Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Data protection Act
In message , Franz Heymann
writes "David Hill" wrote in message ... "...........Actually, no, it isn't. You are not a data holder under either of the two Acts if you simply reply to a message. If you disagree, please post or Email a reference to the section of the Act that makes it illegal........" Actually the reference came from a programme on Radio 4 today dealing with the above act, and it was given as one of the lesser known anomalies of the act, when they were stressing the need for it to be radically revised. The act stinks with anomalies. Even the address list which Outlook Express keeps for my personal use is not supposed to hold data on any person for more than 30 days. In principle every user of OE should registrer with the Data Protection Registrar. Franz Utter rubbish. -- hugh Reply to address is valid at the time of posting |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Re data protection act | United Kingdom | |||
OT (just) Data protection Act | United Kingdom | |||
OT (just) Data protection Act | United Kingdom | |||
OT Data protection Act | United Kingdom | |||
OT. Data protection Act | United Kingdom |