Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
"Sacha" wrote in message . uk... On 1/3/07 10:28, in article , "charles" wrote: snip I have never met Sacha, but in her place I would do just the same. The thing that absolutely amazes me, is that two women who so often make crystal clear their thorough dislike of me would even consider wanting to come to our home and make this ridiculous foot-stamping fuss about doing something they don't want to do with someone they don't like! If that's the case, then what's the point in going public on their banned status? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
"Sacha" wrote in message . uk... On 1/3/07 14:50, in article , "BAC" wrote: "Sacha" wrote in message . uk... On 1/3/07 10:28, in article , "charles" wrote: snip I have never met Sacha, but in her place I would do just the same. The thing that absolutely amazes me, is that two women who so often make crystal clear their thorough dislike of me would even consider wanting to come to our home and make this ridiculous foot-stamping fuss about doing something they don't want to do with someone they don't like! If that's the case, then what's the point in going public on their banned status? I'm surprised at this. June & Anne are not the people I will not have here, though after this display both would need the hides of rhinos to imagine they would be actually welcomed with open arms! As both of them dislike me so intensely, I don't understand why they are making all this fuss, other than the fact that both have made it clear that what they really want is a fight. Pathetic! It would be much more to the point, if they were thinking of the good of this group, if they deplored the behaviour in this group which led to me having to do this. Common sense would dictate that I am not having in our home, people who have sworn at me, insulted me, virtually stalked me and in one case harassed me for years. It's perfectly understandable for you to want to exclude from your home people who, from the sound of it, you clearly detest. However, it does seem that there are more than two urglers who suspected you may have meant them. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
On 1/3/07 17:20, in article , "BAC"
wrote: snip It's perfectly understandable for you to want to exclude from your home people who, from the sound of it, you clearly detest. However, it does seem that there are more than two urglers who suspected you may have meant them. I think the confusion arose when I spoke of the two women making all this fuss. Otherwise, everyone seemed perfectly clear as to whom I mean, as Sue said. -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/ (remove weeds from address) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
In message , Sacha
writes On 1/3/07 17:20, in article , "BAC" wrote: snip It's perfectly understandable for you to want to exclude from your home people who, from the sound of it, you clearly detest. However, it does seem that there are more than two urglers who suspected you may have meant them. I think the confusion arose when I spoke of the two women making all this fuss. Otherwise, everyone seemed perfectly clear as to whom I mean, as Sue said. Well, I certainly didn't know and am still not 100% sure who they are. It makes me feel much better that I am not one of them. -- June Hughes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
In message , Sacha
writes On 1/3/07 14:50, in article , "BAC" wrote: "Sacha" wrote in message . uk... On 1/3/07 10:28, in article , "charles" wrote: snip I have never met Sacha, but in her place I would do just the same. The thing that absolutely amazes me, is that two women who so often make crystal clear their thorough dislike of me would even consider wanting to come to our home and make this ridiculous foot-stamping fuss about doing something they don't want to do with someone they don't like! If that's the case, then what's the point in going public on their banned status? I'm surprised at this. June & Anne are not the people I will not have here, Thank you for telling us. I really believed I was one of those excluded after the things you have said to and about me in ukfd and here. I am pleased. though after this display both would need the hides of rhinos to imagine they would be actually welcomed with open arms! As both of them dislike me so intensely, I thought it was you who disliked me - after all, it was you who accused me when we had been having a friendly email correspondence (I had thought you liked me at last - silly me!) of weedling personal information out of you so that I could in some peculiar way use it against you. It was also you who accused me of 'cosying up' to Puce against Judith - wrong again, Sacha but you wouldn't take my word for it, would you? You called me hypocritical and when no-one listened to you, you stormed out of ukfd in a huff, insulting almost everyone as you went, only to re-appear a few days later as if nothing had happened. I don't understand why they are making all this fuss, other than the fact that both have made it clear that what they really want is a fight. Wrong again Sacha. Your original post about the meet has now proved to be misleading and confusing. Never mind. I hope you all enjoy it. Pathetic! It would be much more to the point, if they were thinking of the good of this group, if they deplored the behaviour in this group which led to me having to do this. Common sense would dictate that I am not having in our home, people who have sworn at me, insulted me, virtually stalked me and in one case harassed me for years. Well, AFAIK, I have not sworn at you, stalked you or harrassed you at all, although I do remember a few months ago in ukfd typing in a post that I couldn't give a flying f**k about what you were saying about me (when you were being at your most insulting) but that is all. -- June Hughes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
