Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
I don't want a solar panel
I want a solar roof
so the top storey of my house becomes a roof conservatory/greenhouse -- http://www.gillsmith999.plus.com/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I don't want a solar panel
"Gill Smith" wrote in message o.uk... I want a solar roof so the top storey of my house becomes a roof conservatory/greenhouse -- http://www.gillsmith999.plus.com/ Expensive! You will not find an off-the-peg solution to this. You will need an architect and heating engineer, and the work will require planning permission and building regulations approval. Good luck R. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I don't want a solar panel
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:00:30 +0100, "Gill Smith"
wrote: I want a solar roof so the top storey of my house becomes a roof conservatory/greenhouse Did you ever see the grand design with the church conversion with the strange tower that he put plastic dome on? I always thought that'd be nice for plants... -- http://www.bra-and-pants.com http://www.holidayunder100.co.uk |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I don't want a solar panel
"mogga" wrote in message
... On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:00:30 +0100, "Gill Smith" wrote: I want a solar roof so the top storey of my house becomes a roof conservatory/greenhouse Did you ever see the grand design with the church conversion with the strange tower that he put plastic dome on? I always thought that'd be nice for plants... gnomes would look nice in the pews -- http://www.gillsmith999.plus.com/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I don't want a solar panel
"Gill Smith" wrote I want a solar roof so the top storey of my house becomes a roof conservatory/greenhouse Remember seeing an old Victorian Mansion in Egham that had, what can best be described as, a greenhouse on the roof 3 storeys up. Always thought that a wonderful idea. Mind you, they obviously had servants to carry all the plants and compost etc up and down. -- Regards Bob Hobden W.of London. UK |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I don't want a solar panel
On 21 July, 00:00, "Gill Smith" wrote:
I want a solar roof so the top storey of my house becomes a roof conservatory/greenhouse --http://www.gillsmith999.plus.com/ You would have a major problem with the building regulations. This would be an incredibly expensive job to carry out too. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I don't want a solar panel
In article ,
harry wrote: On 21 July, 00:00, "Gill Smith" wrote: I want a solar roof so the top storey of my house becomes a roof conservatory/greenhouse You would have a major problem with the building regulations. Good God, WHY? It's nothing terribly out of the ordinary. This would be an incredibly expensive job to carry out too. No more than putting any other kind of extra story on. Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I don't want a solar panel
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I don't want a solar panel
In article o.uk,
Dave Liquorice wrote: I want a solar roof so the top storey of my house becomes a roof conservatory/greenhouse You would have a major problem with the building regulations. Good God, WHY? It's nothing terribly out of the ordinary. The biggest snag would probably be the thermal insulation properties and having to make the building meet current regulations on heat loss. But I agree it shouldn't be that hard. What might be a problem is getting rid of the heat in the middle of summer rather than keeping heat loss down. It's soluble. We did it in our south-facing conservatory. This would be an incredibly expensive job to carry out too. No more than putting any other kind of extra story on. Large bits of glass are expensive, large double or triple glazed units are very expensive. True, but irrelevant. Build it out of medium-sized, double-glazed K glass. Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I don't want a solar panel
"harry" wrote "Gill Smith" wrote: I want a solar roof so the top storey of my house becomes a roof conservatory/greenhouse --http://www.gillsmith999.plus.com/ You would have a major problem with the building regulations. This would be an incredibly expensive job to carry out too. I would have thought no more complicated than getting permission for a conservatory because that is what it is, but on the roof rather than the garden. One problem might be neighbours objecting to loss of privacy. Cost would be down to building it on the existing building but that would be all in the design. Sounds great to me. -- Regards Bob Hobden W.of London. UK |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
I don't want a solar panel
On 21 July, 17:53, wrote:
In article , harry wrote: On 21 July, 00:00, "Gill Smith" wrote: I want a solar roof so the top storey of my house becomes a roof conservatory/greenhouse You would have a major problem with the building regulations. Good God, WHY? *It's nothing terribly out of the ordinary. It's very much out of the ordinary. This would be an incredibly expensive job to carry out too. No more than putting any other kind of extra story on. Regards, Nick Maclaren. Minimum thermal insulation levels. The roof would need to be removed and a completely different specially manufactured structure put on. (Not just the tiles/slates but all the timber work.) Depending on the area, there might well be planning difficulties. Possibly objections from neighbours too (if any) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
