Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pump Confusion
Hello all,
I have purchased a pump with a rating that does not make any sense at all (trusted the knowlegable sales staff). I am trying to figure out my cost per month but the only specification provided is output watts. Now that I have compared it to the next pump size down, I am really confused. I don't want to install it if a smaller one will do the job. Here are the specs: My pump: Rated 3800 GPH Output Watts: 736 Next pump down: Rated 3300 GPH Output Watts: 330 After reading the specs I called the dealer and asked the average monthly cost to run each pump. They replied that the smaller pump will cost about $28.00 and the other (the one I have) about $64.00. There is only a 500 GPH difference! Do they know what they are talking about? After searching the newsgroups, I have found a lot of similar questions but no difinitive answers (at least none that I understand). Why don't the pump companies offer a table of actual killowats used per feet of head?. Its the answer everyone seems to be after. Can anyone help me sort this out? Additional Info: The pump is submersible, I have a 2' head, and a bio filter/falls. Thanks, Steve |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Pump Confusion
Hi from Norway , to figure how much your Pump electrical expenses will cost
its a easy calculation, lets say 1KW costs 0.20 USD ( i am from norway no idea how much the actual cost is elsewhere) however ,, if a pump takes 100W the consumption will be 1000w in 10 hours so will be like USD 0.50 for day You state that one pump use 736 watt and the other 330. So the sellers statment is propably accurate , however why yours uses so much more i cannot answer but i guess it can pump your wather much higher before you will notise a decrease in GPH. Some pumps are stated as HIGH Pressure pumps and would be using more Wattage than the GPH rating they give . Maybe not a answer you was looking for but its my Humble 2cents. Regards Runi S. "RROLD1" wrote in message ... Hello all, I have purchased a pump with a rating that does not make any sense at all (trusted the knowlegable sales staff). I am trying to figure out my cost per month but the only specification provided is output watts. Now that I have compared it to the next pump size down, I am really confused. I don't want to install it if a smaller one will do the job. Here are the specs: My pump: Rated 3800 GPH Output Watts: 736 Next pump down: Rated 3300 GPH Output Watts: 330 After reading the specs I called the dealer and asked the average monthly cost to run each pump. They replied that the smaller pump will cost about $28.00 and the other (the one I have) about $64.00. There is only a 500 GPH difference! Do they know what they are talking about? After searching the newsgroups, I have found a lot of similar questions but no difinitive answers (at least none that I understand). Why don't the pump companies offer a table of actual killowats used per feet of head?. Its the answer everyone seems to be after. Can anyone help me sort this out? Additional Info: The pump is submersible, I have a 2' head, and a bio filter/falls. Thanks, Steve |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Pump Confusion
RROLD1 wrote:
Hello all, I have purchased a pump with a rating that does not make any sense at all (trusted the knowlegable sales staff). I am trying to figure out my cost per month but the only specification provided is output watts. Now that I have compared it to the next pump size down, I am really confused. I don't want to install it if a smaller one will do the job. Here are the specs: My pump: Rated 3800 GPH Output Watts: 736 736 watts = 6.13 mps @120 volts 736 watts = .74KW if 1 KW of electricity costs you $0.118 (11.8 Cents) ..74kw x 0.118 = .087 cents/hour ..087 x 24hours = $2.09 / day $2.09 x 365 days =$764.00 /year $64.00/ month Next pump down: Rated 3300 GPH Output Watts: 330 330watts = 2.75 amps @120 volts 330 watts = .33KW if 1 KW of electricity costs you $0.118 (11.8 Cents) ..33kw x 0.118 = .039 cents/hour ..039 x 24hours = $0.93 / day $0.93 x 365 days =$341.00 /year $28.40/ month Without showing all the calculations you would be paying 55% more money for only a 13% increase in gallons per hour After reading the specs I called the dealer and asked the average monthly cost to run each pump. They