The Truth About "Martin Luther King, Jr."

WHEN THE COMMUNISTS TOOK OVER a country, one of the first things that
they did was to confiscate all the privately-held weapons, to deny the
people the physical ability to resist tyranny. But even more insidious
than the theft of the people's weapons was the theft of their history.
Official Communist "historians" rewrote history to fit the current
party line. In many countries, revered national heroes were excised
from the history books, or their real deeds were distorted to fit
Communist ideology, and Communist killers and criminals were converted
into official "saints." Holidays were declared in honor of the beasts
who murdered countless nations.

Did you know that much the same process has occurred right here in
America?

Every January, the media go into a kind of almost spastic frenzy of
adulation for the so-called "Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr."
King has even had a national holiday declared in his honor, an honor
accorded to no other American, not Washington, not Jefferson, not
Lincoln. (Washington and Lincoln no longer have holidays -- they share
the generic-sounding "President's Day.") A liberal judge has sealed
the
FBI files on King until the year 2027. What are they hiding? Let's
take
a look at this modern-day plastic god.

Born in 1929, King was the son of a Black preacher known at the time
only as "Daddy King." "Daddy King" named his son Michael. In 1935,
"Daddy King" had an inspiration to name himself after the Protestant
reformer Martin Luther. He declared to his congregation that
henceforth
they were to refer to him as "Martin Luther King" and to his son as
"Martin Luther King, Jr." None of this name changing was ever
legalized
in court. "Daddy" King's son's real name is to this day Michael King.

King's Brazen Cheating

We read in Michael Hoffman's "Holiday for a Cheater":

The first public sermon that King ever gave, in 1947 at the Ebenezer
Baptist Church, was plagiarized from a homily by Protestant clergyman
Harry Emerson Fosdick entitled "Life is What You Make It," according
to
the testimony of King's best friend of that time, Reverend Larry H.
Williams.

The first book that King wrote, "Stride Toward Freedom, - -was
plagiarized from numerous sources, all unattributed, according to
documentation recently assembled by sympathetic King scholars Keith D.
Miller, Ira G. Zepp, Jr., and David J. Garrow.

And no less an authoritative source than the four senior editors of
"The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr.- - (an official publication of
the Martin Luther King Center for Nonviolent Social Change, Inc.,
whose
staff includes King's widow Coretta), stated of King's writings at
both
Boston University and Crozer Theological Seminary: "Judged
retroactively by the standards of academic scholarship, [his writings]
are tragically flawed by numerous instances of plagiarism....
Appropriated passages are particularly evident in his writings in his
major field of graduate study, systematic theology."

King's essay, "The Place of Reason and Experience in Finding God,"
written at Crozer, pirated passages from the work of theologian Edgar
S. Brightman, author of "The Finding of God."

Another of King's theses, "Contemporary Continental Theology," written
shortly after he entered Boston University, was largely stolen from a
book by Walter Marshall Horton.

King's doctoral dissertation, "A Comparison of the Conceptions of God
in the Thinking of Paul Tillich and Harry Nelson Wieman," for which he
was awarded a PhD in theology, contains more than fifty complete
sentences plagiarized from the PhD dissertation of Dr. Jack Boozer,
"The Place of Reason in Paul Tillich's Concept of God."

According to "The Martin Luther King Papers", in King's dissertation
"only 49 per cent of sentences in the section on Tillich contain five
or more words that were King's own...."!

In "The Journal of American History", June 1991, page 87, David J.
Garrow, a leftist academic who is sympathetic to King, says that
King's
wife, Coretta Scott King, who also served as his secretary, was an
accomplice in his repeated cheating. ("King's Plagiarism: Imitation,
Insecurity and Transformation," The Journal of American History, June
1991, p. 87)

Reading Garrow's article, one is led to the inescapable conclusion
that
King cheated because he had chosen for himself a political role in
which a PhD would be useful, and, lacking the intellectual ability to
obtain the title fairly, went after it by any means necessary. Why,
then, one might ask, did the professors at Crozer Theological Seminary
and Boston University grant him passing grades and a PhD? Garrow
states
on page 89: "King's academic compositions, especially at Boston
University, were almost without exception little more than summary
descriptions... and comparisons of other's writings. Nonetheless, the
papers almost always received desirable letter grades, strongly
suggesting that King's professors did not expect more...." The editors
of "The Martin Luther King Jr. Papers" state that "...the failure of
King's teachers to notice his pattern of textual appropriation is
somewhat remarkable...."

