Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Stuffing our environment
g'day george,
count australia in there as well mate maybe even more so not sure? i did send a reply to your original post 1 via the return format in this program the other i sent to the e/mail addy ) in your original signature line. not sure if you got them (both the same text)? still would welcome chat with you about self changes, up to you i am on the same wave length as you, just think that as important as this topic is these av' garden forums/groups don't generate the sort of open discussion needed to lead to what can be done. you are welcome to contact me through our web site. len http://www.users.bigpond.com/gardenlen1/ "George.com" wrote in message ... "Mike" wrote in message ... Currently the availability of bio-fuels in New Zealand would account for something like.25% of the current energy demands of our nation. Put another way, it would take 400 years of bio-fuel growth to produce the same energy demands as 2006. rob but rob you are using your natural resources as well which is detrimental to your environment and you are not such a developed (in the industrial/suburban sprawl way) nation. http://www.mikecrowe.photosite.com/a...2ndLeg/?page=4 show the geysers at Rotorua which used to be a lot higher, but as the guide said, 'they are now being used to heat our houses'. What happens when they give up? Mike yeah, thanks Mike, thanks a bunch. It was an article in a magazine pointing out how we are cumitatively rooting NZs environment that threw me into this slough of despondency in the first place. Nice of you to throw me a lifeline, with a lead weight attached. The following discourse is not uk gardening as an advanced warning. More so how NZ is doing environmentally. The geysers are actually doing better than they were 20 years ago. The government capped many many back yard home heating systems as they were drawing off too much thermal heat and dampening down the geysers. They are certainly no where near the level going back 100 years but are showing good signs of good health. In fact, in recent years hot pools and steam vents have started popping up in parks and peoples gardens showing the thermal activity is increasing. If you are talking about using natural resources faster than replacement (sustainability) you are indeed correct. One latest issue is water. In the drier parts of the south island water is being drawn off faster than it is replaced. ancient aquifers are running dry. The water is going in to irrigation for pasture mainly. Show me the logic of that. Other natural resources are being conserved, that is one area NZ is doing quite well. Land and wetlands are being locked away in national parks, native forests no longer logged, increasing marine reserves. We are also starting to invest quite heavily in wind power generation (though still a small % of total demand) although nimbys still exist. One example was the wind turbines may 'scare the horses'. My view on that is short and to the point. Whether this balances up the depletion of natural resources I do not know. I would suspect not however things are getting more in to balance. Eg, we dig up a coal seem but place more land in to a national park or create a new marine reserve. We hunt for more natural gas but also build a large wind farm. More of a concern however is air quality (worsening), water quality (disgusting deterioration), increasing consumer wastes, plastics etc etc. We are cleaning up past decades of DDT, copper, arsenic etc poisoining of land. Good. We continue to pump nitrates into our water ways causing infestations of water weeds. We are a new country with a short history of european colonisation (200 years) however we have gone a long way down the line of environmental degredation. Pity we didn't learn from europe with their centuries of destruction. We seem to emulate it but do so a whole lot quicker. We are still one of, it not the, cleanest country on earth however that is down to our recent development and low population. People are wising up, I just wish they would wise up a hell of a lot faster. rob |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Stuffing our environment
Yes, got your email thanks Len. I have gone to your website and had a shufty
through. I am not as far advanced as you but note some of the tips you give and have stored some away for possible use. I am looking to the simple changes first, some of the bigger issues are a matter of timing but I will get to these later on. As an example, you have recipes for home cleaners, detergents etc. I cant be bothered with elaborate systems for that type of thing. I use a basic washing soda/borax or baking soda mix and sometimes vinegar as a fabric softener. I find it works well and is really simple to mix together and store. About the only thing I would take a lot of time over is bio-fuels if I had the vehicle to run them in. I guess I am just frustrated that more people are not quickly moving to embrace simple changes. I can't establish a marine reserve myself, neither can my neighbour or work mates. We can change the way we do things at home however. It fairly ****es me off more are not. If you have things to add or discuss feel free to email me. I am looking very locally at the moment and changing things around me and with me (and my wife) that I can practically change. My immediate focus is (very) locally as opposed to anything globally. For example, Howard