Rupert wrote:
"Stewart Robert Hinsley" wrote in
message
...
In message . com,
La puce writes

Stewart Robert Hinsley wrote:
Threats of stalking (which is what you appeared to be making)
are
a step beyond namecalling, never mind that you're hardly
innocent
of namecalling yourself.

Do you want to see the emails she has sent me?


No.
--
Stewart Robert Hinsley
Thanks for saying that on my behalf as well, cos I only read and
never reply to some posters.

Thanks for the really productive discussion on what I had been naive
enough to imagine might have been an interesting subject, guys. I
believe our American cousins at this point say something like
"Sheesh!"

--
Mike.

"Mike Lyle" wrote in message
...
Rupert wrote:
"Stewart Robert Hinsley" wrote in
message
...
In message . com,
La puce writes

Stewart Robert Hinsley wrote:
Threats of stalking (which is what you appeared to be making)
are
a step beyond namecalling, never mind that you're hardly
innocent
of namecalling yourself.

Do you want to see the emails she has sent me?


No.
--
Stewart Robert Hinsley
Thanks for saying that on my behalf as well, cos I only read and
never reply to some posters.

Thanks for the really productive discussion on what I had been naive
enough to imagine might have been an interesting subject, guys. I
believe our American cousins at this point say something like
"Sheesh!"

--
Mike.

If your American cousins say somethi9ng like "Sheesh" they must be females
cos the males use a far different set of words...H

"Mike Lyle" wrote in message
...
Rupert wrote:
"Stewart Robert Hinsley" wrote in
message
...
In message . com,
La puce writes

Stewart Robert Hinsley wrote:
Threats of stalking (which is what you appeared to be making)
are
a step beyond namecalling, never mind that you're hardly
innocent
of namecalling yourself.

Do you want to see the emails she has sent me?


No.
--
Stewart Robert Hinsley
Thanks for saying that on my behalf as well, cos I only read and
never reply to some posters.

Thanks for the really productive discussion on what I had been naive
enough to imagine might have been an interesting subject, guys. I
believe our American cousins at this point say something like
"Sheesh!"

--
Mike.


Mike -I thought the discussion was quite interesting with loads of useful
links.
You done better than me mate cos I am still waiting to hear about
"Importing plants from USA"--bugga

On 6/12/05 21:38, in article , "Rupert"
wrote:

snip
You done better than me mate cos I am still waiting to hear about
"Importing plants from USA"--bugga


Didn't you get an email from me with the name of Ray's agent who might be
able to help you find someone?
--
Sacha
www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
(remove the weeds to email me)

"Sacha" wrote in message
.uk...
On 6/12/05 21:38, in article , "Rupert"
wrote:

snip
You done better than me mate cos I am still waiting to hear about
"Importing plants from USA"--bugga


Didn't you get an email from me with the name of Ray's agent who might be
able to help you find someone?
--
Sacha
www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
(remove the weeds to email me)

No I haven't got that. Strange because other email got through from your
address.Perhaps my mailwasher has become too aggressive.
So I have added *sacha*@* and I suppose I will now be bombed with spam from
South Australian Community Housing Authority.

The message
from "Mike Lyle" contains these words:


Thanks for the really productive discussion on what I had been naive
enough to imagine might have been an interesting subject, guys.

On my server, there has been an extensive discussion of the subject
you raised. Since your name recurs throughout it seems unlikely you
missed it.

Plant import is not the only issue which has arisen during the course
of the discussion. As usual, there was lying garbage from a troll whose
only purpose was to disrupt, abuse and antagonise.

Some people here feel that the survival of this newsgroup is what makes
it possible to discuss any horticultural issue, and to that end it's
important to rebut troll attempts to disrupt threads and undermine the
group.Those who care about that, probably think "sheesh" every time you
naively encourage trolls by conversing with them, and help them evade
killfiles by quoting their drivel .

Janet

Janet Baraclough wrote:
The message
from "Mike Lyle" contains
these
words:


Thanks for the really productive discussion on what I had been
naive
enough to imagine might have been an interesting subject, guys.

On my server, there has been an extensive discussion of the
subject
you raised. Since your name recurs throughout it seems unlikely you
missed it.

Ah, I'll search GG. I've been away.

Plant import is not the only issue which has arisen during the
course of the discussion. As usual, there was lying garbage from a
troll whose only purpose was to disrupt, abuse and antagonise.

Some people here feel that the survival of this newsgroup is what
makes it possible to discuss any horticultural issue, and to that
end
it's important to rebut troll attempts to disrupt threads and
undermine the group.Those who care about that, probably think
"sheesh" every time you naively encourage trolls by conversing
with
them, and help them evade killfiles by quoting their drivel .

I don't think I replied to any trolls in this thread. I talked for a
while with one member who got impenetrably irrelevant, but I don't
think he's a troll.

--
Mike.