But researcher Michael Hoffman tells us "...actually the malfeasance
of
the professors is not at all remarkable. King was politically correct,
he was Black, and he had ambitions. The leftist [professors were]
happy
to award a doctorate to such a candidate no matter how much fraud was
involved. Nor is it any wonder that it has taken forty years for the
truth about King's record of nearly constant intellectual piracy to be
made public."

Supposed scholars, who in reality shared King's vision of a racially
mixed and Marxist America, purposely covered up his cheating for
decades. The cover-up still continues. From the "New York Times" of
October 11, 1991, page 15, we learn that on October 10th of that year,
a committee of researchers at Boston University admitted that, "There
is no question but that Dr. King plagiarized in the dissertation."
However, despite its finding, the committee said that "No thought
should be given to the revocation of Dr. King's doctoral degree," an
action the panel said "would serve no purpose."

No purpose, indeed! Justice demands that, in light of his willful
fraud
as a student, the "reverend" and the "doctor" should be removed from
King's name.

Communist Beliefs and Connections

Well friends, he is not a legitimate reverend, he is not a bona fide
PhD, and his name isn't really "Martin Luther King, Jr." What's left?
Just a sexual degenerate, an America-hating Communist, and a criminal
betrayer of even the interests of his own people.

On Labor Day, 1957, a special meeting was attended by Martin Luther
King and four others at a strange institution called the Highlander
Folk School in Monteagle, Tennessee. The Highlander Folk School was a
Communist front, having been founded by Myles Horton (Communist Party
organizer for Tennessee) and Don West (Communist Party organizer for
North Carolina). The leaders of this meeting with King were the
aforementioned Horton and West, along with Abner Berry and James
Dumbrowski, all open and acknowledged members of the Communist Party,
USA. The agenda of the meeting was a plan to tour the Southern states
to initiate demonstrations and riots.

From 1955 to 1960, Martin Luther King's associate, advisor, and
personal secretary was one Bayard Rustin. In 1936 Rustin joined the
Young Communist League at New York City College. Convicted of
draft-dodging, he went to prison for two years in 1944. On January 23,
1953 the "Los Angeles Times" reported his conviction and sentencing to
jail for 60 days for lewd vagrancy and homosexual perversion. Rustin
attended the 16th Convention of the Communist Party, USA in February,
1957. One month later, he and King founded the Southern Christian
Leadership Conference, or SCLC for short. The president of the SCLC
was
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. The vice-president of the SCLC was the
Reverend Fred Shuttlesworth, who was also the president of an
identified Communist front known as the Southern Conference
Educational
Fund, an organization whose field director, a Mr. Carl Braden, was
simultaneously a national sponsor of the Fair Play for Cuba Committee,
of which you may have heard. The program director of the SCLC was the
Reverend Andrew Young, in more recent years Jimmy Carter's ambassador
to the UN and mayor of Atlanta. Young, by the way, was trained at the
Highlander Folk School, previously mentioned.

Soon after returning from a trip to Moscow in 1958, Rustin organized
the first of King's famous marches on Washington. The official organ
of
the Communist Party, "The Worker,- - openly declared the march to be a
Communist project. Although he left King's employ as secretary in
1961,
Rustin was called upon by King to be second in command of the much
larger march on Washington which took place on August 28, 1963.

Bayard Rustin's replacement in 1961 as secretary and advisor to King
was Jack O'Dell, also known as Hunter Pitts O'Dell. According to
official records, in 1962 Jack O'Dell was a member of the National
Committee of the Communist Party, USA. He had been listed as a
Communist Party member as early as 1956. O'Dell was also given the job
of acting executive director for SCLC activities for the entire
Southeast, according to the St. Louis "Globe-Democrat - -of October
26,
1962. At that time, there were still some patriots in the press corps,
and word of O'Dell's party membership became known.

