Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
Shawn Hirn wrote:
In article , Doobie Keebler wrote: On Jan 31, 2:44 pm, " wrote: John McCain .. wants to remain in iraq for 20 years... This is why McCain is not electable: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vf7HYoh9YMM&NR=1 "100 Years In Iraq" is not a good campaign slogan for 2008. Nobody wants their grandkids to still be fighting this war. Rudy's toast, Huckabee is a religious nut, Mitt is a douchebag, so that leaves St. John of McCain and his Holy War. There are no good choices on the GOP ticket: get ready for Hillary/ Obama I agree. McCain will get the Republican nomination, but he ****es off a lot of conservatives, and he won't be able to rely on the religious wing-nut base, which means a lot of Republicans will either sit out this election or vote third party. I know know who will win the Democratic nomination, but whomever it turns out to be will surely be our next president. .... and a very good thing that will be, too. Bush and his clan have wrought enough destruction it'll take two terms of a Democrat just to get things back close to normal. -- The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to minimize spam. Our true address is of the form . |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
In article , CJT
wrote: Shawn Hirn wrote: In article , Doobie Keebler wrote: On Jan 31, 2:44 pm, " wrote: John McCain .. wants to remain in iraq for 20 years... This is why McCain is not electable: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vf7HYoh9YMM&NR=1 "100 Years In Iraq" is not a good campaign slogan for 2008. Nobody wants their grandkids to still be fighting this war. Rudy's toast, Huckabee is a religious nut, Mitt is a douchebag, so that leaves St. John of McCain and his Holy War. There are no good choices on the GOP ticket: get ready for Hillary/ Obama I agree. McCain will get the Republican nomination, but he ****es off a lot of conservatives, and he won't be able to rely on the religious wing-nut base, which means a lot of Republicans will either sit out this election or vote third party. I know know who will win the Democratic nomination, but whomever it turns out to be will surely be our next president. ... and a very good thing that will be, too. Bush and his clan have wrought enough destruction it'll take two terms of a Democrat just to get things back close to normal. Hopefully, the damage that Bush and his band of robber barons did can be fixed in the next two terms, but I am skeptical. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
CJT wrote:
... and a very good thing that will be, too. Bush and his clan have wrought enough destruction it'll take two terms of a Democrat just to get things back close to normal. If you're not with us, you're on the side of the terrorists. On a more practical level, the GOP is in nomination disarray. I predict that JEB Bush will be the nominee! After eight years with JEB (leading us to security, hegemony, and prosperity), it'll be time for that good-looking Bush Hispanic nephew. By the end of his two terms, the dynasty will be well established. After that, it's only a small step to a monarchy, which is what we Republicans are really working for. Don't tell anybody! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
HeyBub wrote:
CJT wrote: ... and a very good thing that will be, too. Bush and his clan have wrought enough destruction it'll take two terms of a Democrat just to get things back close to normal. If you're not with us, you're on the side of the terrorists. On a more practical level, the GOP is in nomination disarray. I predict that JEB Bush will be the nominee! After eight years with JEB (leading us to security, hegemony, and prosperity), it'll be time for that good-looking Bush Hispanic nephew. By the end of his two terms, the dynasty will be well established. After that, it's only a small step to a monarchy, which is what we Republicans are really working for. Don't tell anybody! The word is already out. Ain't gonna happen. -- The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to minimize spam. Our true address is of the form . |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
CJT wrote:
HeyBub wrote: CJT wrote: ... and a very good thing that will be, too. Bush and his clan have wrought enough destruction it'll take two terms of a Democrat just to get things back close to normal. If you're not with us, you're on the side of the terrorists. On a more practical level, the GOP is in nomination disarray. I predict that JEB Bush will be the nominee! After eight years with JEB (leading us to security, hegemony, and prosperity), it'll be time for that good-looking Bush Hispanic nephew. By the end of his two terms, the dynasty will be well established. After that, it's only a small step to a monarchy, which is what we Republicans are really working for. Don't tell anybody! The word is already out. Ain't gonna happen. Sez you. I'm laying in extra moustache wax. -- God help us all, The next President of the United States will be a liberal. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
In article , HeyBub wrote:
