Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Prohibited: Comparison photos of GM/non-GM
In sci.med.nutrition Moosh:] wrote:
On 3 Aug 2003 03:58:04 GMT, Brian Sandle posted: This part of the contract further makes farmers pay Monsanto's legal fees and other costs of enforcement. If the contract says anything you disagreee with, don't sign it, simple. Sheeesh! Which often means you would have to leave farming corn or canola. Not so simple when it has been your livelihood for generations. Now the pollutant GM genes are nearly everywhere in Canada in those crops, trying to avoid paying the GM tech fee is a losing battle. You get charged it anyway if the GM genes get on to your land. I suppose you say litigate, but how do you pay for that when your income stream has been cut? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why some wildflowers prohibited in certain states? | Lawns | |||
Drough Orders- what exactly is prohibited? | United Kingdom | |||
Prohibited orchid substances (was bare-root plants) | Orchids | |||
Comparison photos of GM/non-GM | sci.agriculture | |||
Comparison photos of GM/non-GM (Was: Paying to find non-GE wild corn?) | sci.agriculture |