What did King do? Shortly after the negative news reports, King fired
O'Dell with much fanfare. And he then, without the fanfare,
"immediately hired him again- - as director of the New York office of
the SCLC, as confirmed by the "Richmond News-Leader - -of September
27,
1963. In 1963 a Black man from Monroe, North Carolina named Robert
Williams made a trip to Peking, China. Exactly 20 days before King's
1963 march on Washington, Williams successfully urged Mao Tse-Tung to
speak out on behalf of King's movement. Mr. Williams was also around
this time maintaining his primary residence in Cuba, from which he
made
regular broadcasts to the southern US, three times a week, from
high-power AM transmitters in Havana under the title "Radio Free
Dixie." In these broadcasts, he urged violent attacks by Blacks
against
White Americans.

During this period, Williams wrote a book entitled "Negroes With
Guns."
The writer of the foreword for this book? None other than Martin
Luther
King, Jr. It is also interesting to note that the editors and
publishers of this book were to a man all supporters of the infamous
Fair Play for Cuba Committee.

According to King's biographer and sympathizer David J. Garrow, "King
privately described himself as a Marxist." In his 1981 book, "The FBI
and Martin Luther King, Jr.", Garrow quotes King as saying in SCLC
staff meetings, "...we have moved into a new era, which must be an era
of revolution.... The whole structure of American life must be
changed.... We are engaged in the class struggle."

Jewish Communist Stanley Levison can best be described as King's
behind-the-scenes "handler." Levison, who had for years been in charge
of the secret funnelling of Soviet funds to the Communist Party, USA,
was King's mentor and was actually the brains behind many of King's
more successful ploys. It was Levison who edited King's book, "Stride
Toward Freedom." It was Levison who arranged for a publisher. Levison
even prepared King's income tax returns! It was Levison who really
controlled the fund-raising and agitation activities of the SCLC.
Levison wrote many of King's speeches. King described Levison as one
of
his "closest friends."

FBI: King Bought Sex With SCLC Money

The Federal Bureau of Investigation had for many years been aware of
Stanley Levison's Communist activities. It was Levison's close
association with King that brought about the initial FBI interest in
King.

Lest you be tempted to believe the controlled media's lie about
"racists" in the FBI being out to "get" King, you should be aware that
the man most responsible for the FBI's probe of King was Assistant
Director William C. Sullivan. Sullivan describes himself as a liberal,
and says that initially "I was one hundred per cent for King...because
I saw him as an effective and badly needed leader for the Black people
in their desire for civil rights." The probe of King not only
confirmed
their suspicions about King's Communist beliefs and associations, but
it also revealed King to be a despicable hypocrite, an immoral
degenerate, and a worthless charlatan.

According to Assistant Director Sullivan, who had direct access to the
surveillance files on King which are denied the American people, King
had embezzled or misapplied substantial amounts of money contributed
to
the "civil rights" movement. King used SCLC funds to pay for liquor,
and numerous prostitutes both Black and White, who were brought to his
hotel rooms, often two at a time, for drunken sex parties which
sometimes lasted for several days. These types of activities were the
norm for King's speaking and organizing tours.

In fact, an outfit called The National Civil Rights Museum in Memphis,
Tennessee, which is putting on display the two bedrooms from the
Lorraine Motel where King stayed the night before he was shot, has
declined to depict in any way the "occupants - -of those rooms. That
"according to exhibit designer Gerard Eisterhold "would be "close to
blasphemy." The reason? Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. spent his last
night on Earth having sex with two women at the motel and physically
beating and abusing a third.

Sullivan also stated that King had alienated the affections of
numerous
married women. According to Sullivan, who in 30 years with the Bureau
hadáseen everything there was to be seen of the seamy side of life,
King was one of only seven people he had ever encountered who was such
a total degenerate.

Noting the violence that almost invariably attended King's supposedly
"non-violent" marches, Sullivan's probe revealed a very different King
from the carefully crafted public image. King welcomed members of many
different Black groups as members of his SCLC, many of them advocates
and practitioners of violence. King's only admonition on the subject
was that they should embrace "tactical nonviolence."

Sullivan also relates an incident in which King met in a financial
conference with Communist Party representatives, not knowing that one
of the participants was an infiltrator actually working for the FBI.

