Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Way OT, Foreign Aid
In article ,
Nad R wrote: Bud wrote: US gives 3% total budget to foreighn aid while Denmark gives 52%. I do not believe that a nation gives over half of it total budget to foreign aid. These hard times do augur for a well tended garden, unfortunately. The mechanism that brought these times to us is still in place. We don't have a new Glass-Seagull act, and we (USians) are still vulnerable to new pillages. From Tunisia, to Egypt, to Greece, people are saying, the rich got the money, and we got the bill. All these countries are repressive, American client states, and all of them have imposed neo-liberal economic policies that have worked so well that the people in these countries are rioting. Neo-liberalism concentrates wealth in the hands of the few, and gives emerging economies no way to protect themselves against large economic powers, like the United States. http://www.merip.org/mero/mero011300.html The Collapse of WTO Negotiations: Implications for the Middle East Robert Naiman and Steve Niva (Robert Naiman is a Senior researcher at the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) in Washington, DC. Steve Niva, former MERIP Executive Committee member, teaches at Evergreen State College in Olympia, Washington.) January 13, 2000 Arab elites' opposition at the WTO may seem surprising given that the IMF, World Bank and the US government have long promoted Arab regimes supportive of their agenda and fostered Western-educated leaders schooled in the theology of deregulation, reduced social protections, and export-led growth. Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Morocco and Tunisia were all subject to IMF-imposed structural adjustment programs. Along with Lebanon, they have all embarked upon export-led development strategies and privatization schemes, dramatically cutting back public services. Even Syria and the Gulf states have recently moved in this direction. . . .. . . However, the IMF, the World Bank, and the US‚ extreme policies and their frequently disastrous consequences for economic growth and the exacerbation of poverty have caused some of the same Arab elites who previously embraced the model to fear that increased compliance with WTO and IMF mandates may cause greater economic suffering and thereby further undermine their legitimacy. . . .. . . At the same time, the US commitment to social standards remains largely rhetorical. There is no evidence that the US is prepared to negotiate trade concessions to developing countries in order to win acceptance of social standards. Indeed, the US rejected Egyptian and other developing countries‚ proposals to review existing WTO rules that have undermined food security and economic diversification in the South. ----- The above may also have precipitated 9/11. As far as I know there haven't been demonstrations in Morocco, but there have been in demonstrations in Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Tunisia, Yemen, and Greece. A good, quick read on neo-liberalism is "Bad Samaritans: The Myth of Free Trade and the Secret History of Capitalism" by Ha-Joon Chang http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_no...stripbooks&fie ld-keywords=The+Bad+Samaritan&x=16&y=15 (Available at better libraries near you.) ----- The main points of neo-liberalism include: 1. THE RULE OF THE MARKET. Liberating "free" enterprise or private enterprise from any bonds imposed by the government (the state) no matter how much social damage this causes. Greater openness to international trade and investment, as in NAFTA. Reduce wages by de-unionizing workers and eliminating workers' rights that had been won over many years of struggle. No more price controls. All in all, total freedom of movement for capital, goods and services. To convince us this is good for us, they say "an unregulated market is the best way to increase economic growth, which will ultimately benefit everyone." It's like Reagan's "supply-side" and "trickle-down" economics -- but somehow the wealth didn't trickle down very much. 2. CUTTING PUBLIC EXPENDITURE FOR SOCIAL SERVICES like education and health care. REDUCING THE SAFETY-NET FOR THE POOR, and even maintenance of roads, bridges, water supply -- again in the name of reducing government's role. Of course, they don't oppose government subsidies and tax benefits for business. 3. DEREGULATION. Reduce government regulation of everything that could diminsh profits, including protecting the environmentand safety on the job. 4. PRIVATIZATION. Sell state-owned enterprises, goods and services to private investors. This includes banks, key industries, railroads, toll highways, electricity, schools, hospitals and even fresh water. Although usually done in the name of greater efficiency, which is often needed, privatization has mainly had the effect of concentrating wealth even more in a few hands and making the public pay even more for its needs. 5. ELIMINATING THE CONCEPT OF "THE PUBLIC GOOD" or "COMMUNITY" and replacing it with "individual responsibility." Pressuring the poorest people in a society to find solutions to their lack of health care, education and social security all by themselves -- then blaming them, if they fail, as "lazy." ------ When the Soviet Union collapsed, people survived because of there gardens. Don't think that it can't happen here. So, water those plants, and renew the mulch. ---- Heading this on back to the barn. I'm a couple of weeks away from germinating plants for the 2011 garden. I'm thrilled to be here. The overlooked potatoes have already expressed themselves and are on their way to a new bed. Sulfured around the blueberrys this morning. I've had them for 5 years now and they haven't done much. I'm hoping the sulfur will give them a kick in the hip pockets. I'll start with germinating the lettuce, cabbage, and peas. In the following month, I'll start the tomatoes, peppers, and whatever else I can shoehorn in, as fast as I can. Hope to be in the ground (the crops) by mid-May at the latest. Hoping for some heat this year. Last year, here, was very nice to live in, but it was crummy for gardens in Northern California. -- - Billy “When you give food to the poor, they call you a saint. When you ask why the poor have no food, they call you a communist.” -Archbishop Helder Camara http://peace.mennolink.org/articles/...acegroups.html http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth...130964689.html |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Way OT, Foreign Aid | Gardening | |||
More foreign-made tools in the future? | Lawns | |||
About Ordering Orchids from foreign Countries | Orchids | |||
Monsanto Uses Canadian Taxpayer Money to Violate Foreign Laws Case highlights need for strong Biosaf | Gardening |