Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
CERN Black Hole Generator Online Soon
(European Organization for Nuclear Research) Build Worlds
Largest 17 Mile Round Particle Accelerator Planetary Risk To Create Artificial BIG BANG Conditions In Lab Old Dying Physicists want to go out with a BIG BANG CERN LHC Blackhole Generator Online Soon Many More Helpful Links And Video Links At Bottom Of Post A Rational, Moral and Spiritual Dilemma www.lhcfacts.org Citizens Against The Large Hadron Collider is a non-profit organization established for the purpose of using legal action to prevent the operation of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) until further safety tests are conducted. The LHC is a particle accelerator located on the France/Switzerland border; it has been dubbed the largest, most expensive, most powerful experiment ever attempted, certainly dwarfing all particle colliders ever built before, both in terms of size and power. Some experts fear that the risk of operating the LHC disproportionately outweighs anything science might gain from this experiment. It is not possible to know what the outcome of the experiment will be, but even CERN (the European Organization for Nuclear Research) scientists concede that there is a real possibility of creating destructive theoretical anomalies such as miniature black holes, strangelets and deSitter space transitions. These events have the potential to fundamentally alter matter and destroy our planet. http://lhcconcerns.com/ http://www.lhcdefense.org/ http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/200..._collider.html Please see bottom of Post for many links from all sides of the debate. In summer of 2008 the largest, most expensive scientific experiment ever, The Large Hadron Collider will be completed. This mechanical behemoth located along the French and Swiss border with a total estimated circumference of 17 miles will be the most powerful particle accelerator in existence. The principal behind a particle accelerator is that by speeding up the smallest elements of matter and then colliding them together that they can be broken down further into even smaller fundamental particles, just as Atoms were once thought to be the smallest units, so then were Quarks(Up and Down), Electrons, and Protons discovered. The Large Hadron Collide is hoped to discover what is referred to as the "Higgs Boson". Although a theoretical scalar particle theorized by Peter Higgs in 1974, it is actually a member of the standard model, and it is believed that the Higgs Boson is what gives matter "mass". To achieve the observation of the Higgs Boson, the LHC will be smashing these Hadrons (specifically Protons) together at speeds almost unimaginable to the average person, at near c( .99999999 % the speed of light). To quantify the types of collisions, it must be pointed out that two beams will be set to collide with each other, each beam of protons contains roughly 2,800 Protons with an energy of 7 TeV (1 Teraelectron Volt = 1.60217646 x 10-7 joules) so the combined energies will be 14 TeV. Although such energies in collisions are certainly occurring every day in space, this will be the first time that energies such as these will be observed on Earth, however what is alarming to us are the myriad of other possibilities that could arise. Why haven't I heard about this before? Honestly, this is a good question, I seem to come accross this response a lot, it seems that in general most people have never heard of the LHC, or even particle acclerators in general, I am aware that there has been a lot more coverage of this in the UK then the America's (probably due to it's geographical location), but also I suppose the main reason why it is not covered that often in the states is because of a general lack of interest, or the belief that the general public is probably incapable of understanding something so complex. Still however there are several Documentaries and other programs/magazines that have covered the LHC, so I'm not fully sure why some people have not heard about this as from a financial perspective it's the most expsenive (8.2 Billion Dollars) and most powerful scientific Expirement of all time. Why We're Concerned To explain the concern thoroughly and accurately it has to be stated that the Large Hadron Collider in Geneva is not the first particle accelerator in history. In 1929 the Cyclotron, invented and developed by Ernest O. Lawrence, was the first particle accelerator, and from that initial invention over several decades we have come into a new breed of Larger and More Powerful Particle Accelerators. Although we have had particle accelerators in the past, The luminosity at which these operate has increased dramatically, in fact it is true that prior to the construction of the RHIC (Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider) such theories as MBH Production, Strangelets, and several other theories were placed on the table as relevant possibilities. So, what's different this time? This is the point that has to be emphasized, this time things are quite different, a study was conducted after initial concerns for the RHIC were explored, and to their conclusion the amount of energy necessary for these scenarios was not sufficient. The Large Hadron Collider operates at a total combined energy of 14TeV, which is a lot higher than the energies generated by the RHIC, as such the possibility of Black Hole creation is a reality, in fact on CERN's own web site they admit it could create Black Holes, here is an excerpt from Safety at the LHC "If the LHC can produce