In article ,
"J. Clarke" wrote:

Billy wrote:
In article ,
sherwindu wrote:

Billy wrote:

In article ,
sherwindu wrote:

Comics Momma WebTV wrote:

He McCain is a lefty pinko.
Did not fight in viet nam, helped and assisted the viet cong by
turning himself in and being a prisoner.

OK, Mr. brave guy. What wars did you fight in? What medals
did
you get? I think this is big talk from someone who has never
been in battle.


Real patriot would not have surrendered.

That's what the Nazi SS did. We had to kill every one of the
*******s.

Pinkos surrender. My son
comic would not have surrendered, he would hide under his bed
like
during this war.
I see somebody left the door open. Thanks for the weirdoes "Doo",
not that a fascist, zionist pig would know any better.

Billy

Look what just crawled out from under a rock!

Zionists are to Judaism, what the Klan is to Christianity. Whatever
they claim their motives are, the reality is that they are about
stealing land. With no justice in the middle east, there will be no
peace. Two wrongs don't make a right. Re-unite Palestine.

So you're saying that Syria, Jordan, and Egypt should give up their
pieces of Palestine?

--

What part of re-unite didn't you understand? Hell, Hamas would probably
be down with the Israeli state if the Palestinians had the right of
return, but the would screw up Israel's whole ethnic cleansing thing.
--

Billy

Bush, Cheney & Pelosi, Behind Bars
http://rachelcorriefoundation.org/site/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movemen...George_W._Bush

Rod Speed wrote:

Billy wrote

snip

Who did Osama work for before he went free lance, hmmm.


He didnt 'work for' anyone.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bin_laden

snip

Who trained him?




--
The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to
minimize spam. Our true address is of the form .

CJT wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Billy wrote

Who did Osama work for before he went free lance, hmmm.

He didnt 'work for' anyone.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bin_laden

Who trained him?

No one 'trained him'

Billy wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Dan Espen wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Dan Espen wrote
Kurt Ullman wrote
(Don Klipstein) wrote

I hope this is irony or some other class of humor!

Bush II got re-elected by being against the "terrorists" but has
gone through over 7 years, and over 6 of those after "9/11",
without capturing Osama bin Laden either dead or alive!

The horror! Of course the fact that there hasn't been a (successful)
attempt on US soil since then is all outweighed by not finding OBL.

Come on guys.

There's no need for an attack on US soil.
Plenty of American's right there in the middle east as easy targets.

Yes, but its a lot harder to ensure that they
dont get targetted in a place like Saudi etc.

Count total American losses and then figure out how well this is working.

The death toll isnt any higher than with accidents if Iraq hadnt been invaded.

Huh?

You're trying to say, if that bomb hadn't killed that soldier he
would have died in a traffic accident with the same frequency?

Yes, that is what I am actually saying. There is no 'trying' involved.

I must have misread what you posted.
It makes no sense at all.

Its a fact, quite surprising tho that fact is.

It's not working, whether you count losses as bodies or losses as dollars.

Depends on how you define working. Saddam has been eliminated
and hasnt been replaced by someone who is just as bad.

Try to follow along.

Try retaking Bullshitting 101.

We were attacked by Saudis.

Nope, quite a few of them were egyptians.

15 of 19 Sept. 11 hijackers were Saudi

What matters is who lead each particular hijacking,
and that certainly wasnt exclusively saudis.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2002/02/06/saudi.htm
two from the United Arab Emirates, one from Egypt and one from Lebanon.

Those numbers arent universally accepted.

Your original is just plain wrong.

Number of terrorists from Iraq were zero.

Iraq did financially support a number of terrorists, particularly in Palestine etc.

What does replacing one dictator with another

The current top monkey isnt a dictator, he was elected in democratic elections.

You mean like Bush?

Yep, he aint a dictator either.

have to do with this?

Any fool can see that Iraq will immediately revert to dictatorship when we leave.

You're so stupid that you havent even noticed that they had elections
and most likely will have more of those when the US leaves.

In fact it's a total disaster.

Nope. Nothing like one either.

Still a repressive monarchy in Saudi Arabia.

Nothing like a total disaster tho.

Not enough troops to find the nuts in Afghanistan.

Nothing like a total disaster tho.