should sign Kyoto (and repeal his new labour laws) but I don't waste too much time in angst over it as I can't change it myself. I can tell the checkout operator I don't want a plastic bag and why. I just wish I could also tell the person next to me to dump their 10 plastic bags, stop killing my earth, and use some boxes instead. rob "gardenlen" wrote in message ... g'day george, count australia in there as well mate maybe even more so not sure? i did send a reply to your original post 1 via the return format in this program the other i sent to the e/mail addy ) in your original signature line. not sure if you got them (both the same text)? still would welcome chat with you about self changes, up to you i am on the same wave length as you, just think that as important as this topic is these av' garden forums/groups don't generate the sort of open discussion needed to lead to what can be done. you are welcome to contact me through our web site. len http://www.users.bigpond.com/gardenlen1/ "George.com" wrote in message ... "Mike" wrote in message ... Currently the availability of bio-fuels in New Zealand would account for something like.25% of the current energy demands of our nation. Put another way, it would take 400 years of bio-fuel growth to produce the same energy demands as 2006. rob but rob you are using your natural resources as well which is detrimental to your environment and you are not such a developed (in the industrial/suburban sprawl way) nation. http://www.mikecrowe.photosite.com/a...2ndLeg/?page=4 show the geysers at Rotorua which used to be a lot higher, but as the guide said, 'they are now being used to heat our houses'. What happens when they give up? Mike yeah, thanks Mike, thanks a bunch. It was an article in a magazine pointing out how we are cumitatively rooting NZs environment that threw me into this slough of despondency in the first place. Nice of you to throw me a lifeline, with a lead weight attached. The following discourse is not uk gardening as an advanced warning. More so how NZ is doing environmentally. The geysers are actually doing better than they were 20 years ago. The government capped many many back yard home heating systems as they were drawing off too much thermal heat and dampening down the geysers. They a re certainly no where near the level going back 100 years but are showing good signs of good health. In fact, in recent years hot pools and steam vents have started popping up in parks and peoples gardens showing the thermal activity is increasing. If you are talking about using natural resources faster than replacement (sustainability) you are indeed correct. One latest issue is water. In the drier parts of the south island water is being drawn off faster than it is replaced. ancient aquifers are running dry. The water is going in to irrigation for pasture mainly. Show me the logic of that. Other natural resources are being conserved, that is one area NZ is doing quite well. Land and wetlands are being locked away in national parks, native forests no longer logged, increasing marine reserves. We are also starting to invest quite heavily in wind power generation (though still a small % of total demand) although nimbys still exist. One example was the wind turbines may 'scare the horses'. My view on that is short and to the point. Whether this balances up the depletion of natural resources I do not know. I would suspect not however things are getting more in to balance. Eg, we dig up a coal seem but place more land in to a national park or create a new marine reserve. We hunt for more natural gas but also build a large wind farm. More of a concern however is air quality (worsening), water quality (disgusting deterioration), increasing consumer wastes, plastics etc etc. We are cleaning up past decades of DDT, copper, arsenic etc poisoining of land. Good. We continue to pump nitrates into our water ways causing infestations of water weeds. We are a new country with a short history of european colonisation (200 years) however we have gone a long way down the line of environmental degredation. Pity we didn't learn from europe with their centuries of destruction. We seem to emulate it but do so a whole lot quicker. We are still one of, it not the, cleanest country on earth however that is down to our recent development and low population. People are wising up, I just wish they would wise up a hell of a lot faster. rob |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Stuffing our environment
g'day george,
you had a post in the alt.pc group as well i had nearly forgotten hey chuckle. the attitude in that group is pretty indicative of waht occurs in these um earth friendly chat thingies. that group a few years ago was very viable always heaps of new posts every day new members coming in all the time lots of help and assistance for the newies and the oldies a good friendly crowd. then the dark forces arose and they are still there here as well and the group karked it over night very sad realy, about the only post there now are the spam porn ones. in the past you would ahve a couple of dozens responses to your original post and my guess the thread would still be active. anyhow we are in the same region with similar control problems. len http://www.users.bigpond.com/gardenlen1/ snipped |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Stuffing our environment
g'day george,