microscopic black holes, cosmic rays of much higher energies would already have produced many more. Since the Earth is still here, there is no reason to believe that collisions inside the LHC are harmful. Black holes lose matter through the emission of energy via a process discovered by Stephen Hawking. Any black hole that cannot attract matter, such as those that might be produced at the LHC, will shrink, evaporate and disappear. The smaller the black hole, the faster it vanishes. If microscopic black holes were to be found at the LHC, they would exist only for a fleeting moment. They would be so short-lived that the only way they could be detected would be by detecting the products of their decay." We'll cover the theoretical problem of this statement in the next section. So, what's the problem? In theory (according to Hawking Radiation) any Black Hole created would evaporate in Femtoseconds, not having the chance to accrete any mass, and being essentially harmless, although this is comforting in theory, It has never been proven, and in fact has been questioned before. The problem is that although most people in the physics community believe in Hawkings Radiation, it has no basis in observation. In 2003 Adam D. Helfer Published a paper concerning Hawking's Radiation coming to the conclusion that Hawking's Radiation may in fact be incorrect, and that a Black Hole would not lose mass in such a way. (For the full text of this document go here Paper By Adam D. Helfer on Hawking Radiation.) In fact since the LHC has been on the drawing board several studies and theories which have gained a lot of support in the scientific community such as "String Theory" and "Extra-Large Hidden Dimensions" have surfaced, which do indeed place the threshold for Black Hole Creation much lower than previously thought. The main problem lies in believing in theory as fact, every argument for safety made concerning Black Holes and thier creation immediately references Hawking Radiation, however, if Hawking Radiation turns out to be incorrect then the Black Hole would continue to accrete mass at an exponential rate. Now Hold on, No one would willingly create a machine that would create Black Holes on Purpose? Of course not, I highly doubt the thousands of scientists involved wish to usher in Oblivion any quicker than politicians, however the danger lies in Theory being accepted as Fact, Adam D. Helfer Published a paper recently which outlines a very strong possibility that Hawkings Radiation may in fact not exist, which would actually fit in better with the Laws of Thermodynamics, at which Our current explanation and understanding of the nature of Black Holes has always been somewhat at Odds. Alright, so if a Black Hole created doesn't evaporate, what next? Here is another place that CERN's safety assessment is incapable of addressing, although these extremely high energy collisions each Proton beam is in fact coming from opposite directions, Over 2 thousand Protons in each beam will pretty much collide roughly in the middle, although no collision would create a particle exactly dead center, or "still", in a relative sense any MBH or fundamental particle created in such a manner (even with both beams at a speed of .99999999 c) would be in a relative sense, at Rest, or to elaborate the term at rest we mean lower than the necessary escape velocity to escape the Earth's own gravitational pull. At that point two hypothetical scenarios exist. It would either maintain a rather low orbit within our planet itself, slowly accreting mass at an exponential rate, or it's possible it may "gravitate" to the direct center of the planet in which case would accrete mass very quickly Wait a second, I've also heard of other dangers like "Strange Matter", "Bubble Nucleation", and "Magnetic Monopoles", why the focus on Black Holes? It is true that these scenarios are also possible, however the problem with representing them accurately is the true danger can never be quantified as None of these have been observed, however that does not mean the risk is zero. The very fact that this experiment is called an experiment is the prove a hypothesis, if the results were truly known then this would not be occurring in the first place. The Large Hadron Collider is going to be forcing Protons together in a very unnatural way, not only forcing them into groups of roughly 3,000 protons for the collisions, but exposing them to temperatures colder than space as well (1.9 K or -271 C). These types of collisions in a sense are unnatural because collisions at those speeds and temperature would never happen, meaning at the point of activation, no one will truly know these results until they occur, in a matter of Femtoseconds we would be placing the entire world in potential Danger. I've seen many websites calculate possiblity/problem or a percentage of risk, however without many of these theories as proof, there is no accurate way to calcuate them, So although the risk potential is unknown, the risk can never be calculated at zero. Although the credence given Strange Matter production, and it's subsequent catalytic behavior by the scientific community is not always mutual. Certain types of Strange Matter could be formed that would catalytically convert all matter that it touches into strange matter as well, although this is not as likely as creating a Black Hole, it's worth mentioning because it is a possibility. I want to learn more, where can I go? We would recommend familiarizing yourself with all the issues, and a basic understanding of Black Holes won't hurt either, of course we can always