CJT wrote: ... and a very good thing that will be, too. Bush and his clan have wrought enough destruction it'll take two terms of a Democrat just to get things back close to normal. If you're not with us, you're on the side of the terrorists. I hope this is irony or some other class of humor! Bush II got re-elected by being against the "terrorists" but has gone through over 7 years, and over 6 of those after "9/11", without capturing Osama bin Laden either dead or alive! - Don Klipstein ) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
Don Klipstein wrote:
In article , HeyBub wrote: CJT wrote: ... and a very good thing that will be, too. Bush and his clan have wrought enough destruction it'll take two terms of a Democrat just to get things back close to normal. If you're not with us, you're on the side of the terrorists. I hope this is irony or some other class of humor! Bush II got re-elected by being against the "terrorists" but has gone through over 7 years, and over 6 of those after "9/11", without capturing Osama bin Laden either dead or alive! He has however ensured that there hasnt been another terrorist obscenity in the US since 9/11 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
In article ,
"Rod Speed" wrote: Don Klipstein wrote: In article , HeyBub wrote: CJT wrote: ... and a very good thing that will be, too. Bush and his clan have wrought enough destruction it'll take two terms of a Democrat just to get things back close to normal. If you're not with us, you're on the side of the terrorists. I hope this is irony or some other class of humor! Bush II got re-elected by being against the "terrorists" but has gone through over 7 years, and over 6 of those after "9/11", without capturing Osama bin Laden either dead or alive! He has however ensured that there hasnt been another terrorist obscenity in the US since 9/11 You know, the thing is that a criminal can do pretty much what they want until they attract attention. Once the "heat" starts lookin' at you, it is a whole other story. Maybe Osama had help with 9/11. maybe not. Maybe it was just a coincidence that the neo-cons got just what they were prayin' for. Fact is, Osama ain't theSoviet Union. He don't got no F-16, no tomahawk missiles, no M1 Abrams tanks, and no freakin aircraft carriers. Al Quaida is a gang man, a gang. If Bush didn't need a "War on Terror" to keep the bucks flowin', Osama & CO. would be old news. -- Billy Bush, Cheney & Pelosi, Behind Bars http://rachelcorriefoundation.org/site/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movemen...George_W._Bush |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
Billy wrote
Rod Speed wrote Don Klipstein wrote HeyBub wrote CJT wrote ... and a very good thing that will be, too. Bush and his clan have wrought enough destruction it'll take two terms of a Democrat just to get things back close to normal. If you're not with us, you're on the side of the terrorists. I hope this is irony or some other class of humor! Bush II got re-elected by being against the "terrorists" but has gone through over 7 years, and over 6 of those after "9/11", without capturing Osama bin Laden either dead or alive! He has however ensured that there hasnt been another terrorist obscenity in the US since 9/11 You know, the thing is that a criminal can do pretty much what they want until they attract attention. bin Laden had got plenty of attention before 9/11. No one did anything much about him because no one expected him to be able to organise something like 9/11. Once the "heat" starts lookin' at you, it is a whole other story. Maybe Osama had help with 9/11. maybe not. Its unlikely that whoever organised it expected the towers to implode as spectacularly as they did. Maybe it was just a coincidence that the neo-cons got just what they were prayin' for. Yep, thats what happened. Fact is, Osama ain't theSoviet Union. He don't got no F-16, no tomahawk missiles, no M1 Abrams tanks, and no freakin aircraft carriers. And it aint that easy to find someone who chooses to hide out in some cave etc. Al Quaida is a gang man, a gang. If Bush didn't need a "War on Terror" to keep the bucks flowin', Osama & CO. would be old news. Bullshit. He'd be disposed of if they could find him, just like the others have been killed when they can be. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
In article ,
"Rod Speed" wrote: Billy wrote Rod Speed wrote Don Klipstein wrote HeyBub wrote CJT wrote ... and a very good thing that will be, too. Bush and his clan have wrought enough destruction it'll take two terms of a Democrat just to get things back close to normal. If you're not with us, you're on the side of the terrorists. I hope this is irony or some other class of humor! Bush II got re-elected by being against the "terrorists" but has gone through over 7 years, and over 6 of those after "9/11", without capturing Osama bin Laden either dead or alive! He has however ensured that there hasnt been another terrorist obscenity in the US since 9/11 You know, the thing is that a criminal can do pretty much what they want until they attract attention. bin Laden had got plenty of attention before 9/11. No one did anything much about him because no one expected him to be able to organise something like 9/11. Once the "heat" starts lookin' at you, it is a whole other story. Maybe Osama had help with 9/11. maybe not. Its unlikely that whoever organised it expected