J. Edgar Hoover personally saw to it that documented information on
King's Communist connections was provided to the President and to
Congress. And conclusive information from FBI files was also provided
to major newspapers and news wire services. But were the American
people informed of King's real nature? No, for even in the 1960s, the
fix was in "the controlled media and the bought politicians were bound
and determined to push their racial mixing program on America. King
was
their man and nothing was going to get in their way. With a few minor
exceptions, these facts have been kept from the American people. The
pro-King propaganda machine grinds on, and it is even reported that a
serious proposal has been made to add some of King's writings as a new
book in the Bible.

Ladies and gentlemen, the purpose of this radio program is far greater
than to prove to you the immorality and subversion of this man called
King. I want you to start to think for yourselves. I want you to
consider this: What are the forces and motivation behind the
controlled
media's active promotion of King? What does it tell you about our
politicians when you see them, almost without exception, falling all
over themselves to honor King as a national hero? What does it tell
you
about our society when any public criticism of this moral leper and
Communist functionary is considered grounds for dismissal? What does
it
tell you about the controlled media when you see how they have
successfully suppressed the truth and held out a picture of King that
can only be described as a colossal lie? You need to think, my fellow
Americans. You desperately need to wake up.

Sources:

1. The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr.- - (an official publication
of
the Martin Luther King Center for Nonviolent Social Change).

2. "King's Plagiarism: Imitation, Insecurity and Transformation," The
Journal of American History, June 1991, p. 87) David J. Garrow

3. New York Times" of October 11, 1991, page 15.

4. "The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr.", David J. Garrow, (1981).

5. "And the walls came tumbling down," Rev. Ralph Abernathy (1989)

In article
,
Rusty Trombone wrote:

The Truth About "Martin Luther King, Jr."

Thanks for reminding us.

The truth is that he was a great man. A man who spoke truth to power,
even when it put his own life in jeopardy. A man who looked at the
contents of a man's heart, not just the color of his skin. A man of
peace, who is sorely missed today.

Even as America has turned it's back on those who would use race to
divide us, those who would seek privilege based on the color of their
skin, those who wish to distract our attention away from the important
tasks that lie before us to protect all the citizens of the world, we
need to remember that even as we have moved forward, the journey to
equality and justice is not over.

Martin Luther King, Jr. didn't have to die. He could have walked away to
become an old man, bouncing his grandchildren on his knee, but he stood
firm to give us a dream of what could be, a dream of a better world, a
world with equality, justice, and dignity for all.

Thank you, Reverend King.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbUtL_0vAJk
--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satelli...cle%2FShowFull
http://countercurrents.org/roberts020709.htm

A very biased picture. The bogeyman of communism combined with the huge
evil of adultery. He must have been such a bad man capable of anything,
surely he spat on the pavement and lied to his mother about getting home
late at night as well, why wasn't that mentioned? I wonder why you had the
need to post it here, I wonder who is it serving and in what way. Don't
tell me that this is a public service to tell the truth. It is propaganda
pure and simple - but why? And speaking of plagiarism if you are the author
of this I would be amazed. If you are going to publish such OT material at
least tell us where you got it.

As an outsider I really wonder about the American tendency to both revile
and worship their heroes. It seems that one man's saint is another's sinner
and there is little objective balance. As if discovering that MLK was not a
saint was such a surprise.

If you took all the great men and women of history who have made the world a
better place you would find many of them had serious personal flaws,
particularly if judged against the prevailing public morality of the day. A
morality that is disregarded in private more often than not. Of course those
who also went against the establishment are bound to cop it by having those
flaws exposed and exploited for political reasons. Does that mean that
their achievements didn't happen? Getting back to King, does that mean
there was no need for the lot of Negroes to be improved? A biased and
sanctimonious picture indeed.

David

In article
,
Rusty Trombone wrote:

The Truth About "Martin Luther King, Jr."
SNIP...


Decisive hate talk only leads to the misery of the human soul.

Proverb: If you're too conceited or self-important, something will
happen to make you look foolish.

In many religions, PRIDE is a sin.
Are you committing a sin Rusty?
Do you really think you are better than MLK?
Consider the Proverb before you respond.

Enjoy Life ... Dan

--
Garden in Zone 5 South East Michigan.

In article c0ef122b-9e67-4753-885b-8e3bf8a0bc23
@g25g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says...
The Truth About "Martin Luther King, Jr."

