Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
On 27 Feb, 23:20, Anne Jackson wrote:
The message from Sacha contains these words: Unhappily, recent developments in this group mean that two people are not included in this open invitation and I feel quite sure they know who they are, so am going into that no further. It's something I regret *very* much having to say. Given this caveat, you cannot actually call it a 'meet' Sacha, since NO-ONE can ever be excluded from a true meet. Better call it 'a soiree' or some other such pretentious nonsense! -- AnneJ Was that really necessary, why on earth did you make that nasty comment for - I am gobsmacked!!! Judith |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
In message .com,
" writes On 27 Feb, 23:20, Anne Jackson wrote: The message from Sacha contains these words: Unhappily, recent developments in this group mean that two people are not included in this open invitation and I feel quite sure they know who they are, so am going into that no further. It's something I regret *very* much having to say. Given this caveat, you cannot actually call it a 'meet' Sacha, since NO-ONE can ever be excluded from a true meet. Better call it 'a soiree' or some other such pretentious nonsense! -- AnneJ Was that really necessary, why on earth did you make that nasty comment for - I am gobsmacked!!! Writing as one of the people Sacha loves to ostracise, I don't think it was nasty. Just a fair comment. -- June Hughes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
"June Hughes" wrote " writes Anne Jackson wrote: Given this caveat, you cannot actually call it a 'meet' Sacha, since NO-ONE can ever be excluded from a true meet. Better call it 'a soiree' or some other such pretentious nonsense! Was that really necessary, why on earth did you make that nasty comment for - I am gobsmacked!!! Writing as one of the people Sacha loves to ostracise, I don't think it was nasty. Just a fair comment. Hardly. It was just bitchy and silly. Obviously anyone hosting a meet on their own property is at liberty to include or exclude anyone they wish. Really it'd be far pleasanter all round if you and Anne could try and resist dragging up old arguments and grudges at every turn. It's unnecessary, and verges on trolling. -- Sue |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
In article , Sue
writes Hardly. It was just bitchy and silly. Obviously anyone hosting a meet on their own property is at liberty to include or exclude anyone they wish. Not to mention the fact that if you can't exclude some people from a meet on your own property then no one would feel happy about holding them! After all it's not a public Meeting in a Park or Gardens which would be something completely different. I didn't know that 'Meet' had a rigid definition! After all (to be pedantic) an Annual General Meeting excludes all but those on a fully paid up Membership List. If people have an objection to a Meeting's venue or Guest List then perhaps another Meeting could be arranged by someone else to include those that feel excluded? -- Janet Tweedy Dalmatian Telegraph http://www.lancedal.demon.co.uk |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
"Janet Tweedy" wrote in message ... In article , Sue writes Hardly. It was just bitchy and silly. Obviously anyone hosting a meet on their own property is at liberty to include or exclude anyone they wish. Not to mention the fact that if you can't exclude some people from a meet on your own property then no one would feel happy about holding them! After all it's not a public Meeting in a Park or Gardens which would be something completely different. I didn't know that 'Meet' had a rigid definition! After all (to be pedantic) an Annual General Meeting excludes all but those on a fully paid up Membership List. If people have an objection to a Meeting's venue or Guest List then perhaps another Meeting could be arranged by someone else to include those that feel excluded? -- Janet Tweedy Dalmatian Telegraph http://www.lancedal.demon.co.uk What ! A meeting of just two people. What a horrible thought if those two bred:-) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
In article , "Rupert (W.Yorkshire)"
writes What ! A meeting of just two people. What a horrible thought if those two bred:-) Well not so unusual. Last Meet I held there were 32 people planned to come and then 26 dropped out within the preceding week! (Broken limbs, collecting relatives, colds, work and probably just lost interest!) We still had a good time and an awful lot of food -- Janet Tweedy Dalmatian Telegraph http://www.lancedal.demon.co.uk |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