recommend reading A Brief History of Time or the Universe in a Nutshell there is always Google, for as many people as there are concerned, there are people who believe the danger is zero, it's important for you, to properly evaluate the facts and come to your own conclusion. Thinking outside the box can't hurt either, We encourage you to Talk to a Professor at a local college, write a Letter to CERN, do whatever you need to do to inform yourself and make an informed decision, any contribution you make, even discussing with one other single person in the world, has the possibility to make all the difference. The probability of them finding what they are looking for is near if not ZERO. But there is a tiny chance of success. The probability of some bad happening is NOT zero. But there is a tiny chance of massive failure. Most scientists agree on these two points. The question is do they have the right to endanger the entire planet and future generations to conduct this experiment? A Rational, Moral and Spiritual Dilemma by Otto E. Rossler, Division of Theoretical Chemistry, University of Tubingen, F.R.G. Abstract. A nightmarish situation, that can still be hoped to be averted in time through communication within the scientific community, is drawn attention to. Only a few weeks remain to find out whether the danger is real or nothing but a mirage. After this time window is closed, it will take years until we know whether or not we are doomed. The story line has all the features of a best-selling novel. The reader is asked to contribute constructively. Introduction A surreal situation is described as being present: the greatest conceivable danger - the end of both history and future. This author still stands almost alone with a few hard results that completely change the status of a currently running public endeavor. What can and must rationally be done in what order? The most economic way would be to find out where the error lies in the perceived new danger. Since time is running out, the help of other scientists needs to be solicited. This proves not easy. The two major science journals refuse to publish but equally steadfastly refuse to give a scientific reason for their verdict. The unwillingness of the scientific community to falsify the danger takes the public hostage. This remains true even if the whole danger is only a mirage. To publicize the danger because time is running out is a big decision. The legal term for doing something like this is "instigation of irrational panic." Can anyone take this on his or her shoulders? Most likely, of course, the silent scientific establishment is well-advised to ignore the danger. Nevertheless a younger-generation Nobel laureate in physics recently suggested I should go on - even CERN would profit from the publicity. But at the expense of many ordinary citizens being unnecessarily scared to death, I added. All I suggest to do is to convene an independent safety conference within the remaining four to ten weeks time. This is very little to ask, but exactly this bit is being refused. Why? It looks as if my scientific proposals are so far-off that anyone who ever had a physics course grasps this immediately while everyone else is deeply impressed by the arguments. Or is this just a crime story made up to boost the publishing rights of an unnamed person? The Rational Dilemma The scenario looks unbelievable enough: that a prestigious group of ten thousand mostly young and enthusiastic scientists should unwittingly prepare the greatest conceivable risk to the planet. Both "Trinity" and "Eniwetak" - the two previous Russian-roulette feats of our species - would be dwarfed by this third instance, without the protagonists' noticing. You will have realized by now that I do not have a 100-percent proof to offer - just probabilities. The latter can be summed up in 7 points. Those points I have put into the Appendix for conciseness. Here let me at last say what we are talking about. The experiment in question is called the LHC ("Large Hadron Collider") and is the most expensive and prestigious non-military scientific endeavor ever. Hadrons (protons) are to be hauled against each other at 14 times the power of the previous generation of accelerators and 7 times the maximum energy ever achieved (2.000 Giga-electron-Volts). The experiment at CERN is completely normal science as far as an understanding of every single element is concerned. Only the implications are unusual here since an unexplained natural threshold (called the electro-weak unification barrier) will be surpassed for the first time. This excites string theorists - perhaps the most sophisticated brand of theoretical physicists - since they have a way to predict that even these minuscule energies (compared to the Planck energy thought necessary before) will be sufficient. Mini black-holes could then arise for the first time in history. Now my group has discovered that black holes possess a new property (lack of evaporation). The two possibilities - that string theorists are right and that we are right - taken together make for a volatile mixture. In such a case it is the most rational thing for the world to convene a scientific conference to discuss the joint implications before the experiment is allowed to become overcritical. If this plea is heeded, everything is going to be alright. For we will then all know how the leading experts of the world sum up both their mutual consensus and their currently unresolvable dissent. In either case everyone will see clearly what is the most reasonable response to take. Since rationality will be back, no