on the plastic bag issue i have a different outlook, i tend to think laterally and outside the square and comfort zone, those attributes make it easdy to adopt change needed for earth friendlier living. for 1.. where did the push come from for consumers to adopt change? from the governements of our countries is where, and they where preasured by vested interests namely the retailers of groceries. the price of those "free" plastic bags has been factored into every item you buy. s for me i would waqnt to see the retailers drop the prices of all their range before i would consider change, or it just simply becomes more profit for shareholder. 2.. those so called dreaded plastic bags break down very quickly in direct sunshine, you could put them in a wire container and in a month they will be nothing but dust. 3 the so called enviro' friendly bags are made of polymers (alomost impossible to break down), and when they are in total use paid for by the consumer they too will end up as litter but they will last longer, plus those green/blue/red whatever coloured bags are made in china. just for me i think we need to tread carefully when something is thrust upon us by the very people who are crueling our environment with their excesses. there are plenty of other real issues to get the public behind, i feel anyhow just how i see it. we use those bags to collect household (non-reusable/recycle) waste into saves buying just as equaly bad bin bags, which don't break down as quickly as do those recycled plastic grocery bags. in permaculture anything that we create that will rot or break down stays on site, and plastic shopping bags are low on the priority of waste off site product there are lots of wrapping from grocery stores that have to be dumped so we also need to be aware of "if you can't recycle it on sight in your garden then don't bring it home", would rather see more paper wrapping used. the hidden problems film wraps. polystyrene, plastic food containers. we need to return to grease-proof paper, glass containers, tin containers. but food processors are pushing more and more porduct into plastic containers agin they don't break down, and recycling plastics is itself an unfriendly process. take care my friend len http://www.users.bigpond.com/gardenlen1/ snipped |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Stuffing our environment
"gardenlen" wrote in message ... g'day george, on the plastic bag issue i have a different outlook, i tend to think laterally and outside the square and comfort zone, those attributes make it easdy to adopt change needed for earth friendlier living. for 1.. where did the push come from for consumers to adopt change? from the governements of our countries is where, and they where preasured by vested interests namely the retailers of groceries. the price of those "free" plastic bags has been factored into every item you buy. s for me i would waqnt to see the retailers drop the prices of all their range before i would consider change, or it just simply becomes more profit for shareholder. 2.. those so called dreaded plastic bags break down very quickly in direct sunshine, you could put them in a wire container and in a month they will be nothing but dust. i prefer to reduce Len before I look at reuse or recycle. Whilst waste can be disposed of in various ways I think it best to try and avoid it altogether where possible. If the plastic coming in is cut down so the waste going out is cut down. 3 the so called enviro' friendly bags are made of polymers (alomost impossible to break down), and when they are in total use paid for by the consumer they too will end up as litter but they will last longer, plus those green/blue/red whatever coloured bags are made in china. Plastic bags can be reused at the shops, the enviro bags I have are natural fibres. Yes, they do come from China however our oil to make the plastic bags are also imported. The miles travelled by the enviro bags is similar to the miles travelled by the plastics. I use large supermarket plastic bags for bin liners (I need about 1 a week) and smaller bags to pick up dog crap when I walk my mutts. That is conceivably the only usage I can see. Larger plastic sacks are useful for carting things in bulk however I have few of those and do not get them thrust at me everyday I make a purchase. rob |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Stuffing our environment
"George.com" wrote snip I use large supermarket plastic bags for bin liners (I need about 1 a week) snip I do that too. Over here the major supermarkets provide a bin for recycling their old used plastic bags. Perhaps you could get them to do the same where you shop. If enough people demanded it they should listen. The bigger places also do large boxes made of recycled plastic that you buy and then use each time you shop. I recall my local Sainsbury's providing paper sacks at one time but that didn't seem to last long. I think people probably didn't find them durable enough, e.g if it was raining, and handle-less bags are not much good for anyone without a car needing to carry shopping home. I've also read that paper sacks use more resources to make and transport than plastic ones. -- Sue |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Stuffing our environment
