Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
"js1" wrote in message
... You're the only person who has claimed anything absolutely. http://www.aquabotanic.com/carbon.html Can algae feed on Excel? No. I'm sure this may raise a few eyebrows ;-) since at face value this would be a reasonable expectation. But, for reasons Uncle Sam won't let us discuss, all I can say is that algae can't feed on Excel and I will leave it as an exercise to the reader to deduce why this is the case (big picture folks, no chemistry involved ;-). Gregory Morin, Ph.D. ~~~~~~~Research Director~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Seachem Laboratories, Inc. www.seachem.com 888-SEACHEM Notice no claims of algicide by Seachem. Though, from the above comments, it's not unreasonable to infer that perhaps Excel is at some level an algicide, but Seachem is not willing, or not allowed, to make sucha a claim. You are the one who, on anectdotal evidence, claims absolutely that Excel is not an algicide and is in fact good to grow algae with. all that says is that "algae can't feed on it". It is a far leap to say that means that it kills algae or that it is an algicide. and on top of that, it sounds like complete and utter marketing bs anyway. Why would the government prevent them from even talking about why they thought algae couldn't use this as food? If it is valid scientifically it would be permissable. -- Margolis http://web.archive.org/web/200302152...qs/AGQ2FAQ.htm http://www.unrealtower.org/faq |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Margolis wrote: Notice no claims of algicide by Seachem. Though, from the above comments, it's not unreasonable to infer that perhaps Excel is at some level an algicide, but Seachem is not willing, or not allowed, to make sucha a claim. You are the one who, on anectdotal evidence, claims absolutely that Excel is not an algicide and is in fact good to grow algae with. all that says is that "algae can't feed on it". It is a far leap to say that means that it kills algae or that it is an algicide. Snippets of email from Dr. Greg Morin, CEO of SeaChem: There are products which claim to kill algae but I didn't know they might have to meet any EPA qualifications. Yes, they do. They _should_ have an EPA registration # on them. If not, they are "illegal" products if they are also claiming to kill algae. Remember, it is only the claim that counts as far as EPA is concerned. I can't endorse or discuss your product in any event but it certainly has me puzzled now. If there were a product that really was effective for algae but didn't harm plants or invertebrates, I would certainly be interested in it if there were a scientific study of some sort. AFAIK SeaChem has a very high reputation. We would need to do that for EPA registration to make that claim, but the costs of doing that and the registration/application process far outweigh whatever we would hope to make off such a product. The government sets the financial burden so high it is just not worth it ... I *think* a scientific study of a specific chemical compound could investigate certain effects upon various organisms without contravening any product marketing regulations, however I am not an expert on these matters. Further, we could discuss those findings on public forums couldn't we? A product containing that compound could then reference the study or people could endorse the product citing the study... I am very puzzled! A 3rd party would have to do such a study and even then we could not disclose any findings showing algacidal activity... the 3rd party could and others could discuss it... but we could not ... yes it is crazy but that's how it is unfortunately. We could do it but since we could not disclose anything it kind of defeats the purpose of doing it. -Greg -- Gregory Morin, Ph.D. ~~~~~~~President/CEO~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Seachem Laboratories, Inc. www.seachem.com 888-SEACHEM ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Later that same day: I realize there are governmetn regulations concerning what you can and cannot say about stuff. I maintain a culture of cladophora algae ("moss rocks"). It would be good to know if Flourish Excel is harmfull to them at regualr ot higher dosage. Ie, a warning would be handy. To answer your question, algae will not fare too well when Flourish Excel is dosed as recommended. Yes, a warning is probably a good idea. It had not been thought of to date as typically algae is not desired in a planted aquarium. -Greg Morin -- Gregory Morin, Ph.D. ~~~~~~~President/CEO~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Seachem Laboratories, Inc. www.seachem.com 888-SEACHEM ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So is Excel an algicide? Certainly not. Have people found it inhibis algae growth? Most have. Have you tried seevral large water changes? How often do you change water in this problem tank? -- Need Mercedes parts ? - http://parts.mbz.org http://www.mbz.org | Mercedes Mailing lists: http://lists.mbz.org 633CSi 250SE/C 300SD | Killies, killi.net, Crypts, aquaria.net 1970 280SE, 72 280SE | Old wris****ches http://watches.list.mbz.org |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Richard wrote:
A 3rd party would have to do such a study and even then we could not disclose any findings showing algacidal activity... the 3rd party could and others could discuss it... but we could not ... yes it is Sounds like an interesting research project for a grad student in chemistry/biology/biochemistry... I'd be willing to co-supervise the research if anybody is interested. -- Victor M. Martinez Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM) Send your spam he Email me he |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
To answer the original question...
