"Janet Tweedy" wrote in message
...
In article , Sue
writes

Hardly. It was just bitchy and silly. Obviously anyone hosting a meet on
their own property is at liberty to include or exclude anyone they wish.


Not to mention the fact that if you can't exclude some people from a meet
on your own property then no one would feel happy about holding them!
After all it's not a public Meeting in a Park or Gardens which would be
something completely different.
I didn't know that 'Meet' had a rigid definition! After all (to be
pedantic) an Annual General Meeting excludes all but those on a fully paid
up Membership List.

If people have an objection to a Meeting's venue or Guest List then
perhaps another Meeting could be arranged by someone else to include those
that feel excluded?


--
Janet Tweedy
Dalmatian Telegraph
http://www.lancedal.demon.co.uk

What ! A meeting of just two people. What a horrible thought if those two
bred:-)