Total, complete, utter failure.

Nothing like that. The talibums no longer run Afghanistan
and afghanistan is no longer a base for terrorist training.

But NATO doesn't want to play any more

Pig ignorant lie.

and attacks are on the rise.

And they arent in Iraq.

Afghanistan report warns of 'failed state'

Still nothing like a total disaster. The talibums got the bums rush, very comprehensively
indeed and even you should have noticed that Saddam ended up dead.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...,6606733.story

Just the usual mindless pig ignorant silly stuff. And it doesnt even say that its a total disaster anyway.

Kurt Ullman wrote
CJT wrote
Rod Speed wrote

No one cares much about the debt except a few rabid loons.

... just like everybody was happy with the subprime market except "a few rabid loons."

Wrong, as always.

The only downside of the national debt is that a lot of taxes are ****ed
against the wall on the interest paid on it. It wont implode, you watch.

At the time. Yeah. Congress and the White House and the Fed were
all touting subprime as a way to get more people into houses and
help people who might not otherwise acheive the American Dream.

None of them were doing that.

Of course the rabid loons were eventually proved right (just like the naysayers
of the Tech Bubble, the GoGo 60s, and probably the Tulip Bubble in 1593.

And they wont be about the national debt, you watch.

I knew we were going to have trouble when the Rocket Scientists started
telling us that The Subprime Was Different from all the other bubbles.

They didnt do that either.

Generally that is when you start heading for the doors (g).

No point in doing that about the national debt.

Kurt Ullman wrote:
... just like everybody was happy with the subprime market except "a
few rabid loons."

At the time. Yeah. Congress and the White House and the Fed were all
touting subprime as a way to get more people into houses and help
people who might not otherwise acheive the American Dream. Of course
the rabid loons were eventually proved right (just like the naysayers
of the Tech Bubble, the GoGo 60s, and probably the Tulip Bubble in
1593. I knew we were going to have trouble when the Rocket Scientists
started telling us that The Subprime Was Different from all the other
bubbles. Generally that is when you start heading for the doors (g).

Worse. Federal morgatage and banking regulations actually REQUIRED lenders
to provide a certain percentage of loans to minority, ethnic, disadvantaged,
etc. groups. Members of these groups could not possibly afford current
rates, even if risk factors were ignored.

Banks are even required to have branch offices in neighborhoods where the
only foot traffic consists of hookers and bank robbers.

CJT wrote:
Now, which of the candidates still in the hunt do we believe is more
blood-thirsty? Who do we think can hate more intensely? Who is it
that is not disgusted by seeing body parts of our enemies strewn to
the four corners? Who would have the no regrets over the families of
terrorists destined to wander the plains, leaving bloody footprints
in the snow, while the lamentations of the widows and the cries of
the children mix with the foul north winds?

Kinda makes you wonder how they call themselves Christians.


Shame on you! We are a pluralistic nation with no religious qualifying test
for our government employees. Check your beliefs at the door of the Warrior
Wing. Hillary said the military requires a "suspension of disbelief." That's
not true. We want, if necessary, a suspension of BELIEF (plus someone who
enjoys a job well done as he disembowels the enemy).

Hey Billy Goat,

Ain't going to be any peace until the Palestinians stop firing rockets into
Israel, stop
sending in suicide bombers, and recognize the State of Israel

Sherwin

Billy wrote:

In article ,
"Rod Speed" wrote:

Nate Nagel wrote
Don Klipstein wrote
CJT wrote
Shawn Hirn wrote
Doobie Keebler wrote
wrote

John McCain .. wants to remain in iraq for 20 years...

This is why McCain is not electable:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vf7HYoh9YMM&NR=1

"100 Years In Iraq" is not a good campaign slogan for 2008.
Nobody wants their grandkids to still be fighting this war.

Thats arguable. Not too many care about the US troops still in Germany and
Japan etc.

Rudy's toast, Huckabee is a religious nut, Mitt is a douchebag,
so that leaves St. John of McCain and his Holy War.

There are no good choices on the GOP ticket: get ready for Hillary/
Obama

I agree. McCain will get the Republican nomination, but he ****es
off a lot of conservatives, and he won't be able to rely on the
religious wing-nut base, which means a lot of Republicans will
either sit out this election or vote third party. I know know who
will win the Democratic nomination, but whomever it turns out to
be will surely be our next president.