Most environments have one 'rate limiting' nutrient- that is, the lack of one nutrient constrains growth much more so than others. In marine environments, it is often iron, in freshwater lakes, it is often phosphorus. For example, in the case of your body, it's iron, which your body goes to great lengths to tie up and make unavailable and pathogens go to great lengths to get at. (Often by blowing up red blood cells and grabbing the iron in the hemoglobin) |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
How about a better source (encyclopedias are great for primary school
projects)- http://www.sidwell.edu/us/science/vl...arya/Protista/ http://www.sidwell.edu/us/science/vl...karya/Plantae/ http://clab.cecil.cc.md.us/faculty/biology1/plants.htm http://www.plantphys.net/article.php?ch=t&id=17 Bottom line about algae being plants - it depends. On the algae, and on who/when is classifying them. Tony "Margolis" wrote in message ... "js1" wrote in message ... You must have missed the part where it says, "All algae lack true leaves, roots, flowers, and other tissue structures found in higher plants." they may lack those, but they are still simple plants. They lack the structure of HIGHER plants, but that doesn't mean that they are not plants -- Margolis http://web.archive.org/web/200302152...qs/AGQ2FAQ.htm http://www.unrealtower.org/faq |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
All plants are Eukaryota. Algae are a kind of plant. All algae are
eukaryota. Algae are distinguished from other plants by their lack of cellular differentiation. All algae have chloroplasts. All plants have chloroplasts, which are captured bacterial symbionts. The capture event is over a billion years back, if rRNA is any good as a molecular clock. (So far, so good, at least) Unlike most other organelles in plant cells, chloroplasts have their own DNA and control their own division and replication apart from their host. Unfortunately, some people off handedly call cyanobacteria, green sulfur, green non-sulfur, purple non-sulfur, and purple sulfur photosynthetic bacteria algae when they're not- they're Prokayota, commonly refered to as bacteria. Further reading on the web: Explanation of celluar differentiation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellular_differentiation Lynn Margulis' endosymbiont theory: http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/93/3/1071 The Tree of Life: http://tolweb.org/tree/phylogeny.html The Ribosomal Batabase Project http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/index.jsp |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
BBA= poor CO2 issues.
Nothing to do with reduction, 90%(or higher) of the time: folks need to add more CO2, PO4, not less. Things you do not want to add: too many fish, fish food, NH4, not clean filters, general neglect, lack of prunign, etc. Keep in mind that Excel adds carbon as well. Adding CO2 properly could be considered a mild algicide as well:-) Regards, Tom Barr |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Green algae are still considered in Plantae, Charophyceans/Coleocheteae
are very plant like and have differentiated cells, in many ways so do Caulperales, kelps etc, they went a different pathway but are extremely successful and very plant like. Byrophytes are an odd group as well. BGA, Cyanophyta/Cyanobacteria (whatever you prefer to call them, Cyanobacteria works well) are very unlike ANY other group of bacteria, so much so I'd consider them almost in their own group, they possess thyalkloids, but not chloroplast. Most folks that do the work on this group are phycologist, not microbiologist, most of us retain the term BGA as a common name. Zoo folks call Divisions, phylums and plant folks call phylums Divisions, depending on what side of the fence you are on. I did like that you referred to algae as "a type of plant". Regards, Tom Barr |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
js1 wrote:
On 2005-01-11, blank wrote: eg., java fern, java moss, elodea, amazon swords etc etc. Each week I do a 50% water change and add the following Seachem products: 35ml Excel, 3ml Supplement, 4ml Nitrogen, 4ml Phosphorous, 10ml Potassium, 7ml Iron. Filtration is an Eheim Pro II 2028. If you do a search, you'll find interviews and articles from Seachem reps who basically say that a tank stocked with fish should produce enough nitrates and phosphates to feed the plants in a tank. Seems like you only need nitrogen and phosphorus if you have little to no fauna. I add Flourish, Excel, and potassium. My algae has come under control even with it sitting next to a window. I use Florish, Excel and Potassium and I have no algae either, been using it for years, especially the Excel. Kay |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Richard wrote:
