The message
from martin contains these words:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 10:02:46 GMT, Janet Baraclough
wrote:

Thankyou. You'll always know it's me, because I only use one,
genuine posting ID.

and how many false ones? :-)

Don't be personal!

ducks and runs

Aye. Wisely...

--
Rusty
horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co full-stop uk
http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/

Janet Baraclough wrote:
Just keep whining for sympathy,

The first and last time, beleive me. I bet you even scare the little
children. If not, you probably eat them.

Jaques d'Alltrades wrote:
Known for it.

) It's nice to see pleasant people. My lil' nagging cold has turned
into a full blown flu today, I'm not at work and missed college last
night. I think I've got the tomato flu...

The message .com
from "La puce" contains these words:

Jaques d'Alltrades wrote:
Known for it.

) It's nice to see pleasant people. My lil' nagging cold has turned
into a full blown flu today, I'm not at work and missed college last
night. I think I've got the tomato flu...

You should have ducked (not avian) when the tomatoes flu.

--
Rusty
horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co full-stop uk
http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/

On 2/11/05 11:00, in article
, "La puce"
wrote:


Janet Baraclough wrote:
Just keep whining for sympathy,

The first and last time, beleive me. I bet you even scare the little
children. If not, you probably eat them.


I would remind you of your declared intention not to communicate with Janet
again. That would probably be a good idea - for all of us.
--
Sacha
www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
(remove the weeds to email me)

In article .com,
La puce wrote:
Janet Baraclough wrote:
Just keep whining for sympathy,

The first and last time, beleive me. I bet you even scare the little
children. If not, you probably eat them.

I certainly do.


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.

"Nick Maclaren" wrote in message
...
In article .com,
La puce wrote:
Janet Baraclough wrote:
Just keep whining for sympathy,

The first and last time, beleive me. I bet you even scare the little
children. If not, you probably eat them.

I certainly do.


A whole one? ;-)

The message
from (Nick Maclaren) contains these words:

In article .com,
La puce wrote:
Janet Baraclough wrote:
Just keep whining for sympathy,

The first and last time, beleive me. I bet you even scare the little
children. If not, you probably eat them.

I certainly do.

Ick or eat?

--
Rusty
horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co full-stop uk
http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/

The message
from "Mike" contains these words:

"Nick Maclaren" wrote in message
...
In article .com,
La puce wrote:
Janet Baraclough wrote:
Just keep whining for sympathy,

The first and last time, beleive me. I bet you even scare the little
children. If not, you probably eat them.

I certainly do.


A whole one? ;-)

Everything except the whinge...

--
Rusty
horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co full-stop uk
http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/

Sacha wrote:
I would remind you of your declared intention not to communicate with Janet
again. That would probably be a good idea - for all of us.

pout

Nick Maclaren wrote:
In article .com,
La puce wrote:
Janet Baraclough wrote:
Just keep whining for sympathy,

The first and last time, beleive me. I bet you even scare the
little
children. If not, you probably eat them.

I certainly do.

With me, it's a bit like smoking: only OP's.

--
Mike.

Make that ANY number of people (gardeners or not) with any level of intelligence. A friend of mine is a novice gardener and was gobsmacked at how appalling this "reality-TV" little in-crowd jokey clique show was.

Thank God for "Gardener's World " following hot on its heels, and returning us to the world of intelligence and normality.

Blossom wrote:

Make that ANY number of people (gardeners or not) with any level of
intelligence. A friend of mine is a novice gardener and was gobsmacked
at how appalling this "reality-TV" little in-crowd jokey clique show
was.

Thank God for "Gardener's World " following hot on its heels, and
returning us to the world of intelligence and normality.

Oh yes. Thank God for Monsieur Darcy, Monty I mean ... faint

On 5/11/05 12:51, in article , "Janet
Baraclough" wrote:

The message
from Blossom contains these words:


Make that ANY number of people (gardeners or not) with any level of
intelligence. A friend of mine is a novice gardener and was gobsmacked
at how appalling this "reality-TV" little in-crowd jokey clique show
was.

She should pay closer attention, she'll learn something worthwhile
about the astonishing breadth of gardening and some valuable skills.
That's clearly DG's intention towards the students.

Much of what DG has covered so far, are topics which have been raised
in urg countless times over the years. What seeds are suitable for kids
to grow? How to start planning a garden from scratch on a blank canvas?
What on earth can I use to map out and help visualise a
three-dimensional plan? (So far, DG has demonstrated three really
excellent practical techniques for that, none of which I have ever seen
on any other TV gardening program).

He's making the students think for themselves , which frankly GW does not.

Janet.

We saw it for the first time last night and enjoyed it for the most part. I
really *cannot* be doing with DG's voice, it drives me mad BUT we thought
the general thrust of the programme was at the least, interesting. However,
I am highly dubious about the extent of DG's real and genuine, continuous
input.
--
Sacha
www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
(remove the weeds to email me)

Janet Baraclough writes

from Blossom contains these words:


Make that ANY number of people (gardeners or not) with any level of
intelligence. A friend of mine is a novice gardener and was gobsmacked
at how appalling this "reality-TV" little in-crowd jokey clique show
was.

She should pay closer attention, she'll learn something worthwhile
about the astonishing breadth of gardening and some valuable skills.

Quite! It pays to watch this kind of programme with, at least, half an
open mind.

It increasingly makes me chuckle, erm, slightly... A fairly common trait
of the deconstructive British mentality regularly turns its attention to
the 'reality-TV' genre. I've seen this sniping in so many places
now...cristicsms of the programmes, criticisms of the people on them,
and with so many of those criticisms then offered with, often at best,
half-assed appreciation and/or trite generalisations.

Much of what DG has covered so far, are topics which have been raised
in urg countless times over the years. What seeds are suitable for kids
to grow? How to start planning a garden from scratch on a blank
canvas? What on earth can I use to map out and help visualise a
three-dimensional plan? (So far, DG has demonstrated three really
excellent practical techniques for that, none of which I have ever
seen on any other TV gardening program).


He's making the students think for themselves, which frankly GW does not.

But at least they tell us how to put a lawn to bed for the
winter...*every* year.

--
Flower Bobdew
South Facing Garden
South West: UK