On 1/3/07 19:00, in article , "June
Hughes" wrote: In message , Sacha writes On 1/3/07 14:50, in article , "BAC" wrote: "Sacha" wrote in message . uk... On 1/3/07 10:28, in article , "charles" wrote: snip I have never met Sacha, but in her place I would do just the same. The thing that absolutely amazes me, is that two women who so often make crystal clear their thorough dislike of me would even consider wanting to come to our home and make this ridiculous foot-stamping fuss about doing something they don't want to do with someone they don't like! If that's the case, then what's the point in going public on their banned status? I'm surprised at this. June & Anne are not the people I will not have here, Thank you for telling us. I really believed I was one of those excluded after the things you have said to and about me in ukfd and here. I am pleased. though after this display both would need the hides of rhinos to imagine they would be actually welcomed with open arms! As both of them dislike me so intensely, I thought it was you who disliked me snip Let us put this down to a misunderstanding, shall we? Whatever has gone before, there has never been a moment in which I have felt your behaviour towards me was in any way sinister or potentially dangerous to me or my family. I think that, to most people here, those I do not wish to see at our home are very clearly identifiable for unpleasantly obvious reasons. You and I may have differences of opinion but I don't think they even begin to enter the realms that would make me ban you from our home. -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/ (remove weeds from address) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
On Mar 1, 11:24 pm, Sacha wrote:
On 1/3/07 19:00, in article , "June Hughes" wrote: In message , Sacha writes On 1/3/07 14:50, in article , "BAC" wrote: "Sacha" wrote in message . co.uk... On 1/3/07 10:28, in article , "charles" wrote: snip I have never met Sacha, but in her place I would do just the same. The thing that absolutely amazes me, is that two women who so often make crystal clear their thorough dislike of me would even consider wanting to come to our home and make this ridiculous foot-stamping fuss about doing something they don't want to do with someone they don't like! If that's the case, then what's the point in going public on their banned status? I'm surprised at this. June & Anne are not the people I will not have here, Thank you for telling us. I really believed I was one of those excluded after the things you have said to and about me in ukfd and here. I am pleased. though after this display both would need the hides of rhinos to imagine they would be actually welcomed with open arms! As both of them dislike me so intensely, I thought it was you who disliked me snip Let us put this down to a misunderstanding, shall we? Whatever has gone before, there has never been a moment in which I have felt your behaviour towards me was in any way sinister or potentially dangerous to me or my family. I think that, to most people here, those I do not wish to see at our home are very clearly identifiable for unpleasantly obvious reasons. You and I may have differences of opinion but I don't think they even begin to enter the realms that would make me ban you from our home. -- Sachahttp://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devonhttp://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/ (remove weeds from address)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - A generous post, well done Sacha, you really are a nice person, I did tell you that June, didn't I? Judith (Goodnight) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
On 1/3/07 23:14, in article ,
"Martin" wrote: On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 19:00:10 +0000, June Hughes wrote: snip . Well, AFAIK, I have not sworn at you, stalked you or harrassed you at all, although I do remember a few months ago in ukfd typing in a post that I couldn't give a flying f**k about what you were saying about me (when you were being at your most insulting) but that is all. So will you be going, June? Does your wooden spoon have a name, Martin? ;-) Give it a rest. -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/ (remove weeds from address) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
On 2 Mar, 11:34, Martin wrote:
I call it Puce. Oy! With all the hens about, your plumage is magnificent. Just watch you don't fall off your perch ;o) |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
On 2 Mar, 22:21, Martin wrote:
on the midden? Guano. Cockadoodle do! You mad fella you )) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Devon urg meet | United Kingdom | |||
misinformation about urg meet here | United Kingdom | |||
URG meet 2007? | United Kingdom | |||
Parallel lines in agriculture do meet? | sci.agriculture | |||
++ Meet More Women Easily With Pheromones ++ | Ponds |