Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Tall thin shrub recommendation??
In article , Sacha
writes It's a beautiful tree but a bit too tall & spreading for what Kate describes? Obelisk isn't Sacha it's quite fastigate and much smaller than the normal A. -- Janet Tweedy |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Tall thin shrub recommendation??
In article , Sacha
writes Sounds good and as if it might do the job then. A picture http://www.frankpmatthews.com/amelan...ia-obelisk.htm -- Janet Tweedy |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Tall thin shrub recommendation??
"Janet Tweedy" wrote in message ... In article , Sacha writes Sounds good and as if it might do the job then. A picture http://www.frankpmatthews.com/amelan...ia-obelisk.htm -- Janet Tweedy It's not just the flowers but the edible fruits and the stunning autumn colour. It is quite hardy here in the far north of Scotland (Bonar Bridge). Phil |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Maybe that's another effect of the dry conditions? Mine seems to be in flower for a reasonable amount of time. Not the months-on-end of Viburnum bodnantense, but comparable to other flowering shrubs. Better, than , eg lilac.
__________________
getstats - A society in which our lives and choices are enriched by an understanding of statistics. Go to www.getstats.org.uk for more information |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Tall thin shrub recommendation??
On 12/12/2012 16:13, echinosum wrote:
'Janet Tweedy[_2_ Wrote: ;974784']In article , Sacha writes- Sounds good and as if it might do the job then.- A picture 'Amelanchier alnifolia 'Obelisk' ® amelanchier - Trees for Life - Frank P. Matthews Ltd.' (http://tinyurl.com/c88y2uw) That says to 4m. But mine has remained less than 2m after 10 years, but it clearly isn't very happy. I think Amelanchiers don't like dry conditions. The flowering period is extremely short, blink and they've gone. *Is* flowering that brief, or could the dry conditions you describe cause the buds/flowers to abort? I would love to grow Amelanchier in the near future, so would like to understand a bit more about its habit. I'd be grateful for your reflections. For instance, are there plenty of berries despite brief flowering,(which suggests to me that the flowers persist long enough however apparently brief) or do you feel there is a poor crop of berries. Do you know which form of Amelanchier you are growing? -- Spider from high ground in SE London gardening on clay |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Tall thin shrub recommendation??
On 12/12/2012 11:32 PM, Spider wrote:
On 12/12/2012 16:13, echinosum wrote: 'Janet Tweedy[_2_ Wrote: ;974784']In article , Sacha writes- Sounds good and as if it might do the job then.- A picture 'Amelanchier alnifolia 'Obelisk' ® amelanchier - Trees for Life - Frank P. Matthews Ltd.' (http://tinyurl.com/c88y2uw) That says to 4m. But mine has remained less than 2m after 10 years, but it clearly isn't very happy. I think Amelanchiers don't like dry conditions. The flowering period is extremely short, blink and they've gone. *Is* flowering that brief, or could the dry conditions you describe cause the buds/flowers to abort? I would love to grow Amelanchier in the near future, so would like to understand a bit more about its habit. I'd be grateful for your reflections. For instance, are there plenty of berries despite brief flowering,(which suggests to me that the flowers persist long enough however apparently brief) or do you feel there is a poor crop of berries. Do you know which form of Amelanchier you are growing? Jumping in here, I grow A. lamarckii, flowering is indeed very brief (but lovely). It's in a pretty wet spot where it thrives. Birds get the berries before us, though! I would have said it was a spreading shrub, so 'Obelisk' sounds very interesting. The spring leaf out is a gorgeous bronze colour, and the pure white flowers make a really pretty contrast. Good fall colour too, mixed reds and purples. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Tall thin shrub recommendation??