WHEN THE COMMUNISTS TOOK OVER a country, one of the first things that
they did was to confiscate all the privately-held weapons, to deny the

Geezus Marie.

If you're going to troll, why not make it short and to the point?

phorbin wrote:
In article c0ef122b-9e67-4753-885b-8e3bf8a0bc23
@g25g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says...
The Truth About "Martin Luther King, Jr."

WHEN THE COMMUNISTS TOOK OVER a country, one of the first things that
they did was to confiscate all the privately-held weapons, to deny
the

Geezus Marie.

If you're going to troll, why not make it short and to the point?

Well he has a history of provocative remarks about negroes, homosexuals and
other target groups. Trolling is definitely his style. But is he genuine
arsehole or just pretending in order to get attention? How does one tell?
Does it matter?

David

In article , says...

phorbin wrote:
In article c0ef122b-9e67-4753-885b-8e3bf8a0bc23
@g25g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says...
The Truth About "Martin Luther King, Jr."

WHEN THE COMMUNISTS TOOK OVER a country, one of the first things that
they did was to confiscate all the privately-held weapons, to deny
the

Geezus Marie.

If you're going to troll, why not make it short and to the point?

Well he has a history of provocative remarks about negroes, homosexuals and
other target groups. Trolling is definitely his style. But is he genuine
arsehole or just pretending in order to get attention? How does one tell?
Does it matter?

I think your last question is most salient.

I don't think his motives matter.

With apologies to the anatidae family, "If it walks like a duck."

I live 10 miles from here.

Bill

........................

GLASSBORO Harry Belafonte is a man all-too familiar with making speeches
on the annual holiday honoring his friend, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
But finding something new to talk about isn't a challenge for him.
"From the way in which we've conducted ourselves as a nation, and as a
people, there seems to be much we have not heard, much we don't know"
about Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Belafonte said Monday before a crowd
of 375 people in Rowan University's student center ballroom.
The 82-year-old musician, social activist and close-confidant of King
during the Civil Rights Movement was the keynote speaker at the
university's 24th annual Martin Luther King Jr. Scholarship Breakfast.

Much more here.

http://www.nj.com/gloucester/index.s...625285320.xml&
coll=8

--
Garden in shade zone 5 S Jersey USA

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/757.html What is Global Dimming??
Less light more shade world wide food implications
Reduction of Vitamin D too?

In article ,
Bill who putters wrote:

I live 10 miles from here.

Bill

.......................

GLASSBORO Harry Belafonte is a man all-too familiar with making speeches
on the annual holiday honoring his friend, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
But finding something new to talk about isn't a challenge for him.
"From the way in which we've conducted ourselves as a nation, and as a
people, there seems to be much we have not heard, much we don't know"
about Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Belafonte said Monday before a crowd
of 375 people in Rowan University's student center ballroom.
The 82-year-old musician, social activist and close-confidant of King
during the Civil Rights Movement was the keynote speaker at the
university's 24th annual Martin Luther King Jr. Scholarship Breakfast.

Much more here.

http://www.nj.com/gloucester/index.s...625285320.xml&
coll=8

Sorry the post needed the delimiter

http://www.nj.com/gloucester/index.s...9625285320.xml
&coll=8

--
Garden in shade zone 5 S Jersey USA

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/757.html What is Global Dimming??
Less light more shade world wide food implications
Reduction of Vitamin D too?

On Jan 18, 6:18*pm, Rusty Trombone wrote:
The Truth About "Martin Luther King, Jr."

WHEN THE COMMUNISTS TOOK OVER a country, one of the first things that
they did was to confiscate all the privately-held weapons, to deny the
people the physical ability to resist tyranny. But even more insidious
than the theft of the people's weapons was the theft of their history.
Official Communist "historians" rewrote history to fit the current
party line. In many countries, revered national heroes were excised
from the history books, or their real deeds were distorted to fit
Communist ideology, and Communist killers and criminals were converted
into official "saints." Holidays were declared in honor of the beasts
who murdered countless nations.

Did you know that much the same process has occurred right here in
America?

Every January, the media go into a kind of almost spastic frenzy of
adulation for the so-called "Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr."
King has even had a national holiday declared in his honor, an honor
accorded to no other American, not Washington, not Jefferson, not
Lincoln. (Washington and Lincoln no longer have holidays -- they share
the generic-sounding "President's Day.") A liberal judge has sealed
the
FBI files on King until the year 2027. What are they hiding? Let's
take
a look at this modern-day plastic god.