dilemma will remain. This statement concludes the rational dimension. What about the two other dimensions? The Moral Dilemma This second aspect arises because of the following fact: If anyone points out the rational danger, he or she cannot possibly know what this information will entail in the longer run. People could be misled into panicking, for example. But only if the experiment becomes overcritical before a scientific consensus has been achieved (our current situation unless a miracle happens). Or else after it has been done with the dreaded outcome so that the catastrophe takes its course. Unexpectedly, there exists a third dismal possibility: that the experiment proceeds and no mini black holes are found. This profoundly distinguishes the present situation from Trinity and Eniwetak (the first atomic fission and fusion explosions which fortunately did not engage the atmosphere). While the probability of a dismal outcome is perhaps no greater this time than it was in the previous instances ("1 percent"), it will not be possible to return to business as usual after the event, this time around: the danger will not be over once the scientists declare that their attempt to produce mini black holes has failed since they found no trace of them. For if mini black holes do not evaporate as predicted, they also leave no decipherable sign of their existence - at first. So a negative and a positive outcome are indistinguishable. This difference to its predecessors makes the current experiment a guaranteed success: at causing an unprecedented amount of human suffering. For there will be no way to explain to anyone that he or she is safe nor to apologize for the suffering to expect. The rational fear unavoidably caused can only be made to go away by convening a post-facto scientific world conference that proclaims absolute safety. Unfortunately, every scientist who would not agree with this preassigned verdict would act irresponsibly. Since this will be obvious, no one would ever again believe a single word from a scientist. Anti-scientific fundamentalism would have won - even if the experiment proves innocuous in hindsight. Hysterical irrational responses from the part of the up-until-now uninformed majority of persons and countries on the planet would be preprogrammed for years to come. This medieval angst is a danger almost as great as the experiment itself. No one will be astonished in retrospect that 10,000 scientifically trained minds were unable to anticipate this predictable consequence since this rational deduction belongs, not to the realm of the natural sciences, but rather to that of the humanities and arts. The oversight would nonetheless not be forgiven. This second catastrophe can only be avoided through rapid action - the very safety conference already proposed above. The Spiritual Dilemma The third dilemma is the most disturbing, perhaps. The experiment started operation on April the first 2008 (end of the official countdown) and is currently in the process of being booted-up in a step-by-step manner to reach a planned 70 percent performance level this summer: 10,000 GeV (or five times beyond the threshold of danger). Suppose for a moment that this way of proceeding took place, not today but at any earlier time in history. Spiritual questions would then inevitably have posed themselves. Today, even thinking of this possibility ("sin"?) sounds crazy. Indeed, no spiritual world leader - pope, emperor, helmsman - was or is ready to speak up on behalf of their worldly and spiritual constituencies despite the fact that they were informed in time. Why is this so? There is an intelligible reason for this third phenomenon, too: It is nothing but probabilities that are at stake here. To decide on such matters is traditionally entrusted to the military - this is what they have been hired to deal with in the first place: sandbox games. Only Gorbachev and Raissa deviated from this preformed path once. Their example illustrates the danger we are presently in: They realized that the equilibrium of deterrence implied a remaining finite risk of bilateral annihilation, but no one currently appreciates their decision. This shows in a nutshell that humankind is no longer able even to notice when it is rescued: Kindynagnosia - the inability to recognize danger - is a collective disturbance caused by mental synchronization. Human beings are still, or once again are, the proverbial lambs of the spiritual. Who would not love them for their innocence? An Enlightened Response Is Called For The spiritual dimension goes still farther. Everyone knows today that for the first time in history we possess the tools to do away with the cruelest inequalities on the planet. The computer and the Internet have made this miracle possible: Work done once can be multiplied and transported free of charge. Information has become cost-free. Nevertheless project Lampsacus remains unknown for 14 years (Google and Wikipedia which implement elements of it notwithstanding). In a historical parallel, the computer-facilitated medical revolution is increasingly withheld from the less well-to-do public even in privileged countries while student fees are re-imposed in defiance of a UNO decision without protest. No one seems to feel his own human rights any more and hence also not those of his neighbor. The notion of cruelty - something that must never happen in the universe - has slipped from public consciousness. Most everybody agrees that someone who rescues people from drowning (like Elias Bierdel) is a "Schlepper." If the notion of dignity (for what is killed by cruelty is