ned wrote:

I've put two pics of a flowering orchid up at
http://website.lineone.net/~alan.dale/

Apologies for the large graphic sizes, but could anyone offer any
suggestions for an id please.

--
ned

Perhaps I could, if the page would open for me (can't see it, tried
Internet Explorer and Netscape).
Regards,
Roger.

--
Walk tall, walk straight, and look the world right into the eye.

You're welcome to visit my gardening page:
http://users.pandora.be/roger.van.loon/gardenp.htm

Roger Van Loon wrote:
ned wrote:

I've put two pics of a flowering orchid up at
http://website.lineone.net/~alan.dale/

Apologies for the large graphic sizes, but could anyone offer any
suggestions for an id please.

--
ned

Perhaps I could, if the page would open for me (can't see it, tried
Internet Explorer and Netscape).


Hmmm. Two others have reported that the web page did not view on
Oracle and was garbled on IE6. 'Have to admit it was my first web page
attempt so 'not many clues on what might be wrong. It was done using
MS PictureIt - could that be the cause? :-)
I now know that MS PictureIt is heavy with java scripts and various MS
baggage files.

I'm off to look at your site.
--
ned

"ned" wrote in message
...
Roger Van Loon wrote:
ned wrote:

I've put two pics of a flowering orchid up at
http://website.lineone.net/~alan.dale/

Apologies for the large graphic sizes, but could anyone offer any
suggestions for an id please.

--
ned

Perhaps I could, if the page would open for me (can't see it, tried
Internet Explorer and Netscape).


Hmmm. Two others have reported that the web page did not view on
Oracle and was garbled on IE6. 'Have to admit it was my first web page
attempt so 'not many clues on what might be wrong. It was done using
MS PictureIt - could that be the cause? :-)
I now know that MS PictureIt is heavy with java scripts and various MS
baggage files.

I'm off to look at your site.
--
ned

The trouble with writing websites is that different browsers, and even
different versions of the same browser, can display the web page (or not, as
the case may be!) in different ways. It's a bit of a minefield. When I
first made my website (3 years ago, now) I didn't know that, and had to rely
on trial and error, and people to tell me they couldn't see bits of my site.
Stick with it - the bit of the page that *did* display for me before the
runtime errors looked really good. (It helps if you can write HTML or
JavaScript so that you can spot what's wrong yourself, but it takes
time........)

Best of luck and a Happy New Year
--
Chrissie
http://www.thegardener.btinternet.co.uk

TheGardener wrote:

snip

The trouble with writing websites is that different browsers, and
even different versions of the same browser, can display the web
page (or not, as the case may be!) in different ways. It's a bit
of a minefield. When I first made my website (3 years ago, now) I
didn't know that, and had to rely on trial and error, and people to
tell me they couldn't see bits of my site. Stick with it - the bit
of the page that *did* display for me before the runtime errors
looked really good. (It helps if you can write HTML or JavaScript
so that you can spot what's wrong yourself, but it takes
time........)

Yes I'm already appreciating how steep the learning curve is. :-)
And, having been advised of all the 'junk' that MS PictureIt, (and
other 'quickie' packages) load in, I'm already contemplating the html
adventure.

As soon as I can put some basic html together - you will be the first
to know!!!

Many thanks for your encouragement.

--
ned

"ned" wrote in message
...
TheGardener wrote:

snip

The trouble with writing websites is that different browsers, and
even different versions of the same browser, can display the web
page (or not, as the case may be!) in different ways. It's a bit
of a minefield. When I first made my website (3 years ago, now) I
didn't know that, and had to rely on trial and error, and people to
tell me they couldn't see bits of my site. Stick with it - the bit
of the page that *did* display for me before the runtime errors
looked really good. (It helps if you can write HTML or JavaScript
so that you can spot what's wrong yourself, but it takes
time........)

Yes I'm already appreciating how steep the learning curve is. :-)
And, having been advised of all the 'junk' that MS PictureIt, (and
other 'quickie' packages) load in, I'm already contemplating the html
adventure.

As soon as I can put some basic html together - you will be the first
to know!!!

Many thanks for your encouragement.

--
ned

HTML is probably the easiest programming language to master - it's very
logical! I taught myself from a book - if a dumbo like me can do it -
anyone can!! Good luck!

--
Chrissie
http://www.thegardener.btinternet.co.uk