replied that the smaller pump will cost about $28.00 and the other (the one I have) about $64.00. There is only a 500 GPH difference! Do they know what they are talking about? According to the monthly electricity cost they quoted you cost per 1000 watts/ hour ( 1KWH ) is $0.118 $64.00/ month @ $0.118 /KWH $28.00/ month @ $0.118 / KWH Check you electric bill for your TOTAL cost per KWH. Total cost = cost of generation + distribution + transmission +transition charges eg. my cost = .046060 + .001720 + .030290 + .006140 = $0.08421 / KWH Without showing all the calculations you would be paying 55% more money for only a 13% increase in gallons per hour After searching the newsgroups, I have found a lot of similar questions but no difinitive answers (at least none that I understand). Why don't the pump companies offer a table of actual killowats used per feet of head?. Its the answer everyone seems to be after. The KW's basically stay the same. It's the GPH @_?_ feet: that they chart Can anyone help me sort this out? Additional Info: The pump is submersible, I have a 2' head, and a bio filter/falls. Your GPH @ 2' head will depend on the specs of the pump. 3300 GPH and 3800 GPH ratings are @ 0' of head (no piping on outlet) What brand and models are the pumps? I should be able to tell you your approximzte GPH @ 2' Thanks, Steve Chagoi |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Pump Confusion
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Pump Confusion
RROLD1 wrote:
After searching the newsgroups, I have found a lot of similar questions but no difinitive answers (at least none that I understand). Why don't the pump companies offer a table of actual killowats used per feet of head?. Its the answer everyone seems to be after. I think many if not most do. Go to a couple of sites of companies that both manufacture & sell pumps. You should find what you are looking for. Also, very important : the cost of running the pump usually out weighs the cost of the pump, so saving a hundred bucks on the purchase doesn't make sense if all you get is an inefficient pump. Joe -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Pump Confusion
Andrew Burgess wrote:
No. The wattage is a maximum value. Throttling the output, for example, will reduce the power draw. I've never heard that. I thought pumps all ran full out regardless if the valve was open all the way or closed? Please elaborate. Thanks Joe -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Pump Confusion
No. The wattage is a maximum value. Throttling the output, for example, will
reduce the power draw. I've never heard that. I thought pumps all ran full out regardless if the valve was open all the way or closed? Please elaborate. I don't have references handy, I'll look. I remember that for a centrifugal pump the current draw is lowest when the output is closed, so the impeller just spins in the water in the pump housing. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Pump Confusion
The brand of the pumps is "Steady Stream". The GPH on both drops about 200 GPH
at 2' head. I did find some info and think I may have put together the puzzle. I saw where a 1/2 hp motor output is equal to about 730 watts (the pump I have) and 1/4 HP at 315 watts. On a pump manufacturers site I saw REAL pump ratings( I wish I bookmarked it as I visited many) . The closest pump was 1/4 hp And their ratings let me figure that the pump would cost about $28.00 to run per month. The paragraph precedding the pumps stated that the key was to maximize the relationship between the pump and the motor without increasing the HP to a point that it wastes energy. That may explain the higher wattage pump without the expected higher output. I am going to exchange the pump for the lower wattage unit and hope for the best. I guess I can always add a small second pump if I want more flow when I am relaxing by the falls. Since this is my first pond so I am full of questions. I have 24" fall from my bio fall to the waterline. I want to maximize the water sound. Any pointers on doing so? Will a series of 3-4" falls into small pools make more sound than two 8" falls? I know this is a wide open question. Any shared experiences would be appreciated. Thanks, Steve |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Pump Confusion
I'd like to add "Anne's corollary"(?) to Joe's statement!