In article , Margolis wrote: "Richard" wrote in message ... Keep in mind Excel is an algicide. Not really. In fact, algae grows quite well with excel, it seems to like it. Yeah, really. You must have way more algae than it can handle then. If you write to Greg, CEO of Sea-Chem and ask him if it's safe to grow Cladophoa he'll tell you no, it'll kill it. But US Government regulations prevent him from claiming it's an algicide. It may not be a great algicide but the acetyl compound in it that releases carbon is death on algae. (Even acetic acid kills algae in small doses). Richard, I have been using Excel for years for my plants and for algae control, ever since I have used it, I have never had any algae in my tanks. My plants grow nicely and I don't have to worry about algae. Kay |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Kay wrote:
I have been using Excel for years for my plants and for algae control, ever since I have used it, I have never had any algae in my tanks. My plants grow nicely and I don't have to worry about algae. I must say I was a bit skeptical at first. However, in my last water change, I dosed with Excel in the large tank (110g). It's been 3 or 4 days (I dosed again yesterday) and the algae does seem to be declining!!! I know it's too early to tell, but it seems to be working. I'll report progress as I see it. -- Victor M. Martinez Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM) Send your spam he Email me he |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Victor Martinez wrote:
Kay wrote: I have been using Excel for years for my plants and for algae control, ever since I have used it, I have never had any algae in my tanks. My plants grow nicely and I don't have to worry about algae. I must say I was a bit skeptical at first. However, in my last water change, I dosed with Excel in the large tank (110g). It's been 3 or 4 days (I dosed again yesterday) and the algae does seem to be declining!!! I know it's too early to tell, but it seems to be working. I'll report progress as I see it. Yes thats what seemed to happen to all my tanks till there was none and in a shorter time than I expected. Kay |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
"Kay" wrote in message news Victor Martinez wrote: Kay wrote: I have been using Excel for years for my plants and for algae control, ever since I have used it, I have never had any algae in my tanks. My plants grow nicely and I don't have to worry about algae. I must say I was a bit skeptical at first. However, in my last water change, I dosed with Excel in the large tank (110g). It's been 3 or 4 days (I dosed again yesterday) and the algae does seem to be declining!!! I know it's too early to tell, but it seems to be working. I'll report progress as I see it. Yes thats what seemed to happen to all my tanks till there was none and in a shorter time than I expected. Kay OK, I am going to give it a try. Will add ONLY excel for a few weeks and see what happens. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
blank wrote:
"Kay" wrote in message news Victor Martinez wrote: Kay wrote: I have been using Excel for years for my plants and for algae control, ever since I have used it, I have never had any algae in my tanks. My plants grow nicely and I don't have to worry about algae. I must say I was a bit skeptical at first. However, in my last water change, I dosed with Excel in the large tank (110g). It's been 3 or 4 days (I dosed again yesterday) and the algae does seem to be declining!!! I know it's too early to tell, but it seems to be working. I'll report progress as I see it. Yes thats what seemed to happen to all my tanks till there was none and in a shorter time than I expected. Kay OK, I am going to give it a try. Will add ONLY excel for a few weeks and see what happens. Please let us know how you like or dislike it. I think it will work for you, but let us know anyhow ok? Kay |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Don't dose with Excel if you are using any kind of CO2. I lost a lot of fish
some time back when I got the bright idea of suplimenting my CO2 with Excel. I'm not sure what the problem was but it was in part species related. I lost all my Amicus Splendens as well as some cheaper fish. Every one perked up with a big water change. bob "Victor Martinez" wrote in message ... Kay wrote: I have been using Excel for years for my plants and for algae control, ever since I have used it, I have never had any algae in my tanks. My plants grow nicely and I don't have to worry about algae. I must say I was a bit skeptical at first. However, in my last water change, I dosed with Excel in the large tank (110g). It's been 3 or 4 days (I dosed again yesterday) and the algae does seem to be declining!!! I know it's too early to tell, but it seems to be working. I'll report progress as I see it. -- Victor M. Martinez Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM) Send your spam he Email me he |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dead algae.. dos that reduce oxy levels? | Ponds | |||
liquid fert or tab fert | Freshwater Aquaria Plants | |||
getting hair algae, should I reduce KNO3? | Freshwater Aquaria Plants | |||
liquid fert or tab fert | Freshwater Aquaria Plants | |||
getting hair algae, should I reduce KNO3? | Freshwater Aquaria Plants |