Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Iceberg and Fabulous are floppy
I planted two Icebergs this year (one bare root, one as part of a tree rose)
and one Fabulous (which is a spawn of Iceberg). They are all three covered with nice blooms now, but the canes are too wispy to support the weight of the blooms. So on all three, the flowers hang down. Not lovely. What's the solution to this? Cut the canes back aggressively to very close? Seems like I'd never get any blooms that way. Help! JimS. Seattle |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Iceberg and Fabulous are floppy
Let them grow.
Eventually the shrub gets so large & bushy the blooms will look like they are stuck in a sea of green. http://home.everestkc.net/tasir/images/IcebergBush.jpg -- Theo in Zone 5 Kansas City "JimS." wrote in message news:mhKIa.44769$hz1.113899@sccrnsc01... I planted two Icebergs this year (one bare root, one as part of a tree rose) and one Fabulous (which is a spawn of Iceberg). They are all three covered with nice blooms now, but the canes are too wispy to support the weight of the blooms. So on all three, the flowers hang down. Not lovely. What's the solution to this? Cut the canes back aggressively to very close? Seems like I'd never get any blooms that way. Help! JimS. Seattle |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Iceberg and Fabulous are floppy
Hmmm....now I'm concerned.
The Fabulous is planted in a pot which it may not have enough room in to get really big and bushy. One Iceberg is planted in the ground and will be fine. The other Iceberg is part of a double-grafted tree rose, the bottom part. This "tree" is going to look really stupid with a huge bush hanging down from halfway up the "trunk", isn't it? JimS. "Theo Asir" wrote in message news:611883db1d6bb8c8d364817a41e2693e@TeraNews... Let them grow. Eventually the shrub gets so large & bushy the blooms will look like they are stuck in a sea of green. http://home.everestkc.net/tasir/images/IcebergBush.jpg -- Theo in Zone 5 Kansas City "JimS." wrote in message news:mhKIa.44769$hz1.113899@sccrnsc01... I planted two Icebergs this year (one bare root, one as part of a tree rose) and one Fabulous (which is a spawn of Iceberg). They are all three covered with nice blooms now, but the canes are too wispy to support the weight of the blooms. So on all three, the flowers hang down. Not lovely. What's the solution to this? Cut the canes back aggressively to very close? Seems like I'd never get any blooms that way. Help! JimS. Seattle |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Iceberg and Fabulous are floppy
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 20:38:42 GMT, "JimS."
wrote: I planted two Icebergs this year (one bare root, one as part of a tree rose) and one Fabulous (which is a spawn of Iceberg). They are all three covered with nice blooms now, but the canes are too wispy to support the weight of the blooms. So on all three, the flowers hang down. Not lovely. Remember when you were a gawky boy and your hands and feet and head were too bit for your body? You were floppy then too! Theo is right. Let them grow up. What's the solution to this? Cut the canes back aggressively to very close? Seems like I'd never get any blooms that way. Don't be prune happy, dahling. Grow a little patience. Help! JimS. Seattle |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Iceberg and Fabulous are floppy
JimS. wrote: I planted two Icebergs this year (one bare root, one as part of a tree rose) and one Fabulous (which is a spawn of Iceberg). They are all three covered with nice blooms now, but the canes are too wispy to support the weight of the blooms. So on all three, the flowers hang down. Not lovely. What's the solution to this? Cut the canes back aggressively to very close? Seems like I'd never get any blooms that way. Help! I have always had this problem with Fabulous, although this summer things have improved. In the past, I ended up staking some of the canes to keep them out of the mulch or off other roses. This summer I have been feeding bi-weekly with 10-50-10, which seems to have helped some. J. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Iceberg and Fabulous are floppy
Hmmm! Never seen one of those. On the other hand Iceberg gets large period. You could try for the poodle effect :-) -- Theo in Zone 5 Kansas City "JimS." wrote in message news:RMKIa.46392$vq.9993@sccrnsc04... Hmmm....now I'm concerned. The Fabulous is planted in a pot which it may not have enough room in to get really big and bushy. One Iceberg is planted in the ground and will be fine. The other Iceberg is part of a double-grafted tree rose, the bottom part. This "tree" is going to look really stupid with a huge bush hanging down from halfway up the "trunk", isn't it? JimS. "Theo Asir" wrote in message news:611883db1d6bb8c8d364817a41e2693e@TeraNews... Let them grow. Eventually the shrub gets so large & bushy the blooms will look like they are stuck in a sea of green. http://home.everestkc.net/tasir/images/IcebergBush.jpg -- Theo in Zone 5 Kansas City "JimS." wrote in message news:mhKIa.44769$hz1.113899@sccrnsc01... I planted two Icebergs this year (one bare root, one as part of a tree rose) and one Fabulous (which is a spawn of Iceberg). They are all three covered with nice blooms now, but the canes are too wispy to support the weight of the blooms. So on all three, the flowers hang down. Not lovely. What's the solution to this? Cut the canes back aggressively to very close? Seems like I'd never get any blooms that way. Help! JimS. Seattle |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cabbage and lettuce seedlings - too tall and floppy? | United Kingdom | |||
A Fabulous Gift for Friends and Relatives | Bonsai | |||
OT/Amaryllis and snail stuff was Granada is fabulous | Roses | |||
wish list was Burgundy Iceberg | Roses | |||
Iceberg vs. Fabulous- comments please? | Roses |