyberpond? Seems to me the conversation is On Topic. Rec.ponds & Computers go hand in hand, if you asked me. ;o) ~ jan (the pond geek living in a household with 3 computer *Linux their specialty* geeks.) OT threads are fun, but the linux vs windows thread is so old, I find it truely boring. I started using linux when I was a freshmen in college, around '93. Then in '97 I switched to FreeBSD, because the version of gcc/g++ I had at the time did not support the C++ standard template library. At the time, my choices were 1: wait a week to download the latest version of slackware over a 14.4 modem 2: spend a week compiling a newer version of gcc so I could upgrade my libc, so that I could compile the latest version of gcc, then recompile all the stuff that broke, when I upgraded the libc. 3: install FreeBSD off the cd. I've been happy with it since, although linux has made a lot of improvements since then, but I'm lazy, and rewriting and recompiling all of my stuff on a linux system is too much for marginal gain. Sameer |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
OT Linux
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 00:48:29 GMT
"Snooze" wrote: OT threads are fun, but the linux vs windows thread is so old, I find it truely boring. Lots of folks here don't have those years of /technical/ computer experience. Informed choice should never go out of style. If it bores one, one may opt out of reading plainly marked OT threads but might re-think netcopping those who are still involved with freeing the ability of people to make informed choice. Boring or not there are serious questions about the Microsoft organization and its products. These need to be brought to the attention of computer users if only for their own edification. Cybe R. Wizard -impressed that Snooze used Linux /before/ the version 1 release! -- Unofficial "Wizard of Odds," A.H.P. Original PORG "Water Wizard," R.P. "Wize(ned) Wizard," A.P.F-P-Y. Barely Tolerated Wizard, A.J.L & A.A.L |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
[IBC] OT Linux (PLS RESPOND OFFLIST) | Bonsai | |||
[IBC] OT Linux | Bonsai | |||
[IBC] OT Linux (pls respond ON list) | Bonsai |