Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #136   Report Post  
Old 14-12-2003, 09:14 PM
Edgar S.
 
Posts: n/a
Default Self-Sufficiency Acreage Requirement?

Fran-

Thanks for your clear and practical comments. Of course, the tires are
just building materials.

Most building materials look bad or unfinished left sitting out in the
open. Cinder block, rebar, or two by fours left in plain sight, or
where someone can trip over them are Not attractive.

Tires are a useful building material. The earthship type houses
sometimes use tires as a core, covered with adobe like materials.
These structures are often very beautiful and the tires are not
showing.

The other thing is, in a garden space, a variety of plants can be
grown in front of the tires.
They can also be lined up in an organized manner in a section of a
garden, storage area or other work area where their appearance would
not be unpleasant.

It's up to the person to make their living space attractive, or at
least what they wish it to be.
SOME people are ok with rough-hewn settings. It's not my place to tell
others how to live tastefully.




"Fran" wrote in message . au...
"paghat" wrote in message
(Edgar S.) wrote:


(snip) Growing your own food makes more or less sense,
depending on the economy. (snip)
If one can meet most of their needs without using dollars, they're
better off. Of course, this presupposes they can raise the food
efficiently.

Even just a dozen tire stacks with home raised potatoes would be nice
to have and takes little effort.


You almost convinced me but then you created this image of the sort of
trashoids who have worn out tires stacked up in their yards as planters --
no doubt lined up in front of the rusting vehicles up on blocks with those
very tires removed, in front of a doublewide that's settling at an odd
angle with a roof that goes BANG! on hot days.


Boy, I don't think I've ever seen anyone drop so quickly into stereotyping
about such a simple thing.

I've grown spuds in tyres and I live in a house that friends who live in the
city think is quite posh. (Possibly the sauna impresses them but the only
thing I find it useful for is to house the mushroom growing kit).

Spuds don't care where they grow and if you have a problem with a few car
tyres then what about an upturned plastic garbage bin with the bottom cut
out of it? Same principle but does that offend you so much? Recycling can
be done with both taste and effectiveness. You of all people should know
that given your own site (which, BTW, is quite impressive [especially the
crataegus which I love]: but where are the veggies????).

Putting a stack of car tyres behind a big healthy rhubarb plant isn't going
to cause any real offence and if the plants are growing vigorously then most
people will see the lushness and productiveness and not have your "eyesore"
reaction.

  #144   Report Post  
Old 15-12-2003, 01:47 PM
Richard A. Lewis
 
Posts: n/a
Default Self-Sufficiency Acreage Requirement?

"rick etter" wrote:

Obviously not the lard butt that sits on the computer all day. There are,
however, many occupations/activities that will burn off far more than 2000
calories in a days work or a few hours a day workouts.
That you are too lazy to actually work/exercise doesn't mean that others
are.


Well-said, Rick.

Too many folks think that gardening or farming is just as easy as
using a can opener in the long run. It's far from it.

ral




  #146   Report Post  
Old 15-12-2003, 01:55 PM
Richard A. Lewis
 
Posts: n/a
Default Self-Sufficiency Acreage Requirement?

(Tallgrass) wrote:

It's not that hard to burn that many calories when using hand tools,
bucking bales, turning soil by hand, and especially if cutting lumber.


It was once a common topic on the misc.survivalism group....how many
acres would it take to grow a year's food and all that. The bottom
line was that if you plan *nothing but a veggan diet*, you pretty much
have resigned yourself to a slow death.

Most of our folks had heard or believed that it was possible to grow
enough food on an acre, but it never stood up to scrutiny.

I have a feeling I just started the argument again on these
cross-posted groups as well. You gardening folks have fun

We on ms had gone so far as to plan out and critique pretty much every
possible diet and analized the requirements vs the benefits etc and we
came out with, at most, two possible ones (nothing but grains and
beans etc) and dozens of proven impossible ones.

One person, using a minimum 3,000 cal a day diet (necessary to produce
those taters after all....gasoline engines don't last long in a
survival situation) would have to eat between 12-15 pounds of taters
per day depending on the type to get the necessary cals.

Of course, as that one fellow pointed out above, you won't be trying
to live on potatoes alone. We added spinach, onions, apples, corn,
beans, cabbage, lettuce, carrots, peas, squash etc etc etc in equal
amounts and in pretty much every case, the required poundage simply
went up. (We tried that menu above and it came out to approx
seventeen pounds a day if I recall correctly.)

""If you add corn to that diet of taters in equal proportions, you
come
out with a diet that consists of 17 large ears of corn and 13 potatoes
to make 3000 calories a day. Want to know how much that weighs?""

It's thus not a question of how much food you have to grow, it's a
question of how much food you have to eat and *NOBODY* can live by
eating fifteen pounds of veggies a day.

Right about now, someone on the gardening groups will be typing out an
irate "but my family did it during the Depression and I grew up just
fine". Problem is that their families, just like the Irish, the
Europeans, and the Russians (all limited diets) all survived by eating
massive amounts of fat. Why do you reckon fried foods were and are so
popular in the US? Why do you think the Russian moms will stand in
line for four hours to buy a pound of lard sold as "sausage"? Linda
H. hit that nail on the head.

ral

Most people will not eat all of that in carbohydrates, tho, but make
up a fair amount of those calories in animal fat. Bacon, butter,
gravy, lard used in cooking.


One can find caloric requirements of particular job types. It is very
interesting to read.


Linda H., M.D.



  #149   Report Post  
Old 15-12-2003, 02:06 PM
Bob Peterson
 
Posts: n/a
Default Self-Sufficiency Acreage Requirement?


"North" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 02:10:31 GMT, KB9WFK said:

On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 19:50:33 GMT, (dstvns) wrote:

On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 01:42:22 GMT,
(Richard A.
Lewis) wrote:

On a 3,000-4,000cal diet, you'll need to eat approximately 12 pounds
of potatoes per day just to maintain your body weight. Add in the
artichokes, if they're of a comparable cal level as the taters, and
you got just over two days of food before you start starving.

Who the hell eats 4 thousand calories a day?


And of those that did, how many would try to get all of those calories
from a single food source like potatos? I just pray for their sake
that they don't try to raise a lone crop of Habanero peppers. I don't
know how many pounds of those you would have to choke down per day but
I think spontanious human combustion would be the result. :-)


There is a way to get your cals from taters and other veggies, simply
fry them in lard, or fat, even veggie oil.

Another way is to eat some taters with a hamburger.

By frying the veggies in fat, you change everything.



The problem is where do you get the fats? the nuts that think you can live
off a small garden are just dreaming. you can't do it without a lot of back
breaking work, and even then the diet is poor and you run the risk of health
problems from poor diet.

better to figure in a lot of animal protein and fat as a big chunk of your
diet. much easier than trying to eat 20 pounds of cauliflower every day.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Self-Sufficiency Acreage Requirement? Down Under On The Bucket Farm Gardening 701 08-02-2004 09:42 PM
Self-Sufficiency Acreage Requirement? (getting fuel) Jim Dauven Gardening 23 06-01-2004 12:12 PM
Where is Bucket?! Was: Self-Sufficiency Acreage Requirement? Frogleg Edible Gardening 0 18-12-2003 05:18 PM
Where is Bucket?! Was: Self-Sufficiency Acreage Requirement? Frogleg Gardening 0 18-12-2003 05:16 PM
Where is Bucket?! Was: Self-Sufficiency Acreage Requirement? Frogleg Gardening 0 18-12-2003 05:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 GardenBanter.co.uk.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Gardening"

 

Copyright © 2017