"Janet Tweedy" wrote in message ... In article , "Rupert (W.Yorkshire)" writes What ! A meeting of just two people. What a horrible thought if those two bred:-) Well not so unusual. Last Meet I held there were 32 people planned to come and then 26 dropped out within the preceding week! (Broken limbs, collecting relatives, colds, work and probably just lost interest!) We still had a good time and an awful lot of food What did I miss out on, all that food going to waste! Alan |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
"Martin" wrote or even to exclude those that are at present included? Martin It's turning into a quiz - guess who's not invited........ Winner gets a free cream tea :~) Jenny |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
On 1 Mar, 18:17, "JennyC" wrote:
"Martin" wrote or even to exclude those that are at present included? It's turning into a quiz - guess who's not invited........ It's like a farce without the French bits slap slam door comes back in kiss slap kiss Winner gets a free cream tea :~) Sorry to disappoint you here but I've won a fiver it seems ;o) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
On Mar 1, 8:50 pm, Anne Jackson wrote:
The message from "JennyC" contains these words: "Martin" wrote or even to exclude those that are at present included? Martin It's turning into a quiz - guess who's not invited........ Winner gets a free cream tea :~) Jenny I'll have a fiver on me and June. -- AnneJ What was it you said about blankets, pot, kettle, black? Judith |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
On 1 Mar, 21:48, Anne Jackson wrote:
The message from " contains these words: On Mar 1, 8:50 pm, Anne Jackson wrote: The message from "JennyC" contains these words: "Martin" wrote: or even to exclude those that are at present included? Martin It's turning into a quiz - guess who's not invited........ Winner gets a free cream tea :~) Jenny I'll have a fiver on me and June. What was it you said about blankets, pot, kettle, black? Oh, but it's Sacha who appears to have an equal dislike of the both of us. Perhaps we're not 'pretentious' enough... G -- AnneJ she only appreciates the genuine article so maybe you are right. Judith |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
Anne Jackson wrote:
I'll have a fiver on me and June. What was it you said about blankets, pot, kettle, black? Oh, but it's Sacha who appears to have an equal dislike of the both of us. Perhaps we're not 'pretentious' enough... G Please, give it a rest. Perhaps you amuse yourself by your rancid witterings, mabye you think you amuse others, in truth you are pathetic and VERY boring. pk |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
In article , Anne Jackson
writes I'll have a fiver on me and June. You've lost then -- Janet Tweedy Dalmatian Telegraph http://www.lancedal.demon.co.uk |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
"Martin" wrote in message ... On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 20:50:40 GMT, Anne Jackson wrote: The message from "JennyC" contains these words: "Martin" wrote or even to exclude those that are at present included? Martin It's turning into a quiz - guess who's not invited........ Winner gets a free cream tea :~) Jenny I'll have a fiver on me and June. June fell at the first fence. -- Martin Was Anne a non starter? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
urg meet
"Martin" wrote in message ... On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 09:29:14 +0000, Janet Tweedy wrote: In article , Sue writes Hardly. It was just bitchy and silly. Obviously anyone hosting a meet on their own property is at liberty to include or exclude anyone they wish. Not to mention the fact that if you can't exclude some people from a meet on your own property then no one would feel happy about holding them! After all it's not a public Meeting in a Park or Gardens which would be something completely different. I didn't know that 'Meet' had a rigid definition! After all (to be pedantic) an Annual General Meeting excludes all but those on a fully paid up Membership List. If people have an objection to a Meeting's venue or Guest List then perhaps another Meeting could be arranged by someone else to include those that feel excluded? or even to exclude those that are at present included? A completely unneccessary comment. Alan -- Martin |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Devon urg meet | United Kingdom | |||
misinformation about urg meet here | United Kingdom | |||
URG meet 2007? | United Kingdom | |||
Parallel lines in agriculture do meet? | sci.agriculture | |||
++ Meet More Women Easily With Pheromones ++ | Ponds |