Born in 1929, King was the son of a Black preacher known at the time
only as "Daddy King." "Daddy King" named his son Michael. In 1935,
"Daddy King" had an inspiration to name himself after the Protestant
reformer Martin Luther. He declared to his congregation that
henceforth
they were to refer to him as "Martin Luther King" and to his son as
"Martin Luther King, Jr." None of this name changing was ever
legalized
in court. "Daddy" King's son's real name is to this day Michael King.

King's Brazen Cheating

We read in Michael Hoffman's "Holiday for a Cheater":

The first public sermon that King ever gave, in 1947 at the Ebenezer
Baptist Church, was plagiarized from a homily by Protestant clergyman
Harry Emerson Fosdick entitled "Life is What You Make It," according
to
the testimony of King's best friend of that time, Reverend Larry H.
Williams.

The first book that King wrote, "Stride Toward Freedom, - -was
plagiarized from numerous sources, all unattributed, according to
documentation recently assembled by sympathetic King scholars Keith D.
Miller, Ira G. Zepp, Jr., and David J. Garrow.

And no less an authoritative source than the four senior editors of
"The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr.- - (an official publication of
the Martin Luther King Center for Nonviolent Social Change, Inc.,
whose
staff includes King's widow Coretta), stated of King's writings at
both
Boston University and Crozer Theological Seminary: "Judged
retroactively by the standards of academic scholarship, [his writings]
are tragically flawed by numerous instances of plagiarism....
Appropriated passages are particularly evident in his writings in his
major field of graduate study, systematic theology."

King's essay, "The Place of Reason and Experience in Finding God,"
written at Crozer, pirated passages from the work of theologian Edgar
S. Brightman, author of "The Finding of God."

Another of King's theses, "Contemporary Continental Theology," written
shortly after he entered Boston University, was largely stolen from a
book by Walter Marshall Horton.

King's doctoral dissertation, "A Comparison of the Conceptions of God
in the Thinking of Paul Tillich and Harry Nelson Wieman," for which he
was awarded a PhD in theology, contains more than fifty complete
sentences plagiarized from the PhD dissertation of Dr. Jack Boozer,
"The Place of Reason in Paul Tillich's Concept of God."

According to "The Martin Luther King Papers", in King's dissertation
"only 49 per cent of sentences in the section on Tillich contain five
or more words that were King's own...."!

In "The Journal of American History", June 1991, page 87, David J.
Garrow, a leftist academic who is sympathetic to King, says that
King's
wife, Coretta Scott King, who also served as his secretary, was an
accomplice in his repeated cheating. ("King's Plagiarism: Imitation,
Insecurity and Transformation," The Journal of American History, June
1991, p. 87)

Reading Garrow's article, one is led to the inescapable conclusion
that
King cheated because he had chosen for himself a political role in
which a PhD would be useful, and, lacking the intellectual ability to
obtain the title fairly, went after it by any means necessary. Why,
then, one might ask, did the professors at Crozer Theological Seminary
and Boston University grant him passing grades and a PhD? Garrow
states
on page 89: "King's academic compositions, especially at Boston
University, were almost without exception little more than summary
descriptions... and comparisons of other's writings. Nonetheless, the
papers almost always received desirable letter grades, strongly
suggesting that King's professors did not expect more...." The editors
of "The Martin Luther King Jr. Papers" state that "...the failure of
King's teachers to notice his pattern of textual appropriation is
somewhat remarkable...."

But researcher Michael Hoffman tells us "...actually the malfeasance
of
the professors is not at all remarkable. King was politically correct,
he was Black, and he had ambitions. The leftist [professors were]
happy
to award a doctorate to such a candidate no matter how much fraud was
involved. Nor is it any wonder that it has taken forty years for the
truth about King's record of nearly constant intellectual piracy to be
made public."

Supposed scholars, who in reality shared King's vision of a racially
mixed and Marxist America, purposely covered up his cheating for
decades. The cover-up still continues. From the "New York Times" of
October 11, 1991, page 15, we learn that on October 10th of that year,
a committee of researchers at Boston University admitted that, "There
is no question but that Dr. King plagiarized in the dissertation."
However, despite its finding, the committee said that "No thought
should be given to the revocation of Dr. King's doctoral degree," an
action the panel said "would serve no purpose."

