On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 11:18:37 +0100, Chris Hogg wrote:

On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 10:42:36 +0100, Judith in England
wrote:

On Mon, 1 Jul 2013 09:29:01 +0100, "Ophelia"
wrote:


"The Todal" wrote in message
...
"I asked these questions on behalf of a group discussing the 'Coulson et
al'
case and I offered to ask here, this being my ultimate place to ask
online.
The person who asked the question came to see what the response was. He
scoffed and said "that was a waste of time, all they seem interested in
is
Latin" That is a shame, because this is a great group"

So what does the moron want - a lengthy apology and a refund?

That was unworthy of you.


Ophelia, Todal has probably decided you are a cyclist, and he's on
record and saying he does not give "a flying ****" about them.

You might get more in the unmoderated group.

In a reply to Sacha in another thread, you said "If you can find a
post (other than a reply) which I have made and cross-posted,
then I will be pleased to apologise".

Well, this is one such. The post to which you are replying appeared
_only_ in uk.net.news.moderation and not here, so you can't claim you
are just following the convention of cross-posting a reply. You have
specifically cross-posted to this group.

Apology due, and FFS, get your act together!



Sorry sunshine - that post was made by the person who posts using the id Judith
in England


Note that it is not a proper email address and in fact is just like your own -
what a coincidence.

My posts are from