Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
This group
In article , Stewart Robert Hinsley writes: | | I put quotes round the species names so that only cases where the words | occur in sequence come up; you've looked for pages contain both words, | not necessarily in sequence, so would have found pages referring to | Viburnum species-X and Genus-Y fragrans. Oops. Yes. I am not sure that it proves what it seems to, from the first few pages of hits. Web page counts are very biassed towards organisations that produce Web pages, and there are far more hits of an academic botanic nature than of a horticultural one. What was the average number of readers of an academic paper again?[*] But I assert that there are more horticultural references to that species than strictly botanic ones. But, even allowing for that, it does seem likely that the balance has definitely shifted (and probably did about 20 years back), which is a strong argument that changing back again now would do more harm than good! [*] To non-academics, one survey found it was 3. Including the referees! I can't remember which field or where that was published. Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Group download in progress... | Gardening | |||
Any Canadian Gardeners freguent this group? | Gardening | |||
Group download in progress... | Bonsai | |||
Group download in progress... | Orchids | |||
Group download in progress... | Edible Gardening |