Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Animals avoid GM food
On 5 Sep 2003 05:41:12 GMT, Brian Sandle
posted: Mooshie peas wrote: On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 18:17:31 +0200, Alf Christophersen posted: On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 17:40:34 +0100, "Jim Webster" wrote: What about lamb and eating it at different times of year? Lamb are mainly slaughtered at autumn over here, and thus hs rather high omega-3 to omega-6 ratio, (or low omega-6 to omega-3 ratio) At Iceland where sheep always, more or less, are range feed (grazing in mountains all days during year), they have one of the lowest mortality rates from CVD, even having genes common with Norwegians and other Northern Scandinavians, which has amongst the highest incidents of these diseases. (but also high intake of meat from farmed animals, except sheep nd lambs in autumn because they are fed in mountain during spring/summer/autumn season. Rheumatic people seldom complains about pain after eating lamb in autumn, while eating spring slaughtered animals give them pain and eating pork meat always give pain. (Pigs are mostly fed omega-6 rich diet) Has all this conjecture (?) been subject to test with double blind placebo controlled studies? Who would it pay to do the studies? Science, public health, health insurance organisations, rich folk.... I note peer-reviewed journals are going to start pointing out to readers when authors fail to declare their research-funding sources. They usually do, don't they. A lot of biotech studies and reviewers have failed to note their funding connections to biotech industry, against the agreed convention. But it's not worth trying to hide something that will come out and cause embarrassment later. Studies on omega-6 - arachidonic acid - inflammation, if proved positive, might benefit persons who were hoping to be paying less for medical treatment. About 6 billion of them about, I believe So it looks as if any researchers interested would have to compete for funds of the type which are not govt-money-in-partnership-with-business. Huh? Isn't Mrs Clark interested in your well-being? The current approach is to encourage partnership with business, so non-partnership research-money is rather hard to get. So how come there is so much research done on all of this? I want to know what the concensus is. As I said to Jim the connection of omega-6 to arachidonic to inflammation is a bit obvious, like rain to being wet. We don't do a study on it because it is rather obvious when money is short? Or is it that business has investment in the health system, too, and guides it away from such studies, since it would remove a lot of profit? You seem so full of conspiracy theories that you can't see the wood for the trees. Where is this concensus that linoleic acid causes arachidonic acid causes inflammation causes CHD causes premature disease and death? Perhaps obesity has a role in this? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
using foraging animals as lawnmower substitutes; return to having animals around every home | Plant Science | |||
[IBC] Avoid Nothing (Was [IBC] Trees to avoid collecting or trying to work with !) | Bonsai | |||
GM crop farms filled with weeds (Was: Animals avoid GM food) | sci.agriculture | |||
Animals avoid GM food (Was: biotech & famine) | sci.agriculture | |||
Animals avoid GM food (Was: biotech & famine) | sci.agriculture |