dignity) has miraculously slipped from public consciousness: why should anyone be expected to stand up for the future of his neighbor's children since his own children and their future are no longer on his mind? Showing love is almost a taboo topic. But it is the young child - the toddler - who invents benevolence out of nothing because no one in the cosmos is wiser or greater. Possessing benevolence and being a person are one and the same thing. Make the test and ask your child whether the LHC emperor has any clothes on. He/she will ask you back to explain what you mean since Hans-Christian Andersen is no longer well known. The returned question will enable you to tell the truth: "Darling, no one seems to know for sure - only after a scientific conference will anyone be able to say." Then your child will ask you what you did to make this conference happen. Will you reply: "Darling, I am not a scientist"? To conclude, I ask you to forgive me for stirring up your waking day. Buddha would do the same thing (now I am crazy!) and Jacob and Martin Luther. Notwithstanding the fact that most hopefully - knock on wood - the danger does not exist. The Appendix demonstrates that we still can find out in time. A petition inviting every parent to sign is on the Internet (just google "Honey, I shrunk the earth!"). Acknowledgments Kensei Hiwaki, George Lasker and Hugh Gash encouraged me to write this paper. I thank Gottfried Mayer for his early criticism and Artur Schmidt, Joachim Frank, Andy Hilgartner, Roland Maurmair, Wolfgang Fedyszin, Gabriele Schröter, Heino Breilmann, Enrico Pellegrino, Michael Langer, Frank Kuske and Dieter Fröhlich for discussions. For J.O.R. Appendix: Seven Reasons for Demanding an LHC Safety Conference 1) Black holes cannot evaporate because their horizon is effectively infinitely far away in spacetime according to a new theorem in the Schwarzschild metric ("Â-theorem") [1]. 2) Black holes are effectively uncharged because of the Â-theorem [1]. Therefore, charged elementary particles cannot at the same time be black holes (or point-shaped). Hence nonpointshaped mini-objects exist already. This makes mini black holes much more likely. 3) Mini black holes grow exponentially rather than linearly inside the earth: "miniquasar principle" [2]. Hence the time needed by a resident mini black hole to eat the earth is maximally shortened - perhaps down to "50 months." This contrasts with the "50 million years" obtained assuming linear growth by BBC-Horizon [3] and CERN's analogous "5 billion years" [4]. 4) CERN [4,5] counters that if the hoped-for mini black holes are stable as claimed [1], equal stable particles must arise naturally by ultra-fast cosmic-ray protons colliding with planetbound protons. This is correct. However, there remains a fundamental difference: only the man-made ones are "symmetrically generated" and hence dangerous. For they alone are slow enough with respect to the earth that one of them (at less than 11 km/sec) can take residence - in contrast to the almost-luminal speeds of their natural cousins. 5) CERN's counterargument could still hold true for more compact celestial bodies than the earth - such that their lifetimes would be drastically reduced in defiance of observation if mini black holes exist. A quantitative bound can be derived from this argument: Take white dwarfs first. They are 105 times denser than earth while being the same size. Hence their cross-section for a mini black hole passing-through is by a factor of 105 greater than earth's. They remain safe if no more than 104 eating-type collisions with a quark await a fast natural mini black hole entering them (so it can pass through). Why? Because the energy of 14.000 GeV pumped into two colliding protons at CERN is 14.000 times the rest mass of a proton (1 GeV). Therefore a mini black hole born of two quarks (one from each proton) likewise has about 14,000 times the rest mass of a quark. Hence by momentum conservation, only about 14,000 (104) collisions with a resident quark can be survived by a fast natural mini black hole of the LHC energy without losing its almost-luminal speed. If this bound applies to white dwarfs, no more than about 0.1 collisions must await a CERN mini black hole on its first passage through the earth. This estimate appears plausible. 6) The just-obtained number presupposes that the nonlinear growth process of point (3) is inapplicable if very dense matter is passed through at almost-luminal speeds. The by very many orders of magnitude shorter collision intervals let this prediction appear justified. 7) Finally, neutron stars have a by another factor of 109 greater density than white dwarfs. Since they are a thousand times smaller, they are a million times more susceptible. But they are protected by quantum coherence effects of the superfluidity type: so mini black holes can pass without friction. The superfluidity extends to the "inner crust" [6]. In order to exclude that man-made mini black holes endanger the earth, it will be necessary to falsify the first of the 7 points, or if this is not possible the second, and so forth. Until this task has been solved, no one can shoulder the responsibility to give the "green light" to the LHC's crossing the 2.000 GeV barrier, as this is currently planned to do within a few weeks. It thus appears that only an immediate safety conference can save the LHC experiment. Links.. LHC Defense http://www.lhcdefense.org/ LHC Concerns http://lhcconcerns.com/ Large Hadron Collider http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Hadron_Collider CERN