"Gordon H" wrote in message
...
In message , Sacha
writes

Gordon, you're a fully paid up nitwit. LOOK AT THE EMAIL ADDRESS THAT
PURPORTS TO BE MINE. It's altered so as to slip past idiots who,
apparently, can't read. I did not start the thread and I did not describe
this as my group. That is the work of a troll who you're giving a really
lovely time. Pull yourself together. My address does not end in 'cum' and
nor do I call myself sachah.

Apparently insults are acceptable in this group.

If you have your own personal Troll following you about it is your
problem, not mine, and I have to say that his style and tone are as
pompous as yours!

I don't examine every address before reading every post, do you?
Neither did Charlie Pridham nor Steve, apparently.

Are you calling them idiots?
LOL!

If I put you in my K/F as I have in other groups it will prevent this
happening again. ;-)
--


Wouldn't it be easier just to hold your hands up and admit you got caught by
a prank?

mark

In message , mark
writes

"Gordon H" wrote

Wouldn't it be easier just to hold your hands up and admit you got caught by
a prank?
mark

I thought that was obvious, and I wasn't the only one. ;-)
It won't happen again.
--
Gordon H
Remove "invalid" to reply

On Aug 11, 11:25*am, Gordon H
wrote:
In message , mark
writes

"Gordon H" wrote

Wouldn't it be easier just to hold your hands up and admit you got caught by
a prank?
mark

I thought that was obvious, and I wasn't the only one. * * ;-)
It won't happen again.
--
Gordon H
Remove "invalid" to reply

I have never ever seen Charlie or any other gentleman on this group
insult Sacha, you seem to make a habit of insulting her. Of course we
both know why, it has NO place here!

On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:25:00 +0100, Gordon H
wrote:

In message , mark
writes

"Gordon H" wrote

Wouldn't it be easier just to hold your hands up and admit you got caught by
a prank?
mark

I thought that was obvious, and I wasn't the only one. ;-)

Me and Charlie were offering methods of avoiding the troll. Neither of
us were fooled by the fake Sacha. I have been using the same groups as
Sacha for long enough to know that she would not have posted the
message. It was obviously a fake message.

Steve

--
Neural Planner Software Ltd www.NPSL1.com

On Aug 11, 12:00*pm, Stephen Wolstenholme
wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:25:00 +0100, Gordon H

wrote:
In message , mark
writes

"Gordon H" wrote

Wouldn't it be easier just to hold your hands up and admit you got caught by
a prank?
mark

I thought that was obvious, and I wasn't the only one. * * ;-)

Me and Charlie were offering methods of avoiding the troll. Neither of
us were fooled by the fake Sacha. I have been using the same groups as
Sacha for long enough to know that she would not have posted the
message. It was obviously a fake message.

Steve

--
Neural Planner Software Ltd * * * * * * * * *www.NPSL1.com

Exactly, Gordon is a relative newcomer, although Sacha has been
posting for a couple of years, as I have, on another group he
inhabits; in fact he followed both Sacha and I into this group. No
doubt his 2 female rottweilers will be along shortly to have a few
words of support for him, this is how it goes with Gordon I'm afraid.

Judith

"Gordon H" wrote in message
...

I don't examine every address before reading every post, do you?

No, but I do check addresses when the post is out of character, as these
were.
--
Kay

"Janet Baraclough" wrote in message
...
The message
from K contains these words:



"Gordon H" wrote in message
...

I don't examine every address before reading every post, do you?

No, but I do check addresses when the post is out of character, as these
were.

Unfortunately, Kay, they were not out of character for how Sacha
behaves elsewhere.
Gordon has been on the receiving end often enough, as have I.

Janet.


Interesting, I thought it was just me on the receiving end. Don't receive it
from anywhere else, so maybe ............... :-(

--
Mike

The Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association
www.rneba.org.uk
Luxury Self Catering on the Isle of Wight?
www.shanklinmanormews.co.uk

In message , Janet Baraclough
writes
The message
from K contains these words:

"Gordon H" wrote in message
...

I don't examine every address before reading every post, do you?

No, but I do check addresses when the post is out of character, as these
were.

Unfortunately, Kay, they were not out of character for how Sacha
behaves elsewhere.
Gordon has been on the receiving end often enough, as have I.
Janet.

It depends who she is talking to. I treat everyone the same until
they give me reason to do otherwise.
Patronisation or an air of superiority always gets my hackles up, and I
block their posts.
--
Gordon H
Remove "invalid" to reply

On Aug 12, 4:57*pm, Gordon H
wrote:
In message , Janet Baraclough
writes

The message
from K contains these words:

"Gordon H" wrote in message
...

I don't examine every address before reading every post, do you?

No, but I do check addresses when the post is out of character, as these
were.

* *Unfortunately, Kay, they were *not out of character for how Sacha
behaves elsewhere.
* *Gordon has been on the receiving end *often enough, as have I.
* *Janet.

