Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Paying for the moderation software for RPM
In article ,
~ jan wrote: On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 18:14:17 CST, Kurt wrote: Were these good ponders gone bad? ;-) Or showing their true colors from the comforts of their closets? ;-) Coincidence that RP is being flooded today? Makes me wonder if they're still seeing RPM as a threat that we might go back there. Some people have too much time on their hands. ~ jan ------------ Zone 7a, SE Washington State Ponds: www.jjspond.us It's only those same two posters who cross-post spam to many unrelated Usenet groups. The problem is when everyone feels the need to respond to them, and cross-post back across a million groups. They've most likely never actually been to rec.ponds. I forgot that I have them kill-filed out of all my other groups- been that long since I've seen one of their posts. -- To reply by email, remove the word "space" |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Paying for the moderation software for RPM
In article . com,
Phyllis and Jim wrote: I am not sure what happened. If you review the posts after about 2005, you get a very quick idea of the hostilities and where they were focused. Others could probably describe it to you. Speaking for myself, I love having a group that is without the rancor of the trolled rec.ponds. It feels rather like the old days before the trolls. I thought they would quit when folks did not respond. Not so. I thought they would tire. Not so. The goal was very much to destroy the group. That brought the attacking of everything. Jim "BC" has probably never even been to rec.ponds, and neither have all those who jumped in the fray to respond. It's all from cross-posting, so you're not seeing anything personally directed to that group. The idea is to inflame multiple groups. -- To reply by email, remove the word "space" |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Paying for the moderation software for RPM
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 13:04:18 CST, Kurt wrote:
It's only those same two posters who cross-post spam to many unrelated Usenet groups. The problem is when everyone feels the need to respond to them, and cross-post back across a million groups. They've most likely never actually been to rec.ponds. Not from my perspective, the flooding looks like (but isn't) all different people, made up, I assume. So no kill-file in the world could stop it to my knowledge. I forgot that I have them kill-filed out of all my other groups- been that long since I've seen one of their posts. You must have one heck of a kill-file to catch all the different made up nyms & e-mail addresses. I personally am real happy to no longer need the use of a kill-file to read our ponding group. :-) ~ jan ------------ Zone 7a, SE Washington State Ponds: www.jjspond.us |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Paying for the moderation software for RPM
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 13:05:06 CST, Kurt wrote:
"BC" has probably never even been to rec.ponds, and neither have all those who jumped in the fray to respond. It's all from cross-posting, so you're not seeing anything personally directed to that group. The idea is to inflame multiple groups. BC came after RP died. BC was not the reason we gave up on RP. ~ jan ------------ Zone 7a, SE Washington State Ponds: www.jjspond.us |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Paying for the moderation software for RPM
Actually, the destruction of RP was instigated by one person who brought the horror
to the group by crossposting (or was followed to the group). That person was central in destroying the first goldfish email lists years ago. An unmoderated RP will never recover as long as that person has access to the internet. No amount of killfiling will work. Only moderation saves this group from a similar fate. Ingrid On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 16:23:24 CST, Kurt wrote: I've never heard of such ferocious and consistant attacks on a group that, in theory, should lack any sort of controversy, and I've been in some pretty wild ones. |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Paying for the moderation software for RPM
"Kurt" wrote in message ... I shy away from PCs, so I use the excellent MTNewswatcher on our Macs. ====================== A lot of people on rec.ponds at the time had no idea how to use a killfile. But as was explained that doesn't work when the trolls are using other poster's names and email addresses and software that flooded the group with thousands of posts a day. Some of those posts were so profane and depraved they alone drove people away. As long as the posters who wouldn't do what he demanded of them, and I myself remain on these pond groups, the troll who destroyed rec.ponds will keep up his attacks on that group. The first Goldfish list died when the man known as "Sillybug" who ran it lost interest in the list and there was no one else to take it over. We also had a poster constantly spamming the list who people were objecting to. He simply lost interest and moved on. At the time he abandoned the list we were getting as many as 75 to 150 messages a day. -- RM.... Frugal ponding since 1995. rec.ponder since late 1996. Zone 6. Middle TN USA ~~~~ }((((* ~~~ }{{{{(ö |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Still at $295 toward moderation software
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 In . com Phyllis and Jim writes: Hi Paul, I have not seen your emails, but appreciate this one! I will touch base with the other mods and write to you privately. Thank you for looking at the situation and having a plan. Jim I received your E-mail reply, and gave a detailed reply of my own, sent to your GMail account that is in the From header of your E-mail, and in your news articles. Please confirm whether or not you have received it. If not, you may have to send along an alternate E-mail address. I have also previously tried the account. Sorry for the closed-circuit in the newsgroup. - -- Paul W. Schleck http://www.novia.net/~pschleck/ Finger for PGP Public Key -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (SunOS) iD8DBQFHObUm6Pj0az779o4RAh+kAJwKDVdI9c+QZP/sWL+Fn82bBVaOQACeNhqR BkWa/BEmh1er1Izj7QFRQOE= =9hp4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Still at $295 toward moderation software
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 19:33:40 CST, Phyllis and Jim
wrote: We are at $295 out of the $360 it takes to use the moderation software next year. I originally guessed we should have at least 36 of us willing to share this expense. May I ask how many contributors we have? -- Hal Middle Georgia, Zone 8 http://tinyurl.com/2fxzcb |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Still at $295 toward moderation software
Hal wrote:
wrote: [ . . . ] May I ask how many contributors we have? And may I ask when we have to pay the piper? -- Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled Veterans and their families! I've known US vets who served as far back as the Spanish American War. They are all my heroes! Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not forgotten. Thanks ! ! ~Semper Fi~ |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Still at $295 toward moderation software
Paul has proposed an alternative moderation scheme. If we find it
helpful, that would affect our renewal time. We started in March and, I assume, will need to renew in Feb or March. That should give us time to work out the best approach to moderation. Jim |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Still at $295 toward moderation software
We have 15 contributors on the chipin page. We also have two checks.
The total is now at $395! Jim |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Still at $295 toward moderation software
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:56:33 CST, Phyllis and Jim
wrote: We have 15 contributors on the chipin page. We also have two checks. The total is now at $395! Jim Ding, Ding, Ding! (That's the winning bell ringing.) ~ jan ------------ Zone 7a, SE Washington State Ponds: www.jjspond.us |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
We did it! $395 contributed by 17 members toward moderation software
We now have $395 conributed by 17 persons toward the moderation
software. We need only $360 and may be able to obtain services for even less. Well done. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
You got it, there is prejudice in rpm moderation team | Ponds | |||
RPM moderation techniques; PGP will not stop nut cases and flame wars | Ponds |