... and a very good thing that will be, too. Bush and his clan have
wrought enough destruction it'll take two terms of a Democrat just
to get things back close to normal.

I doubt anyone who is now or ever was a front-runner for the current
presidential election is going to win the job by
honestly promising to fix what is now broken.

Because most dont agree on what is allegedly 'broken'

And very few candidates care about what YOU personally claim is 'broken'

I see winning the job by either promising to keep most broken things
broken or by being expected to break promises to
fix what is broken.

More fool you.

I sorely wish that American voters would change this state!

Taint gunna happen.

A good start would be admitting that there's more wrong than a couple
minor issues and that there is stuff that's broken that needs fixed...

But again, there will never be general agreement on what is 'broken'

It's like there's this 400 lb. gorilla in the room and both parties are
ignoring it... debt, war, recession, etc.
etc. etc...

No they arent ignoring it. They realise that the fed has avoided full
depression
for getting on for 70 years now fine and that it will do this time too.

And they are both in agreement about how best to minimise a recession too.

No one cares much about the debt except a few rabid loons.

No one can think of any effective way of ending the fiasco in Iraq,
and it looks like the current approach is becoming relatively effective.

Cut and run worked fine in Nam. Hung out to dry some folks who allied
themselves with us, for whatever reason (not always good ones). Cut and
run and, at least, muzzle that mad dog Israel. Ain't gonna be no peace,
as long as Israel keeps killing Palestinians and stealing their land and
water.
--

Billy

Bush, Cheney & Pelosi, Behind Bars
http://rachelcorriefoundation.org/site/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movemen...George_W._Bush

Don Homuth wrote:
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:13:09 -0800, Paul Knudsen
wrote:

After seven years of the Bush, Jesus Christ himself couldn't win on
the republican line.

Most probably because He wouldn't run as one.

He could win Democratic nomination - if he was also a gay, black,
transgendered, union member.

Billy wrote:What part of re-unite didn't you understand? Hell, Hamas would
probably

be down with the Israeli state if the Palestinians had the right of
return, but the would screw up Israel's whole ethnic cleansing thing.
--

Billy


And while we are at it, we can give all the land back to the American Indians
we
displaced or killed. We might even compensate the million Jewish refugees
who
fled from Arab lands in fear of their lives.

Sherwin

Rod Speed wrote:

CJT wrote

Rod Speed wrote

Billy wrote


Who did Osama work for before he went free lance, hmmm.


He didnt 'work for' anyone.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bin_laden


Who trained him?


No one 'trained him'


Ostrich.

--
The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to
minimize spam. Our true address is of the form .

HeyBub wrote:

Don Homuth wrote:

On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:13:09 -0800, Paul Knudsen
wrote:


After seven years of the Bush, Jesus Christ himself couldn't win on
the republican line.

Most probably because He wouldn't run as one.


He could win Democratic nomination - if he was also a gay, black,
transgendered, union member.


He could get the Democratic nomination without being _any_ of those.

But he could _never_ get the Republican nomination, no matter what.

--
The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to
minimize spam. Our true address is of the form .

HeyBub wrote:

Don Homuth wrote:

On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:13:09 -0800, Paul Knudsen
wrote:


After seven years of the Bush, Jesus Christ himself couldn't win on
the republican line.

Most probably because He wouldn't run as one.


He could win Democratic nomination - if he was also a gay, black,
transgendered, union member.


We need a bumper sticker: "How would Jesus vote?"

--
The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to
minimize spam. Our true address is of the form .

CJT wrote
Rod Speed wrote
CJT wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Billy wrote

Who did Osama work for before he went free lance, hmmm.

He didnt 'work for' anyone.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bin_laden

Who trained him?

No one 'trained him'

Ostrich.

****wit.

Rod Speed wrote:

CJT wrote

Rod Speed wrote

CJT wrote

Rod Speed wrote

Billy wrote


Who did Osama work for before he went free lance, hmmm.


He didnt 'work for' anyone.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bin_laden


Who trained him?


No one 'trained him'


Ostrich.


****wit.


Do you kiss your pig's ass with that mouth?

--
The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to
minimize spam. Our true address is of the form .