Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
product ideas
On Sat, 29 May 2004 12:50:53 GMT, FF wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2004 11:36:35 +0100, "DocDelete" wrote: To the original poster: perhaps we need some sort of device that shoots farm silage from bonnet mounted cannons at anyone on a mobile phone while driving? I've always wondered why the sane majority don't toot their horns at drivers with mobiles. because they are either putting on make up whilst breast feeding the baby or shaving whilst trying to pick up the accidentally ejected CD from under the break pedal ducks and runs |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
product ideas
Andy Luckman (AJL Electronics) wrote:
Snipped Text How about trimming to context? Then there would be no scrolling involved for anyone and you wouldn't be regarded as an antisocial idiot. Indeed, I even have a text macro set up for Snipped Text. However, with the number of cross posted groups in this thread it'd be impossible to cater for each group's protocol. -- Andy Hewitt ** FAF#1, (Ex-OSOS#5) - FJ1200 ABS Honda Concerto 16v: Windows free zone (Mac G5 Dual Processor) http://www.thehewitts.plus.com - now online |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
product ideas
The anti social one isn't me...
and I'd never call anyone an idiot..even you...though people do act like them some times..or sound like them! : ) |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
product ideas
Sensible comment.
Safety should be your primary consideration. Suppose you are trundling along at 70 in lane 1 with nothing ahead of you for some distance and you catch up with a clod doing 65 for mile after mile, there's a stream of traffic doing 85 nose to tail in lane 3 and the hard shoulder is clear. It may be a lot safer to overtake on the left than to move over two lanes, overtake and then get back into lane 1. If it all goes pearshaped then it's down to you for infringing the Highway Code but it's not illegal. Of course the clod is also infringing the HC for not driving in the left hand lane (rule 238). -- Richard Porter Mail to username ricp at domain minijem.plus.com "You can't have Windows without pains." |
#110
|
|||
|
|||
product ideas
FF wrote in message ... On Thu, 27 May 2004 11:36:35 +0100, "DocDelete" wrote: To the original poster: perhaps we need some sort of device that shoots farm silage from bonnet mounted cannons at anyone on a mobile phone while driving? I've always wondered why the sane majority don't toot their horns at drivers with mobiles. Liz If I have got a passenger with me, I ask them to jot down the registration. Then I report them here http://www.hogline.co.uk/index.asp Jim |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
product ideas
On Sat, 29 May 2004 19:55:38 +0100, "Jim Warren"
wrote: FF wrote in message .. . On Thu, 27 May 2004 11:36:35 +0100, "DocDelete" wrote: To the original poster: perhaps we need some sort of device that shoots farm silage from bonnet mounted cannons at anyone on a mobile phone while driving? I've always wondered why the sane majority don't toot their horns at drivers with mobiles. Liz If I have got a passenger with me, I ask them to jot down the registration. Then I report them here http://www.hogline.co.uk/index.asp and then what happens? It's not clear from what is on the web site. |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
product ideas
"Matzi" wrote in message ... Sensible comment. Safety should be your primary consideration. Suppose you are trundling along at 70 in lane 1 with nothing ahead of you for some distance and you catch up with a clod doing 65 for mile after mile, there's a stream of traffic doing 85 nose to tail in lane 3 and the hard shoulder is clear. It may be a lot safer to overtake on the left than to move over two lanes, overtake and then get back into lane 1. If it all goes pearshaped then it's down to you for infringing the Highway Code but it's not illegal. Of course the clod is also infringing the HC for not driving in the left hand lane (rule 238). -- Richard Porter Mail to username ricp at domain minijem.plus.com "You can't have Windows without pains." I responded to a request Please point to the law / section of the Highway Code that outlaws 'undertaking'. to show where in the highway code the relevent information is found (ok so far) now as a transport professional " CPC Road Haulage National" I should have pointed out that the Highway Code is not the law in itself but a series of guidelines based on the various acts of law (Construction and Use, Road Traffic Act etc etc which are often written in arcane legalise. So if you fail to obey guidelines in the highway code and are caught so doing or cause an accident as a result you will be subject to prosecution under the relevent act it is certainly not just advisory there are plenty of incidences when Truck drivers have been prosecuted for undertaking slow moving vehicles hogging the middle lane and far too few of MLHog's being prosecuted for obstruction or inconsiderate driving or Due Care DW --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.686 / Virus Database: 447 - Release Date: 15/05/04 |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