http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CERN Some CNN Articles http://search.cnn.com/search?query=l...ate&intl=false Some Fear Debut Of Powerful Atom Smasher http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/06/30/d...ref=newssearch National Geograhic - The God Particle http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text BBC News - Lab Fireball May Have Been Black Hole http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4357613.stm An Open Letter To Stephen Hawking http://lhcconcerns.com/LHCConcerns/F...c.php?f=2&t=72 Black Holes On Demand (George Street Journal) http://www.brown.edu/Administration/.../26GSJ10a.html CBC News - LHC http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/science/lhc.html New York Times - LHC Dangerous? http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/15/sc...rssnyt&emc=rss LHC Legal Defense Fund http://www.lhcdefense.org/ http://www.lhcdefense.org/lhc_legal.php LHC Risk Evaluation Forum http://www.risk-evaluation-forum.org/ MySpace STOP CERN Website http://www.myspace.com/stopcern YouTube music Video Of The Atom Smasher (LHC) Black Hole Generator http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOFSrS03wjE#GU5U2spHI_4 French Build Doomsday Machine http://www.misunderstooduniverse.com...ay_Machine.htm U-Tube Videos Documentery Large Hadron Collider - The Search For The Higgs [1 of 3] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fJ6P...eature=related Large Hadron Collider - The Search For The Higgs [2 of 3] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQNPp...eature=related Large Hadron Collider - The Search For The Higgs [3 of 3] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XbKZ...eature=related The Large Hadron Collider: The End Of The Universe? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPxYd...eature=related Safety Of The Large Hadron Collider http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safety_...adron_Collider What Is The LHC? http://www.uslhc.us/What_is_the_LHC High Res Photos Of The LHC During Construction http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/200..._collider.html Radio Interview- CERN Dangers First hour guest, physicist Dr. Walter L. Wagner spoke about possible dangers from upcoming experiments conducted by CERN's Large Hadron Collider, and an accident that occurred there a number of months ago. Assurances that all will be fine at CERN are not borne out by the evidence, he said, and a lawsuit to postpone testing is proceeding. http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/6992/ Doomsday Debate Update From May 30th 2008 http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archi...0/1078538.aspx CERN uses 666 in new Logo http://www.lhcfacts.org/?tag=666 Large Hardron Collider "Probably" Won't Destroy Earth http://www.boingboing.net/2008/06/24...elated_content About Black Holes http://cosmology.berkeley.edu/Education/BHfaq.html#q1 "It's not so unlikely that the LHC could produce black holes, but it's almost certainly true that if it produces those black holes, they are going to evaporate very quickly" http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2...rgess-lhc.html |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
CERN Black Hole Generator Online Soon
On Aug 19, 1:01*am, "LHC Awareness"
wrote: (European Organization for Nuclear Research) Build Worlds Largest 17 Mile Round Particle Accelerator Planetary Risk To Create Artificial BIG BANG Conditions In Lab Old Dying Physicists want to go out with a BIG BANG CERN LHC Blackhole Generator Online Soon Many More Helpful Links And Video Links At Bottom Of Post SNIP Thank you for that and thank you for choosing, from all of the possible newsgroups on usenet, uk.rec.gardening, for breaking this story and warning the world. You were probably tempted to mail this to some heavy physics or science bulletin boards but you were wise to the cunning possibilities of using gardeners to spread the word. It has to be said that we are a dynamic bunch and love nothing better than writing to our local politicians something along the lines of: Dear Mr. O'Sullivan; as my local Green Party councillor, I wish thank you for the new pooper scooper bag dispensers along the seafront that you installed recently. I wish you would do something about the lack of a seat at the 46A busstop, at the top of Church Road as this used to ne such a help for me when I needed to get into town. By the way, a nice man has just wriiten to a gardening newsgroup I read to warn me that those clever chappies in CERN in Geneva may accidentally cause the entire solar system to disappear into a black hole, next Tuesday Week at half past two in the afternoon, just before Countdown. I would like to you to condemn this in the strongest possible terms and perhaps send a sharply worded letter on official council paper. Maybe you could raise this at the next council meeting in October. Yours sincerely, Penelope Windboggler, Mrs. (Retd.) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
CERN Black Hole Generator Online Soon
LHC Awareness wrote:
(European Organization for Nuclear Research) Build Worlds Largest 17 Mile Round Particle Accelerator that is not the way the world ends; This is the way the world ends: Not with a bang but a whimper. Sam |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New Online Games - Grab it soon !!!... | United Kingdom | |||
How soon is too soon? | Edible Gardening | |||
black spots, Black Spots, BLACK SPOTS!!!!bbbbbblllllllaaaaacccckkkkkk ssspppOOOTTTSSSS!!!!!! | Roses | |||
black spots, Black Spots, BLACK SPOTS!!!!bbbbbblllllllaaaaacccckkkkkk | Roses |