Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#376
|
|||
|
|||
UK farm profitability to jun 2002
"Dave Roberts" wrote in message ... no weekends off, I worked every weekend for years. I really do believe that for once you're telling the truth here. What is it they say about "all work and no play..."? Michael Saunby |
#377
|
|||
|
|||
UK farm profitability to jun 2002
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 16:21:59 -0000, "Michael Saunby"
wrote: "Torsten Brinch" wrote in message news If household income comparison is what you are interested in, Honest comparison is, I believe, what folks would like to see, the average farm household will have additional and non-farm sources of income, typically brought in by the spouse having a job outside the farm. The data I've seen indicates that it would be on avg. about £5000 that is brought in this way. Perhaps, when other employment is available, and only when farm incomes are low!! We are talking about averages. NB, a correction: I took the figure £5000 from memory. Now looking at data, the additional non-farm income brought in to the average farm household would be more like £10000. |
#378
|
|||
|
|||
UK farm profitability to jun 2002
""David G. Bell"" wrote in message .. . On Wednesday, in article "Michael Saunby" wrote: "Torsten Brinch" wrote in message ... On 8 Jan 2003 01:41:17 -0800, (Gordon Couger) wrote: You can't compare running a business to working for wages. I think you mean, they -can- be compared, but will then be found to be different on a number of aspects. But both activities are to make income to cover the living expenses and investments of people, and you can very well compare the income generated by running a business to the income generated by working for a wage. The UK farm economy statisticians do calculate several measures of farm income, e.g. Net Farm Income and Cash Income. The statisticians say: for comparisons with the income of employees in other sectors of society, do not use the Net Farm Income figures, use the Cash Income figures. Avg. annual Cash Income per farm in UK was about £55000 in 1995, decreased to about £30000 during the most recent years up to 2002. For comparison, the avg income earner in UK has had a total income of between £20000 and £15000 per year during the same period. You're still quoting for individuals, not household incomes. Many, perhaps most, farms have 2 or more family members working for the farm business. That's only one of the distortions. Torsten has been rather vague about the relation between average cash income and the other measures of farm business size. I suspect that the known differences between large and small farms, where the large farms spend less per acre for the same income, don't just affect "Net Farm Income". Isn't it also the case that something like 80% of subsidy is paid to 20% of farm businesses. So the "average" farm actually receives a lot less than the average subsidy. However the subsidy largely reflects production which suggests that 20% of our farms - most likely the really big ones - produce most and even without subsidy will thrive. Those farms that are genuinely being kept afloat by subsidy probably only get a very small proportion. This is always the case though, even with listed companies the best performing are often an order of magnitude more productive than the average, yet they all receive tax relief and various incentives to create jobs, etc. Elsethread, Jim-and-Brenda also mention paid holidays. How does one calculate an allowance for that? It's not just the difference between GBP 300 per week for 50 weeks and GBP 288 for 52 weeks, there is an opportunity cost for not having those two weeks. And then there are the longer working hours per week, and the need to check livestock daily. When times were good and farmers did take holidays they employed people to do the work while they were away. Many business don't need to do this. Then again those businesses that do really provide 24hr a day cover 7 days a week such as fire services, employ 4 or 5 people for every post! The actual figures get fuzzy, because a farmer might find the time to do some DIY, but if Torsten wants a price for everything, he should set a price on what the farmer has to forgo. How much does a painter and decorator cost per hour? Depends how long you're prepared to wait for the job to be started and when it might eventually be completed. Michael Saunby |
#379
|
|||
|
|||
UK farm profitability to jun 2002
"Torsten Brinch" wrote in message ... On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 16:21:59 -0000, "Michael Saunby" wrote: We are talking about averages. Which will ultimately gets us nowhere. NB, a correction: I took the figure £5000 from memory. Now looking at data, the additional non-farm income brought in to the average farm household would be more like £10000. So the "average" farm income is presently about £10,000 below farm household needs then. Wouldn't you say? Or do you reckon they do second (even third) jobs for the sheer thrill of it? Michael Saunby |