product ideas
Richard Porter wrote:
http://www.highwaycode.gov.uk/23.shtml#227 Do not overtake unless you are sure it is safe to do so. ... The Highway Code doesn't "outlaw" anything - it indicates the law's requirements with "YOU MUST" or "YOU MUST NOT" in red. The Highway Code's own rules are written in normal text. Safety should be your primary consideration. Suppose you are trundling along at 70 in lane 1 with nothing ahead of you for some distance and you catch up with a clod doing 65 for mile after mile, there's a stream of traffic doing 85 nose to tail in lane 3 and the hard shoulder is clear. It may be a lot safer to overtake on the left than to move over two lanes, overtake and then get back into lane 1. If it all goes pearshaped then it's down to you for infringing the Highway Code but it's not illegal. Of course the clod is also infringing the HC for not driving in the left hand lane (rule 238). *ding, ding, ding-a-ling-a****ing-ding* Finally, someone has posted some ****ing sense in this thread. -- Steve H 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo' http://www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - MZ ETZ300 VW Golf GL Cabrio - Alfa 75 TS - Alfa 155 TS Lusso - COSOC KOTL BoTAFOT #87 - BoTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC # |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
product ideas
I have the number for my local police on my mobile. Website a good idea
though, nice to know there is one. Any idea what happens after you report it though? I've always wondered why the sane majority don't toot their horns at drivers with mobiles. Liz If I have got a passenger with me, I ask them to jot down the registration. Then I report them here http://www.hogline.co.uk/index.asp Jim |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
product ideas
Do not overtake unless you are sure it is safe to do so. ... The Highway Code doesn't "outlaw" anything - it indicates the law's requirements with "YOU MUST" or "YOU MUST NOT" in red. The Highway Code's own rules are written in normal text. Safety should be your primary consideration. Suppose you are trundling along at 70 in lane 1 with nothing ahead of you for some distance and you catch up with a clod doing 65 for mile after mile, there's a stream of traffic doing 85 nose to tail in lane 3 and the hard shoulder is clear. It may be a lot safer to overtake on the left than to move over two lanes, overtake and then get back into lane 1. If it all goes pearshaped then it's down to you for infringing the Highway Code but it's not illegal. Of course the clod is also infringing the HC for not driving in the left hand lane (rule 238). On the rare occassions this has happened to me I usually flash them. That mostly wakes them up lol and they move over. |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
product ideas
A pocket-size mobile phone jammer would be a useful device. It need not
have much in the way of range, just enough to cover a railway carriage or a small restaurant. Of course you might have to think up some other job description for it. . . Ron Robinson |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
product ideas
"R.N. Robinson" wrote in message ... A pocket-size mobile phone jammer would be a useful device. It need not have much in the way of range, just enough to cover a railway carriage or a small restaurant. Of course you might have to think up some other job description for it. . . --------------------------------------------------- Better still a jammer to stop all the cross posting on this group. Now hit delete! |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
product ideas
"Chris" wrote in message ...
I am in the final year of a technology education degree course, part of which involves designing a product and manufacturing it to prototype stage. The product has to be original, or better designed, than any similar product on the market. I am posting this message to a number of newsgroups in the hope that someone will have a problem with a product they use, or can't find a product to suit their requirements in the market place. I would appreciate any (sensible) suggestions. Small rear view mirrors on drop handle bars that can be seen just outside where the hands rest on the shifters. Sean. |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
product ideas
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
re product ideas | United Kingdom | |||
product ideas (just for gardeners) (cross posts deleted) | United Kingdom | |||
new product(?)electric fencing for raccoon woes | Ponds | |||
new product(?)electric fencing for raccoon woes | Ponds | |||
AD: Versatile product for tightening fences, deer stand guide wires, grape vine trellis', etc - Jak | Lawns |