On 12/12/2012 22:34, Emery Davis wrote:
On 12/12/2012 11:32 PM, Spider wrote: On 12/12/2012 16:13, echinosum wrote: 'Janet Tweedy[_2_ Wrote: ;974784']In article , Sacha writes- Sounds good and as if it might do the job then.- A picture 'Amelanchier alnifolia 'Obelisk' ® amelanchier - Trees for Life - Frank P. Matthews Ltd.' (http://tinyurl.com/c88y2uw) That says to 4m. But mine has remained less than 2m after 10 years, but it clearly isn't very happy. I think Amelanchiers don't like dry conditions. The flowering period is extremely short, blink and they've gone. *Is* flowering that brief, or could the dry conditions you describe cause the buds/flowers to abort? I would love to grow Amelanchier in the near future, so would like to understand a bit more about its habit. I'd be grateful for your reflections. For instance, are there plenty of berries despite brief flowering,(which suggests to me that the flowers persist long enough however apparently brief) or do you feel there is a poor crop of berries. Do you know which form of Amelanchier you are growing? Jumping in here, I grow A. lamarckii, flowering is indeed very brief (but lovely). It's in a pretty wet spot where it thrives. Birds get the berries before us, though! I would have said it was a spreading shrub, so 'Obelisk' sounds very interesting. The spring leaf out is a gorgeous bronze colour, and the pure white flowers make a really pretty contrast. Good fall colour too, mixed reds and purples. Thanks, Emery. That useful to know. Reckon I'll have to put up with a short flowering period then. I could always grow a clematis through it for summer flowers. Can you tell me if A. lamarckii, in your experience, is the obedient tree type or the suckering shrub type? -- Spider from high ground in SE London gardening on clay |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Tall thin shrub recommendation??
On 12/12/2012 11:57 PM, Spider wrote:
Can you tell me if A. lamarckii, in your experience, is the obedient tree type or the suckering shrub type? Spider, ours suckers pretty freely. Definitely not obedient! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
It's on neutral-to-acid clay, shaded by greenhouse and by 4 giant leylandiis. As I said before, I don't notice it as having a short flowering period, and it's absolutely smothered in flower. Bronze spring foliage is beautiful, as is the autumn colour, so all-in-all it's one of the better-value shrubs in the garden. Berries are small and I think ripen to black, but the blackbirds are very fond of them, so they're not something I notice.
__________________
getstats - A society in which our lives and choices are enriched by an understanding of statistics. Go to www.getstats.org.uk for more information |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I also have Juneberry A. lamarkii/canadensis (which may be synonyms). Again in a very dry spot, which doesn't work very well. It doesn't get bigger than about 1.5m for me, and suckers a bit. It won't bush out for me, I just get very long straggly bits which I have to shorten or it looks ridiculous. The berries are much nicer to eat than the ones on A alnifolia Obelisk, when I manage to get to a ripe one before the birds, who really like them. I've seen them growing in moist soil in Abingdon, and they grow bushy to 3-4m, a very effective screen while in leaf, and are well covered in really tasty berries. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Tall thin shrub recommendation??
"Sacha" wrote in message ... I think there might be some confusion here. I didn't recommend Amelanchier but people who are happy with it did and I made the "Sounds good" remark. I don't know if will suit the OP's needs. One other thought occurs to me and that is a Wisteria, grown as a standard. We have 3 on a lawn here and the 2 best flowerers look superb. The oldest is no more than 5' tall after about 5 years and of course, is on a 'trunk' with the branches weeping towards the ground. -- Sacha Well -- I would not call standard wisterias naturally tall and thin, although some pruning could assist. (see one of my 20 yr olds ). http://www.flickr.com/photos/8130344...in/photostream Very beautiful, but in need of Very strong support. I have had to resort to guy ropes a la tent style ! Pete |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Tall thin shrub recommendation??
On 13/12/2012 18:16, Sacha wrote:
On 2012-12-13 12:24:07 +0000, "Pete" said: "Sacha" wrote in message ... I think there might be some confusion here. I didn't recommend Amelanchier but people who are happy with it did and I made the "Sounds good" remark. I don't know if will suit the OP's needs. One other thought occurs to me and that is a Wisteria, grown as a standard. We have 3 on a lawn here and the 2 best flowerers look superb. The oldest is no more than 5' tall after about 5 years and of course, is on a 'trunk' with the branches weeping towards the ground. Pete's reply is 'greyed out' so I reproduce the whole thing he "Sacha" wrote in message ... I think there might be some confusion here. I didn't recommend Amelanchier but people who are happy with it did and I made the "Sounds good" remark. I don't know if will suit the OP's needs. One other thought occurs to me and that is a Wisteria, grown as a standard. We have 3 on a lawn here and the 2 best flowerers look superb. The oldest is no more than 5' tall after about 5 years and of course, is on a 'trunk' with the branches weeping towards the ground. -- Sacha Well -- I would not call standard wisterias naturally tall and thin, although some pruning could assist. (see one of my 20 yr olds ). http://www.flickr.com/photos/8130344...in/photostream Very beautiful, but in need of Very strong support. I have had to resort to guy ropes a la tent style ! Pete Your Wisteria is simply beautiful. We're letting ours do something rather different and allowing the branches to arch over towards the ground. I saw this first at a friend's house in Jersey, about 25 years ago. Their Wisterias had been in for a very long time and looked like ball gowns, sweeping the grass with their blossom. I wonder if Myrtus communis, would answer the OP's requirements. While they seed, it's not so badly as to be uncontrollable or a nuisance, imo. But would it be hardy enough? I thought they were borderline hardy and the OP is in the Midlands. -- Spider from high ground in SE London gardening on clay |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Tall thin shrub recommendation??
