Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
tree preservation order
Hi Please help
I have a oak tree in my back garden which has a tree preservation order on it. Every five years or so the neighbours apply to the council to trim a bit more off. It is making the tree top heavy as they keep taking more branches off. Some times illegally and without permission. Permission I believe has been granted again to carry out work, is there anything I can do to complain vigorously against there actions. Thanks |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
tree preservation order
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
tree preservation order
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
tree preservation order
On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 02:56:53 -0700, beddy2005 wrote:
Hi Please help I have a oak tree in my back garden which has a tree preservation order on it. Every five years or so the neighbours apply to the council to trim a bit more off. It is making the tree top heavy as they keep taking more branches off. Some times illegally and without permission. Permission I believe has been granted again to carry out work, is there anything I can do to complain vigorously against there actions. Thanks How about maintaining the tree yourself so it doesn't get 'top heavy' and also doesn't cause your neighbours problems? Why should your neighbours suffer because of a tree on your property? Without the tree preservation order they would be quite within their rights to remove anything overhanging their property without seeking permission; you obviously have the right to have the trimmings returned to you if you so wish. You may detect a certain lack of sympathy from this direction. Cheers Dave R |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
tree preservation order
Why should your neighbours suffer because of a tree on your property?
except that if the TPO means that the OP has to keep the tree then I can see why he wouldn't want it to either look stupid or fall on his house/head etc. -- Hayley (gardening on well drained, alkaline clay in Somerset) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
tree preservation order
"David WE Roberts" wrote in message news On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 02:56:53 -0700, beddy2005 wrote: Hi Please help I have a oak tree in my back garden which has a tree preservation order on it. Every five years or so the neighbours apply to the council to trim a bit more off. It is making the tree top heavy as they keep taking more branches off. Some times illegally and without permission. Permission I believe has been granted again to carry out work, is there anything I can do to complain vigorously against there actions. Thanks How about maintaining the tree yourself so it doesn't get 'top heavy' and also doesn't cause your neighbours problems? Why should your neighbours suffer because of a tree on your property? Without the tree preservation order they would be quite within their rights to remove anything overhanging their property without seeking permission; you obviously have the right to have the trimmings returned to you if you so wish. You may detect a certain lack of sympathy from this direction. Cheers Dave R Just a cotton picking moment Dave--The chances are that the tree is worthy of a TPO and was there long before the neighbours bought the property. It appears that the neighbours are philistines. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
tree preservation order
Rupert wrote:
"David WE Roberts" wrote in message news On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 02:56:53 -0700, beddy2005 wrote: Hi Please help I have a oak tree in my back garden which has a tree preservation order on it. Every five years or so the neighbours apply to the council to trim a bit more off. It is making the tree top heavy as they keep taking more branches off. Some times illegally and without permission. Permission I believe has been granted again to carry out work, is there anything I can do to complain vigorously against there actions. Thanks How about maintaining the tree yourself so it doesn't get 'top heavy' and also doesn't cause your neighbours problems? Why should your neighbours suffer because of a tree on your property? Without the tree preservation order they would be quite within their rights to remove anything overhanging their property without seeking permission; you obviously have the right to have the trimmings returned to you if you so wish. You may detect a certain lack of sympathy from this direction. Cheers Dave R Just a cotton picking moment Dave--The chances are that the tree is worthy of a TPO and was there long before the neighbours bought the property. It appears that the neighbours are philistines. Trees with TPOs can be a real problem. I have three and all you are allowed (officially) to cut off without specific permission are small twigs that can be pruned with secatures. One of mine appears to be dying, this year, at not inconsiderable expense I need to pay an expert to negotiate with the council about what I can or cannot remove. If the council stop me from doing work that I consider necessary then if a large branch falls causing injury or damage I hope that the courts will look upon me with benign consideration. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
tree preservation order
"Broadback" wrote in message ... Rupert wrote: "David WE Roberts" wrote in message news On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 02:56:53 -0700, beddy2005 wrote: Hi Please help I have a oak tree in my back garden which has a tree preservation order on it. Every five years or so the neighbours apply to the council to trim a bit more off. It is making the tree top heavy as they keep taking more branches off. Some times illegally and without permission. Permission I believe has been granted again to carry out work, is there anything I can do to complain vigorously against there actions. Thanks How about maintaining the tree yourself so it doesn't get 'top heavy' and also doesn't cause your neighbours problems? Why should your neighbours suffer because of a tree on your property? Without the tree preservation order they would be quite within their rights to remove anything overhanging their property without seeking permission; you obviously have the right to have the trimmings returned to you if you so wish. You may detect a certain lack of sympathy from this direction. Cheers Dave R Just a cotton picking moment Dave--The chances are that the tree is worthy of a TPO and was there long before the neighbours bought the property. It appears that the neighbours are philistines. Trees with TPOs can be a real problem. I have three and all you are allowed (officially) to cut off without specific permission are small twigs that can be pruned with secatures. One of mine appears to be dying, this year, at not inconsiderable expense I need to pay an expert to negotiate with the council about what I can or cannot remove. If the council stop me from doing work that I consider necessary then if a large branch falls causing injury or damage I hope that the courts will look upon me with benign consideration. I do sympathise having been in the same position several times. Local tree specialist/tree surgeon negotiates with the council who are always very helpful. It is an expensive job particularly as you are only allowed to use a qualified/certified tree chap and under no circumstances will they grant permission for you to touch the tree yourself. I do know that policy varies from council to council |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
tree preservation order
thanks all for the reply a few mixed view. i just think enough is
enough and the tree has been cut too many times. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
tree preservation order
I would guess an oak has a wide and stable root system and can tolerate a
lot of messing about. We have a garden with many mature trees and they do pose a problem. I tend to regard trees as garden plants that have stringent pruning requirements.-oak spreads as broad as it is tall, but in traditional woodland management can be pruned very severely. Trees always look bad immediately after pruning, but they tend to recover their looks. We have cut trees quite severely to cover reasonable complaints by neighbours. Two others, an ash and beech, capable of reaching ginormous heights we had pruned by a tree surgeon, discusing the shape and pruning using digital camera images. I have a large Leylandii used by nesting bluetits and I think a goldcrest, and it will have to be topped next winter-it's about 60ft high and 40ft from the house. Being a conifer it will not refurnish. Regards David T wrote in message ups.com... thanks all for the reply a few mixed view. i just think enough is enough and the tree has been cut too many times. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tree Preservation Order - UK | United Kingdom | |||
Tree Preservation Orders | United Kingdom | |||
Rainforest Preservation Novel | alt.forestry | |||
The Illusion of "The Illusion of Preservation" | alt.forestry | |||
The Illusion of "The Illusion of Preservation" | alt.forestry |