#381
|
|||
|
|||
UK farm profitability to jun 2002
In article , David G. Bell
writes I've an idea of how much money a photographer can have tied up in hardware. Can vary enormously, the difference between David Bailey or Lord Lichfield and myself would be quite large. It's a couple of orders of magnitude less than the equivalent for farming, Again that could vary, Bailey probably has far more tied up in his business than you. But if you want to use myself as an example then yes, you are correct. and quality camera gear seems to hold its value rather better than farm machinery. Not true, second-hand photographic equipment is in abundance. Prices are very cheap. Now digital photography is taking over older film cameras/darkroom/processing equipment is not sought after and you can pick up some good deals. I have a film processor I paid about 5 grand for a few years ago, I could hardly give it away now. Digital equipment will hold its value relatively well in the short term but rapid developments in technology make it quickly outdated and virtually worthless in the same way as computers and printers. Come to think of it I have a lot tied up in computers/printers/software which I am going to see virtually no return on when I come to sell it. Most of it will end up in a skip, I already have piles of it in the loft. You can see why Gordon and Tony give me 100 per cent tax relief on it! I realise given the state on agriculture that there is probably an abundance of machinery out there at bargain prices but when you are in an industry that has become computer technology based you have similar problems. For that reason, I suspect it was easier for you to change direction. Less of your wealth was tied up in a specific business. Yes, I take your point now you have got to it It is not impossible to get out of agriculture if you are unhappy with it though is it? You must forgive me my intolerance of whiners and moaners of their lot. In some cases it is genuinely out of their hands but usually it is not. Be positive ! Cheers Dave -- |
#382
|
|||
|
|||
UK farm profitability to jun 2002
In article , Michael Saunby
writes I really do believe that for once you're telling the truth here. I'm amazed, for once you have said something sensible, well done. What is it they say about "all work and no play..."? sigh knew it couldn't last.......... Plenty of play, it can be a very rewarding and enjoyable job. There were times I found it hard to believe I was being well paid for what I was doing What's you're excuse ? Cheers Dave -- |
#383
|
|||
|
|||
UK farm profitability to jun 2002
"Dave Roberts" wrote in message ... In article , Michael Saunby writes I really do believe that for once you're telling the truth here. I'm amazed, for once you have said something sensible, well done. What is it they say about "all work and no play..."? sigh knew it couldn't last.......... Plenty of play, it can be a very rewarding and enjoyable job. There were times I found it hard to believe I was being well paid for what I was doing What's you're excuse ? Don't need one. I'm a grown-up. Michael Saunby |
#384
|
|||
|
|||
UK farm profitability to jun 2002
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 17:09:34 -0000, "Michael Saunby"
wrote: "Torsten Brinch" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 16:21:59 -0000, "Michael Saunby" wrote: We are talking about averages. Which will ultimately gets us nowhere. NB, a correction: I took the figure £5000 from memory. Now looking at data, the additional non-farm income brought in to the average farm household would be more like £10000. So the "average" farm income is presently about £10,000 below farm household needs then. Wouldn't you say? No, it is a non sequitur. |
#385
|
|||
|
|||
UK farm profitability to jun 2002
Dave Roberts wrote in message ... In article , Jim Webster writes most of us are. We have rejigged the business twice in pretty major ways. Both times in response to economic situations created entirely by government/EU action. Both times it worked and in both cases was then rendered void by new government action. The problem is this takes time, and our third rejigging will probably take another two or more years because agriculture works over that sort of time scale. Remember with agriculture that 'walking away tomorrow' can take over a year, especially if, like most farmers, you have some tenancy agreements. Nevertheless the ball is in your court. If you don't like your hours/pay/conditions then change it, whinging not achieve anything. I take your point that it may take some time and effort but it is achievable if you want to do it. sure and we are doing it interesting, each change produces less food but takes more money out of the government, or at least costs the government more. But then we are merely reacting rationally to their policies. -- Jim Webster "The pasture of stupidity is unwholesome to mankind" 'Abd-ar-Rahman b. Muhammad b. Khaldun al-Hadrami' Cheers Dave -- |
