Hmm.

Are you saying two wongs make it right?

Are you another one of the newsgroup psychics that can read the mind of
trolls? Do you really know her well enough to make excuses for her? Do you
think doing so will let you get into her pants?

Your excessively long annotated rambling pedant would sure make for great
fertilizer in itself!!! Are you trying to bore us all to death with the
obvious?

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.


"nswong" wrote in message
...
Hi Cereus-validus,

Only an idiot would make excuses for a cross-posting troll like Lisa
Horndog.
It may be she/he are simply don't know that cross-posting are not welcome
by
most of the UseNet user. When we are new to something, we may do wrong. I
believe that point out clearly what are wrong are the better approach than
become angry.

I do trim headers reply to rec.gardens only in the previous post. This
current cross-posting are to reply you.

Sorry for my bad English, no offendding. :-)

BTW: Below are part of the nettiquette(Internet ettiquette) I keep in my
notes, hope this help. I do know that is not right to post the whole text
here, but can't remember the address already. Sorry about that.

Regards,
Wong

[From Microsoft]
Rules of Conduct

Appropriate Language: The purpose of our communities is to exchange
technical information and expertise about Microsoft products. Please avoid
personal attacks, slurs, and profanity in your interactions.

Relevance to Topics: Please make sure that your postings in newsgroups and
chats are relevant to the subject at hand. It is normal for some topics to
drift from the stated subject. However, to ensure maximum benefit for
everyone, we encourage you to keep your postings as close to the subject
as
possible.

[From Borland]
NEWSGROUP ETIQUETTE

Keep quoted text to a minimum. When quoting a previous post, edit out the
non-relevant parts of the message. Remove salutations and signatures. A
good
rule of thumb is, there should not be more quoted text than new text.

NOTE: Under certain circumstances your message may be cancelled for
quoting
style. One such circumstance is quoting a message that is subsequently
determined to be in violation of the newsgroup rules; when the message in
violation is cancelled, your message quoting it will also be cancelled.
Another special case is EXTREME over-quoting. If you post a very brief
reply
to a very long message, and you quote the entire message, your message may
be cancelled.

Separate paragraphs with a blank line. Also, separate your text from
quoted
text with a blank line.

If you include quoted text in your message, be considerate and clean up
the
margins and line breaks in the quoted material. Quoted text is typically
preceded by a character indicating that it is quoted, and this additional
character increases the line length. The longer line length can cause the
message editor to re-parse the line and insert new line breaks that
conflict
with the existing line breaks.

Spelling and grammar count. The only part of you that the members of the
newsgroup see is your typed words. Sending a poorly written message is
like
giving a speech in a dirty shirt. Of course, if your native language is
something other than English, this consideration is reduced.

Stay on topic. When you post a reply to a message ask yourself, "Does the
subject line describe the contents of my message?" If the answer is no,
you
probably want to revise your message or modify the subject. Modifying the
subject helps other members of the newsgroup determine if your message or
thread has information of interest to them.

Write conservatively, read forgivingly. Communication in a pure text
medium,
such as a newsgroup, is prone to misunderstanding, often due to the lack
of
non-verbal cues such as inflections, facial expression and body language.
Given this, it is best to be conservative with expressions of anger and
sarcasm when writing. When reading, assume good intent; if a message can
be
taken two ways, assume the friendliest meaning.

Remember, your words will last a long time. With news archiving services,
the whole world can read your words, long after you have written them.
Think
twice about what you say.

[From C# newsgroup FAQ]
Choose the right group
There are many different newsgroups under the microsoft.public.dotnet.*
hierarchy, and sometimes it isn't clear which newsgroup is the most
appropriate one to use. Very few people seem to get hung up about this,
but
for your own benefit it's worth considering where you're likely to get the
best answers. For instance, if you're asking an ASP.NET question (even if
your code is in C#) then the ASP.NET group is probably the best one to
use.

Cross-posting (posting the same article to multiple groups) and
multi-posting (posting multiple articles with the same text, each to a
single group) is fairly widespread on the .NET groups, but both are
frowned
upon in conventional netiquette, particularly multi-posting which
fragments
the discussion and often leads to people wasting time answering a question
on one group when it's already been answered on another. I would suggest
picking a single group (after careful consideration) and posting there,
then
waiting for a couple of days to see if you get any replies - if you don't,
pick another single group. (If you get replies which you don't consider
very
helpful from the first group, explain why they're not helpful on that
group
rather than just moving on and posting in another group - you may well get
the answers you're after that way.)

In article ,
"Cereus-validus" writes:
Hmm.

Are you saying two wongs make it right?

Are you another one of the newsgroup psychics that can read the mind of
trolls? Do you really know her well enough to make excuses for her? Do you
think doing so will let you get into her pants?

Your excessively long annotated rambling pedant would sure make for great
fertilizer in itself!!! Are you trying to bore us all to death with the
obvious?

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.


OK, long version of post. The original post is probally not from
Lisa Horton. It appears to be a forged post from the rec.photo.* troll
in an attempt to ecourage cross posts ranting about off topic cross posts.

If I were you I'd kill file this thread.

--

http://www.petezilla.co.uk

Hi Cereus-validus,

Are you saying two wongs make it right?
For myself, if I'm doing something wrong without aware, I do hope people
point it out clearly and let me know. This will not imply that I will
denying I'm wrong. Hopefully, I will also always treat other in this way.

Are you another one of the newsgroup psychics that can read the mind of
trolls? Do you really know her well enough to make excuses for her?
My previous reply are base on what I readed in the original posting. The
content of post are alright to me, what was wrong are the cross posting. To
me, it look like a person who does not aware of nettiquette, that is good
that if we can point it out.

Your excessively long annotated rambling pedant would sure make for great
fertilizer in itself!!! Are you trying to bore us all to death with the
obvious?
I'm sorry that this offendding you. But I do believe that it will serve some
of the UseNet user here.

BTW: I had to say sorry to users in other newsgroup and stop my cross
posting now, so I'm afraid that I can't reply your post anymore. Have a
good day! :-)

Regards,
Wong

Fashizzle yer nizzle, chanted Peter Mc Swizzle!

You ain't me and you ain't my mother.

Who you wack ain't nobody's business.

Word up!


"Peter Chant" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Cereus-validus" writes:
Hmm.

Are you saying two wongs make it right?

Are you another one of the newsgroup psychics that can read the mind of
trolls? Do you really know her well enough to make excuses for her? Do
you
think doing so will let you get into her pants?

Your excessively long annotated rambling pedant would sure make for
great
fertilizer in itself!!! Are you trying to bore us all to death with the
obvious?

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.


OK, long version of post. The original post is probally not from
Lisa Horton. It appears to be a forged post from the rec.photo.* troll
in an attempt to ecourage cross posts ranting about off topic cross posts.

If I were you I'd kill file this thread.

--

http://www.petezilla.co.uk