Joe said [among other things], "Also, very important : the cost of running the pump usually out weighs the cost of the pump......" Anne's corollary: "The cost of the pump -- and of running the pump -- are miniscule to the money/time/effort you will eventually spend on your pond." And I'm only talking about moving bricks I already had & a few goldfish from Petsmart, plus the odd "dog toy" (water hyacinth for the first 20 minutes I owned them, then dog toys!) Anne Lurie Raleigh, NC "joe" wrote in message ... RROLD1 wrote: After searching the newsgroups, I have found a lot of similar questions but no difinitive answers (at least none that I understand). Why don't the pump companies offer a table of actual killowats used per feet of head?. Its the answer everyone seems to be after. I think many if not most do. Go to a couple of sites of companies that both manufacture & sell pumps. You should find what you are looking for. Also, very important : the cost of running the pump usually out weighs the cost of the pump, so saving a hundred bucks on the purchase doesn't make sense if all you get is an inefficient pump. Joe -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Pump Confusion
Sssssssshhhhhhh, Anne, he doesn't know this yet!
Anne Lurie wrote: I'd like to add "Anne's corollary"(?) to Joe's statement! Joe said [among other things], "Also, very important : the cost of running the pump usually out weighs the cost of the pump......" Anne's corollary: "The cost of the pump -- and of running the pump -- are miniscule to the money/time/effort you will eventually spend on your pond." -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Pump Confusion
Andrew Burgess wrote in
: No. The wattage is a maximum value. Throttling the output, for example, will reduce the power draw. I do not think this is true. Two elements, pressure and volume, influence the power consumption of any pump. If you look at Mark's Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers 14-22 thru 14-25 you will find the formula for centrifugal pump output. Stripped of its more complicated bits the formula shows that the power required, p = Q*H, where p = power, Q=volume and H = head. Throttling reduces the volume output but increases the internal pressure. Essentially throttling the pump has the same effect within the pump of increasing the head. AXO |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Pump Confusion
" Since this is my first pond so I am full of questions. I have 24" fall from my bio fall to the waterline. I want to maximize the water sound. Any pointers on doing so? Will a series of 3-4" falls into small pools make more sound than two 8" falls? I know this is a wide open question. Any shared experiences would be appreciated. Thanks, Steve I think that one fall from up high will make more sound than the babbling brook sounds of multiple small falls. The sound can also be increased by making the falls deeper over the spillway, by making the spillway narrower. -- RichToyBox http://www.geocities.com/richtoybox/pondintro.html |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Pump Confusion
Take a look at this site, it shows may different pumps at head, amps, watts
etc. I just bot a Danner 3600 from them as they were the best prices I found. http://www.webbsonline.com/catalog/pumps/index.html Karen Zone 5 Ashland, OH http://hometown.aol.com/kmam1/MyPond/MyPond.html My Art Studio at http://members.aol.com/kmmstudios/K....M.Studios.html for email remove the extra extention |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Pump Confusion
In article cgU2b.269286$o%2.122746@sccrnsc02, "RichToyBox"
writes: The sound can also be increased by making the falls deeper over the spillway, by making the spillway narrower. -- and making it cave like behind the falls, so the sound echoes. karen Zone 5 Ashland, OH http://hometown.aol.com/kmam1/MyPond/MyPond.html My Art Studio at http://members.aol.com/kmmstudios/K....M.Studios.html for email remove the extra extention |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Pump Confusion
In article , Axolotl
writes: formula for centrifugal pump output. I have a question about centrifugal pumps. Jan recommended putting the pump in the filter, which would mean the pump is pulling water out of the pond not pushing it into the filter. However, when reading the specs for my pump, it says: "Centrifugal pumps cannot pull water from a lower level. In order to start, pump must be below water level and filled with water. Unless the ai can escape from the outlet, the pump will not start." So how do I put it in my filter? Karen Zone 5 Ashland, OH http://hometown.aol.com/kmam1/MyPond/MyPond.html My Art Studio at http://members.aol.com/kmmstudios/K....M.Studios.html for email remove the extra extention |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
bulb spectrum confusion | Freshwater Aquaria Plants | |||
Fla. Mall Orchid Show Confusion | Orchids | |||
Growing under lights: confusion--Thanks | Orchids | |||
Growing under lights: confusion | Orchids | |||
Height confusion - fagus | United Kingdom |