I don't want a solar panel
"Gill Smith" wrote in message o.uk... I want a solar roof so the top storey of my house becomes a roof conservatory/greenhouse This is an idea that I have long fantasised about, as well :-) There are a few practical issues, of course. For example, this is slightly more than a loft conversion. Not only does the floor have to bear the weight of the greenhouse/conservatory contents but it has to be waterproofed to protect the house from the water, moisture,etc. The floor also has to be insulated to modern standards and the electrical work will have to take account of the added moisture. So very much like taking off a pitched roof and installing a flat roof, then building a conservatory on the flat roof. [Although I don't think BCOs are very keen on new flat roof construction.] In fact, this sounds like a very practical approach because you can then have an outside area as well to put out plants in the summer if you so wish. [Also to sit and enjoy the view.] Not a cheap option, but it does sound achievable. I have often wondered why this construction is not adopted - you gain the use of the roof as a conservatory albeit at a significantly grater construction cost. Neigbour privacy may be an issue, but no more so than balconies or flat roof (or 'town houses' with a third storey). I presume that there may be issues over the status of the whole thing. Is it 'habitable'? In which case the insulation requirements are much higher. When I win the lottery (which I don't enter) I may have a go. Cheers Dave R -- No plan survives contact with the enemy. Helmuth von Moltke the Elder |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
I don't want a solar panel
In article ,
harry wrote: I want a solar roof so the top storey of my house becomes a roof conservatory/greenhouse You would have a major problem with the building regulations. Good God, WHY? =A0It's nothing terribly out of the ordinary. It's very much out of the ordinary. No, it's not. It's unusual for a domestic dwelling, but is a fairly common commercial and industrial construction - not typically used as a conservatory, of course. This would be an incredibly expensive job to carry out too. No more than putting any other kind of extra story on. Minimum thermal insulation levels. No problem. 3/4" gap K glass. Absolutely bog-standard nowadays. We have it on our conservatory, and I can witness it works. The roof would need to be removed and a completely different specially manufactured structure put on. (Not just the tiles/slates but all the timber work.) Depending on the area, there might well be planning difficulties. Possibly objections from neighbours too (if any) As I said, no more than putting any other kind of extra story on. It's no cheaper or easier, either. Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
I don't want a solar panel
On 21 July, 22:47, wrote:
In article o.uk, Dave Liquorice wrote: I want a solar roof so the top storey of my house becomes a roof conservatory/greenhouse You would have a major problem with the building regulations. Good God, WHY? *It's nothing terribly out of the ordinary. The biggest snag would probably be the thermal insulation properties and having to make the building meet current regulations on heat loss. But I agree it shouldn't be that hard. What might be a problem is getting rid of the heat in the middle of summer rather than keeping heat loss down. It's soluble. *We did it in our south-facing conservatory. This would be an incredibly expensive job to carry out too. No more than putting any other kind of extra story on. Large bits of glass are expensive, large double or triple glazed units are very expensive. True, but irrelevant. *Build it out of medium-sized, double-glazed K glass. Regards, Nick Maclaren.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Double glazed K glass is not even the equivalent of a single brick wall. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
I don't want a solar panel
In article ,
harry wrote: I want a solar roof so the top storey of my house becomes a roof conservatory/greenhouse You would have a major problem with the building regulations. Good God, WHY? =A0It's nothing terribly out of the ordinary. The biggest snag would probably be the thermal insulation properties and having to make the building meet current regulations on heat loss. But I agree it shouldn't be that hard. What might be a problem is getting rid of the heat in the middle of summer rather than keeping heat loss down. It's soluble. =A0We did it in our south-facing conservatory. This would be an incredibly expensive job to carry out too. No more than putting any other kind of extra story on. Large bits of glass are expensive, large double or triple glazed units are very expensive. True, but irrelevant. =A0Build it out of medium-sized, double-glazed K glass. Double glazed K glass is not even the equivalent of a single brick wall. Wrong. It's the equivalent of a cavity wall. Look it up. Also, the inside glass of our conservatory stays at roughly the same temperature as the inside of our cavity brick house walls. This is getting ridiculous, and I shall stop posting corrections on the grounds of reducing the boredom factor. The regular readers will know who to believe. Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|