On Friday, May 23, 2014 5:24:15 PM UTC-7, David Hare-Scott wrote:
Fran Farmer wrote:

On 24/05/2014 3:30 AM, Higgs Boson wrote:

On Thursday, May 22, 2014 11:46:44 PM UTC-7, Fran Farmer wrote:





On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 2:40:23 PM UTC-7, David E. Ross wrote:



Or does cutting off part of a leaf degrade its function?





I generally leave a small margin of dead leaf, about 1/2 inch. I

think the remaining leaf cannot be affected since anything in

the dead area already stopped contributing any substances

produced during the dying.





I agree with David Ross.



Dead is dead. Live parts on a leaf would still function to feed

the plant.







? How does that address what David said? His practice, if I read

it right, was to leave a tiny bit of dead leaf because cutting

into the live MIGHT be deleterious to plant.







David cuts off the dead bits. He leaves the live bits. The fact

that David leaves a tiny bit of live leaf is not inconsistent with

what I wrote.



Look back. He said he leaves a tin bit of DEAD leaf. Question of

aesthetics, or question of plant function?



Reread. I've left in the pertinent bits and snipped the rest since

you seem to be confused.



David said he cuts off dead bits and says the dead bit he's cut off is

not contributing substances. I said that dead is dead but live feeds

the plant. They both say the same thing, or they should.



Oooh! Intercontinental (incontinent?) ballistic keyboards! We haven't had

a deathmatch since Shelly last stepped out of line.

Down, boy! On this NG all is peace, friendship, and the occasional mild editing contretemps.

HB