Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
OT. new antispam laws in the US
In article , Jane Ransom
writes In article , martin writes (4) some innocent victim of her bounces will formally complain to her ISP about her spamming, eventually. How will they distinguish between a bounce and an invalid address used initially by the spammer? I contacted demon recently because of what people were saying on this thread - their advice was . . . . continue bouncing. I had a similar conversation with Demon but when I pointed out that if the return address was invalid it would just be bounced back, their response was "well just delete them then", I challenged them on what they were doing to reduce/eliminate spam and it appears the answer is absolutely nothing (unless its coming from a demon account) -- David |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Even chickens get a better life under new animal laws | United Kingdom | |||
LAWS ABOUT DIVERTING WATER | Ponds | |||
LAWS ABOUT DIVERTING WATER | Ponds | |||
Monsanto Uses Canadian Taxpayer Money to Violate Foreign Laws Case highlights need for strong Biosaf | Gardening | |||
Messy laws | Gardening |