It depends who she is talking to. * * *I treat everyone the same until
they give me reason to do otherwise.
Patronisation or an air of superiority always gets my hackles up, and I
block their posts.
--
Gordon H
Remove "invalid" to reply

How many times do you have to be told? Please do us all a favour, we
are tired of you and your behaviour.

On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:29:58 -0700 (PDT), Judith in France
wrote:

On Aug 12, 4:57*pm, Gordon H
wrote:
In message , Janet Baraclough
writes

The message
from K contains these words:

"Gordon H" wrote in message
...

I don't examine every address before reading every post, do you?

No, but I do check addresses when the post is out of character, as these
were.

* *Unfortunately, Kay, they were *not out of character for how Sacha
behaves elsewhere.
* *Gordon has been on the receiving end *often enough, as have I.
* *Janet.

It depends who she is talking to. * * *I treat everyone the same until
they give me reason to do otherwise.
Patronisation or an air of superiority always gets my hackles up, and I
block their posts.
--
Gordon H
Remove "invalid" to reply

How many times do you have to be told? Please do us all a favour, we
are tired of you and your behaviour.

What about you and your behaviour with Mike Clayton?

Does his wife and your husband know all about it?

--
Sandra

In message ,
lid writes
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:29:58 -0700 (PDT), Judith in France
wrote:

On Aug 12, 4:57*pm, Gordon H
wrote:
In message , Janet Baraclough
writes

The message
from K contains these words:

"Gordon H" wrote in message
...

I don't examine every address before reading every post, do you?

No, but I do check addresses when the post is out of character, as these
were.

* *Unfortunately, Kay, they were *not out of character for how Sacha
behaves elsewhere.
* *Gordon has been on the receiving end *often enough, as have I.
* *Janet.

It depends who she is talking to. * * *I treat everyone the same until
they give me reason to do otherwise.
Patronisation or an air of superiority always gets my hackles up, and I
block their posts.
--
Gordon H
Remove "invalid" to reply

How many times do you have to be told? Please do us all a favour, we
are tired of you and your behaviour.


There she goes again, all hoity-toity, spokeswoman for a whole group.

What about you and your behaviour with Mike Clayton?

Does his wife and your husband know all about it?

I bet Mike wishes he had never heard of her...
--
Gordon H
Remove "invalid" to reply

In message , Anne Welsh Jackson
writes
Judith in France wrote:

How many times do you have to be told? Please do us all a favour, we
are tired of you and your behaviour.

Are you speaking for everyone else in this group, Judith?

Who told you this was acceptable?

Now, just sit down, and shut up for a while, why don't you?

Peers out from behind Anne's skirt

Take the dogs for walk Judy, the mountain air will do you all good.
I'm going to breathe some tomorrow.
--
Gordon H
Remove "invalid" to reply

On Aug 12, 10:42*pm, Gordon H
wrote:
In message , Anne Welsh Jackson
writesJudith in France wrote:

How many times do you have to be told? *Please do us all a favour, we
are tired of you and your behaviour.

Are you speaking for everyone else in this group, Judith?

Who told you this was acceptable?

Now, just sit down, and shut up for a while, why don't you?

Peers out from behind Anne's skirt

Take the dogs for walk Judy, the mountain air will do you all good.
I'm going to breathe some tomorrow.
--
Gordon H
Remove "invalid" to reply

Unless you can talk about gardening Godon, you will find yourself very
unwelcome here, you have shown urglers just why you came here and who
you are aligned with. Now quit the crossposting, the sly digs, many
of us are very tired of this and want urg to be as it was before you
arrived.

Anne Welsh Jackson wrote:
Judith in France wrote:
Gordon H wrote:
Anne Welsh Jackson writes: Judith in France
wrote:

How many times do you have to be told? Please do us all
a favour, we are tired of you and your behaviour.

Are you speaking for everyone else in this group, Judith?
Who told you this was acceptable?
Now, just sit down, and shut up for a while, why don't you?

Peers out from behind Anne's skirt

Take the dogs for walk Judy, the mountain air will do you all good.
I'm going to breathe some tomorrow.

Unless you can talk about gardening Godon, you will find yourself
very unwelcome here, you have shown urglers just why you came here
and who you are aligned with. Now quit the crossposting, the sly
digs, many of us are very tired of this and want urg to be as it
was before you arrived.

In which case if you were to stop adding to the thread, and stop
ordering people around, and accusing others of being trolls, who
knows but it just might die down?

As long as you keep stoking the fire, it'll keep on burning...
AND I'll remind YOU of your comment, next time you go off
at a tangent, and post off-topic threads, be sure of it!

And so you will continue to try to destroy a persons life. How proud you
must be,

In message , Anne Welsh Jackson
writes

I was just up at the top of the garden, to see if the meteor shower
was visible - but it wasn't! Beautiful clear, starry night, though...

I went to bed. I guessed it would be cloudy.
Just popped up here to check the rainfall radar before my driver calls.
Hardly worth taking waterproofs, but there's some nasty stuff headed for
Northern France and Hutsonland. :-)
--
Gordon H
Remove "invalid" to reply