No purpose, indeed! Justice demands that, in light of his willful
fraud
as a student, the "reverend" and the "doctor" should be removed from
King's name.

Communist Beliefs and Connections

Well friends, he is not a legitimate reverend, he is not a bona fide
PhD, and his name isn't really "Martin Luther King, Jr." What's left?
Just a sexual degenerate, an America-hating Communist, and a criminal
betrayer of even the interests of his own people.

On Labor Day, 1957, a special meeting was attended by Martin Luther
King and four others at a strange institution called the Highlander
Folk School in Monteagle, Tennessee. The Highlander Folk School was a
Communist front, having been founded by Myles Horton (Communist Party
organizer for Tennessee) and Don West (Communist Party organizer for
North Carolina). The leaders of this meeting with King were the
aforementioned Horton and West, along with Abner Berry and James
Dumbrowski, all open and acknowledged members of the Communist Party,
USA. The agenda of the meeting was a plan to tour the Southern states
to initiate demonstrations and riots.

From 1955 to 1960, Martin Luther King's associate, advisor, and
personal secretary was one Bayard Rustin. In 1936 Rustin joined the
Young Communist League at New York City College. Convicted of
draft-dodging, he went to prison for two years in 1944. On January 23,
1953 the "Los Angeles Times" reported his conviction and sentencing to
jail for 60 days for lewd vagrancy and homosexual perversion. Rustin
attended the 16th Convention of the Communist Party, USA in February,
1957. One month later, he and King founded the Southern Christian
Leadership Conference, or SCLC for short. The president of the SCLC
was
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. The vice-president of the SCLC was the
Reverend Fred Shuttlesworth, who was also the president of an
identified Communist front known as the Southern Conference
Educational
Fund, an organization whose field director, a Mr. Carl Braden, was
simultaneously a national sponsor of the Fair Play for Cuba Committee,
of which you may have heard. The program director of the SCLC was the
Reverend Andrew Young, in more recent years Jimmy Carter's ambassador
to the UN and mayor of Atlanta. Young, by the way, was trained at the
Highlander Folk School, previously mentioned.

Soon after returning from a trip to Moscow in 1958, Rustin organized
the first of King's famous marches on Washington. The official organ
of
the Communist Party, "The Worker,- - openly declared the march to be a
Communist project. Although he left King's employ as secretary in
1961,
Rustin was called upon by King to be second in command of the much
larger march on Washington which took place on August 28, 1963.

Bayard Rustin's replacement in 1961 as secretary and advisor to King
was Jack O'Dell, also known as Hunter Pitts O'Dell. According to
official records, in 1962 Jack O'Dell was a member of the National
Committee of the Communist Party, USA. He had been listed as a
Communist Party member as early as 1956. O'Dell was also given the job
of acting executive director for SCLC activities for the entire
Southeast, according to the St. Louis "Globe-Democrat - -of October
26,
1962. At that time, there were still some patriots in the press corps,
and word of O'Dell's party membership became known.

What did King do? Shortly after the negative news reports, King fired
O'Dell with much fanfare. And he then, without the fanfare,
"immediately hired him again- - as director of the New York office of
the SCLC, as confirmed by the "Richmond News-Leader - -of September
27,
1963. In 1963 a Black man from Monroe, North Carolina named Robert
Williams made a trip to Peking, China. Exactly 20 days before King's
1963 march on Washington, Williams successfully urged Mao Tse-Tung to
speak out ...

read more »

This is rec.gardens.edible, I think you may have posted to the wrong
group. Please try to be more careful in the future. I doubt that you
will get much sympathy posting off topic here.
Chas

villon wrote:
On Jan 18, 6:18 pm, Rusty Trombone wrote:
The Truth About "Martin Luther King, Jr."

WHEN THE COMMUNISTS TOOK OVER a country, one of the first things that

read more »

This is rec.gardens.edible, I think you may have posted to the wrong
group. Please try to be more careful in the future. I doubt that you
will get much sympathy posting off topic here.
Chas

You repeat the whole pile of manure for that????