On 12/13/2012 10:13 PM, Sacha wrote:
But would it be hardy enough? I thought they were borderline hardy and the OP is in the Midlands. It depends very much on her particular area. We've had some lasting cold snaps here that they've sailed through. But we're not talking months. Greece, where they grow most beautifully, can be very cold but it's very well drained. Personally, I'd be tempted to try it, if it's the right tree for the setting in terms of shape etc. But I wouldn't be prepared to risk a lot of money on it if the ground is soggy and holds winter wet They hate wet it seems, I killed a well established one that way (change in the drainage). |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Tall thin shrub recommendation??
On 13/12/2012 21:13, Sacha wrote:
On 2012-12-13 19:29:05 +0000, Spider said: On 13/12/2012 18:16, Sacha wrote: On 2012-12-13 12:24:07 +0000, "Pete" said: "Sacha" wrote in message ... I think there might be some confusion here. I didn't recommend Amelanchier but people who are happy with it did and I made the "Sounds good" remark. I don't know if will suit the OP's needs. One other thought occurs to me and that is a Wisteria, grown as a standard. We have 3 on a lawn here and the 2 best flowerers look superb. The oldest is no more than 5' tall after about 5 years and of course, is on a 'trunk' with the branches weeping towards the ground. Pete's reply is 'greyed out' so I reproduce the whole thing he "Sacha" wrote in message ... I think there might be some confusion here. I didn't recommend Amelanchier but people who are happy with it did and I made the "Sounds good" remark. I don't know if will suit the OP's needs. One other thought occurs to me and that is a Wisteria, grown as a standard. We have 3 on a lawn here and the 2 best flowerers look superb. The oldest is no more than 5' tall after about 5 years and of course, is on a 'trunk' with the branches weeping towards the ground. -- Sacha Well -- I would not call standard wisterias naturally tall and thin, although some pruning could assist. (see one of my 20 yr olds ). http://www.flickr.com/photos/8130344...in/photostream Very beautiful, but in need of Very strong support. I have had to resort to guy ropes a la tent style ! Pete Your Wisteria is simply beautiful. We're letting ours do something rather different and allowing the branches to arch over towards the ground. I saw this first at a friend's house in Jersey, about 25 years ago. Their Wisterias had been in for a very long time and looked like ball gowns, sweeping the grass with their blossom. I wonder if Myrtus communis, would answer the OP's requirements. While they seed, it's not so badly as to be uncontrollable or a nuisance, imo. But would it be hardy enough? I thought they were borderline hardy and the OP is in the Midlands. It depends very much on her particular area. We've had some lasting cold snaps here that they've sailed through. But we're not talking months. Greece, where they grow most beautifully, can be very cold but it's very well drained. Personally, I'd be tempted to try it, if it's the right tree for the setting in terms of shape etc. But I wouldn't be prepared to risk a lot of money on it if the ground is soggy and holds winter wet. The OP is on slightly acid clay, so I'd be a bit worried about drainage. All the same, if drainage were improved, it could work. It's a lovely shrub and can be clipped to keep it within bounds, so it may work. -- Spider from high ground in SE London gardening on clay |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How tall is TOO tall for seedlings? | Gardening | |||
Struggling to find homes for New Zealand Tree Ferns ranging in size from 7ft tall to over 10ft tall. PLEASE HELP | Gardening | |||
Tall shrub or tree that can be grown in large planter on a deck? | Gardening | |||
Tall, "Soft" Shrub/Plant | Gardening | |||
Need tall, thin plant for back of tank. Which do you recommend? | Freshwater Aquaria Plants |