the towers to implode as spectacularly as they did. Maybe it was just a coincidence that the neo-cons got just what they were prayin' for. Yep, thats what happened. Fact is, Osama ain't theSoviet Union. He don't got no F-16, no tomahawk missiles, no M1 Abrams tanks, and no freakin aircraft carriers. And it aint that easy to find someone who chooses to hide out in some cave etc. Al Quaida is a gang man, a gang. If Bush didn't need a "War on Terror" to keep the bucks flowin', Osama & CO. would be old news. Bullshit. He'd be disposed of if they could find him, just like the others have been killed when they can be. Never heard of Echelon, huh? Who did Osama work for before he went free lance, hmmm. It wasn't until after the USS Cole was attacked that Osama's name came up, according to the NSA. Without Osama, the last seven years wouldn't have been possible. Osama was managed before. He may still be being managed. -- Billy Bush, Cheney & Pelosi, Behind Bars http://rachelcorriefoundation.org/site/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movemen...George_W._Bush |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
In article ,
"Rod Speed" wrote: B bin Laden had got plenty of attention before 9/11. No one did anything much about him because no one expected him to be able to organise something like 9/11. Yeah who'd a thunk that merely because he was busy with the Cole and those bombings of the Africam embassies and also had a piece of WTC I, he would be able to actually pull off something like this. Boggles the mind that anyone would think that. Once the "heat" starts lookin' at you, it is a whole other story. Maybe Osama had help with 9/11. maybe not. Its unlikely that whoever organised it expected the towers to implode as spectacularly as they did. True. Although he had killed a few people before the towers went down but nothing to get all that excited about, huh? Maybe it was just a coincidence that the neo-cons got just what they were prayin' for. Yep, thats what happened. Of course most of the prelude and almost all of the planning took place before Bush, et al, took office. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
Rod Speed wrote:
Billy wrote Rod Speed wrote snip You know, the thing is that a criminal can do pretty much what they want until they attract attention. bin Laden had got plenty of attention before 9/11. No one did anything much about him because no one expected him to be able to organise something like 9/11. snip Actually, Clinton was trying to get something done about him, but the political pressure from the Republican Congress against his efforts was intense. Then, when Bush took over, he and his people deliberately took the heat off, not wanting to seem in any way like Clinton. -- The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to minimize spam. Our true address is of the form . |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
Rod Speed wrote:
Don Klipstein wrote: In article , HeyBub wrote: CJT wrote: ... and a very good thing that will be, too. Bush and his clan have wrought enough destruction it'll take two terms of a Democrat just to get things back close to normal. If you're not with us, you're on the side of the terrorists. I hope this is irony or some other class of humor! Bush II got re-elected by being against the "terrorists" but has gone through over 7 years, and over 6 of those after "9/11", without capturing Osama bin Laden either dead or alive! He has however ensured that there hasnt been another terrorist obscenity in the US since 9/11 No, there hasn't been one because Bush has been accomplishing all the terrorist sought -- the destruction of America -- no need for the terrorists to attack to reach their goal. -- The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to minimize spam. Our true address is of the form . |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
CJT wrote
Rod Speed wrote Don Klipstein wrote HeyBub wrote CJT wrote ... and a very good thing that will be, too. Bush and his clan have wrought enough destruction it'll take two terms of a Democrat just to get things back close to normal. If you're not with us, you're on the side of the terrorists. I hope this is irony or some other class of humor! Bush II got re-elected by being against the "terrorists" but has gone through over 7 years, and over 6 of those after "9/11", without capturing Osama bin Laden either dead or alive! He has however ensured that there hasnt been another terrorist obscenity in the US since 9/11 No, there hasn't been one because Bush has been accomplishing all the terrorist sought -- the destruction of America -- Clearly wouldnt know what the real destruction of america was if it bit it on its lard arse. no need for the terrorists to attack to reach their goal. How odd that they bothered with 9/11 then. One hell of a footshot for them, thats what got them done over very comprehensively indeed in Afghanistan and saw bin laden having to spend his entire pathetic excuse for a 'life' down some rat hole, just like Saddam. Its just a bit harder to find bin Laden's rat hole given that its likely in the wilds of Pakistan. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
John McCain, liar and liberal punk
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|