Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Coffee grounds and slugs
Would you mind not falsely editing my post to make it look as if I replied to you above? I was responding to this .In article , says... The results of this study will be interesting https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-44357663 Janet Would you care to explain just what you are objecting too? The answer I gave was to the discussion in general, reposting the complete thread every time is pointless. In no way would I ever knowinly falsely edit any ones post, and have not ever done it in the 20 + years I have been using this newsgroup. If I have made an error a simple polite correction would have been in order Derek |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Coffee grounds and slugs
On 06/06/18 22:25, Derek wrote:
Would you mind not falsely editing my post to make it look as if I replied to you above? I was responding to this .In article , says... The results of this study will be interesting https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-44357663 Janet Would you care to explain just what you are objecting too? The answer I gave was to the discussion in general, reposting the complete thread every time is pointless. In no way would I ever knowinly falsely edit any ones post, and have not ever done it in the 20 + years I have been using this newsgroup. If I have made an error a simple polite correction would have been in order Derek From an independent observer's point of view... Janet's original post said (with my emphasis between the **):- "Pity they aren't including wood ash in the trial. When we had a woodstove I used to put a circle of the fine ash round individual brassicas and in rows between the strawberries, *which seemed to work well*." Your reply to, and including, her snipped post (again, my emphasis between the **): " Pity they aren't including wood ash in the trial. Janet Well they did, *and it was not a succes*, after all the slug rides on mucus, so most materials willnot stop them " Your reply indicates a direct opposite to what she had found when she tried wood ash. In addition, the BBC page made no mention of wood ash as far as I can see, so your use of "they" is misleading in that anyone reading it would believe it referred to the RHS trial. In any case, that trial has only just started, so if you know of someone who tried wood ash in another trial you are referring to, and if it was not a success, could you please post a link to it. -- Jeff |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Coffee grounds and slugs
In addition, the BBC page made no mention of wood ash as
far as I can see, so your use of "they" is misleading in that anyone reading it would believe it referred to the RHS trial. In any case, that trial has only just started, so if you know of someone who tried wood ash in another trial you are referring to, and if it was not a success, could you please post a link to it. Thanks for clearing that up, Allotment growers UK facebook page has had lots of discussions and the trial I was refering to is the one by Matt Peskett https://www.growlikegrandad.co.uk/al...ypsum-yes.html I too saw the BBC item, and it came across as some new fangled research. it seemed relevent to point out that ash when wet is like most barriers a waste of time, Asking for clarification would have been a better way Derek A user of News groups since Bullinton Boards and Blue Wave :-) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Coffee grounds and slugs
On 08/06/18 21:24, Derek wrote:
In addition, the BBC page made no mention of wood ash as far as I can see, so your use of "they" is misleading in that anyone reading it would believe it referred to the RHS trial. In any case, that trial has only just started, so if you know of someone who tried wood ash in another trial you are referring to, and if it was not a success, could you please post a link to it. Thanks for clearing that up, Allotment growers UK facebook page has had lots of discussions and the trial I was refering to is the one by Matt Peskett https://www.growlikegrandad.co.uk/al...ypsum-yes.html I too saw the BBC item, and it came across as some new fangled research. it seemed relevent to point out that ash when wet is like most barriers a waste of time, Asking for clarification would have been a better way Derek A user of News groups since Bullinton Boards and Blue Wave :-) Thanks for the link. I am not in the least surprised that most of the barriers were ineffective, especially when wet. The thorny barriers are interesting, but only really suitable for selected plants. I have wondered if ultrafine sand or silica sprayed in an adhesive gel which sticks to plants would dissuade slugs and snails from eating them. It would be a very hard material which could blunt the teeth on their radulas. -- Jeff |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Coffee grounds and slugs ? | Edible Gardening | |||
Mystery of slugs & coffee grounds | Gardening | |||
Mystery of slugs & coffee grounds | United Kingdom | |||
coffee grounds from cold press coffee | Roses | |||
Q: Worms and Coffee Grounds | Gardening |