baldrick bunts claim was struck out this afternoon, even though he was lucky
enough to have a Judge, who seemed quite prepared to ignore the implications
of non-compliance with 3 very clear and concise unless orders, and grant
interim injunctions against defendants preventing any further mention of
baldrick bunt!

This being the case I feel it would be a very fair admission of defeat for
baldrick to commence posting using the name "baldrick" while I assume the
name "Guy Fawkes" until such time as he is able to return top court and put
right the silly mistake the "beak" has obviously made today!

Finally in terms of costs, wonder if £600 sounds a reasonable sum for 2 full
days loss of earnings, travel expenses to London and Exeter, and spending
more than 4 hours on the telephone finding out which documents had gone
"missing", and helpfully providing them to the court, to ensure baldricks
nonsense would be dismissed.............?

I just e-mailed Guy Kewneys daughter see if she wants to run it as a
news item? I don't think she will somehow but Struan Robertson at
Out-Law no doubt will.

"Guy Fawkes" wrote in message
...

baldrick bunts claim was struck out this afternoon, even though he was
lucky enough to have a Judge, who seemed quite prepared to ignore the
implications of non-compliance with 3 very clear and concise unless
orders, and grant interim injunctions against defendants preventing any
further mention of baldrick bunt!

This being the case I feel it would be a very fair admission of defeat for
baldrick to commence posting using the name "baldrick" while I assume the
name "Guy Fawkes" until such time as he is able to return top court and
put right the silly mistake the "beak" has obviously made today!

Finally in terms of costs, wonder if £600 sounds a reasonable sum for 2
full days loss of earnings, travel expenses to London and Exeter, and
spending more than 4 hours on the telephone finding out which documents
had gone "missing", and helpfully providing them to the court, to ensure
baldricks nonsense would be dismissed.............?

You mean you weren't sent down for seven years? I am shocked...

"Pod" wrote in message
reenews.net...

"Guy Fawkes" wrote in message
...

baldrick bunts claim was struck out this afternoon, even though he was
lucky enough to have a Judge, who seemed quite prepared to ignore the
implications of non-compliance with 3 very clear and concise unless
orders, and grant interim injunctions against defendants preventing any
further mention of baldrick bunt!

This being the case I feel it would be a very fair admission of defeat
for baldrick to commence posting using the name "baldrick" while I assume
the name "Guy Fawkes" until such time as he is able to return top court
and put right the silly mistake the "beak" has obviously made today!

Finally in terms of costs, wonder if £600 sounds a reasonable sum for 2
full days loss of earnings, travel expenses to London and Exeter, and
spending more than 4 hours on the telephone finding out which documents
had gone "missing", and helpfully providing them to the court, to ensure
baldricks nonsense would be dismissed.............?

You mean you weren't sent down for seven years? I am shocked...


I think if baldrick got a sentence proportional to his IQ, then he may well
do a 7 stretch................

"Guy Fawkes" wrote in message
...

"Pod" wrote in message
reenews.net...

"Guy Fawkes" wrote in message
...

baldrick bunts claim was struck out this afternoon, even though he was
lucky enough to have a Judge, who seemed quite prepared to ignore the
implications of non-compliance with 3 very clear and concise unless
orders, and grant interim injunctions against defendants preventing any
further mention of baldrick bunt!

This being the case I feel it would be a very fair admission of defeat
for baldrick to commence posting using the name "baldrick" while I
assume the name "Guy Fawkes" until such time as he is able to return top
court and put right the silly mistake the "beak" has obviously made
today!

Finally in terms of costs, wonder if £600 sounds a reasonable sum for 2
full days loss of earnings, travel expenses to London and Exeter, and
spending more than 4 hours on the telephone finding out which documents
had gone "missing", and helpfully providing them to the court, to ensure
baldricks nonsense would be dismissed.............?

You mean you weren't sent down for seven years? I am shocked...


I think if baldrick got a sentence proportional to his IQ, then he may
well do a 7 stretch................

What where the grounds for a strike out?

"Pod" wrote in message
reenews.net...

"Guy Fawkes" wrote in message
...

"Pod" wrote in message
reenews.net...

"Guy Fawkes" wrote in message
...

baldrick bunts claim was struck out this afternoon, even though he was
lucky enough to have a Judge, who seemed quite prepared to ignore the
implications of non-compliance with 3 very clear and concise unless
orders, and grant interim injunctions against defendants preventing any
further mention of baldrick bunt!

This being the case I feel it would be a very fair admission of defeat
for baldrick to commence posting using the name "baldrick" while I
assume the name "Guy Fawkes" until such time as he is able to return
top court and put right the silly mistake the "beak" has obviously made
today!

Finally in terms of costs, wonder if £600 sounds a reasonable sum for 2
full days loss of earnings, travel expenses to London and Exeter, and
spending more than 4 hours on the telephone finding out which documents
had gone "missing", and helpfully providing them to the court, to
ensure baldricks nonsense would be dismissed.............?

You mean you weren't sent down for seven years? I am shocked...


I think if baldrick got a sentence proportional to his IQ, then he may
well do a 7 stretch................

What where the grounds for a strike out?


Non compliance with 3 unless orders.............Judge was prepared to ignore
non-compliance with 2 earlier orders, but wasnt able to provide a written
reason for claimant ignoring the third order...........

Incidentally all of these papers were in fact "lost" and had I not provided
them to the court several weeks ago, the matter would have gone to
trial..................