"Sue" wrote in message reenews.net... "George.com" wrote snip I use large supermarket plastic bags for bin liners (I need about 1 a week) snip I do that too. Over here the major supermarkets provide a bin for recycling their old used plastic bags. Perhaps you could get them to do the same where you shop. If enough people demanded it they should listen. we have those too Sue however I would rather reduce on the manufacture than recycle. Reduce comes before recycle on the enviro hierarchy. A large national retailer of cheap(ish), often made in china products, has plastic bags with a large RECYCLE emblazened acorss them with a much small reduce and a far smaller reuse. I simply tell the checkout operator no plastic bags please and why. I use a cardboard box for groceries that the supermarket puts out after stacking shelves. rob |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Stuffing our environment
The best way is to reduce packaging use and change our life style. The
marketing communication promote wrong behaviours as cool models for people. TV ask to all consumers to buy a lot of useless stuff every day. I never see a sit com where the actors say stupid to someone because he has a big polluting car or because someone forgot the light on.. etc.. The first problem is our culture. I usually don't buy products with useless packaging I prefer buy product using my own bag and so on.. We have to work on comunication. On the other side, according to the oil higher price plastic price is rising up very fast. So the plastic scraps value is now higher than one years ago. If everybody knows that plastic scrap has value and that it's better recycle than disposal. Try to check some waste stock exchange www.recycle.net www.wastexchange.co.uk |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Stuffing our environment
Sue wrote: "George.com" wrote snip I use large supermarket plastic bags for bin liners (I need about 1 a week) snip I do that too. Over here the major supermarkets provide a bin for recycling their old used plastic bags. Perhaps you could get them to do the same where you shop. If enough people demanded it they should listen. The bigger places also do large boxes made of recycled plastic that you buy and then use each time you shop. I recall my local Sainsbury's providing paper sacks at one time but that didn't seem to last long. I think people probably didn't find them durable enough, e.g if it was raining, and handle-less bags are not much good for anyone without a car needing to carry shopping home. I've also read that paper sacks use more resources to make and transport than plastic ones. over here in Ireland plastic shopping bags used to be everywhere; we have bad litter problems and the plastic bags were a very visible sign of that; you got them all over roadsides and in hedges and fences etc. We spent years trying to ask people to use re-usable bags or boxes etc. That had almost no effect but it did allow me to feel very superior everytime I asked for no bag and used my backsack for small purchases. Eventually, the solution was very direct and simple. It became illegal to give plastic bags away for shopping. You could still get them but you had to ask for them and pay a tiny fee (15cents a bag or so). It worked overnight. They have disappeared from the countryside (at least the fresh ones have). Now, whenever you go to the supermarked, you have to remember to bring 4 or 5 reusable ones (made of cloth/canvas of some kind and that last about a year) or get boxes or buy your bags. At first you can never remember to bring teh bags; now it is second nature. It really worked. Des in Dublin -- Sue |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Stuffing our environment
wrote over here in Ireland plastic shopping bags used to be everywhere; we have bad litter problems and the plastic bags were a very visible sign of that; you got them all over roadsides and in hedges and fences etc. We spent years trying to ask people to use re-usable bags or boxes etc. That had almost no effect but it did allow me to feel very superior everytime I asked for no bag and used my backsack for small purchases. Eventually, the solution was very direct and simple. It became illegal to give plastic bags away for shopping. You could still get them but you had to ask for them and pay a tiny fee (15cents a bag or so). It worked overnight. They have disappeared from the countryside (at least the fresh ones have). Now, whenever you go to the supermarked, you have to remember to bring 4 or 5 reusable ones (made of cloth/canvas of some kind and that last about a year) or get boxes or buy your bags. At first you can never remember to bring teh bags; now it is second nature. It really worked. Yes I think that would certainly change things. I agree it's awful to see the amount of plastic blowing around and stuck in roadside hedges etc but sadly it's true that it takes a charge, however small, to concentrate people's minds on not being careless with most resources. I'm sure it would encourage me to remember to take bags to reuse more often. I can't see the big supermarkets doing it here on their own initiative though, as they'd each be wary of the others gaining some advantage in pricing, so it probably would need legislating for. When you think about it lots of seemingly minor law changes like that could have quite big results in lots of ways. -- Sue |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Doing Our Bit for the Environment | United Kingdom | |||
From those wishing to reclaim our rights to post on our fish andpond groups without disruption or games | Ponds | |||
Daily wildlife & environment news from the British Isles - Habitat April 21st | Plant Science |