"IntarsiaCo" wrote in message
...
Why should Kerry apologize for doing what he felt was best at the
time?

Why did Hanoi Jane apologize for doing what she felt was best at the time?

Because she decided it was in her best interests to do so financially,
considering her movie career and future plans to be a leg-warmer model.



Patriotic duty does not extend to giving aid and comfort to the enemy.

Kerry points out atrocities.
Nixon & Kissinger continue committing them.

Who's the asshole?

Because she decided it was in her best interests to do so financially,
considering her movie career

What movie career after she apologized in 1988, Old Gringo, that 1989
blockbuster movie?

I believe she has had one more after that, and perhaps another in production to
be released in 2005.

ROTFLMA

"IntarsiaCo" wrote in message
...
Because she decided it was in her best interests to do so financially,
considering her movie career

What movie career after she apologized in 1988, Old Gringo, that 1989
blockbuster movie?

I believe she has had one more after that, and perhaps another in
production to
be released in 2005.

ROTFLMA

Meanwhile, back in the real world, Kerry didn't apologize, and he was still
elected to public office. Apparently, there are lots of voters who are able
to think for themselves, rather than being sock puppets for bozos like Rush
Limbaugh.

being sock puppets for bozos like Rush
Limbaugh.

Don't listen to the big man, but do watch C-Span and listen to NPR, is that OK
with you? But then again, I don't have a lifelong subscription to The Guardian
nor do I believe in Leninism (don't confuse that with Lennonism) and men from
mars.

Apparently, when confronted with facts, not fictions, only disparaging
accusations become appropriate, lame, very lame.

http://www.nationalreview.com/kudlow...0410260846.asp


Kerry, Viet Cong and Osama, indeed

"IntarsiaCo" wrote in message
...
http://www.nationalreview.com/kudlow...0410260846.asp


Kerry, Viet Cong and Osama, indeed



Now there's a good source of unbiased news. Not. National Review is a
magazine and book publisher focusing on international and political news and
opinion from a conservative viewpoint.



karen

Now there's a good source of unbiased news.

Did you read the article and check the references and citations? I believe
they include the old grey lady and the wash/po. And, what is wrong about a
conservative viewpoint, must a view only be liberal to be true? I know, they
only good sources are CBS, Michael Moore and Paul Begala, 100% truthful,
right?

Anonny Moose wrote:
"IntarsiaCo" wrote in message
...

http://www.nationalreview.com/kudlow/kudlow200410260846.asp

Kerry, Viet Cong and Osama, indeed


Now there's a good source of unbiased news. Not. National Review is a
magazine and book publisher focusing on international and political news and
opinion from a conservative viewpoint.

karen


That was an unusually good article for Larry Kudlow. Of course it's
biased. If you want unbiased, read _US News and World Report_. Boring.


A couple of thoughts that I've stolen from I-dont-remember-where that
kind of sum up Bush and Kerry:

1) Bush has a plan, and Kerry has a plan to have a plan.
2) Bush was born on third base and thinks he hit a triple.

Best regards,
Bob

P.S. John Edwards, and to a lesser extent Dick Chaney, scare me more
than Kerry or Bush. President Chaney is scary; President Edwards is
terrifying.

"IntarsiaCo" wrote in message
...
being sock puppets for bozos like Rush
Limbaugh.

Don't listen to the big man, but do watch C-Span and listen to NPR, is
that OK
with you? But then again, I don't have a lifelong subscription to The
Guardian
nor do I believe in Leninism (don't confuse that with Lennonism) and men
from
mars.

Apparently, when confronted with facts, not fictions, only disparaging
accusations become appropriate, lame, very lame.



Ahhh....the old "socialism" kneejerk reaction. Right out of the play book!

.the old "socialism" kneejerk reaction. Right out of the play book!


Some people do for themselves, some expect the government to do for them cradle
to grave, which side do you tend to favor? Are you of the entitlement ilk?

"IntarsiaCo" wrote in message
...
.the old "socialism" kneejerk reaction. Right out of the play book!


Some people do for themselves, some expect the government to do for them
cradle
to grave, which side do you tend to favor? Are you of the entitlement
ilk?

Sorry. No left turns. We're discussing Kerry & Jane Fonda, not economic
theory. You injected Lenin into the conversation, even though it had
absolutely nothing to do with the subject. I called you on it, as was
appropriate, because as you ran out of breathing room, you pulled the old
"socialism" nonsense out of your hat.