#386
|
|||
|
|||
UK farm profitability to jun 2002
Dave Roberts wrote in message ... It is not impossible to get out of agriculture if you are unhappy with it though is it? actually for some people it is. Thank god I am not in that particular boat but I know a lot of tenants who cannot get out because the sale of their assets might not cover their liabilities, and even if it did they would not be left with enough to put down the deposit on a house. Indeed some have run into the problem that they are volunterily homeless and therefore will not be put on the waiting list for council housing. A lot of these people are clinging on, hoping that things will pick up (farming moves in cycles and in ten or so years things will inevitably look different,). We saw with fmd that a lot of dairy farmers did get out, because the people restocking were buying cattle and suddenly cattle had a value again. I couldn't say what proportion of farmers are in this particular bind, perhaps 10%, perhaps more, but to be honest it is guessing. -- Jim Webster "The pasture of stupidity is unwholesome to mankind" 'Abd-ar-Rahman b. Muhammad b. Khaldun al-Hadrami' |
#387
|
|||
|
|||
UK farm profitability to jun 2002
Dave Roberts wrote in message ... It is very true that we could do something else all farmers could and be easily employable being so multiskilled There are plenty of jobs out there, I'd be surprised if anyone would struggle that much. surprising how easily farmers do pick up jobs. I've never known one not pick up a job. Interestingly they tend to be driving and delivery jobs for firms who want someone they can leave to get on with it -- Jim Webster "The pasture of stupidity is unwholesome to mankind" 'Abd-ar-Rahman b. Muhammad b. Khaldun al-Hadrami' |
#388
|
|||
|
|||
UK farm profitability to jun 2002
Dave Roberts wrote in message ... In article , Jim Webster writes I have an office job, we worked out Brenda and I spend 200hrs a year on just dealing with livestock movement etc. Which is not even a couple of hours a week each. but that is only one particular part of the paperwork, and isn't actually business paperwork (by which I mean paperwork that you do because you need to monitor your business (just as you might do a cash flow or forward budget) but purely to provide data for government. I suspect few employees spend two hours a week unpaid providing government data, but here again the self employed and small businessmen will doubtless be very familiar with the situation. not usual for an employee. Remember torsten is comparing farmers with employees. Certainly in ship building which is the common employer in this town, if you are on call, you are amply rewarded. Not usual but not uncommon. things may be different in "white collar" industries, but in traditional blue collar industries like ship building being on call pays well. but remember you are just backing up my point with torsten. He is comparing farmers with employees. Self employed do not compare with employees. I've snipped the other self employed comparisons, I agree with them, but it is torsten who doesn't appear to understand it. I feel you haven't really made that point choosing the examples you did. remember I am used to traditional heavy industry which still exists round here. -- Jim Webster "The pasture of stupidity is unwholesome to mankind" 'Abd-ar-Rahman b. Muhammad b. Khaldun al-Hadrami' Cheers Dave -- |
#389
|
|||
|
|||
UK farm profitability to jun 2002
In article , Michael Saunby
writes Don't need one. I'm a grown-up. Could've fooled me. I had enough of your childish slanging match. Still think sparrows are lazy ? Welcome to the killfile. plonk Cheers Dave -- |
#390
|
|||
|
|||
UK farm profitability to jun 2002
In article , Jim Webster
writes Nevertheless the ball is in your court. If you don't like your hours/pay/conditions then change it, whinging not achieve anything. I take your point that it may take some time and effort but it is achievable if you want to do it. sure and we are doing it If by 'we' you mean others here I have my doubts. I realise you have developed a second string to your bow but I see little sign of it elsewhere. interesting, each change produces less food but takes more money out of the government, or at least costs the government more. But then we are merely reacting rationally to their policies. Don't you mean EU money and policies ? It was a point of yours I took on board previously. Cheers Dave -- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tour-2002 vs.2009 - 2-2002-2009-Front_Walk.jpg (1/1) | Garden Photos | |||
Tour-2002 vs.2009 - 1-2002-2009-August-Front.jpg (1/1) | Garden Photos | |||
[IBC] BONSAI Digest - 8 Jun 2003 to 9 Jun 2003 (#2003-161) | Bonsai | |||
UK farm profitability to jun 2002 | sci.agriculture | |||
UK farm profitability to jun 2002 | sci.agriculture |